THE RITES OF PASSAGE By Arnold aan Gennep Translated by MONIKA B. YIZEDOM ond GABRIELLE L. CAFFEE Introductionby SOLON T. KIMBALL TIIE UNIYERSITY OI' CEICAGO PNESS INTRODUCTION I The need for a translation of Arnold van Gennep's Les rites de passage has long been felt by those who were appreciative of the significance of his theoretical formula- tions. Although his influence has been considerable in some anthropological circles, his contrihution, in general? has failed to reach the other social sciences. This is an unfortu- nate circumstance, since these other disciplines would have been greatly enriched by his analysis of ritual behavior in its relation to the dynamics of individual and group life. Certainly one explanation for this lack has been the relative inaccessibility of the original monograph. The present trans- lation will do much to overcome this deficiency. ' It is my hope that this brief introductory section will accomplish several purposes. In it I have tried to/describe the intellectual climate and tradition in which van Gennep wrote, and'to summarize his principal,ideas. A much *o.u difficult task has been the attempt tci'assess the relative impact of his ideas upon the various social science discip- lines. Finally, I have tried to indicate the significance of his approach to some of the current problems in an urban in- clustrial society. A brief description of the-intellectgal climatc in which van Gennep lived and 'lvrote rvill aid us in understanding his conceptual use of thc materials that were available. The intellectual ferment which had been a part of the Librury of Congress Cato.Iog Number: 59-1432f internal change and expansion of the Western world was Publishc<l 1960 Dy 'I'rrn Uxrvonsrty oF CnrcAGo Pnnss, Cxrclco 37, Ir,r,rNors in full force. Grcat minds were in the process of exploring lloutlTehtlgc cU annivde rKseitgya no fP'foaruol nLttod .P, rle,osns,d Tono roEn.Cto.4 ,5 ,I iCnganlaandda the world with a fresh point of view; they were busy organi- zing the new facts which were being turned up at every hand @ Monika B. Vizedom antl Gnbrielle L. Ca{Iee 1960 except in the Unitcd Statcs of Americu into systematic classifi.cations. From these they were con- hy MonikCt oBp. yYriigzehdt oinm thaen dU Gniatebdri eSlleta tLe.s Coaf fAfeme e1r9ic6a0 structing conceptual schemes to give expression to the orderliness of the universe. Charles Darwin's evolutionary Priruted in Grcut, Britair sequence had caught the imagination of such men as Her- bert Spencer and Lewis H. Morgan, who had applied this aspect of his theory to human institutions and had erected Y RITES OF PASSAGE INTRODUC TION monolineal explanatious of the development of civilization. they were found. In this he auticipated the soon-to-appear Adolph Bastian had labored assiduously in gathering the writings of the " functionalists," Radcliffe-Brown and MaIi- materials that would give a firm base to the new discipline nowski. of anthropology. E. B. Tylor, in his now classic concept of The major source of van Genuep's inspiration, of course, " animism," had already struck a blow for the dialectic of came from the tradition of positivism-the insistence that science in its struggle with the prevailing supernaturalism, general laws of social process should be derived from em- which had been inherited from medievalism. Auguste Comte pirical observation rather than from metaphysical specula- had proclaimed the principles on which an objective science tion. Henri Hubert, Marcel Mauss, and Emile Durkheim of society might be achieved. fnterest in the objective were his contemporaries, and were also numbered among analysis of religion and customs had reached a new height. those who found inspiration in Comte. Although labeled Systematic ethnographic studies of peoples from all por- " aociologistsr" they showed little resemblance to their tions of the globe had begun to make their appearance. English and American colleagues, who were concerned with Accounts frequently uscd for comparative analysis included uormative, evolutionary, or organic interpretations. The descriptions of the native