1 Table of Contents I. 9/11: Money Laundering Operation by an International Organized Crime Syndicate Coincidence or Conspiracy? - 4 I. Origin of the False Flag - 8 II. A Silent Coup – 51 III. The Food Chain - 77 IV. Access - 116 V. Extraordinary Events - 146 VI. The Coincidence Theory - 231 II. Supernatural Authorship and Historicity of the Bible - 245 I. Ontological Arguments for the Existence of God - 246 II. Historicity and Accuracy of the New Testament - 257 III. Historical Arguments for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ - 265 IV. Independent Attestation - 268 V. Archeological Confirmation of the Old Testament Narrative - 278 VI. Fulfilled Prophecy - 299 VII. Bible Codes Contain Proof of Supernatural Authorship - 338 VIII. Divine Inspiration - 351 IX. Giati Apologia? - 358 III. So, You Gave Up Your Rights, Freedoms, and Bodily Autonomy for a Virus with a 1% Mortality Rate - 364 IV. This Calls for Wisdom: Examining the Gene Therapy Injection, the Mark of the Beast, and the Eschatology Surrounding Them - 380 V. The Synagogue of Satan - 408 VI. Why? A Conspiracy Theory - 420 VII. Conclusion - 426 © 2022 The Two Witnesses All Rights Reserved 2 Foreword Within the field of epistemology, or the study of knowledge, the best way to rationalize a belief is to find supportive evidence for it, using facts that are corroborative, verifiable, and widely considered to be mainstream. In pursuit of that effort, this writing provides 785 sources, through which we can attempt to discern a truthful and sufficiently explanatory worldview. In order to show that the conclusions drawn throughout this text are not the more rational worldview, one would have to tear down, or discredit, at least a majority of these sources, and then erect in its place a more sufficiently plausible or explanatory worldview. Unfortunately, anyone wishing to do so would have their work cut out for them, as the vast majority of these 785 sources are mainstream, authoritative, and easily verifiable by the public. The current mainstream view, accepted by the vast majority of people alive today, is the Coincidence theory, as told by the government and media. However, as we will see, this worldview suffers from irreconcilable conflictions, unexplained anomalies, staggeringly high probabilistic odds against it, and literal physical impossibility. Provided is a graph demonstrating the type of sources used. We find a stark dichotomy, in which sources that are considered reliable and mainstream far outnumber what could be called more easily dismissed sources, which are shown in the graph as documentary through non-mainstream sources. The sources used here from mainstream news through government sites are the official narrative, and they constitute the predominate evidence used in this book to elucidate and define these dueling, logically necessary, and mutually exclusive narratives. 3 “Mainstream News” refers here to any unquestionably, widely considered “official” news sites, such as the New York Times, Washington Post, and other reputable sources and outlets that exclusively publish news, such as the Guardian, Forbes and Haaretz. “Organization or company” consists of the official websites of any groups or companies, such as the US Naval Institute, Foreign Policy Institute, IMF, or the website of any private company or group, such as the Gelitin art group’s website. “Published book” refers to any book available through a publisher in print, while “published study” refers only to peer- reviewed studies published in academic journals. “Encyclopedic or educational site” refers to a site that solely provides information in an unbiased manner, such as Britannica, the World History Encyclopedia, or otherwise any source with an educational domain, and “government site” refers exclusively to a .gov or other government owned domain. When YouTube is used, it is because the source is only comprehensible in video format, primarily as supplementary evidence, and Wikipedia is likewise used as supplementary or non-critical supportive evidence only eight times. What could be called “non- mainstream sources” comprise 46 out of 785 sources. These are websites that present information from a more personal view, as opposed to information that has been accredited through an organization, and this category includes any primarily Conspiracy or theologically Biblical worldviews. However, it is fallacious to reason that simply because a source is considered non-mainstream, or is in the form of a personal article or testimony, the source can be a priori dismissed as untrue or unreliable. Sources used in this manner primarily present simple corroborating evidence that can be verified or falsified independently, while intellectual integrity demands that each source must be individually analyzed and have its credibility ascertained on a case-by-case basis. Every source linked in this writing was active and quoted accurately at the time of publication. The best way to expose a liar is to cross-examine their lies, and fortunately, thanks to the vast amount of documentation and data available in the modern world, we can do precisely that – examine with a close lens what we are told over time by the government and media. Through this examination, the first two sections of this writing will demonstrate two major worldviews that present massive implications for the modern day; namely that: 1.) 