A JOURNAL ON TAXONOMIC BOTANY, PLANT SOCIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY ISSN 0034 – 365 X A I T D R A W N I E R 13 (5) REINWARDTIA A JOURNAL ON TAXONOMIC BOTANY, PLANT SOCIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY Vol. 13(5): 391–455, December 20, 2013 Chief Editor Kartini Kramadibrata (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Editors Dedy Darnaedi (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Tukirin Partomihardjo (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Joeni Setijo Rahajoe (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Marlina Ardiyani (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Topik Hidayat (Indonesia University of Education, Indonesia) Eizi Suzuki (Kagoshima University, Japan) Jun Wen (Smithsonian Natural History Museum, USA) Managing Editor Himmah Rustiami (Herbarium Bogoriense, Indonesia) Secretary Endang Tri Utami Layout Editor Deden Sumirat Hidayat Illustrators Subari Wahyudi Santoso Anne Kusumawaty Reviewers David Middleton (Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh, UK), Eko Baroto Walujo (LIPI, Indonesia), Ferry Slik (Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, China), Henk Beentje (Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, UK), Hidetoshi Nagamasu (Kyoto Universi- ty, Japan), Kuswata Kartawinata (LIPI, Indonesia), Mark Hughes (Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh, UK), Martin Callmander (Missouri Botanic Gardens, USA), Michele Rodda (Singapore Botanic Gardens, Singapore), Mien A Rifai (AIPI, Indonesia), Rugayah (LIPI, Indonesia), Ruth Kiew (Forest Research Institute of Malaysia, Malaysia). Correspondence on editorial matters and subscriptions for Reinwardtia should be addressed to: HERBARIUM BOGORIENSE, BOTANY DIVISION, RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY– LIPI, CIBINONG 16911, INDONESIA E-mail: [email protected] Cover images: Begonia hooveriana Wiriad. spec. nov. REINWARDTIA Vol 13, No 5, pp: 449−454 THE DYNAMICS OF PANDANUS ILLUSTRATIONS FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Received August 09, 2011; accepted October 16, 2013 VERA BUDI LESTARI SIHOTANG Herbarium Bogoriense, Botany Division, Research Center for Biology-LIPI, Cibinong Science Center, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46, Cibinong 16911, Bogor, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT SIHOTANG, VERA B. L. 2013. The dynamics of Pandanus illustrations from a historical perspective. Reinwardtia 13 (5): 449–455. — Pandanaceae is placed in the superorder Pandaniflorae and the order Pandanales, indicating its uniqueness when compared with the other seed plants. Pandanaceae contains three genera, Pandanus, Sararanga and Freycinetia. Limited collections seem to be one reason why botanical illustrations are made, so that people can enjoy their ―collections‖ from a picture painted on canvas. Botanical illustration is one type of record that can also give evi- dence about whether the plant exists. In addition, botanical illustration can give information about the growth of the plant, and historical evidence can be traced. There is no doubt that Pandanus has also been well illustrated. Later, fur- ther developments in Pandanus research obviously influenced the illustrations of Pandanus. Key words: Pandanaceae, Pandanus, history, illustration. ABSTRAK SIHOTANG, VERA B. L. 2013. Dinamika ilustrasi Pandanus dari perspektif sejarah. Reinwardtia 13 (5): 449–455. — Pandanaceae menjadi unik jika dibandingkan dengan tanaman berbiji lainnya karena merupakan satu-satunya represen- tasi dari superordo Pandaniflorae dengan ordonya Pandanales. Pandanaceae terdiri dari tiga genus, Pandanus, Sararanga, dan Freycinetia. Keterbatasan koleksi nampaknya menjadi salah satu hal yang mendorong dibuatnya ilustra- si dari sebuah tanaman, sehingga manusia pun dapat menikmati ―koleksi‖ tanamannya lewat sebuah gambar di atas kan- vas. Ilustrasi tumbuhan lewat sebuah lukisan menjadi salah satu rekaman yang menjadi bukti bahwa tumbuhan itu pernah ada dan menjadi gambaran mengenai perkembangan tumbuhan itu sendiri. Artinya, lewat ilustrasi tumbuhan, sebuah bukti sejarah pun dapat dilacak. Tidak dapat diragukan lagi bahwa Pandanus juga telah terilustrasi dengan baik, Perkembangan selanjutnya, penelitian yang lebih mendalam mengenai Pandanus ternyata mempengaruhi ilustrasi- ilustrasi Pandanus