Australians, the Todas of India, approach used by this group of French scholars places them the Masai of Africa, and numerous other tribal groups in in the tradition of what is today known as functional America, Asia, and Africa. These detailed descriptions r{ere anthropology. a welcome addition to the earlier accounts provided by mis- sionary, traveler, or colonial administrator. II The analysis of ceremonies accompanying an indi- tolife Studies and theorics of religious belief and ceremonialism vidual's crises" which van Gennep called rites de were of particular interest to van Gennep. He was conver- passage is usually considered to be his unique contribution. sant with, although sometimes critical of, the writings of He poiuted out that, when the activities associated with 'W'illiam Andrew Lang, Robertson Smith, Jane B. Harrison, such ceremonies were examined in terms of their order and Alfred E. Crawley, Henri Flubert, James G. Frazer, and content, it was possible to distinguish three 4ejor phases: many others; his main objections centered upon their clas- separation (sdparation), transition (marge), and incorpora- si{ications or interpretations and not upon the main current tion (agrdgalion). Considered as a whole, he labeled these the of intellectual and scientific inquiry in which they moved. schdma of riues de passage. Passage might more appropriately Thero was agrecrnent among them in their general abandon- have been translated as ootransition,t' but in deference to ment of supernaturalism and in their desire to provide a van Gennep and general usage of the term o'rites of pas- 'rational explanation of religious behavior by tracing his- sager" this form of the translation has been preserved. His I torical origins, rnaking comparative analyses, or presenting tertn sch6,mo has usually been translated as "pattern," al- functional interpretations. It 'was a period in which the though the flavor of his usage inclines one toward "dyna- creation of classi{icatory catcgories was a major concern of mics" if such a term might be construed to include scientilic thinking. Yan Gennep also utilized taxonomic ttprocess" and tt gtructure.t' principlcs, but lre was vehement in his protest against those The examination of any life-crisis ceremony will quickly who extractcd from " corrtext " data which supported their establish the validity ofthe threefold classification of separa- theses. He was insistent that ceremonies needed to be ex- tion, transition, and incorporation. But van Gennep cautions amined in their entirety and in the social setting in which us that these three subcategories are not developed to the vi vu RITES OF PASSAGE INTRODUCTION same extent by all peoples or in every set of ceremonies. ,'l:H;lHLlJ';""T*riim*xi;:'1,,ffi ::TH"'HII " Rites of separation are prominent in funeral ceremonies, rites of incorporation at marriages. Transition rites may him to the customary routines of life. These changeo may be play an important part, for instance, in pregnancy, be- dangerous, and, at the least, they are upsetting to the life trothal, and initiation; or they may be reduced to a mini- of the group and the individual. The transitional period is mum in adoption, in thc delivery of a second child, in met with rites of passage which cushion the disturbance. fn remarriage, or in thc passage from the second to the third one sense all life is transition, with rhythmic periods of age group." quiescence and heightened activity. Although concern with the prevalence and elaborateness Van Gennep also applied his system to the analysis of the of different rites is a necessary consideration in the ex- periodic changes associated with natural phenomena. Cere- amination of any society or in cornparative analyses of monies which accompany and assure the changes of the several societics, thcrc is the danger that such routine or year, season, or month are rites of passage: new year mechanical operation may ignore the theoretical problems ceremonies would include rites of expulsion of,winter and irr whlch van Gennep was also engrossed. He was interested incorporation of spring-the one dies