mCOlUKX-moy mm Gro)a alaatelats Talatedc-hake)aMmOlaliyislacna(=ce Science and Skills Committee a al-mrce)a. ace)m aa al= Committee in 2007-08 Second Report of Session 2008-09 NA Hou/C HC 49 House of Commons Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee The work of the Committee in 2007-08 Second Report of Session 2008-09 Report, together with formal minutes, and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 December 2008 WELLCOME LIBRARY MEDICINE & SOCIETY A , | / “i \ X // et ry; jji j # >» \ /} | A A j es HC 49 Published on 16 January 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £13.50 The Innovation, Universities, Science & Skills Committee The Innovation, Universities, Science & Skills Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. Current membership Mr Phil Willis (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chairman) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Tim Boswell (Conservative, Daventry) Mr lan Cawsey (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Mrs Nadine Dorries (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Dr lan Gibson (Labour, Norwich North) Dr Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon (Labour, Bolton South East) Mr Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) Dr Bob Spink (UK Independence Party, Castle Point) lan Stewart (Labour, Eccles) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Rob Wilson (Conservative, Reading East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/ius A list of Reports from the Committee in this Parliament is included at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are: Sarah Davies (Clerk); Glenn McKee (Second Clerk); Dr Christopher Tyler (Committee Specialist); Dr Joanna Dally (Committee Specialist); Ana Ferreira (Senior Committee Assistant); Camilla Brace (Committee Assistant); Anna Browning (Committee Assistant); and Jonathan Olivier Wright (Committee Support Assistant). Previous staff of the Committee during the Session Dr Lynn Gardner (Clerk); and Dr Edward Waller (Second Clerk) Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Innovation, Universities, Science & Skills Committee, Committee Office, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general inquiries is: 020 7219 2793; the Committee’s e-mail address is: [email protected]. The work of the Committee in 2007-08 1 Contents Report Page 1. Introduction 3 Formation of the Committee 3 A change of name 4 2 Committee inquiries and evidence sessions 9 Core Scrutiny of DIUS 9 One-off sessions 9 DIUS's Departmental Report 2008 J Executive Agencies and Non-Departmental Public Bodies 10 Science and Innovation Network 11 Inquiries into long-term issues 12 Renewable electricity-generation technologies 12 The Leitch Review of Skills 12 Engineering 12 Reactive Inquiries 12 Equivalent or Lower Level Qualifications 12 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 13 Science Budget Allocations 13 Biosecurity 14 Pre-legislative Scrutiny 14 Other work 14 Follow-up to previous inquiries 15 3 Other activities and innovative practices 17 4 Relations with the Government 19 5 Conclusion 21 6 Abbreviations 22 Annex 23 Formal Minutes 41 List of written evidence 42 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 43 Goce sel halasdniint rs - Sgtaaa Yo? Satp eare — i. | Rene oneal — a ed i ca 4 otto yr rom ‘; - a fevlegny Wed-aents one a sons, hen! hecrrerteeue are) y : Ven aires et Tey 2am Pweg vAMOGAT iygel Dy ai aves: WwW cr oa , : ; Sonny. yes yrs Ooi ® “fi!o nt abeg ow Oe y Tower Vv2 he amen! Cala! ats = ' One wns | ap “ype ype? = pa Tl) 07a Ch | D Wlavecd 5 at, WA AEDS 2nd De vrs poate’ 2 tog linus gine? a ves 2.4 ; Seg sone. ; ge er eemy wok i ag ; ¥ a Pa) NY Jeevan Hv i on ieQ a" - : a ig - Y howl 2a78 eviive ri vies ‘ SORT - “ao hevoriroii peteF W 2a Ps sf>e rdhea rt ece a ne Smhion eMaiknwe s ¥ aaya bya cay o haw els ponieawgiions ; a;n e nae Bsr ke = Se eae a heen er e=e. b ut (8 hewn iMirtta ead : ~ , a) +. a - 7 ‘ , aes Oe 7 veo = iia The work of the Committee in 2007-08 3 1 Introduction Formation of the Committee 1. The Select Committee on Innovation, Universities and Skills was established as a result of the machinery of Government changes announced on 28 June 2007 which created a new Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS). DIUS inherited from the former Department for Education and Skills responsibility for higher and further education and skills training as well as science and innovation policy from the former Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). The new Committee was nominated on 8 November 2007 and this, our first Sessional Report, provides an account of our early work and the way in which we have addressed our core tasks as set by the House’s Liaison Committee.’ 2. Until the start of Session 2007-08 scrutiny of science policy was carried out by the Science and Technology Committee (a non-departmental committee) which had a remit to monitor the Office of Science and Innovation (OSI) within the DTI and science across Government. That Committee was abolished at the end of the 2006-07 Session and responsibility for scrutiny of science passed to the new Innovation, Universities and Skills Committee, a move which led to concerns being expressed by the Science and Technology Committee’ and the wider scientific community (including in a letter to the Guardian in July 2007): The recent changes to the organisation of government departments involved moving the work of the Office of Science & Innovation into the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills, (DIUS) which will be scrutinised by a departmental select committee covering all those areas and matters to do with expenditure. However, as a result, there is the prospect of the abolition of the science and technology select committee along with its important functions. This committee does a great deal of vital work scrutinising scientific matters and the use of evidence across government departments and agencies. Recent important inquiries include hybrid/chimera embryos, nanotechnology, the future of health research, the impact of EU legislation on MRI, open access publishing, carbon capture and space (published this week). Just as peer review is important in science, so is adequate oversight of the use of science in policy-making. The government has acquired a good reputation in the science world for supporting science. It could enhance its reputation further by ensuring the continuation of this, either through a stand-alone science and technology committee or through an adequately resourced and autonomous subcommittee of the DIUS select committee. * 1 See Box 1 and Table 1 2 Science and Technology Committee, Thirteenth Report of Session 2006-07, The Last Report, HC 1108 3. Science needs its Select Committee, letter to the Guardian 20 July 2007: Prof Sir Martin Rees, President, Royal Society, Lord Browne of Madingley, President, Royal Academy of Engineering, Dr Mark Walport, Director, The Wellcome Trust, Prof Colin Blakemore, Chief Executive, Medical Research Council, and 34 eminent members of the scientific and engineering community. 