This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Spilsbury, Stephen Ronald Paul Title: The concordance of scripture : the homiletic and exegetical methods of St Antony of Padua. General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •(cid:9)Your contact details •(cid:9)Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •(cid:9)An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. The Concordance of Scripture The homiletic and exegetical methods of St Antony of Padua by Stephen Ronald Paul Spilsbury A thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Trinity College, Bristol validated by the University of Bristol March 1999 ABSTRACT Antony of Padua (c.1195-1231) was a Portuguese Augustinian canon who joined the Franciscan Order in the lifetime of the Founder. Commissioned by Francis to teach theology to the friars, Antony exercised an itinerant preaching ministry in Italy and France before encapsulating his experience in his Sermones Dominicales and Sermones Festivi. This thesis examines what we know from external evidence about Antony's practice, and what we know from his written works about the models he followed and his own vision of the preacher's work. It also examines briefly the tradition of Biblical interpretation in which he stood, especially as regards the so-called 'four senses' of Scripture (historical, allegorical, moral and anagogic). The structure of the Sermones Dominicales is examined in some detail, and the sources Antony drew upon, both theological and secular, are briefly surveyed. The heart of the dissertation is the examination of Antony's use of the terms concordare and concordantia to express the relationship between the liturgical elements that underpin the Sermones-the Gospel, Introit and Epistle of the Mass, together with the Office reading -and in particular between the Gospel and the Old Testament. The instances of these terms are enumerated and classified, and recent Antonian scholarship is surveyed in so far as it touches on this subject. Suggestions are offered regarding the origins of Antony's terminology, and an attempt is made to uncover the theory underlying it, by means of an extensive analysis of the sermons for the Sundays after Pentecost. Some conclusions are drawn. Finally, the thesis traces Antony's influence on those who came after him, both preachers and theologians, and suggests reasons for the apparent eclipse of his approach, as well as reasons why it may be of renewed interest to theologians today. ADGLORIAM SANCTISSIMAE TRINITATIS VERBIQUE INCARNATI IESU CHRISTI; ET IN HONOREM MAT RIS PAUPERCULAE EIUS~ NECNON S. ANTONII DE LISBOA ET PADOVA : HOC OPUS ALMAE PROVINClAE IMMACULATAE CONCEPTIONlS B.V. MARIAE IN ANGLIA ORDINIS MINORUM FRATRIBUS VIVIS ATQUE DEFUNCTIS PIE DEDICATUM EST Author's Declaration: The work contained in this dissertation is entirely my own; The views expressed in it are those of the Author, and not of the University of Bristol ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish first of all to acknowledge with thanks the encouragement and friendly criticism of Dr Carolyn Muessig and Dr Robert Forrest, without which the inadequacies of this dissertation would have been even greater. Together with them, I also thank the staff and fellow-students of Trinity College, and of the Department of Theology and Religious Studies of the University of Bristol for their support. I thank, too, the staff of the Franciscan Central Library and the Franciscan Study Centre at Canterbury, for allowing me access to their facilities. I express my heartfelt gratitude to my sister, Dr Sarah Spilsbury, for allowing me to use her computer, and for making me numerous cups of tea and coffee which I often forgot to drink. Last, but by no means least, I am grateful to my wife Marilyn, and to our children Thomas, John, Helen, Edward and Elizabeth, for their patience and love. CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION CHAPTER ONE: LIFE AND mSTORICAL CONTEXT 6 1.1 Antony's early life and education 6 1.2 The appointment of Antony to teach theology to the friars 12 1.3 The writing of the Sermones Dominicales and the Sermones Fesfivi 19 CHAPTER TWO: ANTONY THE PREACHER 29 2.1 Antony's own preaching 30 2.2 Antony's models 39 2.21 Augustine 40 2.22 Gregory 42 2.23 Bernard 45 2.24 'Paris style' 48 2.25 Innocent III 51 2.3 Antony'sprolog; consonantes 55 CHAPTER THREE: ANTONY AND THE EXEGETICAL TRADITION 62 3.1 Background 62 3.2 Augustine and Antony 65 3.3 The development of Allegory: Gregory 67 3.4 Hugh of St Victor 70 3.5 Antony 75 3.6 'Objective' allegory 77 CHAPTER FOUR: THE SERMONES DOMINICALES ET FESTIVI 79 4.1 The structure of the Sermones 79 4.11 The General Prologue 80 4.12 The Tabula thematum 83 4.13 The prolog; consonantes 84 4.14 The Gospel commentaries 85 4.15 Minor prologues and Epilogue 87 4.16 The Sermones Festivi 87 4.2 The theological sources of the Sermones 88 4.21 The Bible 88 4.22 Jerome and Isidore 89 4.23 The 'Gloss', 'Sentences', 'Historia Scholastica' 89 4.24 Possible Jewish influences 90 4.25 Augustine, Gregory and Bernard 90 4.3 Secular Sources of the Sermones: the 'Concordance of Nature' 92 4.31 'The Case of the Curious Curlew' 92 4.32 The Book of Creation 94 4.33 'Philosophus' and 'Poeta , 97 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCORDANT/A: EXTENT AND ORIGIN 99 5.1 The method and terminology of concordance 100 5.11 From Septuagesima to Easter 100 