and the other is not alone in the 'o what " but also in the t'ho\v " and " why." reborn. He also points out that seasonal changes interest Ile does not devote thc same degree of attention to theee men only insofar as they aflect economic activities. questions, however, as he does to those necessary to eetab- Tu,o or three additional points deserve mention. Van lish the universality and validity of the dynamics which he Gennep makes a sharp distinction in the diflerence between is examining. Oftentimes, he seems to leave such problems religion and magic. The latter comprises the technigues- as unstated assumptions in his specific analyses. ceremonies, rites, services-which, when accompanied by ft would seem wise to call attention to some of these metaphysical theory, constitutes religion. But van Gennep principles so that thc reader will be explicitly conscious of also Iinks theory and practice in science in a comparable them and will thus gain a fuller understanding of this work. manner. This definition is more comprehensive and hence Yan Genncp saw t'regcneration" as a law of life and of the more useful than those advanced by either Durkheim or universe : the cnergy which is found in any system gradually Malinowski. bccornes spent and must be renewed at intervals. For him, Van Gennep was also insistent that puberty ceremonies this rcgeneration is accomplished in the social world by the rvere misnamed, since this type of rite occurred at, ages ritcs of passagc given expression in the rites of death and which hail no specific relation to the physical appearance of rebirth. Thc full signifrcance of this idea may be grasped, sexual maturity..He considered these rites to be primarily howcver, only when its relation to other concepts is seen. rites of separation from an asexual world, followed by rites Yan Gennep, with others, accepted the dichotomy of the of incorporation into a sexual world: His interpretation is sacred and the profane; in fact, this is a central concept for at soIrre variance with both popular belief and psycho- understanfing the transitional stage in which an individual analytic theory. or group finds itself frorn tirne to time. The sacred is not an When van Gennep summarized those aspects of his work o'Our absolute value but one relative to the situation. The person 'lvhich he believed important, he stated, interest lies who enters a status at variance with the one previously held not in the particular rites but in their essential significance becomes "sacred" to the othcrs who remain in the profane and their relative positions within ceremonial wholes, that viii tx RITES OF PASSAGE is, their order." He then added that the ..underlying ar- INTROD UCTION rangement is always the same "l it is the pattern of ih"iites less interested in the analysis of the ceremonies and their of passage. "The second fact to lle pointed 6u1_w[6gs patterns than in their relation to culture and personality. generality no one seems to have noticed previously_is the This emphasis is represented in monographs by Mu.gr""t existencc of transitional periods which sometimes .cq.rire . Mead (1930), Gregory Bateson (1936), and Cora Orinois certain autonomy." Ilir third point was the relationship (1944). rn addition, there has been a shift ofauthropological between actual spatial passage and the change in sociar interest away fi:om religion and ceremonials since th" duy, position, expressed in such ritualizatioo of -o*,"rnents from of the excellent studies produced by washington Matthews, one status to another as an..opening of the doors.,, Alice C. Fletcher and Francis LaFlesche, Ruth Bunzel, and ^ These were major contributions in the epoch in which van Elsie clews Parsons, to name only a few American workers, Gennep wrotc; they helped to clarify ood to systematize Presumably, the same trend may be discovered amons existing data for the benefit of subsequent schorars. But anthropologists of other nationalities. there were additional pcnetrating insights which have direct Au additional test of the impact made by van Gennep is relevance for some nf our contemporary problems. For