VIRGINIA DUI DRUG TREATMENT COURTS Restoring Lives, Reuniting Families and Making Communities Safer September 20-21, 2010 Williamsburg Marriott, Williamsburg, VA AGENDA Monday, September 20, 2010 9:00 a.m. – 10:30am Registration 10:00 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Welcome and Introduction Paul DeLosh & Michele White 10:15 a.m.-11:45 p.m. Drug Court Legal Aspects Honorable Charlie Sharp, Judge Stafford County Circuit Court 11:45 a.m.-12:45 p.m. Lunch 12:45 p.m.- 2:00 p.m. Drug Court Best Practices Doug Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. NADCP 2:00 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Project Remote Dr. Mary McMasters, MD Comprehensive Health Systems 3:15 p.m. -3:30 p.m. Break 3:30 p.m.– 4:30 p.m. Legal Defense Issues in Drug Courts Jim Gochenhour, Esq. Hampton Adult Drug Court 4:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Virginia Drug Court Association Open Meeting 5:0 p.m. Adjourn Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:00 a.m.-9:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast/Registration 8:30 a.m.-9:00 a.m. Keynote/Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation Honorable Jerrauld Jones, Judge State Drug Treatment Court Advisory Commite 9:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. Resistance to Change & Benefits to Motivational Interviewing Ray Ferns, M.S., Restorative Correctional Services 11:00 a.m.-11:15 a.m. Break 11:15 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Drug Court Treatment Issues V. Morgan Moss, Jr., Ed. S., LPC, Center for Therapeutic Justice 12:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Lunch 1:00 p.m.-2:15 p.m. DWI Drug Court Issues/Judges’ Perspective Honorable Kent Lawrence, Judge Chair, National Center for DWI Courts Task Force 2:15 p.m.-3:00 p.m. Integrating Law Enforcement into Drug Courts Cynthia Herriott, National Drug Court Institute 3:00 p.m. - 3:15 p.m. Break 3:15 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Wrap-up Anna Powers & Michelle White Adjourn Best Practices in Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Meta-Analyses Number of Crime Reduced Citation Institution Drug Courts on Avg. by . . . Campbell Wilson et al. (2006) C Colaborative 55 14% to 26% Canada Dept. of 66 14% Latimer et al. (2006) Justice University of Shaffer (2006) 76 9% Nevada Lowenkamp et al. University of 22 8% (2005) Cincinnati Aos et al. (2006) Washington State Inst. 57 8% for Public Policy Cost Analyses No. Drug Courts Avg. Benefit Per Avg. Cost Saving Citation $1 Invested Per Client Loman (2004) 1 (St. Louis) $2.80 to $6.32 $2,615 to $7,707 Finigan et al. (2007) 1 (Portland, OR) $2.63 $11,000 Carey et al. (2006) 9 (California) $3.50 $6,744 to $12,218 Barnoski & Aos (2003) 5 (Washington St.) $1.74 $2,888 Aos et al. (2006) National Data N/A $4,767 Bhati et al. (2008) National Data $2.21 N/A Best Practices Research *Shannon Carey et al. (2008). Exploring the key components of drug courts: A comparative study of 18 adult drug courts on practices, outcomes and costs. Portland, OR: NPC Research. *Shannon Carey et al. (2008). Drug courts and state mandated drug treatment programs: Outcomes, costs and consequences. Portland, OR: NPC Research. *Michael Finigan et al. (2007). The impact of a mature drug court over 10 years of operation: Recidivism and costs. Portland, OR: NPC Research. Deborah Shaffer (2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review. Las Vegas, NV: Dept. of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada. * www.npcresearch.com Key Component #1 “Realization of these [rehabilitation] goals requires a team approach, including cooperation and collaboration of the judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, probation authorities, other corrections personnel, law enforcement, pretrial services agencies, TASC programs, evaluators, an array of local service providers, and the greater community.” Team Involvement • Is it important for the attorneys to attend team meetings (“staffings”)? Drug Courts That Required a Treatment Representative at Court Hearings Had 9 Times Greater Savings p<.05 Drug Courts That Expected the Public Defender to Attend All Team Meetings Had 8 Times Greater Savings *p<.05