itu sendiri. Kata kunci: Pandanaceae, Pandanus, sejarah, ilustrasi. INTRODUCTION research. In the history of biological research, botanical illustrations are the illustrations that re- Describing species is one important activity in ceived most of the attention. There have been term of biology research. In the botanical field, changes in plant illustration over time. At the begin- there are certain requirements which must be ful- ning of 16th century, illustrations were used to pre- filled, for example a researcher must choose a plant sent the beauty of the plant, whereas in the next specimen that will be a voucher specimen as well as centuries, the depiction of the plant was more de- take photographs and make illustrations that will tailed and specific (Rix, 1989). This shows that provide documentation about the species being there has been a progressive development in studied. As well as documentation, a researcher also botanical illustration from century to century, and makes an illustration to clarify the smallest parts of we can see that the characteristics of botanical illus- the plant that are not easily visible. Illustrations also tration have changed between the 1600s and 1900s. allow researchers to differentiate one species from Botanical illustration has been influenced with another. the progress of human technology. For example, In the past, when documentation media was not using magnification with a sophisticated micro- as sophisticated as today, a researcher had to make scope and camera, we can now see the details of an illustration of the plant rather than taking photo- plant parts like pollen grains, cellular structure of graphs. This illustration could be made by the re- tissues, and even the organelles inside cells. With- searcher or by a specialized illustrator who joins the out the improvement of technology, we would not 449 450 REIN WARD TIA [VOL.13 be able to see these small structures, which is essen- information sources explaining the history of illus- tial for biological research. As well as being im- tration were consulted in order to see if the history portant for science, botanical illustrations was also of Pandanus illustration would follow a similar pat- initially used by society for other reasons, such as tern. Evaluation of these sources was carried out to religious purposes and worship, and for beauty or as determine the originality of the data. These histories art, for example cave paintings, statues, and other were analyzed using a descriptive analysis and ana- historical objects. Thereby, illustration is not only a lytic model with a historical approach (Gottschalk, part of biological research but is also a record of the 1950) to determine for how plant illustrations have journey of the researcher and the social situation developed over time. In the search for the sources, which influenced him/her. Therefore, the history of difficulty was found due to a lack of Pandanus illustration also tells us about social change and illustration from 18th century. Also, we compare trends in knowledge. the characteristics of Pandanus illustration over Pandanaceae is a representative from the order time with the general model for development of Pandanales and is the sole representative of the illustration style and determine if Pandanus fits the Pandaniflorae super order. Pandanaceae has three model. genera, Sararanga with 2 species, Freycinetia, with about 180 species, and Pandanus itself with 500- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 700 species (Jebb, 1991). Compared to the other two other genera, Pandanus has the widest distribu- Illustration is a means by which texts are en- tion, from Tahiti to West Africa, and from Australia hanced and made capable of conveying information to the foothills of the Himalayas, and Hawaii. Pan- and emotion in a way that words cannot. In this danus is also frequently illustrated over a long time study, we will examine Pandanus illustration from period, making it suitable for a study on the devel- 17th century to the 20th century. Pandanus illustra- opment of illustrations. tions were produced in 17th century by the Dutch As described above, this paper aims to explore naturalist who worked for the Dutch East India the different characteristics in Pandanus illustra- Company i.e. George Eberhard Rumpf (1628-1702). tions in relation to the changing of the centuries. He