to examine the literature dealing with primitive religion. example, in his cxamination of ritual excharrg"s van Gennep with the exception of Paul Radin (primitiae Religior, rlez1, anticipated Malinowski's brilliant analysis ofthe functiou of not a single author refers to van Gennep or specifically "reciprocity." His study of initiation ceremonies hords im- analyzes rites de passoge. Radin devotes a full chafter to the plications for learning theory that have yet to be explored. consideration of these ceremonies, but comparable material His analysis of rites of incorporation is valid for ood""- is significantly missing from Robert H. Lowie (primitiae standing the problems associated with the ,.alienated.r, Religion, L924), Rafael Karsten (The Origins of Religion, and. the "unclaimed" of modern societies. Finally, his basic 1935), Wilson D. \X/allis (Religion in primitiae Society, ti3g), thesis has direct relevance for theories of change. and'W. \M. Howells (The Heathens,l94B). Father'Wilhelm schmidt (The origin anil Growth of Retigion, 1931) refers to III The ,estimate of a man's contribution to van Gennep's interpretation of Australian concepts of knowledge or theory is often based on the extent to which mythical figures (Mythes et ldgendes d;Australie. 1906), but his ideas have become incorporated into the literature, or to only for the purpose of quarreling with him. which they have been attacked, defended, or further ex- It would be naive to assume that the failure to include panded. ff we are to use this basis for our estimate of van van Gennep's contribution-or what might be an even more Gennep, ir seems wise to attempt an estimate of the evi_ serious deficiency, the failure to give separate treatment to dence. The tradition of nontheoreticar descriptive narrative rites of passage-is any indication of the significance of has been deeply imbedded in anthroporogical fierd studies, theory and ritual in this area of religious and social life. which continue to report life-crisis ceremonies_a practice Examination of the content of these works establishes that which had been established previous.to the publication of their authors were interested in quite other subjects, such Les de passage, Only Alfred M. Tonzer u*oog American as the aboriginal distribution of monotheism, the growth _rites anthropologists has given an extended analysis of van and spread of religious ideas, or topical aspects of religious Gennepos theories (LIZS). Others who have examiued life- behavior. This orientation was not one which interesteJ van crisis situations from a theoretical position have been much Gennep, and he took occasion to indicate the deficiencies of x such approaches. rri RITES OF PASSAGE INTRODUCTION ttoo wtthheee ntpehueebdo lritcyoa octiofo nrnse ildiogefi ro Lnteh,s re arelilt eaosdf idwleith iopicnahsa sla apmgpea.e jDaorrue rcdko hsneutirbmisb,e uqit iuofennns,t titewio aonp cpthhlieeaodp rtetyor s ea xtnporoh euroxnpadomeldoin gbaicytai oCl nhd aoapft api.nle dc hiinvai dpapunla eel aaarnlnieddr c gp-oruoobunl pidc-ecarvtioisoitsen . ptIbetoamGEoahthrenm fleeeamese hcmsnik utomsoamareenabs'rmvrjenseyoeyijeioe npto.p arenn nc bt ranadoTcth,,teh isr hanh wywssebso gde ipoishnyhfn F e orcwi oidsgoeclcvceeofi rhrtif ai tfmim fiomicDh tevcntalaesroe eaua lem l sgG gonrniononhcyie r ecfc thoG e ynpeen taenah itrre nsisoeitberonimer l nvsna iinnvpbeRit o es d a urwooeh pet entlhtf(ba,oiadid 1sog asjhns e G9ni uiot gtocmr0 iheunepebDt6aenis.tprvoj) neue n uTeLgdnmorrcetsehk ein tapfia ihissnae vsb,mtA te ene e ielaneiiru( aasrmdat l iws otlaty lycch,hltiatlys rnuus zeoaa s frri y uchesol irsdio meacg exraeuiu oosnphimovDsdc u lf r,eaec;y euD tn ooln.sts orttuhuti kralynepiafrnemhmtcokmiidtn eoeherbviigitin sdetmioevte i u iholaadmoiw,arcnesnn.,sf dwshtrcnehoeheeueiaavrvoamnnTgcrsetesceveteah ,rseenmti ,sne oo sadtar tois rs zoehaonnw.m e lo aoa itn edhTshaaosdtos eeidr kehiciat tsd tevhra ehecr t ar esosuse teypnos bsuirrcro gcoe berenfufcenicmoc andrriai iilia.nfnogis sl rinottecetnTce ehe wsa aied heoen tmnb . heisu n swwto i eva rni dwu fitci naitcdhtincthoshih lnefiaaav