Table of Contents Articles Beset by Boundaries: The Home Office Review of Sex Offences. By Nicola Lacey . Children, Chatrooms and the Interne t. By Aline Gillespie : Compassion without respect? Nine Fallacies in R.v . Smith. By John Giu rdner and Timothy Macklem Corporate Killing—Some Government Proposals. By Bob Sulli van. Criminal Cases Review Commissions and Deference to the Courts: The Evaluation of Evidence and Evidentiary Rules. By Peter Duff. Deceiving without Thieving? By Russell Heaton Decriminalising the Personal Use of cannabis in the United Kingdom: Does International law Leave Room for Manoeuvre? by Neil Boister ce: Delay and Article 6(1): an end to the requirement of prejudice? By Alistair Webster, O.¢ How Culpability Can, and C annot, , be Denied in U nder- age Sex Cir imes. By Jeremy Horder Intermediate sentences for the Severely Personality Dison dered. By Anne- Marie McAlinden. P Jury Unanimity—A Practitioner’s Problem. By H. H Judg e — 1 iC larke, Q.« Jury Unanimity and Homicide. By Richard Taylor Ae iil Cea hin Legislating in the Shadow of the Human — Act: The Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. By Martin Wasik : Male Rape in the Courtroom: Issues and Concerns. By Philip N. S. _— Necessity, private defence and the killing of Mary. By fonathan Rogers New Criminal Sanctions—Inflicting Pain Through the Denial of Employ- ment and Education. By Mirko Bagaric Pee eee e Oe Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000(1): Big Brother.gov.uk: State surveillance i in} the age of information and — By Yaman Akdeniz, Nick Taylor and Clive Walker eas ce etal ; Regulation of eete stigatory Powers Act 2000(22 ): Evidential aiuieee By Peter Mirfield . : Reprimands and Warnings: Populist Punitiv eness or r Res storative Justice’? ‘By Roger Evans and Kyela Puech. Reviewing Crown Prosecution Service Decisions r not to Prosecute. By MaiI nc ly Burton Sentencing Demers Offenders. By Ralph Silesia Sounds familiar?—Voice Identification Evidence. By David ( eed be Striking a Balance between the Rights of Defendants and Vulnerable Wit- nesses. Will Special Measures Directions Contravene Guarantees of a Fair Trial? By Laura C. H. Hoyano The Presumption of Innocence in Delayed fer iming 11P rosecutions for Cch ild- hood Sexual Abuse: Lessons from Ireland. By Penney Lewis . . The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 2000. By Jonathan Burnside : The Reality of Vehicular Homicides: Convictions for Murder, Manslaughter and Causing Death by Dangerous Driving. By Sally Cunningham The Terrorism Act. By ¥ % Rowe, o.« s The Vital Importance of Certain Previous Cco nvictions. . By Marin Wasik © Sweet & MAXWELI Table of Contents What Can We Learn from Published Jury Research? Findings for the Criminal Courts Review 2001 By Penny Darbyshire, with research by Andy Maughan and Angus Stewart . ee Writing Quantitative Narrative Guide sline Judgments: A Proposal. By Austin Victn vote Statements: Don’t Work, Can’t Work. By Andrew Sanders, Carolyn Hoyle, Rod Morgan and Ed Cape ee When is a Prisoner not a Prisoner? Service Work in Israel—and in Britain? By Leslie Sebba , , : ; Withdrawal in C omplicity A Restatement of Principles. By K. 7 M. Smith. Current Topic Articles The Ambit of the Standard Community Rehabilitation Order. By Nigel Stone . The Video Appeals Committee and the Standard of Legal Pornography. By Susan Edwards ; ; nh : The Sexual Offences (Protected Material) Act 1997. By Jonathan Hall and Dennis Clark ; , Military Pre-Trial Custody. By Paul Camp ak : On being Insane in Jersey—The case of Attorney General v. Ffason Prior. By R D. Mackay and C. A. Ge ; : The Innocence at Stake Test and Legal Professional Privilese: A Losics il Progression for the Law But not in England. By Gavin Murphy