» Bn 42, OGIZ ZL W.2:+ Sf. Hi8/999 99-P0-oS SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 Salmon River Community Restoration Program (SRCRP) Final Report FY 99 Cooperative Agreement Number #: 113339-JO28 TABOF LCONETEN TS Bp FR ccenesccnsenennanesesensececencnnecesnennscssnscnssennsnsocsssssonenesononocesens Page | Bp BRR III I occ cecenscscsccccencccsesecceccenesccscsceccsccocesosececocsonsoccesoess Page 2 C) Description of Study Area............scsssssssssssssssssssssesrseseeseneees Page 3 D) Methods and Materials................sssssssssssssssessessseeeseseeeeesesees Page 5 E) Results and Discussion..............ssscssssssssssesseesesseessnseseenseenes Page 8 F) Summary and Conclusion..............scesssssssesssesssssseeesnseenenees Page 8 G) Summary of Expenditures................ccsssssessseseereenesnenensnees Page 10 H) Appendices: # | - Activities Schedule, Evaluation and Participation Log # 2 - Workshop/Workday Notices # 3 - SRRC Handouts, Posters, Planning Meeting Notices, etc # 4 - Community Restoration Plan Ab0k-o11f§We (LD SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 A) ABSTRACT The Restoration Council has performed the tasks identified in our cooperative agreement for the Salmon River Community Restoration Program (CRP) for Fiscal Year 1999 (FY 99). During FY 99, the SRRC continued to enlist community members in a variety of watershed awareness, restoration and protection activities. In FY 99, the SRRC held a series of Ecosystem Awareness Workshops, Restoration Training Workdays and Field Ti:p s in the Salmon River sub-basin that focused on: 1) Fisheries Management, 2) Fire Management, 3) Native Plant Cooperative Seed Bank/Riparian Revegetation, 4) Watershed Education Program- Partnership between the 3 Schools and SRRC, which highlights subbasin water temperature monitoring, 5) Forest Management, 6) Road Management, 7) Noxious Weed Control 8) Landslide stabilization 9) Subbasin Restoration Plan development and 10) SRRC-annual Community Action Plan development SRRC also was represented by staff and community support in a number of project/resource monitoring efforts, restoration strategy planning meetings, vegetation mapping data layer verification, roads sediment analysis mapping technology training, private funding acquisition, meeting with and providing information to government agencies, resource user outreach efforts, and toxic materials awareness activities. SRRC also sponsored formation of an Economic Development committee to insure development of a local capacity to perform restoration work. In 188 events there were 791.75 community/resource user volunteer person days contributed to help restore the Salmon River subbasin. At $10 an hour plus the value of implied benefits (at 12.81%), the value of community in- kind service contribution was $74,669.00 (of which $11,184.00 was attributed to the CRP FY99). The staff also donated 271 perdayss ofo Prnogr am Servicaned s3 4 person days Administration Services. At $12 an hour plus implied benefits, the total dollar value of the staff in-kind services contribution was $33,030.00, of which $7,896.70 attributed to CRP FY99. There was also donated mileage valued at $8,499.00 of which $3,471.18 was attributed to CRP FY99 and donated facilities rental valued at $1,000.00 of which $200.00 was attributed to CRP FY99 Additionally, there was GIS/GPS and related equipment use and maintenance agreement expense in-kind contributions valued at $7,000.00, bringing the total in- kind contribution attributed to the project to $29,752.00. There were also 111 person days associated with the CRP activities in which private and public specialists provided invaluable assistance. In keeping with our commitment to the educational aspects of fisheries restoration, several teachers and student days are associated with this year’s Program. Numerous grant proposals were submitted to public and private funders, including 2 to the Klamath River Fisheries Task Force process. Community cooperation and support is expanding and compliments SRRC’s work in bringing together various stakeholders in the sub-basin to prioritize and implement needed restoration activities. SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 B) INTRODUCTION In the Salmon River sub-basin the Salmon River Restoration Council (SRRC) has taken the lead role in heightening local community awareness and enlisting local support to rehabilitate the anadromous fisheries and the related resources. Our mission is to assess, protect, restore, and maintain the Salmon River ecosystems, focusing on the restoration of the