etcnii icssttnhinistGiunedhsroat cairedui ebninftesandiiiganu.coov rd" eonleantni i iidsnfseT otv, ig. uop stinhriadhrrneian e onetueeie loydulnsomh ias g fp. fu do .ls r i sCocmocirt i"fshli eurahotfrteoaei "isasglpncrnslo" pi iiaygsc.n u.pctsegalua.gr,rlsge e rilrcs awJot ucluhh wgiaolhevr.a eernorpnibiarec.ytdJ' rie y,mh" o., i tid, u"CH wlco t,ppelc aoonue srrrubo.inoeoieo"wgrn"dn--"s---- tI-iso lTanhn, edL em9r3so7,n )Lo a9g2rrae2p )i,h nsa ntbhdye WA s. a.R mL. leRo ytardda cdWliiftfaieor-nnBe raro sw( ADn u(BrTklhahece kAi mCni.ila aiBmlizoaqtn,h-. sGteantunsep p croomdumceendt eidn u tphoen tinhed idviisdtuurabla, nacneds whhei Jsha cwh rloitgis", ioIrf dubaseeuethtehdaro vmlriifsoien r' weca reitnshredies iiarnc temtehrreeeeamosntroeiynnd gioe isfan sna odenc xdfiaua tmlnh acientniiirodn ng rse yilmnam tyerbtedohll asimct i aoylonnthgd sti cor i.a t essBos oct hittaheo] tsfnphueaeenswn sct"sait moigsocetenai na atltuo ssls f id f wseeinuhv ocii cchafeh st c hg heweraro ehdgumic rpbooh.eun eiRpinen.cas od cdarhcipsslai otfapufrep arr_brteeeBesd drtao o natwrhndanr to iicnviuonedgtl ienvhori fdpc eutrhrheaaaetlnbe simidnae totsote rhia dneal ftmamsfaiuaopnnilocTsnedldytnshc u a fiievaarfovnio acllfaa s m ltlsbeluihmydea aeesqvasreid ucasitrsneh e in tttond ef hifoofcG so eerbnd e rs o aytn w ohfa tni atnefpodhe daihepdrirnsik s,icis tam e aiaacoon gtno-tanefewadn lsay.v lt o sitleaTn the hxsnsh sotpoete. uu neGwiirBdrecg oei ioaechfsnuipatsec nlhd.n rptee csh rwpehfereu i,aect hili rvriyciae aseeaht t itastlaode ccnrwnnnhaq detr|wuoimiloititafninnh anit gn ehghat turpso"eo sp dmf ddro obcyanwlbetn"k aa"rieoateo_ihsr--l ccrcmhafeeuhhocaqa-raamteudtirnnohrsi pglignoeaitabeae cgrbtdr b cieiieb uunlus itlspmoweri trhohr uee mwnudaewd mentei.htit h aonehTaitennrt hhne . td e h foaiuaTcvfyen hncih -ddi atscraei un hvtiic giarnoio noteldwiasnsenein c ecswwiaoadln ulfet ay seehsrrsriedioooeqits c un wud tisashaoii hslr efrri tobae iugnbwrbgrrretieboounuelheuaul rmaadapittoir v oc iictb ibntnioribeyoaid rses no seis vtfe suot iiih rnddmc bieh rt ueupaui oaheseapirvtldn"le ooe d rttnnioeeiurct r dpsaittt l ohhh"laoy"neees-r wmeloaitnbhoo groarnatiepo hnmss,a otjhof erv yae nxacr eGe penntoinot enrpe., fsIef r sretchhde\ mtroea ianhra etsh oep trhloiteveerr adat ruitrriuceilt.el esTs hsoe,r 'npTelhiwcua sct ioao nnrte rofibifn ueintmiotenersna.tc itnio nth ean calraysssisif itcoa trioitnu aolf brietehsa vaionrd ath."ee. i t.ar"ipro.- xeCixoicoenp'st ioPnri nicsi pfloeusn odf Ainn thErolipoot toDg.y C$9haaZp)p,l ew haenrde tChaer lienttoenra cS-. ha'vWeh emna wdee coofm liefe t-oc reisxiasm ainnea ltyhseis u isne wthheicirh sottuhdeyr doisf chi^pulimneans xut RITES OF PASSAGE INTRODUCTION " behavior, we find a varied situation. A few years ago I made that this is a cornpletely legitimate concentration of interest an extensive search for empirical descriptions of rites de which can ad.vance our understanding of psychological bases passage in American culture. A handful of American writers of life-crisis behavior. Unfortunately, it seems that almost of fiction havc produced some vivid portrayals of crisis all interest has been concentrated upon puberty rites to the situations, but I turned up only one factual analysis of exclusion of other rites of passage? thus preventing the de- burial behavior, and that by a minister. The writings of velopment of an encompassing theory comparable to that of anthropologisrs and sociologists yielded nothing. This ab- Radcliffe-Brown or Chapple and Coon. sence of rnaterial should be evidence of social scientists' One does not have to search very far in psychoanalytic neglect of au important segment of human behavior. Fur- theory to discover that the emphasis upon libido, and the ther corroboration is provided in the examination of intro' conflict between father and son expressed in the Oedipus ductory tcxtbooks; most, but not all, of the anthropology complex, is a central focus. Since psychoanalysis is the only texts have some reference to rites of passage in tribal discipline other than anthropology which has been con- cultures, but not