FLORIDA VOLUME LXXVI, NO. 1, JANUARY 2002 BARJOLRNAL ADVANCING THE COMPETENCE AND PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY OF LAWYERS Paranoia can be a very healthy thing. With LexisNexis”’ Shepard's®, validation is more than determining whether a case is good or bad law. A wary attorney wants the full spectrum of analysis. And to be assured that it really is good law, you need a true positive indicator. Any properly fearful lawyer will tell you that a mere absence of negatives doesn’t necessarily give you the complete picture. You’ll want to see splits of authority and splits of jurisdiction. With analyses done by dedicated legal experts. Let your worst hunches run wild and see what the experts come up with. Only Shepard's offers so many ways to be really sure about your case. Because when you get to the settlement table or the courtroom, all that paranoia really pays off. LexisNexis" It’s how you know” If you haven’t visited us lately, come see how we’ve changed. Shepardize® @ wwwAexisnexis.com LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks, and Shepard's and Shepardize are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under AL4026 license. It's How You Know is a trademark of LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. © 2001 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. IS JANUARY 2002 VOLUME LXXVI, NO. 1 BARJOLRNAL Features 650 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida Case of the Year: Strasser v. Yalamanchi 32399-2300 by Michael Cavendish (850)561-5600 Florida Homestead: A Difficult Post-mortem Estate www.FLABAR.org Tax Planning Property www.flcourts.org by Mary A. Robison and Michael W. Fisher The Sandoval Decision and Its Implications for Publisher Future Civil Rights Enforcement John F. Harkness, Jr. byAdele P. Kimmel, Rebecca Epstein, and James L. Ferraro Editor A Primer on Motions to Withdraw and Attorney Liens Cheryle M. Dodd by Beth Gilmore Reineke cdodd@f\abar. org Associate Editor Laura L. Johnson ljohnson@flabar. org Assistant Editor Amy K. Brown Columns Advertising Director Cassandra D. Conrad Account Executive Letters 4 Randy Traynor “As I See It”: A Frequently Asked Question 8 by Terry Russell Sales Associate Julie M.Tanner The Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs for the 36 Unsuccessful Offer of a Will for Probate Circulation by Douglas A. Wallace Marie D. Bryant The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 41 Published monthly except July/August, Act of 2001: Estate, Gift and Generation-skipping which is a combined issue, by The Florida Transfer Tax Law Changes Bar, 650 Apalachee Parkway, Tallahassee by David Pratt and Elaine M. Bucher 32399-2300, telephone (850) 561-5600. Pe¬ Time Limitations and Court Supervision in Class Actions 47 riodicals postage paid at the Post Office in Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300 and at Under the FLSA and the ADEA additional nnailing offices. The Florida Bar by Donald J. Spero Journal, ISSN 0015-3915, Pub. No. 200-960. Grandparents Have Rights After All 53 Subscriptions: Florida Bar members re¬ by Carolyn S. Zisser ceive the Journal as part of their annual dues payment. Nonmember subscriptions Sovereignty Lands in Florida: It’s All About Navigability, Part I 58 are $50 a year; single magazine copies, by Daniel W. Peyton $5; September directory issue $40 ($30 to Bar members). Single copy sales subject The Michelle Project: YLS of Palm Beach County Bar 65 to Florida sales tax. Association Donates New Computers to Children in Foster Care Advertising copy is reviewed, but pub¬ lication herein does not imply endorse¬ Books 66 ment of any product, service or opinion advertised. Advertising rate cards will be furnished upon request. Views and con¬ clusions expressed in articles herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the editorial staff, officials or Board of Governors of The Florida Bar. Rates avail¬ able by calling (850) 561-5601. ^2002 The Florida Bar. Printed in U.S.A. POSTMASTER: Send change of ad¬ dress to The Florida Bar, Membership Records, 650 Apalachee Parkway, Talla¬ hassee, Florida 32399-2300. Cover photo of Crescent Beach by Lyndall M. Lambert, Miami 2 THE FLORIDA BAR JOURNAL/JANUARY 2002 LexisNexis™ Litigation Content... - It’s how you know. Find the Litigation Content you need in easy-to-use print, CD or online formats... ...so you can move on. Rich Litigation resources^ including: Q Exclusive — Moore's Federal Practice^ Q Exclusive — Weinstein's Federal Evidence’^ O Exclusive — Mealey's Litigation Reports and Newsletters Q Exclusive — LexisNexis Company Analyzer Q Exclusive — Bender's Federal Practice Forms D Exclusive — Modern Federal Jury Instructions O Exclusive — United States Code Service D Exclusive — Shepard's^' Citations Service D Exclusive — LexisNexis Federal Procedure & Evidence Page O Public Records, Expert Directories, and Verdict and Settlement Reports TM LexisNexis' It’s how you know™ Learn more about our Litigi^tion Content @ www.lexisnexis.com LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks and Shepard's is a registered trademark ot Reed Elsevier Propt^rties Inc used under license. It's How You Know is a trademark ot LexisNexis, a division ot Reed Elsevier Inc. Moore's Federal Practice and Weinstein's Federal Evidence are registered trademarks ot Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. Other prcxiucts and services may be trademarks or registered trademarks ot their respective companies. •-« © 2001 LexisNexis, a division ot Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. AL4056 Letters Exculpatory Clauses the rule, however, it seems unfair President Defeat Justice that either an appellant or appellee Terry Russell The publication of a primer on how before the Florida Supreme Court be President-elect to escape liability for culpable con¬ required to address before the court Tod Aronovitz duct (“The Great Escape—How to arguments of counsel, the briefs of Executive Director Draft Exculpatory Clauses That the opposition, and potentially am¬ John F. Harkness, Jr. Limit or Extinguish Liability,” No¬ icus briefs, and then be faced with Board of Governors vember 2001) is strikingly at odds an additional argument published with The Florida Bar’s purpose of by the official arm of The Florida First Circuit Alan B. Bookman; Second Circuit Kelly Overstreet Johnson, Michael J. Glazer; service to the public and the admin¬ Bar, The Florida Bar Journal. Third Circuit Michael S. Smith; Fourth Circuit istration of justice. In most cases, I do not know whether appellate Christine R. Milton, Henry M. Coxe III; Fifth especially in consumer contracts and judges would feel any obligation to Circuit William H. Phelan, Jr.; Sixth Circuit Louis Kwall, John A. Yanchunis; Seventh Cir¬ recreational settings, exculpatory resist even reading such an article, cuit Charles C. Ebbets; Eighth Circuit Robert clauses are imposed, not bargained and I feel sure that appellate judges A. Rush; Ninth Circuit Kirk N, Kirkconnell, Russell W. Divine, John Marshall Kest; Tenth for. They defeat, not further, justice. would endeavor not to be influenced Circuit Robert M. Brush; Elevet^h Circuit Fran¬ Beyond thwarting justice, the by such an article. Were I the oppo¬ cisco R. Angones, David B. Rothman, Ervin growing use of exculpatory clauses sition, however, I could not help but A. Gonzalez, Jennifer R. Coberly, Don L. Horn, Sharon L. Longer, David W. Bianchi, has invidious implications for soci¬ be concerned about the effect of such Andrew Needle, Steven E. Chaykin, Arthur ety. By shielding wrongdoers from a publication, particularly if I had H. Rice; Twelth Circuit Anthony J. Abate; Thir¬ being held accountable for their ac¬ what I felt were strong arguments teenth CiRcun William Kalish, John F. Rudy II, Richard A. Gilbert; Fourteenth Circuit Rob tions, exculpatory clauses encourage based on the law or the facts which Blue, Jr.; Fifteenth Circuit John G. White III, laxness, bad policies, irresponsible might give a different slant on the Jerald S. Beer, Michael T. Kranz; Sixteenth Cir¬ cuit James S. Lupino; Seventeenth Circuit behavior, and worse. issues than that presented in the Michele Kane Cummings, David D. Welch, All Americans live in a safer article. I would be frustrated that I Henry Latimer, Jesse H. Diner, Frank C. world because of the deterrent ef¬ would have no practical way in which Walker II; Eighteenth Circuit Clifton A. McClelland, Jr.; Nineteenth Circuit Louis