9/11 is either a massive Coincidence, or a Conspiracy. This is not a false dichotomy; rather the evidence conclusively demonstrates the untenability of a Coincidence on this scale, and, 2.) The Bible is demonstrably supernaturally authored, and thus provides a solid ontological foundation from which to build a worldview upon. 4 Section 1 9/11: Money Laundering Operation by an International Organized Crime Syndicate Coincidence or Conspiracy? “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003 The 20th century represented the greatest transfer of wealth in history, enacted primarily in the form of wars, genocides, and state-sponsored looting and terror campaigns, through which the elite gained unprecedented levels of wealth while the common people suffered. These horrific events culminated on 9/11, a day that is impossible to understand outside of its proper context as a complex and sophisticated money laundering scheme, perpetrated by an international organized crime syndicate. The 9/11 event was, primarily, a means to launder money obtained through government-sponsored criminal acts and war crimes, as well as a way to destroy the evidence of these crimes - a precise and targeted attack meant to destroy critical evidence relating to ongoing investigations. Geopolitical maneuvers such as the looting, destruction and conquest of the Middle East, along with greater control of the American public through invasive and unprecedented security measures such as the Patriot Act, can be seen as congruent, but secondary motivations for the events of the day. These tangible benefits to the group of people we will examine are real; however, the evidence allows only two distinct worldviews through which to view them. When we examine the historical record and the forensic evidence of 9/11, we find a staggering amount of highly unlikely events that had to line up exactly right on that day for the events to unfold as they did. In this writing, this widely accepted mainstream viewpoint will be termed the Coincidence theory of the event - the view that 9/11 was, essentially, just a string of incredibly bad luck, incompetence, and strange coincidences that need no further explanation. On the contrary, the Conspiracy view of 9/11 will also be examined, demonstrating the plausibility of a minutely orchestrated, highly-detailed plot conducted from within the highest levels of government. At the turn of the 20th century, the world had high hopes. Europe contained beautiful cities with centuries-old architecture, while America’s cities were generally clean, safe and prosperous. Natural ecosystems were flourishing, and people respected and served their communities with pride and trust in their fellow citizens. After World War II, many of these same cities were reduced to rubble - never again to live up to their previous glory, with hundreds of millions of the strongest young people killed; and countless millions more killed in organized genocide and terror campaigns. Furthermore, vast numbers of 5 people living today have lost faith and hope in our political and economic systems, with trust in the Government remaining steadily at “record lows”.1 What would the people alive at the turn of the 20th century think of the world today? We now inhabit a world where private land ownership is nearly extinct, most people have no savings, and living massively in debt is the norm. Bankruptcy, suicide, and homelessness are seemingly indelible facets of life in the modern world, while natural orders such as the insect ecosystems and rainforests collapse and disappear in front of our very eyes. Through our silence and failure to hold the elite accountable, or to make them pay their fair share, we have created a world where, according to Oxfam, 8 men now own as much wealth as the other half of the world’s population.2 They write, “Eight men own the same wealth as the 3.6 billion people who make up the poorest half of humanity, according to a new report published by Oxfam today to mark the annual meeting of political and business leaders in Davos.” This handful of people watch some 10,000 children die of starvation every day,3 while their families and a few sycophants cavort in garish castles, possessing more wealth than they could ever spend in a lifetime. The Rothchild’s Surrealist Ball, described as follows: “If your family has the largest private fortune in history, the least you can do is hold a party at the most lavish chateau in France with costumes designed by Salvador Dalí, Audrey Hepburn in a birdcage hat and an interactive maze filled with butlers pretending to be cats.”4 1 