one of nearly a dozen sociology texts that cerned with life-crisis ceremorries, it is desirable to present were cxamined contained any reference to the subject. at least sorne aspects of the position lvhich relate to rites of There are a number of sociologists who know and utilize passa€le. van Gennep's conccpts, but it seerns fair to say that, by and One must first understand that Freudian theorists have large, rites of passage have not been incorporated in socio- an intense desire to establish the legitimacy of their position logical thcory or thought. through proof from primal behavior. If it can I:e established The situation in psychology is a very curious one, indeed. that an aboriginal act has become imbedded in the .oracial Except in psychoanalysis, there is no indication of know- memory,'7 not much opportunity fbr dissent is left. There is ledge of or interest in rites of passage, or in events of this a double primacy if the act has been related to need and at type, in the individual's life. It is more customary to ex- thc same time has left its ineraclicable impress on future amine deviation from normal psychic behavior in terms of behavior. Sigmund Frcud's l'otetn und Toboo (1914) at- neurosis or psychosis. With as much attention as modern tempted to establish this double primacy. He posited the psychology gives to learning theory, it is surprisipg to find original patricide arising f,rom the sons' jealousy of their no evidence that careful examination has been made of the fnthcr because of his rnonopolization of the females. Subse- relation betwcerr critical periods in the life history and the ![uentl1r, thc act tvas colnmemorated by toternic rites whic]r learning process. included taboos to prevent its recurrence. The customs and ceremonies of primitive peoples have The psychoXogical intcrprctation of initiation ceremonies provided a rich source of data which psychoanalysis has at the timc o.{ pu}rerty gives support to the theory. Circum- consistently cxploitcd to serve its own ends. Thus, although cision or o[]rer acts of violencc irnposetl upon the initiates psychoanalytic literature does not reveal any evidence of an arc interpr:eted as punishment inflictecl by father figures to interest in rites ofpassage per se, considerable attention has givc rneaning [o tlie threat, of casrration if the sons continue bccn devoted to the initiation ceremonies equated with in thcir sexual desire for the mothers. The rite is interpretcd puberty. This intcrcst, however, is not in the internal struc- as a r:einforoement of the incest taboo. ture or functions ofrites ofpassage but in such data bearing A rcceitr rr:-examination of rhe theory antl data by Bruno upon psychoanalytic theory as they provide. One can agree Ilcttelheirn (Synrbolic Waunds,1954) led him to a modifierl b ,-. xiv INTRODUCTION RITES OF PASSAGE mediaries. Although such rites focused on the individual' formulation. Although he continues to accept the primal they were also occasions for group participation-as in the castration Anxiety, hc adds to this ern envy of the opposite initiation ceremonies of the Australian, or burial or marriage sex, and a dcsire to acquire iLs sexual attributes. Initiation rites in an agrarian community. There is no eviden'ce thaL a ceremonies should then bc explainecl, he believes, as rites secularized urban world has lessened the need for ritualized which minirnizc scxual envy and castration anxiety based expression of an individual's transition from one status to upon ":r conflicI bct.rveen man's irrstinctual desires and the or,oth".. Obviously, ceremonialism alone cannot establish rolc he wishcs to play in society onvhich society expects him the new equilibrium, and perfunctory ritual may be pleasant to fulfill." The ritcs aro efforts to free oneself of these but also meaningless. One of our problems is that we are anxieties. lacking the empirical studies of ritual behavior and its Although anthropologists rcject that part of Freud's for life-cycle crises upon which we might thcorctical formulations which attempt to explain thc a"ossrers"sq -thr"er "reesla tion betrveen