THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH MEDIAEVAL CONTINUATION VOLUME 7 THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH MEDIAEVAL CONTINUATION EDITORIAL BOARD GregoryF. LaNave The Catholic University of America Press Editorial Director Peter Casarella Steven Marrone The Catholic University of America Tufts University John Cavadini Barbara Newman The University of NotreDame Northwestern University Frank A. C. Mantello Jan Ziolkowski The Catholic University of America Harvard University David J. McGonagle Director The Catholic University of America Press Carole C. Burnett Staff Editor PETER DAMIAN LETTERS 151–180 Translated by †OWEN J. BLUM, O.F.M. Quincy University, Quincy, Illinois and IRVEN M. RESNICK University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, Tennessee THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2005 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standards for Information Science—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansiz39.48- 1984. library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Peter Damian, Saint, 1007–1072. [The letters of Peter Damian. (The Fathers of the Church, mediaeval continuation ; vv. 1–3, 5–7) Translation of the Latin letters of Peter Damian. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Contents: [1] 1–30—[2] 31–60—[3] 61–90—[5] 91–120—[6] 121–150—[7] 151–180. 1. Peter Damian, Saint, 1007–1072—Correspondence. 2. Christian saints—Italy—Correspondence. I. Blum, Owen J., 1912–1998. II. Series: Fathers of the Church, mediaeval continuation ; v. 1, etc. bx4700.p77a4 1998 270.3 88-25802 isbn0-8132-0702-9(v. 1) isbn0-8132-0707-x(v. 2) isbn0-8132-0750-9(v. 3) isbn0-8132-0816-5(v. 5) isbn0-8132-1372-x(v. 6) isbn-13: 978-0-8132-1425-2(v. 7) isbn-10: 0-8132-1425-4(v. 7) CONTENTS Introduction, by Irven M. Resnick vii Abbreviations xi Select Bibliography xiii Concordance xix LETTER 151 3 LETTER 152 7 LETTER 153 15 LETTER 154 72 LETTER 155 76 LETTER 156 79 LETTER 157 84 LETTER 158 88 LETTER 159 94 LETTER 160 103 LETTER 161 131 LETTER 162 142 LETTER 163 159 LETTER 164 162 LETTER 165 170 LETTER 166 228 LETTER 167 233 LETTER 168 236 LETTER 169 244 LETTER 170 247 LETTER 171 253 LETTER 172 255 vi CONTENTS LETTER 173 264 LETTER 174 267 LETTER 175 277 LETTER 176 279 LETTER 177 286 LETTER 178 289 LETTER 179 290 LETTER 180 295 Indices Index of Proper Names 301 Index of Sacred Scripture 305 INTRODUCTION by Irven M. Resnick This volume concludes the series of Peter Damian’s Lettersin English translation. Letters151–170were written between 1067 and 1070, in the years before Damian’s death on February 22, 1072. Letters 171–180 are not datable. Several of the Letters in this volume are fragmentary or reconstructed from fragments (Letters163, 173, and 175) found in the Collectaneaof Damian’s disciple, John of Lodi. Letter178was discovered in an eleventh- century manuscript and first printed in the twentieth century. Among these Letters are some of Damian’s most passionate calls to promote the ideals of the eremitic life, wherein he indi- cates his understanding of the proper relationship between cenobites and hermits. These include Letter 152, in which Damian defends as consistent with the spirit and the letter of Benedict’s Rule his practice of receiving monks into the eremitic life who had abandoned their cenobitic communities. Another defense of the ideals of the hermitage is found in Let- ter 153 (previously opusculum 13 and subtitled “On the Perfec- tion of Monks”1), which is a lengthy exhortation to the monks of Pomposa to struggle to achieve religious perfection. Pomposa was a venerable and ancient monastic community that Damian knew well. As a young man, not long after he had entered the hermitage of Fonte Avellana, Damian had been sent to Pomposa by his prior to instruct the monks there. He was impressed by the Benedictine community’s effort to com- bine cenobitic practices and eremitic ideals. It was a communi- ty with an enviable library, and it was there that Damian com- posed his first literary work, entitled Against the Jews(Letter1) in 1. De perfectione monachorum. vii viii INTRODUCTION 1040–41.2In Letter153, written approximately twenty-five years after his first visit, Damian laments a general decline in reli- gious fervor. From this general complaint, he passes to a