B. fect of tort law. By preventing those to file an “article in opposition.” Vocelle, Jr.; Twentieth Circuit John P. Cardillo; laws from having their intended ef¬ It seems to me that the policy of Out-of-State Richard A. Tanner, Ian M. Comisky, Dennis M. Whalen, Brian D. fects, exculpatory clauses promote The Florida Bar should exclude any Burgoon; President YLD Elizabeth G. Rice; a less safe world. possibility that there would be those President-elect YLD Juliet M. Roulhac; Public The Florida Bar should not lend who feel that The Florida Bar Jour¬ Members, Royce B. Walden, Vivian L. Hobbs. itself to serving as an enabler of nal is being used to influence the Editorial Board ways to escape the law and justice. outcome of pending litigation. The Chair: Gary S. Gaffney, Davie; Vice Chair: Larry S. Stewart Florida Bar Journal should limit its Robert H. Sturgess, Jacksonville; Members: Miami activities to criticizing the final re¬ Kelly M. Braun, Tampa; Dean Bunch, Talla¬ sult rather than being seen as at¬ hassee; David R. Cassetty, Coral Gables; Su¬ Reflecting the Current san G. Chopin, West Palm Beach; Christine tempting to influence that result. C. Daly, Lake Wales; Judge Lisa Davidson, Status of Litigation Bill W.agner Viera; Ralph A. DeMeo, Tallahassee; Judge Sandra Edwards-Stephens, Ocala; Heather I am strongly in favor of the posi¬ Tampa Jo Encinosa, Tallahassee; Richard E. Fee, tion taken by the authors in the ar¬ Tampa; Cleveland Ferguson III. Ft. Lauder¬ ticle, “Recovery of Mental Distress Editorial Board & Editor’s note: dale; Nancy S. Freeman, Winter Park; Judge Thomas G. Freeman, Jr, Sanford; Evelyn D. Damages in Bad Faith Claims in The article was submitted in Golden, Atlanta, GA Peart Goldman, Ft. Lau¬ Florida” (November 2001). April, and on May 14, the Supreme derdale; Robyn S. Hankins, Ft. Lauderdale; Having said that, I really oppose Court dismissed the petition for re¬ Keith C. Haymes, Coral Gables; Timothy M. Hughes, Orlando; Valerie G. Itkoff, Miami; The Florida Bar Journal publishing view in the Otero case without fur¬ Marlyne Marzi Kaplan, Hollywood; Judith articles taking a position recom¬ ther opinion. Unfortunately, the No¬ R. Koch. Chapel Hill. NC; Jeffrey D. Kottkamp, Ft. Myers; Benedict R Kuehne, mending either affirmation or rever¬ vember article does not clearly Miami; Brendan M. Lee, Tampa; Steven sal of a matter pending before the reflect the fact that the Florida Su¬ B. Lesser, Ft. Lauderdale; David K. Miller, Florida Supreme Court (or for that preme Court refused to review the Tallahassee; Peter Papagianakis, New York, NY; John R. Reid, Jr, Maitland; Kelley matter, before any Florida appellate case long before this article was ac¬ S. Roark, Miami; Amy D, Ronner, Opa court), it seems that at least poten¬ tually published. In their consider¬ Locka; Luis Salazar, Miami; Lawrence D. Silverman, Miami; Rafael Suarez-Rivas, Hol¬ tially Rule 4-3.5(a) or Rule 4-3.5(b) ation of submissions, the editorial lywood; Howard A, Tescher, Ft. Lauder¬ would caution against such publica¬ board and staff hope for a mutual dale; Frances H. Toomey, Tampa; R. Craig tion. In some cases it might be ar¬ understanding with contributing Waters, Tallahassee; Gary D. Weinfeld, Miami; John O. Williams, Tallahassee; Board gued that Rule 4-3.6(a) would apply. authors to ensure that the Journal Laison: Dennis M. Whalen, Akron, OH. Regardless of your judgment on always reflects the most current sta- 4 THE FLORIDA BAR JOURNAL/JANUARY 2002 mpire 1 800 432-3028 - - Each Corporate Kit features: Checklist. Instructions«Work Sheets. 8 Tab Dividers ♦ 21 Certificates • Stock Transfer Ledger. Corporate Seal with Pouch. Padded Binder. Slip Box . Waiver of Notice and Minutes of Annual Meeting of Shareholders . Waiver of Notice and Minutes of Annual Meeting of Directors. Minutes of Special Shareholders’ Meeting Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Notice of Organizational Meeting of Incorporators and Directors. Waiver of Notice of Organizational Meetingof Directors. Waiver of Notice of Organizational Meeting of Incorporators. Directors (s)’ Resignation. Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders . Notice of Special Meeting of Directors. Resolution Granting Power of Attorney. Special Power of Attorney . Proxy . Independent Contractor Agreement. Buy-Sell Agreement. Employment Agreement. Banking Resolution Cafeteria Plan. Cafeteria Plan Employee Benefit Election . Medical Expense Plan . Death Benefit Plan . Voting Trust. Stock Subscription . Executed Stock Subscription . Stock Purchases . Written Statement Organizing Corporation S Corporation, formerly Subchapter S. Section 248 Election. Consent of Incorporators to Election of Initial Directors Election of Directors. Election of Officers . Waiver of Shareholders Financial Reporting. Corporate Indemnification Plan. Application for Sales and Use Tax . Application for Employer ID Number. Pre-Printed Envelopes for Both Applications . Election by Small Business Corporation (Form 25‘'3). State Unemployment Status Report. tus of any issues discussed or cases tion awarded to the property owner. Competency cuts both ways. Most cited. We regret the fact that this An expert retained by the prop¬ experts comply with the appraisal article did not specifically address the erty owner and/or the attorney pur¬ standards and maintain their inde¬ final result of the Otero litigation. suant to a Ch. 73 proceeding under¬ pendence regardless of the party stands from the outset that there they represent. Unfortunately, the More on Contingency will be payment for the services ren¬ government is normally represented Fee Arrangements dered. Most experts recognize the by the expert who has submitted the In his article (“Contingent Fees for reimbursement of attorney and ex¬ “lowest bid.” It is common knowl¬ Expert Witnesses in Eminent Do¬ pert fees are subject to the theory edge that a low bid generates litiga¬ main—Competency or Credibility?” and purpose of the Constitution, tion, and, therefore, entitles the con¬ October 2001), Henry M. Brown sug¬ which expects that the property demning authority’s expert to gests that experts, and in particu¬ owner is entitled to full compensa¬ additional per hour fees when re¬ lar, appraisers, who testify in an tion; therefore, a jury award to a quired to support the low appraisal eminent domain proceeding brought property owner should not be dimin¬ in court. The fact that a private prop¬ pursuant to F.S. §73, do so on a con¬ ished by the amount of the expert or erty owner’s appraiser doesn’t “bid” tingency fee arrangement. In a Ch. attorney fees. The experts, knowing for his services does not render his 73 eminent domain proceeding there that they will be paid a reasonable expectation to be paid a contingency is a statutory scheme whereby the fee for their services, as opposed to arrangement. If you question com¬ property owner’s attorneys’ fees are a contingency, understand that the petency or credibility, the expert who paid and, in most cases, notwith¬ court will play a major role in es¬ is paid a reasonable fee as assessed standing the amount of compensa- tablishing the amount of fees to be by the court is far more competent I--- paid to the expert or attorney. and credible than the expert who Oath of Admission to Mr. Brown, ignoring Florida’s bids on the job and will be paid for The Florida Bar statutory scheme for the recovery of extra work without court scrutiny. I !■ Ij The general principles which attorney and expert fees, alludes to There is no support for the asser¬ should ever control the lawyer in out-of-state medical malpractice tion that Ch. 73 allows contingency the practice of the legal profession cases for which there is no statutory fees nor that ethical codes or public are clearly set forth in the following oath of admission to the Bar, which basis for the recovery of attorney or policy are violated by Ch. 73 expert the lawyer is sworn on admission to expert fees. His argument that fees fee proceeding. Credibility is simply obey and for the willful violation to guaranteed by statute are somehow recognized as an honest, supported, which disbarment may be had. "I do solemnly swear: equated to a true contingent fee unbiased opinion. The article does "I will support the Constitution of cause of action misses the point. not disclose that the opinions found the United States and the Consti¬ A contingency fee simply means in Dupree v. Malpractice Research, tution of the State of Florida; | that