crisis and ritual in its current origin of tote mic religion ancl initiation ritcs as based upon setting. an original patricide, solnc of them sholv influences of This deficiency is related to another. The scientific in- psycltotrn:rly tic theory. terest in religion of a half-century ago seems to have Psychoaualyt.ic literaturo contains rnany refercnces to dwindled among anthropologists, although a fe'rv sociologists individual lilb criscs, but othcr than the alre:rdy mentioned are now evincing an in.terest in its social aspects' Occasional theoretical spccul:rtions therc is practically nothing ahout essays on the sulijcct emerge in the literature of social the relation of thcsc to lites of passage. 'l'he atrrnost exctrusive ."i"o"", but the field has been left almost entirely to the conccntr:rtion u1t<ln tho incliviciual lnust, in large part, bc theologians. It would seem that the tirne has come when respousililc for tlris state of affairs. The recorded interviervs theories and techniques which have d.eveloped in the last with paticnts, ho'll'evcr, sltould contaitr a rich source for quarter-century might I-,e applied to this subject with re*'. charercteriziug thc problerrns of li{'e crises 'lr'hich face the *a.dirrg ."..rltr. Such studics would be concerned not wit[' urban-inrlustrial porsonality. religion per se but with the naturc and function of symbol. ism and it, relation to social and individual behavior. Rites IIf Thc puLlication of Rites o.f Pctssc'3e irr an English of passage would constitute one segment of the problem' cdi.tion has a liroadcr purpose than just. that of rnahing this flot riies of passage deserve attention within themselves. classic available to a larllcr audiencc. In itsclf this would The critical p.oble*s of becoming male and femalc, of rela- have jusrificd t-lrc cllort. Ilur {br thc' pro}rlons of thr-rse wbo tions within the family, and of passing into old age are ar'o concclnr:tl rvith indiviclrral, grotrp, antl symbolic behavior directly related to the devices which the society offers the thc conccpl.s containctl in this volume coulcl lie a slirirulation individuat to help him achieve the new adjustment' Some' of consideralllc imporranco. how we seem to have forgotten this-or p-g1haps the ritual Thc continuotl cxpartsion of an industrial-urb:rrr civiliza' has become so completely individualistic that it is now tion has proclucecl cx[cnsivc changes in our social system. found for many only in the privacy of the psychoanalyst's Prominent alnong thcse hal'c hccn increascd secularization couch. The evidence, however, does not bear out the sugges' and thc dccline in the irnportance of sacred ceremonialism. tion. It seems much more likely that one dimension of Rit.es of passagc wcrc often, but not neccssarily, tied to mental illness may arise because an increasing number of supernatrrral sanctions antl to the activity of priestly inter' b* xvii xvi IIITES OF PASSAGE INTROD UCTION individuals are lbrccd to accomplish their transitions alone IiEFERENCES CITED and with private symbols. Our basic problem may then be seen as that of the nature I}-r.trsox, Gnrconv, 1936. Naun Cambridge, England: University of individual crisis. If we define it thus and shift our em- Press. phasis frorn desci'iption of the idiosyncratic to the cultural Brrrrr,nBrn, BnuNo. L954. Syntbolic Woun'ds, Glencoe, Ill. : Free Press. and social regularities in relation to individual deviancy, we Cn,rprr,r, Er,ror: D,, and Cootv, Ca'nr,rrox S' 1942. Principles of Antlropology. New York: Henry Holt & Co. have the foundation on which many disciplines could co' I)ullors, Cona Ar,rcn. 1944. The People of Alor. Minneapolis: Univer- operate. 'Ihe theorist, thc researchcr, and the practitioner -sity of Minncsota tsrcss. from biology, psychology, anthropnlogy, and sociology have Dunr<ttntn, Elrrr,r. Tlrc Elenr,entury Fornts of the Religiouslfb. Glencoe' an opportunity to worh together on this problem. Ill.: Frce Press (French cd. 1912). Many persons have contributed in greater or lesser rnea- Iinruo, SrcrruND. 