LLooyyoollaa UUnniivveerrssiittyy CChhiiccaaggoo LLooyyoollaa eeCCoommmmoonnss Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1949 TThhee RRoommaann FFaammiillyy iinn tthhee AAnnnnaallss ooff TTaacciittuuss:: AA CCoonnssiiddeerraattiioonn ooff tthhee FFaammiillyy ooff tthhee AAnnnnaallss aanndd IIttss OObbjjeeccttiivvee VVaalliiddiittyy Walter M. Hayes Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classics Commons RReeccoommmmeennddeedd CCiittaattiioonn Hayes, Walter M., "The Roman Family in the Annals of Tacitus: A Consideration of the Family of the Annals and Its Objective Validity" (1949). Master's Theses. 764. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/764 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1949 Walter M. Hayes • THE ROMAN FAXILY IN TEE AtniALS OF T.ACITUS A CONSIDERATION OF TEE FJKILl OF THE .Am1.A.IS AND ITS OBJlOOTIVE VALIDITY BY WALTER HAYES A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILWENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LOYOlA UNIVERSITY JUNE 1949 Vita Mr. Walter M. Hayes, S.J., Vlras born in Detroit, Michig~~, September 4, 1922. He vms graduated from University of Detroit High School, Detroit, Michigan, June, 1940. Following his entrance into the Society of Jesus, Mr. Hayes continued his studies at Milford. Novitiate and xavier University from 1940 to 1944. He matri.culated as an undergraduate of' Loyola University in Fall of 1944. The Bachelor of Arts degree was conferred by Loyola University, Juno 1945. V.bile t studying Philosophy at West Baden College, West Baden, Indiana, Mr. Hayes began his post-graduate work in Classics. n • TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Definition of tenns. of thesis scope. Summary of L~itation contents chapter by chapter. II. FAMILY PRESTIGE .Am> THE PATER-FAIULIAS • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 7 Patria Potesta.. The effect of family prestige on everyday Rane. Ancestry's force on daily life. on senatorial debate •. funerals. morality, adoption. Children, education. and the family_ Patria potestaa in the various forms ot marriage. Betrothal and marriage ceremonies. III. WCllEli OF THE F.AlfiLY. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • _ • 34- Power ot the wife augumented by marriage. freedom. L1 via Augusta, Agrippina the elder, Messalina,. Divorce and early re-marriage Agrippina the younger. Wife and Roman law ot Examples of the good wife. The wife as priestess • adulte~. IV. THE FAMILY AND THE TIMES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • S1 Family and the times were iDmoral. lmIRorality peculiar to the fandly. Adultery, concubinage, diYorce, birth control. Wea1th's eftect. Uncertainty ot the future at Tome, slavery. tyranny, informers. Examples of heroes. v. THE ANNALS, THE FAMILY AID TRUTH ••••••••••••••••• 75 Value of the pioture of the Annals. Fur.neaux's defence. Hochart's Poggio Bracciolini the real Tacitus' Fabia transits Hochartts arguments. Whoever the writer, Tacitus wishes to be true, his historical criticism. Agreement with contemporary writers. Conclusion. VI. THE F.A\iILY IN THE Aml.A.IS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 89 Conclusion. Summary of the findings on the .family and Tacitus t reality, objectivity, and veracity. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Ours is a period in which the very foundations of the family as a social and political institution have been viciously attacked. Our divorce rate oareens toward promiscuity and the delinquency of our youth is unparat: lah'J.ck in the nation's l11ato17_ A remedy must be sought. A solution must be found or we must despair of our western Heritage--a culture based on the family's inviolability. However the modern horizon is not altogether without its ancient pa~ 2! Perhaps it will help to outline the status quo that old-world lIll~. family. As the ancient was stabilized by the advent of Christ may the mo dern home be vitalized by His return. The purpose of the thesi.,. then. is to set forth as clearly and as completely as possible the condition of the family of Rome between the years A.D. 18--68. the period with Which the ex tant portion of the Annals deals. In focusing upon the precise social and political group about which this thesis Will work. it is not sufficient to say merely that the subject is the "family". For even in English the word "family" has any number of different meanings.l The Latin IIfamiliall is almost equally varied in its 1 Even a dictionary as small as the Funk and Wagnalls College Standard 1 (2) meanings. Harpers' dictionary2 informs us that familia can signi1'Ji1 I. the slaves in a household. the household establishment. II. 1. a. the house and all belonging to it. a family estate. fortune, b. family as part of a 3 gens, c. the members of a household; 2. troop. group of players. soldiers. Very accurately. then. to lIhat do we refer when we speak of the "family in the Amlalsf We designate a social unit ccmposed of husband. wife. and children. The meaning listed under II. 1. in Funk and Wagnall.4 and the meaning II. l.c. in the Harpers"S is the one we Wish. Of' oourse we shall not be able to prescind fran other aspects of the family--its olan spirit. slave system. political ramifications. and the like--yet the main interest shall be on the social grouping of man. wife. and children. Our field 01' activity is Hmited again. this time by Tacitus himself. For the .Annals Diotionary. New York. Funk and Waplls Co •• 1940. lists several meanings UDder the entry "family" I I. a. of. belonging to. or suitable tor a family; II n.l. a group of persons oonsisting of parents and their children, also the ohildren as distinguished fran the parents. 2. a group of persons forming a household. including servants. eto.; a name. etc •• J a house; line; olan; tribe; race. 4. Distinguished or anoient lineage, desoent. 5. Biol. a group larger than a genus. 6. Any olass or group of like or related things. 7. A group of related animals. L. tamilia. famu lus. servant) 2 Cf. revision by Charlten Lewis and Charles Short of Andrews' translation v of Freund's Latin-German Lexicon. New York. Harper and Bros •• 1879. 3 Max Radin. "gens. Familia. Stirps." Classioal Philology. 