anadromous fisheries resources. This is being accomplished through diversification of the local economic base and by improving communication and cooperation between the local community, the managing agencies, Native American tribes, resource use stakeholders, and the general public. Since 1992, SRRC initiators have planned and implemented an annual series of volunteer Ecosystem Awareness Workshops and Restoration Training Workdays. Over 3,046 volunteer days have been contributed by community members technical assistants, and other supporters in the planning and implementation of over 165 SRRC sponsored Workshops anc Workdays. Ways to reduce negative impacts connected to various resource uses are being identified and utilized in areas such as: fishing, mining, forest management, grazing, recreation, road management, and residential use. For the past 8 years, the SRRC has participated in Salmon and Steelhead population and habitat surveys. In 1999 there were over 188 volunteer person days associated with these surveys (including training) that were contributed by community members and other supporters. The SRRC is continuing to promote a series of shaded fuel breaks on private land to protect both riparian and upslope habitats. Fuel breaks were maintained and installed along private roads on several parcels of private lands. We have continued to increase our roads program in which local residents help steward roads that they use through impiementing light maintenance measures (clean culverts and ditches, etc), participating in a roads needs assessment, and checking roads and repairing drainage problems during major storm events. The SRRC coordinated much of this work with the USFS. The USFS was provided a summary of the work perfornied. Through the creation of a Salmon River Community Restoration Program (CRP), the SRRC developed a long range Community Action Plan in 1994, which outlines direction and prioritizes its activities to best accommodate watershed/fisheries recovery. This plan was updated during FY-1999 and renamed Community Restoration Plan. The on-going participation of the local schools has expanded the educational component of many of SRRC’s activities. SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 C) DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA The Salmon River is one of the major sub-basins in the Klamath River Basin. The 744 sq. mile watershed is entirely within the Klamath National Forest. Four communities lie widely dispersed within this watershed. There are approximately 300 people residing in the drainage. The Salmon River has long been known for its exceptioniilly high quality waters and high value fisheries as well as boasting one of the richest regions of species diversity in the temperate zones. In comparison to most rivers in the west, the Salmon River still retains large areas of high quality habitat for anadromofuissh . It is noted to have the largest population of Spring ChiSalnmono ino Calikforn ia. There are both Summer and Winter runs of native Klamath Province Steelhead. A smaller run of Coho salmon is also present. In general, the headwaters of the Salmon River are characterized by coniferous tree assotchati chaangte wiitho elnevatsion s. The major forest types have various understory elements that characterize them specifically, depending on soil type and exposure. The Salmon River watershed is one of the highest risk fire areas on the Klamath National Forest. It has a high natural freoqf luighteningn occcuryrenc e. In recent years the Offield Fire (1973) burned the area near the river confluence. The Hog Fire (1977) burned extensively in the lower North and South Fork watershed and in Nordhaned iCrampo eCrreek s. The total area was about 80,000 acres. In 1987, wildfires burned 90,900 acres in four separate areas, covering much of the Salmon River sub-basin. In 1994, the Specimen fire burned approximately 7,500 acres in the Specimen and Little North Fork Drainages of the North Fork. It is estimated that 40-50% of the Salmon River sub-basin has burned since the early ‘70s. Many acres of intact late successional forande hisgh tval ue riparian habitat burned with high intensities, completely degrading the functional biological quality of these habitats. The Klamath River Fisheries Task Force has identified high water temperatures and excessive sediment production being the key limiting factors for the anadromous fisheries resource in the Salmon River sub-basin. The Forest Service has identified that the recent catastrophic fires’ ive been a major contributor of sediment to the Salmon River and