The Project Gutenberg EBook of Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of Immanuel Kant, by Immanuel Kant This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook. Title: Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of Immanuel Kant Author: Immanuel Kant Editor: David Widger Release Date: March 6, 2019 [EBook #59023] Language: English Character set encoding: UTF-8 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK INDEX OF THE PG WORKS OF KANT *** Produced by David Widger INDEX OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG WORKS OF IMMANUEL KANT Compiled by David Widger KANT CONTENTS Click on the ## before each of the titles to view a linked table of contents for that volume. Click on the title itself to open the original online file. ## THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON ## THE CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON ## FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS ## THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS ## THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS ## CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT ## PERPETUAL PEACE ## PROLEGOMENA TABLES OF CONTENTS OF VOLUMES THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON By Immanuel Kant Translated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn CONTENTS Preface to the First Edition (1781) Preface to the Second Edition (1787) Introduction I. Of the difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge II. The Human Intellect, even in an Unphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions "a priori". III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of Human Knowledge "a priori" IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judgements. V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgements "a priori" are contained as Principles. VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason. VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason. I. Transcendental Doctrine of Elements First Part—TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC § 1. Introductory SECTION I. OF SPACE § 2. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception. § 3. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Space. § 4. Conclusions from the foregoing Conceptions. SECTION II. OF TIME § 5. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception. § 6. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Time. § 7. Conclusions from the above Conceptions. § 8. Elucidation. § 9. General Remarks on Transcendental Aesthetic. § 10. Conclusion of the Transcendental Aesthetic. Second Part—TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC Introduction. Idea of a Transcendental Logic I. Of Logic in General II. Of Transcendental Logic III. Of the Division of General Logic into Analytic and Dialectic IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental Analytic and Dialectic FIRST DIVISION—TRANSCENDENTAL ANALYTIC BOOK I. Analytic of Conceptions. § 2 Chapter I. Of the Transcendental Clue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of the Understanding Introductory § 3 Section I. Of the Logical Use of the Understanding in General. § 4 Section II. Of the Logical Function of the Understanding in Judgements. § 5 Section III. Of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding, or Categories. § 6 Chapter II. Of the Deduction of the Pure Conception of the Understanding Section I. Of the Principles of a Transcendental Deduction in general § 9 Transition to the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. § 10 Section II Transcendental Deduction of the pure Conceptions of the Understanding. Of the Possibility of a Conjunction of the manifold representations given by Sense. § 11. Of the Originally Synthetical Unity of Apperception. § 12 The Principle of the Synthetical Unity of Apperception is the highest Principle of all exercise of the Understanding. § 13 What Objective Unity of Self-consciousness is. § 14 The Logical Form of all Judgements consists in the Objective Unity of Apperception of the Conceptions contained therein. § 15 All Sensuous Intuitions are subject to the Categories, as Conditions under which alone the manifold Content of them can be united in one Consciousness. § 16 Observation. § 17 In Cognition, its Application to Objects of Experience is the only legitimate use of the Category. § 18 Of the Application of the Categories to Objects of the Senses in general. § 20 Transcendental Deduction of the universally possible employment in experience of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. § 22 Result of this Deduction of the Conceptions of the Understanding. § 23 BOOK II. Analytic of Principles INTRODUCTION. Of the Transcendental Faculty of judgement in General. TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE FACULTY OF JUDGEMENT OR, ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES. Chapter I. Of the Schematism at of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. Chapter II. System of all Principles of the Pure Understanding. Section I. Of the Supreme Principle of all Analytical Judgements. Section II. Of the Supreme Principle of all Synthetical Judgements. Section III. Systematic Representation of all Synthetical Principles of the Pure Understanding. Chapter III Of the Ground of the Division of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena. APPENDIX. SECOND DIVISION—TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC. INTRODUCTION. I. Of Transcendental Illusory Appearance. II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat of Transcendental Illusory Appearance. TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC—BOOK I—OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE REASON. Section I-Of Ideas in General. Section II. Of Transcendental Ideas. Section III. System of Transcendental Ideas. TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC—BOOK II—OF THE DIALECTICAL PROCEDURE OF PURE REASON. Chapter I. Of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Chapter II. The Antinomy of Pure Reason. Section I. System of Cosmological Ideas. Section II. Antithetic of Pure Reason. Section III. Of the Interest of Reason in these Self-contradictions. Section IV. Of the necessity imposed upon Pure Reason of presenting a Solution of its Transcendental Problems. Section V. Sceptical Exposition of the Cosmological Problems presented in the four Transcendental Ideas. Section VI. Transcendental Idealism as the Key to theSolution of Pure Cosmological Dialectic. Section VII. Critical Solution of the Cosmological Problem. Section VIII. Regulative Principle of Pure Reason in relation to the Cosmological Ideas. Section IX. Of the Empirical Use of the Regulative Principle of Reason with regard to the Cosmological Ideas. I. