ALSO BY JONATHAN HAIDT The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom Copyright © 2012 by Jonathan Haidt All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York, and in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto. Pantheon Books and colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Haidt, Jonathan. The righteous mind : why good people are divided by politics and religion / Jonathan Haidt. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. eISBN: 978-0-307-90703-5 1. Ethics. 2. Social psychology. 3. Political psychology. 4. Psychology, Religious. I. Title. BJ45.H25 2012 201′.615—dc23 2011032036 www.pantheonbooks.com www.righteousmind.com Jacket design by Sagmeister Inc. v3.1 In memory of my father, Harold Haidt I have striven not to laugh at human actions, not to weep at them, not to hate them, but to understand them. —Baruch Spinoza, Tractatus Politicus, 1676 Contents Cover Other Books by This Author Title Page Copyright Dedication Epigraph Introduction Intuitions Come First, Strategic Reasoning Second PART I 1 Where Does Morality Come From? 2 The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail 3 Elephants Rule 4 Vote for Me (Here’s Why) There’s More to Morality than Harm and Fairness PART II 5 Beyond WEIRD Morality 6 Taste Buds of the Righteous Mind 7 The Moral Foundations of Politics 8 The Conservative Advantage Morality Binds and Blinds PART III 9 Why Are We So Groupish? 10 The Hive Switch 11 Religion Is a Team Sport 12 Can’t We All Disagree More Constructively? Conclusion Acknowledgments Notes References Illustration Credits Introduction “Can we all get along?” That appeal was made famous on May 1, 1992, by Rodney King, a black man who had been beaten nearly to death by four Los Angeles police officers a year earlier. The entire nation had seen a videotape of the beating, so when a jury failed to convict the officers, their acquittal triggered widespread outrage and six days of rioting in Los Angeles. Fifty-three people were killed and more than seven thousand buildings were torched. Much of the mayhem was carried live; news cameras tracked the action from helicopters circling overhead. After a particularly horrific act of violence against a white truck driver, King was moved to make his appeal for peace. King’s appeal is now so overused that it has become cultural kitsch, a catchphrase1 more often said for laughs than as a serious plea for mutual understanding. I therefore hesitated to use King’s words as the opening line of this book, but I decided to go ahead, for two reasons. The first is because most Americans nowadays are asking King’s question not about race relations but about political relations and the collapse of cooperation across party lines. Many Americans feel as though the nightly news from Washington is being sent to us from helicopters circling over the city, delivering dispatches from the war zone. The second reason I decided to open this book with an overused phrase is because King followed it up with something lovely, something rarely quoted. As he stumbled through his television interview, fighting back tears and often repeating himself, he found these words: “Please, we can get along here. We all can get along. I mean, we’re all stuck here for a while. Let’s try to work it out.” This book is about why it’s so hard for us to get along. We are indeed all stuck here for a while, so let’s at least do what we can to understand why we are so easily divided into hostile groups, each one certain of its righteousness. People who devote their lives to studying something often come to believe that the object of their fascination is the key to understanding everything. Books have been published in recent years on the transformative role in human history played by cooking, mothering, war … even salt. This is one of those books. I study moral psychology, and I’m going to make the case that morality is the extraordinary human capacity that made civilization possible. I don’t mean to imply that cooking, mothering, war, and salt were not also necessary, but in this book I’m going to take you on a tour of human nature and history from the perspective of moral psychology. By the end of the tour, I hope to have given you a new way to think about two of the most important, vexing, and divisive topics in human life: politics and religion. Etiquette books tell us not to discuss these topics in polite company, but I say go ahead. Politics and religion are both expressions of our underlying moral psychology, and an understanding of that psychology can help to bring people together. My goal in this book is to drain some of the heat, anger, and divisiveness out of these topics and replace them with awe, wonder, and curiosity. We are downright lucky that we evolved this complex moral psychology that allowed our species to burst out of the forests and savannas and into the delights, comforts, and extraordinary peacefulness of modern societies in just a few thousand years.2 My hope is that this book will make conversations about morality, politics, and religion more common, more civil, and more fun, even in mixed company. My hope is that it will help us to get along. BORN TO BE RIGHTEOUS I could have titled this book The Moral Mind to convey the sense that the human mind is designed to “do” morality, just as it’s designed to do language, sexuality, music, and many other things described in popular books reporting the latest scientific findings. But I chose the