Letters to the Editor Obtaining Property by Deception Surviving Without Majewski Kevin McCormac Richard Taylor P. W. Ferguson ; His Honour Judge G. O. Edwards Book Reviews Punishment, Responsibility and Fustice. . lational itique. By Alan Norrie Reviewed by G. R. Sullivan The Law of Human Rights. By Richard Clayton and Hugh Tomlinson Reviewed by A. T. H. Smith. ; : j Rethinking English Homicide Law. By Andrew Ashworth and Barry Mitchell Raeduaedl by Steve Brown Die deutsche Strafrechtswissenschafaftt vi vor d er Fahrtausendwende. Ruckbestimmn 1 Ausblick. By Albin Eser, Winifried Hassemer and Bjorn Burkhart Reviewed by D. van Zyl Smit Contributors of Articles Akdeniz, Yaman, Taylor, Nick and Walker, Clive: Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000(1): Big Brother.gov.uk: State surveillance in the age of information and rights. ree ar j Bagaric, Mirko: New Criminal Sanctions—Inflicting Pain Through the Denial of Employment and Education , Boister, Neil: Decriminalising the Personal Use of cannabis in the U nited Kingdom: Does International Law Leave Room for Manoeuvre? Burnside, Jonathan: The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 2000 SwEET & MAXWELI Table of Contents Burton, Mandy: Reviewing Crown Prosecution Service Decisions not to Prosecute ee es ae ee ee Camp, Paul: Military Pre-Trial Custody ae ee ae Clarke, Q.c., H.H. Judge David: Jury Unanimity—A Practitioner’s Problem Cunsiahem, Sally: The Reality of Vehicular Homicides: Convictions for Murder, Manslaughter and Causing Death by Dangerous Driving . , Darbyshire, Penny: with research by Andy Maughan and Angus Stewart: What Can We Learn from Published Jury Research? Findings for the Criminal Courts Review 2001 ae ie? ane om Ee ache i Duff, Peter: Criminal Cases Review Commissions and Defence to the Courts: The Evaluation of Evidence and Evidentiary Rules Edwards, Susan: The Video Appeals Committee and the Standard of Legal Pornography : Evans, Roger and Puech, Kyela: Reprimands and Warnings: Popul ist Puni- tiveness or Restorative Justice? : ; : ‘ ‘ : ‘ , ; ; Gardner, John and Macklem, Timothy: Compassion without respect? Nine Fallacies in R.2 ae , Gillespie, Alisdair: children, ¢ chatrooms and the Internet. Heaton, Russell: acaaae without Thieving? Henham, Ralph: Sentencing Dangerous Offenders a, ies Horder, Jeremy: How Culpability Can, and Cannot, be Denied in Under-age i a a a Di Hoyena, Laura, C. H.: Striking a Balance between the Rights of Defendants and Saaen Ww itnesses: Will Special Measures Directions Contravene Guarantees of a Fair Trial? ee ae aa ee ee Lacey, Nicola: Beset by Boundaries: The Home Office review of Sex Offences Lewis, Penney: The Presumption of Innocence in Delayed Criminal Prosecu- tions for Childhood Sexual Abuse: Lessons from Ireland ee ae Lovegrove, Austin: Writing Quantitative Narrative Guideline Judgments: A Proposal Mackay, R.D. and Gearty, C.A.: On being Insane in Jersey—The case of Attorney Generalv . Fason Prior ae a McAlinden, Anne-Marie: Indeterminate sentences for the Severely Person- ality Disordered. . po practi Mirfield, Peter: Regulation of investigatory Powers Act 2000 2): Evidential Aspects ; ‘ . . ° : . : ‘ ‘ ° : ‘ ° ‘ . Murphy, Gavin: The Innocence at Stake Test and Legal Professional Privi- lege: A Logical Progression for the Law... But not in England. Ormerod, David: Sounds Familiar?