1950. Totent. antl Taboo. London: f{outledge & sure to the preparation of this translation. fn particular, I Kegan Paul (Gcnnan ed. 1914). I{orvnr,r.s, Y/rr-r,r.trrl \{/. 1948. Th,c Lleathens' Gardcn City, N.J.: wish to cxpress my deep appreciation to Monika Basch Doubleday. Vizedorn whose contribution has been rnuch more than that Kenstrx, Il.q.nnrr,. 1935. Th.e Origins o.f Religiotr.. London: Kegan of a translator. She has worked faithfully and patiently at a Paul, Trench, Tmbner, & Co. task that prescnted more than ordinary dilficulties. I also Lowrn, RoeEnr H. 1924. Primitir;e RcliSiort. New York: Boni & wish to thank Mrs. Geraldine L. Caffee for her interest and Liveriglrt. trelp in the initial phases of the translation. Our joint thanks Muo, Mrnc,rnnt. L930, Grouing Up in. New Cuinea. New York: Blue Ribbon Books. are due to those whosc secretarial skills were so necessary. These include Mrs. Hclen D. Zolot, Miss Och-soou I(im, Englantl: University Press. Miss Sylvia l(nopp, and Mrs. Marnesba Hill. Finally, I wish R,totx, Paur,. 1937. Pri.mitiae Religiort.. New York: Yiking Press. to thank thc Columbia Universi[y Council on Research in Scrtntror, Wrr,nnr,rt. 793L. The Origin and Grouth of Religion, London: the Social Sciences for a grant to defray expenses encoun' Methucn, Tozzan, Ar,rnrn IL 1925. Social Origins a,n,d Social Contirr.uities. New tered in verifying and chccking bibliographical references, Yorl<: Macmillan Co. and Teachers College, Columbia University, for funds which v,rx Gexxor', Anxor,n. '1906. Mvtl:,; et l4geniles il'Australi.e. Paris: helped to meet the expenses of typing the final manuscript. Il. Guilmote. Our gratcful thanks, as well as those of the University of VAnNrn, W. Lr-ovo. L937. A Bl.olk Ciailization,. New York: Harper & Chicago Press, Bo to those experts who have helped us Ilro. solve problems of terminology and translitcration in their Wtuts, Wrr-soN D. 1939. Religion, in. Primi.tiue Society. New York; Ir. S. Crofts & Co. respective fields. They are Charles Callender, Arthur Cappell, M. B. Emencau, George \(I. Grace, Leopo]d H. Haimson, Marshall G. S. I{odgson, Bert P. Hoselitz, John Lotz, Father Frank Lynch, Edwin McClellan, Norman A. Mc- Quarn, J. A. B. van Buitenen, William E. Welmers, June Warh, I)ean S. Worth. Sor,ox T. Krunar,r xwiii xrx TRANSLATOR'S NOTE Arnold van Gennep published Les rites de passage in 1908. In his introduction Dr. Kimball has, on the one hand, placed this work within the context of its time and, on the other, pointed to its relevance for many areas of con- temporary thought. This relevance is especially striking, for, though \ye may question one or another of van Gennep,s statements or ideas, they only serve to remind us how much has happened since his time in the fields for which his thinking is most germane. The translator's task has been to act as a bridge, not only between languages and the cultures they express but also betvreen two eras in related cultures with their own characteristics of thought and speech. This taslc has mani- fested itself in two ways: first, in the matter of vocabulary van Gennep wrote without the benefit of much of our -for current social science jargon. The reader will therefore think of relevant terms which the translator has not used because they represent conceptual tools not available to van Gennep, and because it seems unfair to his v,ork that its meaning should be limited to one of a number of contemporary frames of reference. The second. phase in bridging the gap between van Gen- uep's time and ours has been rnore difficult to carry out, for it involved checking the author's ethnographic sources. Many of them have remained standard to the present, but it has not been possible to locate all sources. Where com- plete bibliographical information could not be found, the author's notes have been left in their original form. The usage in names of some primitive groups has changed since the book was written, and every effort has been made to substitute current terms wherever necessary. fn the few instances where d.ata used by van Gennep seemed to call for clarification, the translator has appended notes (in brackets) at the bottom of the page.