discus- sion of the requirements of monastic life, and a description of its offices. He also encourages his fellow monks at Pomposa (and elsewhere, since Damian knew his letters circulated among a larger audience) to pass beyond the minimum stan- dards established in the Ruleof St. Benedict, to the higher and more demanding vocation of the eremitic life. The standards of the eremitic life demanded a rigorous penitential discipline focused on prayer, solitude, fasting, and self-flagellation, which Damian often recommends to monks as well. The cenobitic monastery, he remarks, was established by Saint Benedict as a sort of primary school for learning obedience to the Rule; but, claims Damian, Benedict always viewed the hermitage as the culmination of the monks’ struggles and aspirations. The “gen- tler” regimen in cenobitic houses Damian viewed as an accom- modation to human infirmity, but one that hermits regularly surpassed. Despite the instruction Damian himself had offered to the monks at Pomposa a quarter-century earlier, in this letter he reproves those monks who devote themselves more to the study of the works of the Latin grammarians and to secular lit- erature than to the Rule of Benedict, their spiritual guide. In- stead, he urges the monks to shed tears of compunction, which represent the first step of spiritual renewal. And, finally, Dami- an outlines the duties of the monastic officers—the abbot, pri- or, lector, cellarer, and others—and elaborates upon the prop- er training of novices. Damian develops some of the same themes in his Letter 161 (previously opusculum43, subtitled “In Praise of Flagellation”3), addressed to Abbot Desiderius of Monte Cassino. Monte Cassi- no, the venerable and ancient font from which Benedictine spirituality flowed, was another community Damian visited of- ten and knew well. He was on especially friendly terms with its abbot, Desiderius, who later was named Pope Victor III (d. 2. Antilogus contra Judaeos(FOTC, MC 1.37–83). 3. De laude flagellorum et ut loquuntur disciplinae. INTRODUCTION ix 1087). Despite (or perhaps because of) their friendship, in Let- ter 161 he chastises the community for having abandoned the practice of public flagellation on Fridays, which it had em- ployed previously. Damian describes this scourging as a salutary practice that renders the monk a more perfect image of Christ himself. If they will not share his suffering, Damian wonders, how will they share his glory? Also well known is Letter165(previously opusculum12, subti- tled “On Contempt of the World”4). This letter is addressed to a hermit, Albizo, and to a monk, Peter. Written in August 1069, after Damian’s participation in two Roman synods at which his best efforts seem to have been frustrated, the letter laments the deplorable condition of this world, which seems to be rushing toward its destruction and end. Monks who had vowed to re- nounce the world, he complains, have reneged on their prom- ises and involve themselves in worldly affairs. He enumerates their many sins and judges that as the integrity of the monastic profession has weakened, so too has the world fallen even deeper into an abyss of sin and corruption. Carried away by his denunciation of these false monks, who ought to have served the Church as a model of religious perfection, he paints a pic- ture of unrelenting worldly corruption that must be a prelude to final disintegration. The Roman synods mentioned above were called during the pontificate of Alexander II. Although Alexander had previously allowed Damian to be relieved of his responsibilities as Cardi- nal-bishop of Ostia in order to return to a life of contemplation at Fonte Avellana, Damian had continued to serve the Holy See as a papal legate when called upon. He was also a very influen- tial figure in the Church, whom Alexander himself praised as “the eye and immovable support of the Holy See.”5 Roman in- trigues and money’s influence on ecclesiastical politics, howev- er, left him yearning all the more for the solitude of his her- mitage. In Letter165he urges his recipients not to abandon the 4. De contemptu saeculi. 5. “Petrum videlicet Damianum, Ostiensem Episcopum: qui nimirum et nos- ter est oculus et apostolicae sedis immobile firmamentum.” Diploma Alexandri II, de legatione S. Petri Damiani in Gallias(PL 145.857B).