is also known as Rumphius, and he spent most The scope of this study is from the 1600s to the late of his time in Indonesia on the island of Ambon 1900s. The late 1600s was the beginning of Panda- where he lived from his arrival in 1653 until his nus illustrations in Indonesia, starting with the decease. Dutch scientist Rumphius who settled in Ambon in The Herbarium Amboinense consist of twelve 1653. Through his research, he produced paintings books, published in six volumes. Although the book of Pandanus that were contained in a book called was published in the 1700s, Rumphius made the Herbarium Amboinense. This study used the illustrations in the 1600s so we can say that these 1900s as the end point because at this time illustra- illustrations represent illustration characteristics of tions of various types of Pandanus were found 17th century. Some of the characteristics of along with the rapid growth of research on this Pandanus can be seen. For example, the first plant. illustration he describes is Pandanus verus (Fig. The purpose of this research is to explain the 1A). In this picture he shows the small pandanus characteristic differences in Pandanus illustrations fruit. He describes the main stem with segmented from the 1600s to the 1900s. In addition, the author roots and prop roots, and describes the leaves as will also explore the history of plant illustrations, long and narrow with a thorn on the side of the leaf. with Pandanus illustrations as a case study. The second illustration is Pandanus fpurius (Fig. 1B). Apparently this was a mature pandanus be- METHODS cause the stems are usually branched only in adult plants. The leaves were located at the end of the A qualitative method was used in this study. That branch. The fruit in this picture is larger, and the method was divided into five stages, namely topic flowers are also shown. The third illustration is selection, gathering information sources, source Pandanus humilis (Fig. 1C). In this illustration, evaluation, interpretation, and manuscript prepara- Rumphius showed characteristics from Pandanus tion. The selected topic was Pandanus plant illustra- which is an inverted cone and short stem as well as tions, and several Pandanus illustrations from the alternate leaf arrangement and flowers that grow books and reprints were examined. The illustrations, from axillary leaves. which were from different years, were compared Rumphius tried to illlustrate Pandanus with de- and differences in characteristics were recorded. tailed description. He illustrated inflorescence in In addition to examining Pandanus illustrations, Fig. 1B, though it was not too detailed. Also, he SIHOTANG: The dynamics of Pandanus illustrations from historical perspective 2013] 451 A B C Fig. 1. Pandanus illustrations produced by Rumphius from Herbarium Amboinense in 17th century. A. Pandanus verus; B. P. fpurius ; C. P. humilis. (Source: Herbarium Amboinense). illustrated an aggregate fruit heads comprised of entifically as well as beauty, this illustration cannot many tightly bunched wedges (Fig. 1B), the ring represent them, while the first impression of this pattern on bark characteristics (Fig. 1A) and prop illustration is a pencil scratches only. Illustrations roots (Fig. 1C), to the 17th century, scientifically from the 19th century are characterized by the this illustration can represent Pandanus. Rumphius interest of the illustrator on one particular part of already started the distribution of parts of the plant the plant such as flowers or leaves. Pandanus and this was followed by illustrators in the next cen- illustration from this century represented by original tury. In terms of beauty, these illustrations are not illustration from Curtis's Botanical Magazine, pub- enough to represent it. lished as a watercolor and pencil on paper plate on Another Pandanus illustration which was studied 1st November 1857. The specimen figured here was is a P. tectorius illustration made by Sydney sent to Kew by the Governor Hercules G.R. Robin- Parkinson in the 18th century, namely in the year son from Saint Kitts, this species is a native of the 1769 in Tahiti. He was a painter in the field of West coast of Africa (Fig. 3A). botany and made this illustration when he The illustration focused on fruit heads comprised participated in the voyage with Captain Cook to an aggregate of many tightly bunched wedge. The