https://news.gallup.com/poll/355124/americans-trust-government-remains-low.aspx 2 https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/just-8-men-own-same-wealth-half-world 3 https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/losing-25000-hunger-every-day 4 https://therake.com/stories/icons/party-animals-the-rothschild-surrealist-ball/ 6 To reason that this tiny number of people, who now control wealth equivalent to entire continents, aren’t working together, or conspiring, to make themselves richer and more powerful is simply absurd, as well as incredibly naïve. This behind-the-scenes wealth and power has had a profound effect on the world. As stated by former Congressman Lawrence McDonald, “Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”5 Congressman McDonald died at age 48 when his plane was Coincidentally shot down in 1983.6 The strategic mode of operation for this organized crime group is deception, in which they disguise themselves within a civilization in order to take it over from the inside, while remaining hidden and largely preserving the structure of society. It is a logical and successful strategy, the same as postulated in the Art of War by Sun Tzu:7 In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good…Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting. The key events of the 20th century can, in retrospect, be seen to be tied together behind the scenes by a common thread: compromised and controlled governments, official deception, planned wars, and state-sponsored terror, all used to facilitate a tremendous criminal act of looting. Ultimately, this hostile takeover bankrupted the world through real-wealth robbery and malicious banking schemes, utilizing the illicit proceeds to fund a sinister agenda of control. At the end of the 20th century, the enormous, unprecedented, and illegal consolidation of wealth produced by decades of financial and ethical improprieties, conducted by a group of rogue government agents and the powerful banking families of the world, was at risk of being exposed. Thus, a decisive and destructive coup had to be performed, in which the evidence of these criminal acts would be conclusively destroyed and the motivations of the government would be beyond question. 5 Gary Allen, The Rockefeller File, 1976, 0892450010, 9780892450015, foreword to book 6 https://www.nytimes.com/1983/09/02/obituaries/rep-lp-mcdonald-of-georgia-among-the-americans-lost-on- jet.html 7 http://changingminds.org/disciplines/warfare/art_war/sun_tzu_3-1.htm 7 Through the historical record, we will determine how a rogue faction within the U.S. Government was able to perform a silent coup, and hijack control of government institutions and geopolitical policy in order to place an economic and military stranglehold on the world. The false dichotomy of a monolithic two-party system, a strategy of tension and terror on their own citizens, and a sophisticated method of blackmail and control beget a conspiracy almost too vast in nature to question, and certainly, one “too big to fail” for its members. This Conspiracy is evidenced in the form of a significant pattern of false-flags, official deception, and horrifically violent acts of terror committed on citizens by their own governments. Coincidence or Conspiracy are the only two ways in which we can view 9/11 – either an incredible number of extraordinary circumstances did align exactly right on that day in order for the events to happen according to the official narrative, or it was a minutely orchestrated, highly-detailed plot conducted from within the highest levels of government, formulated with specific purposes and intentions. Beyond these dueling, logically necessary, and mutually exclusive theories, there exists no sufficiently explanatory or intellectually cogent explanation for the events. Therefore, the plausibility of the 9/11 Conspiracy theory can be demonstrated using primary sources, data from mainstream news, government archives, eyewitness testimonies, and known facts that are publicly verifiable, through which the absolute impossibility of the Coincidence theory becomes unequivocally clear. I looked and saw how much people were suffering on this earth. I saw the tears of those who are suffering. They don’t have anyone to comfort them. Power is on the side of those who treat them badly. Ecclesiastes 4: 1 8 Chapter 1: Origin of the False Flag According to Cambridge Dictionary, false flag can be defined as, “a political or military action that is made to appear to have been carried out by a group that is not actually responsible.” We also find a definition relating to naval warfare, “a flag flown on a ship to hide which country it comes from or which side it is fighting for.”8 Thus, the term false-flag originates from naval warfare, and, furthermore, often involved privateers, mercenaries, and pirates. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, “many commentators trace the use of ‘false flags’ to pirates, who would fly the flag of a target ship until they got close enough to attack, at which time they would raise the skull and crossbones, too late for the target ship to escape.”9 Additionally, we find documentation that the earliest use of false flags can be traced to naval warfare and privateers in several books, including Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812, which reads, “American privateers like Frolic and Saratoga slyly flew false flags and pretended to be British to trick the captains… False flags flew on both sides.”10 In the book, Espionage and Secrecy: The Official Secrets Acts 1911-1989 of the United Kingdom, we read, "the use of a false flag has always been accepted as a legitimate ruse de guerre in naval warfare, the true battle flag being run up immediately before engaging."11 Additionally, in Modern Aspects of The Laws of Naval Warfare and Maritime Neutrality, we read, “Undertaken by the International Law Association in 1920, it was stipulated unconditionally: ‘a merchant vessel, whether belligerent of neutral, shall not, under any circumstances, fly a false flag or wear false colours.’”12 Numerous historical examples of false flag events can be found, such as the Mukden incident, in which Japan staged a bombing of a railway in order to invade Nanking,13 and the infamous Reichstag fire in Germany, which was falsely blamed on a communist dissident, but in reality was committed by the Nazi party itself.14 These are two among many powerful and compelling examples of false flag operations in recent history, demonstrating that this is a successful and underappreciated method of political control. Many lists can be found online of documented false flag events, such as this website presenting 42 historically confirmed false flag events.15 With this review, and the maritime, or nautical, etymology of the term false flag in mind, let’s briefly examine an often-overlooked historical event that helped set the catastrophic events of the 20th century in motion - the sinking of the Lusitania. 8 https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/false-flag 9 https://www.cjr.org/language_corner/false-flags.php 10 Kert, Faye, 2015, Privateering: Patriots and Profits in the War of 1812, 1421417472, 9781421417479, p. 62 11 Thomas, Rosamund M., ed. (1993), Teaching Ethics: Government ethics, Centre for Business and Public, p. 80, ISBN 9781871891034 12 Politaki, George, 2007, The Laws of Naval Warfare and Maritime, ISBN 0710305893, 9780710305893 13 https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2020459/china-marks-false-flag-attack- triggered-japanese 14 https://www.history.co.uk/article/the-truth-about-false-flags-from-nazi-germany-to-the-vietnam-war 15 https://washingtonsblog.com/42-admitted-false-flag-attacks/ 9 Lusitania The sinking of the Lusitania was, in large part, responsible for drawing an unwilling and isolationist American population into World War I. When the event is examined more closely, we find evidence suggesting official foreknowledge, criminal acts, and improprieties regarding the investigation, as well as revelations of dishonesty from the highest levels of government unveiled decades after the event. We will begin with an article from the History Collection:16 The Defense of the Realm Act was changed just before the hearings began, making it illegal to discuss whatever cargo Lusitania had been carrying at the time of the attack. The head of the investigation, Lord Mersey, resigned when the case was closed and refused to be paid for his work, calling the investigation, “a damned dirty business” The truth was the ship was indeed carrying munitions, beyond what was listed on Lusitania’s released manifest, and the government lied to cover it up for a century…Subsequent British governments maintained the deception in order to save face and to avoid the possibility of lawsuits by survivors and the descendants of those killed in the sinking. For many years, during World War I and in the interwar period, the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force bombed the wreck, and bombarded it with depth charges, leaving the after portion of the hull riddled with holes, and creating damage which concealed the true nature of that caused by the torpedoing in 1915. According to the manifest, 148 tubs of butter were being carried in the hold near the point where the torpedo struck, and where the secondary explosion occurred. The butter wasn’t provided by Borden, or by any other American dairy. It was provided by Remington Arms, which also shipped the small arms ammunition at the same time…Remington shipped the “butter” (unrefrigerated) on behalf of its parent, E. I. duPont de Nemours, which was not in the business of making and shipping butter. But they did manufacture guncotton, which when exposed to seawater becomes extremely volatile. Guncotton still present in the wreck explains why in 1982 the British government warned salvage divers the ship could “literally blow up on us”. 16 https://historycollection.com/how-the-sinking-of-rms-lusitania-changed-world-war-i/13/