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Composition of Phenomena in the Universe. II. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Division of a Whole given in Intuition. III. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Deduction of Cosmical Events from their Causes. IV. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Dependence of Phenomenal Existences. Chapter III. The Ideal of Pure Reason. Section I. Of the Ideal in General. Section II. Of the Transcendental Ideal (Prototypon Trancendentale). Section III. Of the Arguments employed by Speculative Reason in Proof of the Existence of a Supreme Being. Section IV. Of the Impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the Existence of God. Section V. Of the Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the Existence of God. Section VI. Of the Impossibility of a Physico-Theological Proof. Section VII. Critique of all Theology based upon Speculative Principles of Reason. Appendix. Of the Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason. II. Transcendental Doctrine of Method Chapter I. The Discipline of Pure Reason. Section I. The Discipline of Pure Reason in the Sphere of Dogmatism. Section II. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Polemics. Section III. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Hypothesis. Section IV. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Relation to Proofs. Chapter II. The Canon of Pure Reason. Section I. Of the Ultimate End of the Pure Use of Reason. Section II. Of the Ideal of the Summum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of Pure Reason. Section III. Of Opinion, Knowledge, and Belief. Chapter III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason. Chapter IV. The History of Pure Reason. THE CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON By Immanuel Kant 1788 Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott CONTENTS PREFACE. INTRODUCTION. Of the Idea of a Critique of Practical Reason. FIRST PART — ELEMENTS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. BOOK I. The Analytic of Pure Practical Reason. CHAPTER I. Of the Principles of Pure Practical Reason. I. DEFINITION. REMARK. II. THEOREM I. III. THEOREM II. REMARK I. REMARK II. IV. THEOREM II. REMARK. V. PROBLEM I. REMARK. VII. FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE PURE PRACTICAL REASON. REMARK. COROLLARY. REMARK. VIII. THEOREM IV. REMARK. REMARK II. Practical Material Principles of Determination taken as the Foundation of Morality, are: I. Of the Deduction of the Fundamental Principles of Pure II. Of the Right that Pure Reason in its Practical use has to an Extension which is not possible to it in its Speculative Use. CHAPTER II. Of the Concept of an Object of Pure Practical Reason. Table of the Categories of Freedom relatively to the Notions of Good Of the Typic of the Pure Practical Judgement. CHAPTER III. Of the Motives of Pure Practical Reason. Critical Examination of the Analytic of Pure Practical Reason. BOOK II. Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason. CHAPTER I. Of a Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason Generally. CHAPTER II. Of the Dialectic of Pure Reason in defining the Conception of the "Summum Bonum". I. The Antinomy of Practical Reason. II. Critical Solution of the Antinomy of Practical Reason. III. Of the Primacy of Pure Practical Reason in its Union with the Speculative Reason. IV. The Immortality of the Soul as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason. V. The Existence of God as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason. VI. Of the Postulates of Pure Practical Reason Generally. VII. How is it possible to conceive an Extension of Pure Reason in a Practical point of view, without its Knowledge as Speculative being enlarged at the same time? VIII. Of Belief from a Requirement of Pure Reason. IX. Of the Wise Adaptation of Man's Cognitive Faculties to his Practical Destination. SECOND PART. -- METHODOLOGY OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. Methodology of Pure Practical Reason. CONCLUSION. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS By Immanuel Kant 1785 Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott CONTENTS PREFACE FIRST SECTION—TRANSITION FROM THE COMMON RATIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF MORALITY TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL SECOND SECTION—TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS The Autonomy of the Will as the Supreme Principle of Morality Heteronomy of the Will as the Source of all spurious Principles of Morality Classification of all Principles of Morality which can be founded on the Conception of Heteronomy THIRD SECTION—TRANSITION FROM THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS TO THE CRITIQUE OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The Concept of Freedom is the Key that explains the Autonomy of the Will Freedom must be presupposed as a Property of the Will of all Rational Beings Of the Interest attaching to the Ideas of Morality How is a Categorical Imperative