LAI t-16 The Roman Imperial Cult in Alexandria during the Julio-Claudian Period. Nicholas Eid M.A. thesis submitted to the Department of Classics, Universify of Adelaide. August 1995. ABSTRA 2 DECLARATION. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. 4 INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS. 5 CHAPTER 1. 6 I.I INTRODUCTION 6 ll I.2 FACTORS AFFECTING THE NATURE OF THE IMPERIAL CULT. I,3 EVIDENCE FOR THE IMPERIAL CULT IN ALEXANDRIA. t4 I.4 MODERN SCHOLARSHIP ON THE IMPEzuAL CULT. t7 t9 CHAPTER 2. Religious precursors of the Imperial Cult in Alexand 19 2.I THE PHARAONIC RELIGIONS t9 2.2THE CULT OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT. 22 2.3THE PTOLEMAIC CULTS 24 2.4 CONCLUSIONS. 32 3. CHAPTER 33 Political influences upon the structure of the Imperial Cult. 33 3.I PTOLEMAIC POLITICAL AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE. 5J 3.2THE CIVIC STRUCTURE OF ALEXANDRIA UNDER THE PTOLEMIES 34 3.3 THE INFLUENCE OF M. ANTONIUS AND CLEOPATRA. 35 3.4 THE POLITICAL STATE OF EGYPT AND ALEXANDRIA UNDER AUGUSTUS. 37 3.5 THE ROMAN ADMINISTRATION OF ALEXANDRIA. 42 3.6 ALEXANDRIAN CIVIC STRUCTURE UNDERTHE ROMANS 43 3.7 CONCLUSIONS. 47 4. ¿ CHA7TER 49 Art and architecture. 49 4.I INTRODUCTION 49 4.2 HELLENISTIC PORTRAITURE. 50 4.3 EGYPTIAN ART. 52 4.4 ROMAN IMPEzuAL ART IN ALEXANDRIA. 53 4.5 ROMAN CULT ARCHITECTURE IN ALEXANDRIA. 51 4.6 THE ALEXANDzuAN COINAGE IN THE ruLIO-CLAUDIAN PERIOD. 65 CHAPTER 5, 71 The written evidence of the Imperial Cult. 7t 5,I INTRODUCTION 7l 5.2 THE INSCzuPTION OF TIBEzuUS CLAUDIUS BALBILLUS. 7l 5.3 THE RES GESTAE DIVI AUGUSTI. 75 5.4 FURTHER EVIDENCE FROM THE AUGUSTAN PERIOD. 78 5.5 PRIVATE IMPERIAL CULT IN ALEXANDRIA 79 5.6 TIBERIUS AND THE IMPERIAL CULT. 8l 5.7 THE EMPEROR CAIUS AND ALEXANDRIA. 83 5.8 CLAUDIUS'LETTER TO THE ALEXANDRIANS. 85 5.9 THE IMPERIAL CULT UNDER 89 CHAPTER 6, 92 Conclusion 92 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 100 Primary Sources. 100 Secondaty Sources. 100 -Page2- ABSTRAGT. The purpose of this study is to examine the imperial cult in Alexandria under th Julio-Claudian Emperors of Rome. It will consider the origins of the imperial cult in Alexandria. It witt look at the nature of the cult, through an analysis of It the contemporary art, architecture and literature' will study the political behaviour of the Ptolemies and the nature of the dynastic and personal cults th/y created to determine what factors influenced the imperial cult in Egypt. It will also consider briefly the effect, ,f ory, of the native Egyptian religions upon the cult. Finally, it will review the nature of the imperial cult under each of the Julio-Claudian emperors. - Page .3 - DECLARATION. This thesis contains no material which has been acceptedþr the award of any other degree or diploma in any university and, to the best of my lcnowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. This thesis may be lent or photocopied. Signed, NICHOLAS EID -Page4- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. I would like to thank all those people who contributed to the writing of this thesis. To my supervisors Dr. Anne Geddes, Dr. Margaret O'Hea, and Dr. Albert Devine þr offering advice on how to approach the subject and þr the editing of the countless drafts submitted to them.¿ My thanlcs to Gillian Bartlett þr the use of her time and computer skills in the preparation of the final product. Finally, my thanks to my wife Donna þr her patience and understanding over the years of study -Page5- INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS. A.E. L'Annee Epigraphique. A.J.A.H. The American Journal of Ancient History A.N.R.W. Aufstieg tJnd Niedergang Der Romischen Welt. B.G.U. Griechische Urlunden aus den KSl. Museen zu Berlin Griechische Urkunden, Vols. I -9, I 89 5- I 9 3 7. B.M.P. British Museum Papyrus C.I.G C orpus Ins cr ip t io num Gr ae c ar um. C.I.L. C orpus Ins cr ip t i o num Lat inqrum. ILS. Dessau H. Dessau, Inscriptiones Latinqe Selectae 1892-1916' E.J. Ehrenberg, V. & Jones, A.H.M., Documents illuslrating the reigns of Augustus and Tiberius, Oxford, 1955. J.E.A. Journal of Egtptian Archaeolog,t J.H.S. Journal of Hellenic Studies J.R.S. Journal of Roman Studies. R.S.A. Rivista Storica dell Antichita. Z.P.E. Zeitschrift fur Papyrologie und Epigraphik. -Page6- CHAPTER 1. 