Tahiti, New Zealand, and Australia. This illustration Pandanus illustration was produced with good uses water colors on paper. In the illustration, coloring in order to illustrate the fruit and leave Parkinson drew the male inflorescence of Pandanus more accurately. People will know that this is tectorius (Fig. 2A - Natural History Museum, Pandanus leaves by looking this, because the leaves London). In this century, illustration has begun represent lifelike. It also shows shaped phalange or with detailed character. In terms of beauty, this il- drupe and describe part of it. Also, this illustration lustration can represent it even though the color of give great attention to detail and precision, not only the real male inflorescence of Pandan did not a correct image but a beautiful one as well. Illustra- correctly enough. Nevertheless, scientifically this tion in Fig. 3B shows Pandanus branch cutting with illustration cannot represent it, because part of the female inflorescence. The original illustration is a male inflorescence is not described in detail. watercolor and pencil on paper plate published on Fig. 2B are botanical illustrations of Pandanus 1st September 1857 and was stated to have come leram (Martelli, 1913) in late 18th century (1792). from Madagascar. Unfortunately, we can not see This illustration began to focused on one part of morphological characteristics of Pandanus by plant, though it is not too detail as well as looking this illustration. illustration in 19th century. The illustration focused Pandanus illustration in Figs. 4A and 4B focused on drupe, but cannot accurately describe the drupe. on drupe of Pandanus. Scientifically, those When viewed at a glance, we will not know that illustrations can describe drupes accurately, either these illustrations depict Pandanus drupe. Both sci- outside or inside appearance. Figs. 4A and 4B 452 REIN WARD TIA [VOL.13 A B Fig. 2. A. Pandanus tectorius illustration by Sydney Parkinson. Source: http://internt.nhm.ac.uk; B. Pandanus leram illustration in 18th century. Source: Enumerazione Delle “Pandanaceae” . show the drupe characteristics from Pandanus phalange, drupe, base of leaves, leaf tip, the anther, dubius and Pandanus kaida. Fig. 4B-A shows drupe filament, and the stigma (Fig. 4C). Phallange is with longitudinal section from Pandanus illustrated in full form and split lengthwise. Great drupaceus. Fig. 4B-B shows drupe with lateral attention in measurement was taken but the section from Pandanus eydeouxia. By looking those illustration in split form doesn’t looks like the real illustrations, we can imagine what the drupe looks one. like, when it took apart from the fruit. Most people Another illustration that distinguishes Pandanus who see those illustrations perhaps do not know illustration in 17th, 18th, and 19th century with whether it is Pandanus. Text was heavily used to Pandanus illustrations from 20th century can be describe the botanical illustrations, it is used as seen in the Field Guide to Pandanus in New supplement for the illustration. Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago and the Solomon By the 20th century, Pandanus illustrations were Islands (Jebb, 1991). In 20th century, plants illustra- much more specific than those from the 17th, 18th, tions were produced in the form of field guides. and 19th centuries. Pandanus illustration in these These books served to help the amateur botanist centuries did not just describe the plant as a whole when identifying a specimen. Until the mid-20th or only the outside appearance but also the small century, the coloring in plant illustrations was still part which is inside the plant. Illustration of this done by hand. In the book, Matthew Jebb represents plant was already developed from the time that trees, fruit, leaves, and male inflorescence of each Linnaeus started classifying plants. In the 20th Pandanus. In addition, the size of the leaves, and century the illustrations were more detailed and drupe, the height of the prop roots, and the height of focused. Illustration was really intended to examine the tree are given (Fig. 5). Scientifically, this certain parts of the plant more deeply, and in this illustration cannot represent the real Pandanus. case only one part of the plant was drawn. Morphological characteristics, the drupe, the leaves In some Pandanus reprints of the 1900's, most of cannot