VAT[ValueAddedTax]:reviewoflandandproperty Page 1 of1 BOPCRIS UnlockingKeyGovernmentPublications Home AboutBOPCRIS Search Browse What’sNew Help Title: VAT[ValueAddedTax]:reviewoflandandproperty FordListTitle: VAT[ValueAddedTax]andlandandproperty CorporateAuthor: HMCustomsandExcise Series: Non-pariiamentarypapers Session: 1992-93 Publisher: HMCustomsandExcise DatePublished: 1993/07/26/ FordListKeywords:Nationalfinance Home ContactBOPCRIS Disclaimer CopyrightBOPCRIS2001 TopofPage http://www.bopcris.ac.uk/bopl991/refl350.html 21/06/2002 PrintedimagedigitisecfbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit . INTRODUCTION 1. This consultation paper is issued as part of the Government’s drive towards deregulation and the easing of burdens on business. It focuses on areas in which the interaction of VAT rules and property law creates particular complexity and invites comments and proposals. BACKGROUND 2. Major changes to the VAT legislation concerning land and buildings were made in 1989. The changes were necessary because the European Court of Justice had ruled that some of the UK’s zero rates were in breach of EC Directives. Further changes were introduced at the beginning of 1992. 3. This area is particularly complex because: land law is complicated (and the law in 4. England and Wales differs from the law in Scotland and that in Northern Ireland) we have to implement EC Directives (which are modelled more on European land law than on that in the UK) large sums are involved, which makes measures to prevent avoidance particularly important We know that businesses find it difficult to understand some of the recent changes and we would like to simplify the law (so far as the constraints outlined above permit) REFERENCE ONLY 3 w 1 mwmkni ii uvmmsstmrmumms dbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit ) ) SCOPE OF REVIEW 5. Four areas are specifically addressed in this paper: ° the developer's self-supply charge ° the option to tax (election to waive exemption ° licences to occupy land ° trusts and co-ownership of property 6. However, we would also be very interested in any comments or suggestions which you would like to make in relation to other areas of VAT legislation which affect property transactions. Some other areas in relation to which you may have comments are ° caravans and pitches ° lettings of sports facilities ° test of when a new building is "completed" ° parking 8. Transfers of going concerns 7. One further area of concern may be the application of the rules relating to the transfer of a business as a going concern ( 'TOGC' to property transfers. This is to be the subject of a separate consultation exercise through the issue of a draft leaflet. Nevertheless, if you wish to comment on this subject in the context of this consultation paper you are welcome to do so. Liability of Domestic. Charity and Listed Buildings While this consultation is primarily aimed at VAT and the commercial sector for land and property, we are conscious that the 2 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit domestic and charity area is not without its problems. We have therefore conducted an internal review in consultation with some representatives of outside interests. We would be happy to receive any comments and suggestions with regard to the interpretation of this area of the law (Group 8 and 8A, Schedule 5 VAT Act 1983). In particular we would welcome comments on the Court of Session findings in the case of Link Housing Association and the High Court decisions of Briararch and Curtis Henderson, i9.ncluding whether Group 8 item 1 should be amended to take account of these decisions, and if so, how. TIMING OF ANY PROPOSED CHANGES It is likely that many, if not all, of the changes which will result from this review will need a change in the law. Amendments to legislation will not be introduced before 1994/95. YOUR COMMENTS 10, In this paper we suggest various ways in which the law or administrative practice might be changed in order to simplify and clarify the current rules. Our suggestions are not intended to be exhaustive and we would welcome details of any other arrangements which you believe we should consider. 11. In considering proposals for new regulations, the Government places great importance on the likely impact on business costs. To measure this impact, a Compliance Cost Assessment (CCA) is produced for all such proposals, and made available to businesses on request. Therefore, in giving your views on the proposals described in this document, it would be particularly helpful if you could identify and quantify any additional direct or indirect costs (recurring and non-recurring) that would be likely to arise for your sector of business as a result. 3 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit Recurring costs — e.g. extra ad.ministrat.orsr consumable materials Non-recurring costs ~~ e•g* additional expenditure on computer systems and other capital expenditure. 12. Your comments should be sent to us by 15 October 1993 and should be addressed to Ian Heron HM Customs and Excise VAF3 4th Floor West New King's Beam House 22 Upper Ground London SE1 9PJ 4 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit . THE SELF-SUPPLY CHARGE Current Provisions 13. The charge aims to ensure that there is no VAT advantage to be gained by buying land and then arranging for a building to be constructed rather than buying a ready-constructed new building. From January 1992, the scope of the charge was extended to cover 1 buildings which had been substantially reconstructed, enlarged or extended. This was to ensure that there was no tax advantage in reconstructing or enlarging an existing building rather than constructing a completely new building. 