1,1 INTRODUCTION. The nature of the Roman imperial cult in Alexandria was determined by a number of factors. The major contributing factors, from the period before the Roman annexation of Egypt, which subsequently affected the nature of the cult in Alexandria, were religious, social and political. Dynastic Egypt had the pharaoh as its central religious and political focus. The survival of the people and the country was directly linked to his ability to intervene with the gods. This idea was encouraged and developed under the Ptolemies and is particularly evident in Alexandria. These factors in the Roman period found expression in several aleas of life in Alexandria. The evidence for these factors is found in the art, architecture and the literature of the period. The arrival of Augustus in Egypt further modified the existing traditions of kingship. Duling the Roman period in Egypt we are able to trace a pattern of influence in the imperial cult that dernonstrates an influence from Greek, Egyptian and Roman sources. As a consequence the cult in Alexandria was unique in the empir,e. The aims of this thesis are to determine the nature of the imperial cult during the Julio- Claudian period in Alexandria and to analyse the nature under each of the emperors to determine if it varied. It is important to consider the political context of Egypt within the Roman empire, since it appears that the development of the imperial cult was influenced by the status of Egypt and Alexandria. It will also examine the nature and origins of the Ptolemaic dynasty in political and religious terms to determine if the Roman cult in Alexandria was influenced by any Greek or native Egyptian factors. The fundamental question that this thesis aims to address is the issue of the nature of the imperial cult, that is, whether it was a political or a religious phenomenon, In order to consider these points the thesis will be structured in the following way. Firstly a brief review of the literature on the imperial cult in Egypt and Alexandria in the last one hundred years will give an overview of the existing knowledge and theories relating to the imperial cult. In some cases it may be useful to consider material from sutside Alexandria' -Page7- The second part of the thesis will consider Alexander the Great and his impact upon the dynastic cult of the Ptolemies and the imperial cult. It will also consider the influences that the Ptolemaic cults had upon the imperial cult, as well as the Hellenistic nature of the imperial cult. Finally it will consider the political and social context that the Ptolemies left in Egypt for the Romans, and the adoption and modification of this enviromrent by the Romans. The third part of the thesis will consider the nature of the imperial cult in Alexandria. It will do this tluough the sources reviewed earlier. It will draw the evidence together and try to for.mulate an overall picture of the cult. The fourth and final part will consider chronologically each of the Julio-Claudian emperors and the uature of the cult under each of them. Ruler worship in the classical world is defined as "the practice of offering sacrifice and other forms of cult homage to a mortal ruler, living or deceased."r From this definition the Roman imperial cult can be considered in the context of ruler cult. The pu{pose of the imperial cult has been variously described throughout the empire. ÞIowever Roman ruler worship is best presented in the eastern provinces as, "a medium for expressing their loyalty by the states of Greece and Asia Minor when these came progressively under Roman control."2 The imperial cult in the Roman empire was a political tool. Augustus initiated ruler cult as part of the romanisation of a newly pacified teritory. As a consequence the provinces had an outlet for loyalty and a means to express their newly developed romanisation,' He achieved this by focussing the imperial cult upon himself and the city of Rome. The daimon ol spirit of the city of Rome was embodied in the image of the goddess Roma. The incorporation of some of the religious traditions of the conquered provinces into the imperial cult served to add a religious dimension to what was otherwise a very political institution. Within the imperial cult it is clear that the emperor was able to use the cult as a means of political communication. It enabled him to clarify his position within the empile and to influence the ' J.R. Fears, "Ruler Worship." R. Kitzinger & M. Grant (eds.), Civilization of the Ancient Mediterranean: Greece and Rome, vol. 2, 1988, p.1009' 'D. Firhwick, "The development of provincial ruler worship in the western Rornan empire", ANRW, 16.2, 197 8, p.1207 . 