be seen by looking this illustration. the illustrations focused on one part only, but in In the 20th century, illustrations of Pandanus more detail. There are some parts of the plants that furcatus were also produced in the form of were not shown in the Pandanus illustration in 17th lithographs by J.N Fitch. This illustration is found century and early 18th century, but that appeared in in the Curtis Botanical Magazine, in 1914 and the 20th century illustrations, including the 1916. It is said that the coloring of the illustration SIHOTANG: The dynamics of Pandanus illustrations from historical perspective 2013] 453 A B Fig. 3. A. Pandanus candelabrum, P. Beauv. Source: http://plants.jstor.org/visual/kcur000001263; B. Pandanus pygmaeus Thouars. Source: http://plants.jstor.org/visual/kcur00000814. A B C Fig 4. A. Illustrations A–D Pandanus dubius Spreng., illustrations E–G P. kaida S. Kurz. Source: Pflanzenreich: Pandanaceae; B. Illustration (A) Drupe of Pandanus drupaceus Thou., illustration (B) P. eydeouxia Balf. (Source: Pflanzenreich: Pandanaceae); C. Pandanus illustration made in 20th century which focused on the phalange. (Source: New species of Pandanus from East Malaysia). Fig. 5. Pandanus calatiphorus by Matthew Jebb. (Source: A field guide to Pandanus in New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago and the Solomon Islands). 454 REIN WARD TIA [VOL.13 was not finished yet, but it illustrates the process of good handcoloring. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONCLUSIONS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof. From the above discussion, it can be said that Dr. Mien A. Rifai, who has given me idea to do research there are differences in characteristics between which combine history and biology and also for his Pandanus illustrations from the 17th, to the 20th valuable criticism. I am also indebted to Dr. Gillian Dean centuries. During the 17th century, Pandanus for a critical reading of the manuscript. Without her great illustrations were detailed, but only showed the patience and suggestions, this paper would never have main parts of the plant, such as fruit, flower, and been completed. I am also indebted to Prof Dr. Eko stem. In the 18th century, Pandanus illustrations Baroto Walujo, who gave his approval for carrying out showed a detailed depiction of flowers and other my research. I would like to give my special thanks to plant parts. At the beginning of the 19th century, the reseachers of the Herbarium Bogoriense for their Pandanus illustrations were also detailed and with expertise, knowledge and essential support, and to good coloring. In the 20th century the Pandanus librarians who have provided me with all of the necessary materials. illustrations were more even detailed and focused on particular parts of the plant. Illustration was REFERENCES really intended to examine certain parts of the plant more deeply, and in this case only one part of the GOTTSCHALK, L. & NOTOSUSANTO, N. plant was drawn. (translator). 1986. Mengerti Sejarah. Universitas These characteristic differences can be seen from Indonesia Press. Jakarta. the addition of more plant parts to the illustrations. http://internt.nhm.ac.uk. Accessed 20 October 2005. In addition, more specific parts of the plant were http://plants.jstor.org/visual/kcur00001263. Accessed 20 illustrated in more detail in the 19th and 20th October 2005. centuries. In the 19th century the illustrations of one http://plants.jstor.org/visual/kcur00000814. Accessed 13 august 2011. part of the plant were created because of the interest of the illustrator in that section. In the 20th century, JEBB, M. 1991. A field guide to Pandanus in New Guin- illustrations aimed to be more focused on the area ea, the Bismarck Archipelago and the Solomon Is- lands. Christensen Research Institute, Papua New of of interest being studied. In addition, plant illustrations done in the 20th century have more Guinea. MARTELLI, U. 1913. Enumerazione Delle emphasis on scientific purpose, especially for more “Pandanaceae”. Webbia 4(1): Tav. XX in-depth examination of the characteristics of each MERRIL, E. D. 1917. An Interpretation of Rumphius’s species of the genus Pandanus. In the illustration of Herbarium Amboinense. Manila. previous centuries, in order to display the beauty of RIX, M., 1989. The art of the plant world: The great the plant, it can be seen that