—Voice Identification Evidence n0ow0o Rogers, Jonathan: oe Private defence and the killing of Mary swUlaI Rowe, Q.c., J.J.: The Terrorism Act 2 ‘©NNoeY e Philip N.S. = lake Male sat in the Courtroom: ‘Issues and Cco ncerns dVOI VVii n Sanders, Andrew, Hoyle, Carolyn, Morgan, Rod and Cape, Ed: Victim Impact Statements: Don’t Work, Can’t Work ' ius Sebba, Leslie: When is a Prisoner not a Prisoner? Service Work in Tacs el and ee ee ee eer ee i eer Gn eee Smith, K.J.M.: Withdrawal in Complicity: A Restatement of Principles Stone, Nigel: The Ambit of the Standard Community Rehabilitation Order Sullivan, Bob: Corporate Killing—Some Government Proposals Taylor, Richard: Jury Unanimity in Homicide. “4 8 Ss Wasik, Martin: Legislating in the Shadow of the Human Rights Act: The Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. a oy Wasik, Martin: The Vital Importance of Certain Previous Convictions © Sweet & MAXWELI Table of Contents ———— Webster, Q.c., Alistair: Delay and Article 6(1): an end to the requirement of prejudice? SwEET & MAXWELI Table of Cases Crim.L.} = 1 All E.R 821, Wiggins 213, HI Indiana (¢ 5, Judgment 1996) 929 } sports 1996-, pp 1567-1568, . ira rt - r 80, Series A, No. 37; 3 E.H.R.R ( H.R. 1316 Q H.R crim L.R Si¢ Mai 111999 1199 9] E.M.I [1995 and News Group Newspapers Ltd, u rey 1A 957]|1 i All E.R 894, ¢ LA \p p.R 2a03 [1998] E.M.L.R . Cheung Wai-bun [1994] Peis ae 994 98 Cr App R. 17 Robinson [1998] 1999) 163 J )0] 3 AI E.R Table of Cases s Reference (No. 3 of 1999) [2000 pp.R.475; [2001] Crim.L.R. 394, HI 35 of 1999) [2000] 1 Cr.App.R.(S.) 44( [1999] 2 Cr.App.R.(S.) 369; R. v. Thompson and I Table of Cas [2001] 2 AllI 07, 809, 859, 862, The Queen [1995-6] 185 C.K.L.R. 375, p ) E.H.R.R. 477 479 Germany Lord Advocate, Danoch, D Haes ¢ V l 1997) 25 Daley v. Hargreaves [1961] 1 W.L.R. 48 Daly v. Sharples, unreported, November Darmalingum \ Table of Cases 37, ECHR Dickie v. H.M Dixon v. Attorn 82, ECHR 130, QBD -rim.L.R.37 r.App.R.165; 3 WI [1993] A.¢ 359: 11993 1 W.L.R. 80 71) A.C.1 A.C v. Niman (1981 v. DPP (2000 v. Un . Table of Cases Division Department 194 US 872, 108 Led 2(d etherlands (1976) 1 E.H.R.R. 647 United Kingdom, App. No. 18601/91 i ‘7 1990] 2 A.C. 1; [1989] 2 W.L.R. 1025, Cz United Kingdom (1980) 21 D.R. 126 West Berkshire Health Authority. See I 1997) Supreme Court of Israel United Kingdom (1997 Heywood, 2000 J.¢ 44 inkensieper v. Netherlands itt, Jasper v. United Kingdom a ] he Queen [2000]1 W.L. ‘ , Kingston, 313, at ~ 3.H.R.R. 2 t pare § 3 euans 157 rancisco v. Diedrick, The Times, April 3, 1998, QBD United States, 293 F 3 (1923 France, App. No. 1082/84, Series A256—A, Irist 1 Suprem [1998] 2 WI United Kingdom (1996) 22 E 28, 1996, ECHR nited Kingdom, App. No. 27237/95, rattor State (1984) 456 So 2d 865 Gray’s Haulage v. Arnold [1966]1 W.L.R Greaves v. Aikman (1994) 74 A. Crim Gregory \ nited Kingdom (i 1997 Gunawal Sexual abuse: Standard ate v. Boyle 1993 S.L.T Brown, The Times, December 6, 2 Little, High Court of Justiciary, June McIntosh, [2001] 3 W.l K..107 2 Halford v. Brookes [1991] v. U.K., App No 20605 5/‘ Hammond \ il Handyside \ ; 976) Series A, No. 2 Han and Yau v. Commissioners of Customs and Excis Hardie and Lane v. Chilton [1928] 2 K.B. 306 Hard nv. United Kingdom [1996] E.H.R.L.R. 425 Hasham and Harrup v. United mani gdom (2000) 30 E.H.R.R 241 Hastings v. Ostle (1931) 94 J.P. Hatsaot Hok 1766, 1986, p Heaney and NcGuinness v. Ireland [2001] Crim.L.R. 481, ECHR 484, 822, 859, 859, 867 Helle v. Finland, Reports 1997-VIII, p.2928 53 Hewitt and Harman (No.1), App Hewitt and Harman (No.2), App SwEET & MAXWELI Table of Cases Hill v. Baxter [1958] 1 Q.B. 277 ‘ Hirst v. United Kingdom [2001] Crim.L.R. 920, ECHR Hoang v. France (199 2 6 I H.R.R. 53, ECHR Hols v. Netherlands (App. No.25206/94, ruled inadmissible October 19, 1995 HHoorrnnaslb y v v. -beSrtatge er (1993) Produc2t1s0 GLa. td App[.1 957]5 71 1 Q.B. 247, CA Howarth v. United Kingdom [2000] 31 E.H.R.R. 861, [2000] Crim.L.R.229 ECHR 229, 789, [1990] 154 J.P. 821 v. DPP [1973] 3 L.R 174] Crim 365, HI DPP; M. v. DPP; H. v. DPP [20 IjJL, GMR and AKP R Bulgaria, 255920055 /94, rruullee d in1 admisil sib]I SWEET & MAXWELI