4 The work of the Committee in 2007-08 In one of our new inquiries, Putting science and engineering at the heart of government policy, the terms of reference include an examination of how science policy is scrutinised, enabling us to revisit this issue. 3. In parallel, the Education and Skills Committee was disbanded and while we assumed responsibility for scrutiny of Universities and Skills, a Committee was established to examine the work of the new Department for Children, Schools and Families. 4, Nine members of the former Science and Technology Committee and three members of the former Education and Skills Committee were appointed to the new Committee, which has 14 members rather than the more usual 11. Phil Willis (Chairman of the former Science and Technology Committee) was elected Chairman at our first meeting on 14 November 2007. A change of name 5. Scrutiny of science policy is just one part of the remit of the new Committee and we have made a conscious effort to cover as many aspects of innovation as well as skills, higher and further education as possible. However we were keen to retain—and be seen to retain—our role in scrutinising science, and following our representations to the Government the House of Commons agreed on 11 March 2008 to change the name of the Innovation, Universities and Skills Committee to include the word science in the title.* This underlines the inclusion of science in our remit and our role in scrutinising science across Government. However, the title of the Department still does not include the word ‘science’. Changes to both names had been recommended by the Science and Technology Committee in its Last Report, and we believe that the Department would be better named the Department for Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills.” 6. The Leader of the House, Harriet Harman MP, commented that “If the Committee chooses to have a Sub-Committee covering science and technology issues, it will be able to operate that Sub-Committee, in effect, as a successor to the current Science and Technology Committee.”° We chose, on balance, not to appoint a standing Sub- Committee on Science and Technology because we thought that this could be seen as downgrading our science scrutiny role. Instead we have made frequent use of sub- committees to conduct inquiries on a variety of subjects. 7. During the 2007-08 Session we held 50 Committee meetings and 12 Sub-Committee meetings and took oral evidence on 46 occasions. We published seven Reports and over and above the evidence for these inquiries also held 11 separate oral evidence hearings. Table 2 lists all our inquiries and evidence sessions and Table 3 shows the visits we have made both in the UK and abroad. For further details see the Committee’s entry in the Sessional Return, which is annexed to this Report. 4 Votes and Proceedings, 11 March 2008 5 Science and Technology Committee, Thirteenth Report of Session 2006-07, The Last Report, HC 1108, paras 5-7 6 HC Deb, 25 July 2007, col 942 The work of the Committee in 2007-08 5 Box 1: Objectives and core tasks issued by the House of Commons Liaison Committee OBJECTIVE A: To examine and comment on the policy of the department Task 1: To examine policy proposals from the UK Government and the European Commission in Green Papers, White Papers, draft Guidance etc, and to inquire further where the Committee considers it appropriate Task 2: To identify and examine areas of emerging policy, or where existing policy is deficient, and make proposals Task 3: To conduct scrutiny of any published draft bill within the Committee’s responsibilities Task 4: To examine specific output from the department expressed in documents or other decisions OBJECTIVE B: To examine the expenditure of the department Task 5: To examine the expenditure plans and out-turn of the department, its agencies and principal NDPBs OBJECTIVE C: To examine the administration of the department Task 6: To examine the department’s Public Service Agreements, the associated targets and the statistical measurements employed, and report if appropriate Task 7: To monitor the work of the department’s Executive Agencies, NDPBs, regulators and other associated public bodies Task 8: To scrutinise major appointments made by the department Task 9: To examine the implementation of legislation and major policy initiatives OBJECTIVE D: To assist the House in debate and decision Task 10: To produce Reports which are suitable for debate in the House, including Westminster Hall, or debating committees 6 The work of the Committee in 2007-08 Table 1: Relationship of inquiries and evidence sessions to objectives and core tasks Inquiries/Evidence Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective D Sessions 1 |Th e Sainsbury Review | X Higher education issues GCSA—Professor Sir David King GCSA—Professor John Beddington Formation of DIUS Renewable Electricity- Generation Technologies Funding for X Equivalent or Lower Qualifications (ELQs) Biosecurity in UK Research Laboratories UK Centre for Medical Research and Innovation Science Budget Allocations The work and operation of the Copyright Tribunal Engineering |Th e Leitch Review of Skills Re-skilling for recovery - After Leitch: Implementing Skills And Training Policies The use of Government Statistics in Evidence-Based Policy-Making The Office For Fair Access (OFFA) Investigating the Oceans The Quality Assurance Agency’s Recent Report on Standards in Universities Scrutiny of the Draft Apprenticeships Bill DIUS’s Departmental Report 2008 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council