9.235--247. tells us yet another meaning, a group descended from the same known an cestor and who are all living at the same time. (This would extend to about four generations.) The majority of Radin's referenoes are to Livy but oitations fram other authors enable him to oonolude. if we may use phrases oonsecrated by the logician. that generally speaking the exten sion of familia was larger than that of gena and that therefore the com. prehension of the latter was greater. 4 ct. supra. note 1. S Cf. supra. note 2. = 3 deal almost exclusively with the patrician or at least senatorial £waily If'hose residence was Rome. This was the family of the aristocracy whence came the rulers of a Rome. mistress of the If'Orld. As might be suspeoted from. the limitations If'e have made. the thesis approach is not that of the Roman private life student with his interests in the family's daily routine. houses. villas. theaters. and viaducts. Our approach is rather that of the sociologist anxious to feel the fabric of this natural group so close to the brink of dissolution. Data on the family shall be gathered fr(IJI. the Annals of Tacitus--the t 6 mature work of one of Rome's truly great historians. Thesis procedure in its most simplified form. will be to make excerpts from the Annals of all passages pertinent to the family. After this process of analysis. a task of synthesis remains. Later the unity must be corroborated or interpreted in the light of more recent research and secondary authors. References to such writers may thus clarify what might be left obscure were we to l~ited the text of the Jnnals alone. In the second chapter we cons ider the importance in the Roman mind of the family unit--the relation between the father~other-children group and their clan of ancestors. What power did the family history wield! What prestige was involved in the family name! Since a Roman husband was first in authority-~ jure all power within the family circle was focused in the 6 Cf. Chapter V on the authenticity and credibility of the Annals. 4 father--the pater-fami1ias merits priority of consideration. What in general was his relation to his family.? What power did he exercise over his children the hope of his fami1y'l How he affected by the marriage ceremony. the 'WaS launching of the new family! .E! Facto. perhaps of even greater power in the family circle than the pater.N'm.ltliaaL whose .£! jure power was absolute. the mother-wife receives our attention in the third chapter of the thesis. We consider certain re ligious duties of the wife. But a point of even greater is an ~portance evaluation of this Roman wanan's family group is her social position conse quent upon her great wealth and her political influence. That the ,family was laboring through a transition period of stress. that family unity was no longer a virtue. a reader of the Annals need not be told. On every page of the 'Work we read an unending tale of wealthy homes weakened by luxury and ease or shattered by vice. Marriage infidelity. either in the form. of divorce or open adultery. and birth control--each struck a blow at the fami1y's inner unity of spirit. Fran the pages of Tacitus we feel. too. the great unrest and upheaval of the times as he narrates the daily grind of murder. suicide, and rapine. ubiquitous infonners had stQ1en from the family hearth even the joy of a secret shared. Both husband and wife were surrounded by a horde of spying infonners--rriends. clients. and slaves. as ready to report as to invent their tale of malice. To be sure not everything in the picture Tacitus draws is disheartening. for occasionally he completes the general trame of 5 the family's status qUt> with examples of heroism and virtue in the ],ives of the men and 1I'aII.en whose ideals had raised them. above the times in which they lived. Since we may not content ourselves with merely repainting the picture given us by Tacitus. we must consider how true his colors were. This we do in the fif'th chapter. Was there a Tacitus? Did he write the Annals? Do we .!:! have the A.tmals wrote' Secondly. is he trustworthy! Though it is out of the question to go into the matter exhaustively, the arguments pro and contra merit our attention even brief as we must be. When we further restrict our- selves to an investigation of our author's credibility on just what he re- ported of the family. our conclUSion, already in agreement with the best accepted authors. gains even more assurance. By way of thesis conclusion, a sixth chapter synthesizes the picture of the family of the Annals. Hot content now with the statement that Tacitus reported thus on the family. the theais contends that what ftS reported was objectively true of the family. Facts and data gathered from the Annals are accurate knowledge of the first century patrician family of Rome. Yet a preliminary caution is in order. Whatever his avowed7 or even subconscious motives were for writing the Annals, Tacitus hardly intended ~ 7 facitus, APnales. 1.1. f.E. Page, E. Capps, W.H.D. Rouse, ed, The Histor .!!!. ~.!!. !§g1ish Trans1ation}:z Clifford !. Moores .!!:! Annals with ~ English Translation 1?l. ~ Jackson, £:!!. Putnam' s ~, Hew York, 1931. The text used throughout the thesis is that followed by this Leeb Classi cal Library edition. 6 ,E:0fesso to present a picture ot the Roman tamily. Information we tather about the family will be obiter dicta trom passages dealing with other sub jects. facitus had before his mind a tar grander scheme than the story of the Roman :t'am1ly. His was the history ot the rise and hegemony of a tyran- nical government of dictators. !bus what he says ot the fanily. though true. should not lead us to suppose that details omitted are false or simply lack ing fran the anoient family. His was not the task to tell all about the family. but only suoh as filled in the political picture he was sketching. Again. the aristocrat Tacitus deals almost exclusively with a patrician and imperial family. Referenoes to the family outside the aristocratic circle of Rome are tew and of a more general character. Of course it is easy to inter that the common hearth was as troubled as the aristocratic. For the ancients. an historian was also a moralist. whose peculiar temp tation it is to drive home his point by heightened contrast-sometimes. even. at the expense ot a more objective presentation. For this reason. perhaps. the hideous vices of the Annals .were in reality not so hedeous. nor the exalted virtues quite so virgin pure. However. though the moralizing tends to obscure the objectivity. the over-all view is substantially correct.