the attorney or expert will not Inc., 445 NW 2d 498, involved a “I will maintain the respect due to | courts of justice and judicial officers; j be paid unless there is a recovery. medical malpractice action for which “I will not counsel or maintain Under Ch. 73, both the attorney and there was no statutory scheme ad¬ any suit or proceedings which shall the expert will be paid, subject to dressing attorney or expert fees. appear to me to be unjust, nor any the court’s scrutiny of the reason¬ Dupree is inapplicable to Ch. 73. defense except such as I believe to be honestly debatable under ableness of their services. Clearly, Dupree was specifically rejected in the law of the land; as the author points out, there are Ojeba V. Sharp Cabrillo Hospital, 10 “I will employ for the purpose of courts who have found that fees can Cal. Rptr. 2d 230, which advances maintaining the causes confided to me such means only as are con¬ be unreasonable and accordingly the argument that contingent fee sistent with truth and honor, and have awarded less than the fee re¬ consulting contracts are not auto¬ will never seek to mislead the judge quested. Such a procedure protects matically violative of public policy. or jury by any artifice or false state- | the property owner, as well as the It should be noted that the offer of ment of fact or law; j “I will maintain the confidence condemning authority, by assuring judgment statute was a creature of and preserve inviolate the secrets that fees and costs are reasonable. the Tort Reform and Insurance Act of my clients, and will accept no It should not be up to a property of 1986. Eminent domain proceed¬ compensation in connection with I their business except from them or owner to argue with the experts as ings where damages are assessed with their knowledge and approval; to the reasonableness of their fee. based on testimony presented by “I will abstain from all offensive That is the very purpose of the statu¬ experts following the appraisal stan¬ personality and advance no fact tory scheme established by the leg¬ dards and guidelines are not akin to prejudicial to the honor or reputa¬ tion of a party or witness, unless re¬ islature. Fortunately, under the damages that may be suggested in quired by the justice of the cause statutory scheme, the court can con¬ a tort action. The utilization of the with which I am charged; sider the reasonableness of the con¬ offer of judment statute in an emi¬ “I will never reject, from any con¬ demning authority’s acts and con¬ nent domain proceeding intimates sideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless or op¬ duct during litigation which a property owner into a settlement. pressed, or delay anyone's cause necessitated the fees charged by the for lucre or malice, So help me God." property owner’s experts. Letters continued on page 34 6 THE FLORIDA BAR JOURNAL/JANUARY 2002 Beat ‘em? Join Consider a better strategy for dealing with the new competitive order. Consider aligning with us. The BDO Seidman Alliance of Law Firms is the alternative strategy for firms looking to increase their competitive advantage in the face of rapid consolidation, the encroachment of multi-disciplinary practices, and increasing client needs spanning state and national borders. • Access the full suite of services of a national professional services firm and our international network. • Leverage our consulting resources in areas including local, national and international tax; corporate finance; and business valuation services. • Network with other law firms providing complementary practice specialties and geographic coverage. • Boost support for your back-office and practice management needs such as information technology, document management, human resources and benefit plans. d. e v er es Become “An Independent Member of hts r g the BDO Seidman Alliance of Law Firms.” All ri P. For additional information contact LL n, . Scott Univer, JD, BDO Seidman ma BDO Seidman, LLP eid S Accountants and Consultants General Counsel, at (312) 240-1236, O D B www.bdo.com [email protected]. 