Possible? Of the Extreme Limits of all Practical Philosophy. CONCLUDING REMARK THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS By Immanuel Kant 1780 Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION TO THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS I. Exposition of the Conception of Ethics II. Exposition of the Notion of an End which is also a Duty REMARK III. Of the Reason for conceiving an End which is also a Duty IV. What are the Ends which are also Duties? V. Explanation of these two Notions A. OUR OWN PERFECTION B. HAPPINESS OF OTHERS VI. Ethics does not supply Laws for Actions (which is done by Jurisprudence), but only for the Maxims of Action VII. Ethical Duties are of indeterminate, Juridical Duties of strict, Obligation VIII. Exposition of the Duties of Virtue as Intermediate Duties (1) OUR OWN PERFECTION as an end which is also a duty (2) HAPPINESS OF OTHERS as an end which is also a duty IX. What is a Duty of Virtue? X. The Supreme Principle of Jurisprudence was Analytical; that of Ethics is Synthetical XI. According to the preceding Principles, the Scheme of Duties of Virtue may be thus exhibited XII. Preliminary Notions of the Susceptibility of the Mind for Notions of Duty generally A. THE MORAL FEELING B. OF CONSCIENCE C. OF LOVE TO MEN XIII. General Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals in the treatment of Pure Ethics XIV. Of Virtue in General XV. Of the Principle on which Ethics is separated from Jurisprudence REMARKS Of the Doctrine of Virtue on the Principle Of Internal Freedom. XVI. Virtue requires, first of all, Command over Oneself XVII. Virtue necessarily presupposes Apathy (considered as Strength) REMARK ON CONSCIENCE OF THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS By Immanuel Kant CONTENTS OF THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS I. Deduction of the Editor's Right against the Counterfeiter Proof of the Major Proof of the Minor II. Refutation of the Counterfeiter's pretended Right against the Editor. Proof of the Major Proof of the Minor Universal Observation KANT'S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT Translated With Introduction And Notes By J. H. Bernard, D.D., D.C.L. Bishop Of Ossory CONTENTS Editor's Introduction xi Preface 1 Introduction 7 I. Of the division of Philosophy 7 II. Of the realm of Philosophy in general 11 III. Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole 14 IV. Of Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori 17 V. The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgement 20 VI. Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature 27 VII. Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature 30 VIII. Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature 35 IX. Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgement 39 First Part.—Critique of the Aesthetical Judgement 43 First Division.—Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement 45 First Book.—Analytic of the Beautiful 45 First Moment of the judgement of taste, according to quality 45 § ?1. The judgement of taste is aesthetical 45 § ?2. The satisfaction which determines the judgement of taste is disinterested 46 § ?3. The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest 48 § ?4. The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest 50 § ?5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction 53 Second Moment of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity 55 § ?6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction 55 § ?7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic 57 § ?8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective 59 § ?9. Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object 63 Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein 67 § 10. Of purposiveness in general 67 § 11. The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) 69 § 12. The judgement of taste rests on a priori grounds 70 § 13. The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion 72 § 14. Elucidation by means of examples 73 § 15. The judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection 77 § 16. The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure 81 § 17. Of the Ideal of Beauty 84 vi Fourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object 91 § 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is 91 § 19. The subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgement of taste is conditioned 92 § 20. The condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense 92 § 21. Have we ground for presupposing a common sense? 93 § 22. The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense 94 General remark on the first section of the Analytic 96 Second Book.—Analytic of the Sublime 101 § 23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime 101 § 24. Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the Sublime 105 A.—Of the Mathematically Sublime 106 § 25. Explanation of the term "Sublime" 106 § 26. Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime 110 § 27. Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgements upon the Sublime 119 B.—Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature 123 § 28. Of Nature regarded as Might 123 § 29. Of the modality of the judgement upon the sublime in nature 130 General remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgement 132 Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgements 150 § 30. The Deduction of aesthetical judgements on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful 150 § 31. Of the method of deduction of judgements of taste 152 § 32. First peculiarity of the judgement of taste 154 § 33. Second peculiarity of the judgement of taste 157 § 34. There is no objective principle of taste possible 159 § 35. The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgement in general 161 § 36. Of the problem of a Deduction of judgements of Taste 162 § 37. What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgement of taste 164 § 38. Deduction of judgements of taste 165 § 39. Of the communicability of a sensation 167 § 40. Of taste as a kind of sensus communis 169 § 41. Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful 173 § 42. Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful 176 § 43. Of Art in general 183 § 44. Of beautiful Art 185 § 45. Beautiful art is an art in so far as it seems like nature 187 vii § 46. Beautiful art is the art of genius 188 § 47. Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius 190 § 48. Of the relation of Genius to Taste 193 § 49. Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius 197 § 50. Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art 205 § 51. Of the division of the beautiful arts 206 § 52. Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product 214 § 53. Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts 215 § 54. Remark 220 Second Division.—Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement 229 § 55. 229 § 56. Representation of the antinomy of Taste 230 § 57. Solution of the antinomy of Taste 231 § 58. Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgement 241 § 59. Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality 248 § 60. Appendix:—Of the method of Taste 253 Second Part.—Critique of the Teleological Judgement 257 § 61. Of the objective purposiveness of Nature 259 First Division.—Analytic of the Teleological Judgement 262 § 62. Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material 262 § 63. Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature 268 § 64. Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes 272 § 65. Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings 275 § 66. Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings 280 § 67. Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes 282 § 68. Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science 287 Second Division.—Dialectic of the Teleological Judgement 292 § 69. What is an antinomy of the Judgement? 292 § 70. Representation of this antinomy 293 § 71. Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy 296 § 72. Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of Nature 298 § 73. None of the above systems give what they pretend 302 § 74. The reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable 306 § 75. The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgement 309 § 76. Remark 313 § 77. Of the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible 319 § 78. Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature 326 viii ix Appendix.—Methodology of the Teleological Judgement 334 § 79. Whether Teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of nature 334 § 80. Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose 336 § 81. Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product 342 § 82. Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings 346 § 83. Of the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system 352 § 84. Of the final purpose of the existence of a world, i.e. of creation itself 359 § 85. Of Physico-theology 362 § 86. Of Ethico-theology 370 § 87. Of the moral proof of the Being of God 377 § 88. Limitation of the validity of the moral proof 384 § 89. Of the use of the moral argument 392 § 90. Of the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God 395 § 91. Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith 403 General remark on Teleology 414 PERPETUAL PEACE, A PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY By Immanuel Kant 1795 Translated With Introduction And Notes By M. Campbell Smith CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE BY PROFESSOR LATTA v TRANSLATOR'S INTRODUCTION 1 PERPETUAL PEACE 106 FIRST SECTION CONTAINING THE PRELIMINARY ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE BETWEEN STATES 107 SECOND SECTION CONTAINING THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE BETWEEN STATES 117 FIRST SUPPLEMENT CONCERNING THE GUARANTEE OF PERPETUAL PEACE 143 SECOND SUPPLEMENT-A SECRET ARTICLE FOR PERPETUAL PEACE 158 APPENDIX I.-ON THE DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN MORALS AND POLITICS WITH REFERENCE TO PERPETUAL PEACE 161 x APPENDIX II.-CONCERNING THE HARMONY OF POLITICS WITH MORALS ACCORDING TO THE TRANSCENDENTAL IDEA OF PUBLIC RIGHT 184 INDEX 197 PROLEGOMENA By Kant Edited In English By Dr. Paul Carus CONTENTS PUBLISHERS' PREFACE. INTRODUCTION. PROLEGOMENA. PREAMBLE ON THE PECULIARITIES OF ALL METAPHYSICAL COGNITION. FIRST PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM. HOW IS PURE MATHEMATICS POSSIBLE? SECOND PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM. HOW IS THE SCIENCE OF NATURE POSSIBLE? THIRD PART OF THE MAIN TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM. HOW IS METAPHYSICS IN GENERAL POSSIBLE? SCHOLIA. SOLUTION OF THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE PROLEGOMENA, "HOW IS METAPHYSICS POSSIBLE AS A SCIENCE?" APPENDIX. End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of Immanuel Kant, by Immanuel Kant *** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK INDEX OF THE PG WORKS OF KANT *** ***** This file should be named 59023-h.htm or 59023-h.zip ***** This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: http://www.gutenberg.org/5/9/0/2/59023/ Produced by David Widger Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will be renamed. Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution. START: FULL LICENSE THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license. Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works 1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. 1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below. 1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. 1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United States. 1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: 1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work