14. The self-supply charge applies to a person who constructs a building or commissions or finances its construction. It is triggered on the first occasion, during a ten year period, on which such a person puts the building to an exempt use, either by occupying it or by granting an interest in it to another. The person will, if registered for VAT, be entitled to recover the VAT incurred during the construction process. However, when the c1h5a.rge is triggered, VAT must be paid on the full value of the building (construction and land costs). In appropriate cases, the VAT paid can be recovered in accordance with the usual rules, with a possible adjustment under the Capital Goods Scheme (which permits certain VAT incurred in relation to a property to be recovered by reference to the use made of that property over a ten year period) As yet there have been relatively few buildings which have fallen within the self-supply provisions. We would be grateful for any general comments you have about your experiences if you have been required to account for the self-supply charge. 5 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit Problems 16. The legislation in this area is very complicated. Furthermore, the scope of the charge is wide and it requires people engaged in wholly exempt activities, such as medical practitioners or fee-paying schools, to register for VAT purposes when they would not otherwise be required to register. Suggestions Retain the self-supply charge as it stands 17. The advantages would be that the charge succeeds in taxing land used for non-domestic building on a selective basis, by only applying where buildings are used for an exempt purpose, and that, for the reasons given above, it prevents distortion in the property market. 18. The disadvantages are that it brings otherwise unregistered people into the VAT net and that the provisions are complex and can be difficult to apply. Modify the de minimis limits 19. Currently, buildings costing less than £100,000 (construction costs and land value) are excluded from the charge. Some reconstructed or enlarged buildings are also excluded by provisions which take into account the period of ownership of the land and degree of works involved. It would be possible to increase the £100,000 de minimis figure so as to exclude more developments from the self-supply charge and to streamline the criteria for determining when the charge is payable on reconstructed and enlarged buildings. 20. Another possibility would be to change the criteria for excluding small developments (e.g. by focusing on the amount of VAT paid on the land as a result of the charge or excluding from 6 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit . . the charge cases where VAT was paid on acquisition of the land as the result of an option to tax by the seller and/or cases where the land cost was minimal). 21 . The advantage would be that fewer small developments would be brought within the provisions. This would potentially reduce the number of otherwise unregistered people who would have to register because of the self-supply charge. The disadvantage would be that some revenue would be foregone which might have to be made good elsewhere 22. Alternatively developers of lower value buildings could be , relieved of the obligation to register for VAT and be allowed merely to render the VAT due on the land. This could, however, create difficulties in administration for Customs. There is also some doubt whether this would be permissible under the current structure of VAT. Align the criteria for period of ownership 23. Under the current rules a new building is subject to the charge, no matter how long the land has been owned by the developer. However, certain extensions and enlargements are excluded from the charge if the majority of the building land has b2e4e.n owned for 10 years. These criteria could be aligned either by excluding from the charge all developments where the land has been owned for at least 10 years or by applying the charge to both new buildings and extensions etc. no matter how long the land has been owned by the developer Abolish the charge and tax "building land" on acquisition The advantage of doing this would be that people who would not otherwise be required to register for VAT would no longer be obliged to register simply because they constructed or enlarged their business premises. Further, businesses would potentially be relieved of the need to review the use of their property over a 7 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit ten year period (though they might still need to do this for the Capital Goods Scheme). Overall there could be a reduction in the compliance burdens on businesses. 25. However, it would be necessary to find a suitable method of identifying commercial ’’building land” at the point of sale. This can be extremely difficult to identify because: ° land purchased on a speculative basis without planning permission may later be developed ° land sold with planning permission may remain undeveloped ° land intended to be used for domestic development may in fact be used for non-domestic development 26. The use to which the land is put becomes certain once development has commenced. However, EC Directives do not permit a self-supply charge on land alone, which is why the current charge applies to the whole building. 27. Moreover the Capital Goods Scheme, which facilitates the recovery of a fair proportion of the VAT incurred in relation to buildings, may not apply unless there is a lump sum of VAT due on the building on which adjustments can be made. Abolish the charge and exempt building land 28. The advantages would be the reduction in the time devoted by businesses to tax affairs. It would not be necessary to define when land is "building land”. Temporary measures under EC Directives would permit us to exempt building land from VAT for the time being. 8 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit . 29. The disadvantages of this would be the distortion in VAT treatment that would arise between buildings which were purchased new, with VAT added to the purchase price, and buildings which were self-developed. Furthermore, there would be a loss of revenue to the Exchequer, which may have to be recovered elsewhere 9 PrintedimagedigitisedbytheUniversityofSouthamptonLibraryDigitisationUnit