1 0 0 2 President’s Page “As I See It” A Frequently Asked Question S o what is it like?” I recognize and handle special projects assigned the question immediately by the president—all without reim¬ now. Sometimes the question bursement of expenses or for their is even briefer—“Well?” time ... and without complaint. They Former presidents like to ask it that are eager servants of our profession, way... with a knowing glance. Sim¬ and we are fortunate to have their ply stated, you have to experience it leadership. to really understand it. I can sum¬ I remember when the board was a marize the experience with two hotbed of aspirants to the presidency. words, “more” and “less.” Board members maneuvered for More challenging. More exciting. years in advance for a chance at the More exhausting. More demanding. office. I fear that day has passed. Our More important. More of everything best and brightest still serve on the than I ever expected from my obser¬ board, and many are well qualified vations of Bar presidents for the past to serve as your president, but I have 20 years. And less . . . less ceremo¬ watched with sadness and concern as nial; less to delegate to the staff, as one qualified lawyer after another able as the staff is. Less able to tol¬ drops out of the “hunt.” Let’s face it: erate other than a full-time commit¬ A contested race for the presidency ment of time, energy, and talent. f ullest of their abilities. They have can cost more than $150,000 and There was a day when conven¬ had the support of great law firms, of committed service as president-elect tional wisdom held that The Florida wonderful spouses and families, and and then as president displaces pro Bar could survive a year or two with the advice and help of other dedicated tern any meaningful law practice. a part-time president without back¬ Bar leaders. Unfortunately, I sense We have studied this issue in the sliding. I’m not sure that really ever now an undercurrent of change, of less past. We’ve shortened the campaign was the case, but I’m very sure that commitment to the office—perhaps period to three months. We’ve offered it isn’t the case now. because the practice of law has be¬ free ads in The Florida Bar News. Think about it. Your Florida Bar come more business-oriented, and Numerous campaign rules and regu¬ president is the chief executive of¬ maybe because the task of campaign¬ lations have been proposed and many ficer of the third largest professional ing for the presidency, and then the adopted, all intended to make the state organization in the United even more daunting task of holding process fairer and more attractive. States with a $30 million budget, the office, has simply become too Amazingly, nothing has materially over 300 employees, and nearly much of a sacrifice. reduced the cost of a contested race. 70,000 shareholders, some quite vo¬ I am concerned about the future So I raise the subject again for dis¬ cal. Add to that a society that has of The Florida Bar presidency, and cussion, for your input, if you care to become super critical of its most because fully committed leadership give it. But I think it’s time to think important institutions; state and is so critical, the future place of our a little more “out of the box.” Per¬ national governments that see the Florida Bar among the great uni¬ haps about presidents nominated or third branch as too powerful and too fied bars of our nation. selected by the Board of Governors independent; and an ever increas¬ And let’s not forget the Board of and about ways to lessen the finan¬ ing need to provide access to justice Governors, your elected representa¬ cial burden of the office for future for all who need it, especially those tives to the Bar’s policymaking as¬ presidents, like maybe a stipend. We who can least afford it, and what you sembly. I have had the privilege of need our very best to lead our profes¬ have is more than a full-time job. If serving with and observing the work sion. We always have, but now more it’s done right. of the board since 1987. They are than ever. Many presidents of the past have hardworking, dedicated men and been blessed, as I have been, with just women who meet six times a year, the right circumstances to allow serve as liaisons to all of the Bar’s (7 them to carry out their duties to the standing committees and sections. Terr^ Russeli, 8 THE FLORIDA BAR JOURNAUJANUARY 2002