plants illustrations were botanical illustrators and their work. The Overlook generally made in larger sizes. In addition, Press. Woodstock, New York. delineation of other parts of the plant before the 20th RUMPF, G. E. & BURMANNI J. 1750. Herbarium Am- century was only as an informal addition. boinense. Meinard Uytwere, Amsterdam. STONE, B. C. (1966/67), A new species of Pandanus We have to make difference between botanical from East Malaysia. Malaya Science 3: 24–26. art and botanical illustration. Botanical art is the WARBURG, O. 1900. Pandanaceae . In: ENGLER , A aesthetically focused art of a botanical object, where (Ed.). Das Pflanzenreich 4 (9). Engelmann, Berlin: 1- botanical art is an interpretation of subject. Whereas 100. the aims of botanical illustration is to study and to WATSON, L., & DALLWITZ, M. J. 1992 onwards. The understand the details of plants, flowers and other families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, part of plants. It means that, botanical illustration identification, and information retrievel. Version 4th produce not only correct image but a beautiful one March 2011. http://delta-intkey.com. Accessed 5 Au- as well (Watson & Dallwitz, 1992). gust 2011. INSTRUCTION TO AUTHORS Strict adherence to the International Code of Reinwardtia is a scientific irregular journal on Botanical Nomenclature is observed, so that plant taxonomy, plant ecology and ethnobotany. taxonomic and nomenclatural novelties should be Manuscript intended for a publication should be clearly shown. English or Latin description for new written in English represent an article which has not taxon proposed should be provided and the herbaria been published in any other journal or proceedings. where the type specimens area deposited should be Every manuscript will be sent to two blind presented. Name of taxon in taxonomic treatment reviewers. should be presented in the long form that is name of taxon, author’s name, year of publication, The manuscript of no more than 200 pages by abbreviated journal or book title, volume, number using Times New Romance letter type, submitted and page. to the editor through <[email protected] > Map, line drawing illustration, or photograph For the style of presentation, authors should preferably should be prepared in landscape follow the latest issue of Reinwardtia very closely. presentation to occupy two columns. Illustration Title of the article should be followed by author’s must be submitted as original art accompanying, but name and mailing address in one-paragraphed. separated from the manuscript. The illustration English abstract of not more than 250 words. should be saved in JPG or GIF format at least 350 Keywords should be given below each abstract. pixels. Legends or illustration must be submitted Author(s) should send the preferred running title of separately at the end of the manuscript. the article submitted. Bibliography, list of literature cited or references Taxonomic identification key should be prepared follow the Harvard system. using the aligned couplet type. REINWARDTIA Vol. 13. No. 5. 2013 CONTENTS Page HARRY WIRIADINATA, DEDEN GIRMANSYAH, JAMES M. HUNTER, W. SCOTT HOOVER & KUSWATA KARTAWINATA. Floristic study of West Sumbawa, Indonesia ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 391 NURHAIDAH IRIANI SINAGA, ARY PRIHARDHYANTO KEIM & PRATITA PURADYATMIKA. The unique characters and habitat of Freycinetia (Pandanaceae) with seven new species in Timika, West Papua, Indonesia ……………………………………………………………………………………………………405 ABDULROKHMAN KARTONEGORO. A revision of Rhynchoglossum (Gesneriaceae) in Malesia …...421 SITI SUSIARTI, TUTIE DJARWANINGSIH & ARY PRIHARDHYANTO KEIM. Pandan (Pandanaceae) in Flores Island, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: an economic-botanical study….………………………...431 ARY PRIHARDHYANTO KEIM. A new species of Freycinetia Gaudich. (Pandanaceae; Freycinetoideae) from Tidore Island, Moluccas, Indonesia ………………………………………………………………… 441 HARRY WIRIADINATA. A new species of Begonia (Begoniaceae) from South Sulawesi, Indonesia …445 VERA B. L. SIHOTANG. The dynamics of Pandanus illustrations from a historical perspective ………..449 LINA S. JUSWARA. Book review …………………………………………………………………..….....455 Reinwardtia is a LIPI acredited Journal (517/AU2/P2MI-LIPI/04/2013) Herbarium Bogoriense Botany Division Research Center for Biology – LIPI Cibinong, Indonesia