5.12 From Easter to Pentecost 101 5.13 From Pentecost to Epiphany 102 5.14 The Prologues; the Marian and Festival Sermons 103 5.2 The origins of Antony's use of concordare and concordantia 104 5.21 Augustine and Gregory 104 5.22 Joachim of Fiore and the Concordia nov; et veteris testamenti 108 5.3 Modem studies: the state of the question 114 CHAPTER SIX: CONCORDANT/A: ANALYSIS 121 6.1 Pentecost IX 121 6.2 Case study: the tructure of an Antonian •S ermo': Pentecost I 122 6.3 The Introits 126 6.4. The Epistles 129 6.5 Old Testament Concordances: Examples of three different types 132 6.51 Pentecost I, first clause 132 6.52 Pentecost XIV, first clause 134 6.53 Pentecost XXIV, first clause 137 6.6 Further case studies 138 6.7 Conclusions 146 CHAPTER SIX: AFTERMATH 150 6.1 Antony remembered: sermons on the Saint 150 6.2 Antony forgotten: the intellectual legacy 160 6.3 Antony recovered? Some modern theological approaches 168 CONCLUSION 175 APPENDIX Table I Citations from Augustine, Gregory, Bernard and Innocent III 179 Table II Instances of concordantia, etc. in the sermons up to Pentecost 181 Table III Instances of concordantia, etc. in the sermons for the Sundays after Pentecost; and from Advent to Epiphany III 185 Table IV Instances of concordantia, etc. in the Marian and Festival sermons 190 Addenda 191 Table V Sermons on Saint Antony 192 Abbreviations 194 BffiLIOGRAPHY 196 INTRODUCTION Saint Antony of Padua is one of the most popular saints of the Catholic calendar. His image is found in countless churches, and even the undevout invoke him as a finder oflost property. In popular piety he is remembered above all as a miracle worker: 'If, then, you ask for miracles: death, error, all calamities, the leprosy and demons fly, and health succeeds infirmities. The sea retires, and fetters break~ new life to broken limbs restore! while what is lost returns again, when young and old thy aid implore!'} It was with some surprise, then, that in 1989 I came across the newly re-edited and published Sermones Dominicales et Fe stivi of St Antony Until then, I had not 2. realised that he had left any writings, let alone that they were still extant and available. Even a brief study convinced me of their intrinsic interest, and this work has grown from that initial encounter. We are fortunate in now possessing a very fine critical edition of the certainly authentic works of St Antony. It has been in the course of preparing an English translation of them that I have been forced to ask a number of questions about Antony's intentions and methods which I have tried to answer in this critique: in particular, about the nature and scope of his method of concordance, the juxtaposition and correlation of Scriptural passages, so that they illuminate and interpret one another. Responsory at Matins, Office of St Antony by Julian of Spires: Si quaeris miracula, mors, e"or, calamitos, daemon, lepra fugiunt, aegri surgunt sani. Cedunt mare, vincula, membra, resque perditas petunt et accipiunt iuvenes et cani. Saneti Antonii Patavini Sermones Dominicales et Festivi (padua, 1979). For full reference, 2 see Bibliography, and notes to Chapter IV. Referred to throughout as SDF I,II,I1I and page number; also by title of sermon and paragraph number. \ We are fortunate, too, in that the primitive sources for the biography of St Antony have also been edited and published in recent years. The neglect of these sources over the centuries has been in proportion to the accretion of legendary material that has gathered around his memory. We now seem better placed to put Antony back again into his true historical context. This is because (a third piece of good fortune) the earliest sources are very early indeed, and appear to be conscientious in their effort to be accurate. An outline of these sources will be appropriate in this Introduction. The earliest, written within two years of Antony's death by a friar who had been associated with him in his last years, is the' Vita Prima' or 'Assidua,3. The author says that he consulted Sueiro, bishop of Lisbon, for information about Antony's early life. Sueiro came to Italy for the canonization ceremony in 1232, and had doubtless made sure he was equipped with the relevant facts. The accounts of Antony's last years appear to be from the personal memories of the author. Where he had no information (notably regarding Antony's time in France), he makes no attempt to invent, but merely notes that the Saint visited many other provinces. He recounts in circumstantial detail miracles attributed to Antony's prayers after his death (again, probably, gained from the canonization proceedings), but when due allowance is made for the conventions ofhagiographicallanguage, his account of Antony's life is singularly free of the miraculous. Not long after the' Vita Prima', friar Julian of Spires composed the rhyming office for the Feast of St Antony which was still used in the Order until the Second Vatican Council It was a companion to the Offices he composed for other 4 Franciscan feasts. He also paraphrased and abbreviated the 'Vita Prima " and incorporated some material from Thomas of Celano's first 'Life' ofSt Francis. This 3 G.Abate, 'Le fonti della biographia di S. Antonio: I. La 'Vita Prima' di S. Antonio' (1968, II Santo (padua) 8, 127-226) (abbreviated: 'Fontl L II', etc.) 4 G. Abate, 'Le fonti della biographia di S. Antonio: II. L' ufficio ritmico' (1969,1S9,149-160) 2.