3 D. Firhwíck, ibid., p.rzo9. -Page8- manner in which he was viewed by his subjects. Therefore it was useful as a form of propaganda. The clear distinction in the background and the development of the imperial cult 'Western between the Eastern empire and the empire must be emphasised. Comparisons cannot generally be made given the differences between the two. Price states that the earlier Hellenistic ruler cults \¡rere an "attempt to come to terms with a new type of power... The cult of the gods was the one model that was available to them (the Greeks) for the representation of a power on whom the city was dependent which was external and yet still Greek. By borrowing and adapting this pre-existing model of classification it proved to be possible to accommodate the new kings."4 It is possible to use this Greek model to explain the evolution of the imperial cult in Alexandria. At the time of the Roman conquest of Alexandria it already contained a large proportion of Greeks and maintained many religious customs from Greece. Fufthermore he states that the imperial cult relied on local competition of residents to create honours for the imperial cult and hence gain public advancement, and that offers of cult wers, made in association with requests concerning privileges.s This firmly places the role of the imperial cult into the political arena. Other writers such as Nilsson also favour the theory that the imperial cult was political in nature. "Emperor-worship is a masterpiece of the politician's art of employing religion towards the upbuilding of the State, and it contributed to keeping the Empire together; but, like all religious constructions of politicians, it had a weakness, for it lacked all genuine religious content."6 Thus the question of the status and the method of administration of the city of Alexandria is an important issue in the analysis of the imperial cult in Alexandria. I shall consider the various types of cult that are discussed by modern writers. Some of the forms that the imperial cult could take under the Roman empire included dynastic, personal, civic, plovincial, public and private cult. o S.R.F. Price, Rituals and Power; The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor, 1984,p.30 t S.R.F. Price, ibid.,p.70. u M.P. Nilsson, Greek Piety, H.J. Rose (trans.), 1969, p.178. -Page9- The development of the Roman imperial cult had its origin in the Greek world. It was an extension of the cult paid to semi-mythical and mythical heroes. Late.l. such honours were extended to historically recognised people. Such cults were characterised by the award of divine honours by civic populations to distinguished men both living and deceased' This became known as ruler cult. The key factor that separated ruler cult fi'om the previous hero cults was the recognition that the rulers were nonetheless still considered to be mortal. However some of the rulers achieved, by the very nature of their honours, a form of divinity. As Fears suggests, "Such worship frequently drew upon popular piety and patriotism, and cults of heroes were often unique to a single city, resting upon a popular perception of a miraculous intercession of divine power by the heroes through an act defined in time and place. Furthermore and most important, such cult worship could be bestowed upon histolical persons."T The key characteristic of a dynastic cult was the award of divine honours to the deceased kings, like those which occurred in the Ptolemaic cults in Egypt The award of these religious honours was usually made by the living ruler to the deceased ruler, or was initiated by the priesthood. The honours were perpetuated through successive generations. The dynastic cult of the Ptolemies had some themes in common with the Roman tradition of aucestor worship. Later in the Ptolemaic cults divine honours were offered to the living ruler and also to members of the royal family, both living and deceased. In some respects the characteristics of the early Julio-Claudian imperial cult in Egypt appears to have been influenced indirectly by the Ptolernaic cults. In their later phases both the Roman imperial cult and the Ptolemaic dynastic cult underwent a fundamental change to a personal cult. Personal cult offeled to a living ruler appears to have evolved from the dynastic cult of the Ptolemies and first occurred during the Ptolemaic pe¡iod. The major difference between personal cult and dynastic cult was the award of religious honours to the living ruler normally reserved for the gods. Such awards in Egypt 7 J.R. F"uts, Ruler llorship, p.1010.