have eliminated significant areas of riparian coveri n the sub-basin (Salmon River Sediment Analysis - USFS 1994). Since the Hog fire in 1977 Salmon River water temperatures have exceeded 77 degrers Fahrenheit. (Wesett al 1991). The recent wildfires have increased sediment run- off on roads, in riparian areas, and from the upslope areas. SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 Our community-based program is of particular significance in managing the Salmon River sub-basin because access to the district may also be viewed as a limiting factor. Managing agency personnel have to drive two or more hours just to get to the main roads. There are two high summits to go over on the access routes. The main Salmon River road is mostly a one-lane road with tumouts carved into the steep cliffs of the river corridor. This makes management activities expensive and sometimes prohibitively costly. Monitoring both for legal and illegal resource use has often been difficult to accomplish with any sort of effectiveness. We must also mention that the difficult access has: been somewhat responsible for limiting development by larger corporate resource-extraction industries. Atp resfeueln lotadi,ng is at an unnaturally high hazard level in many areas of the watershed. This threatens to severely damage the more biologically intact or recovering landscapes in the sub-basin (Each of the USFS Watershed Analyses). Several Late Successional Reserves in the sub-basin have a high fire potential (USFS North Fork, Eddys, Carter Meadow/Taylor Late Successional Reserve (LSR) Assessments-1995&1996). The Karuk Tribe of California has presented information pointing to the fact that, “Fifty years of fire suppression has resulted in an ecosystem with accumulations of flammable debris capable of fueling future catastrophic fires within the watershed.” (Karuk Tribal Module for the Main Stem Salmon River Watershed Analysis, Draft, June 25", 1996). In the winter of 1995-1996, we experienced an unusually heavy snow, probably combined with wind, which created a tremendous number of downed and broken trees and other damage to woody vegetation. This has exacerbthae taleredad y severe problem. The SRRC is participating in cooperative monitoring of this federal project in addition to providing volunteers to pull back excessive fuels from residual large trees prior to scheduleUdS Forest Service underbuirnn thien argea . Without critical fuels management, one can easily predict that catastrophic wildfires will return more frequentlyi n the Salmon River. The fire history and fire potential of this sub-basin establish that increased catastrophic wildfire occurrence is the number one threat to fisheries and general ecosystem health and diversity. During 199the7 Sa,lmo n River experienced the largest high water event since the 1964 flood. Several roads and hillsides failed in the sub-barin. In addition several miles of riparian habitat (particularloyn the South Fork) were scoured, reducing shade over streams and sections of the river. SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 D) METHODS AND MATERIALS s WwW . * « W The Salmon River Restoration Council has performed the tasks identified in our cooperative agreement for Salmon River Community Restoration (CRP) for Fiscal Year 1999 (FY 99). The SRRC continued to enlist community members in a variety of watershed restoration and protection activities... In FY 99, the SRRC held a series of Ecosystem Awareness Workshops, Restoration Training Workdays and Field Trips in the Salmon River sub-basin that focused on: 1) Fisheries Management, 2) Fire Management, 3) Native Plant Cooperative Seed Bank/Riparian Revegetation and landslide stabilization, 4) Watershed Education Program- Partnezship between the 3 Schools, and SRRC, which highlights subbasin water temperature monitoring 5) Grazing Management, 6) Forest Management, 7) Road Management, 8) River Clean-up, 9) Noxious Weed Control 10) Landslide stabilization and 11) Subbasin Restoration Plan development, 12) SRRC-annual Community Action Plan development (See Appendix #1. Activities Schedule and Description and Participation Log) © Public Outreach SRRC distributed announcements and information at key locations that serve as community information distribution points. These points are at the Forks of Salmon Post Office, Cecilville Post Office and Sawyers Bar Post Office. We have maintained current information and handouts at these and other points. Notices and informational announcements have also been posted at public bulletin boards in Somes Ear, Orleans, Happy Camp, Etna, Fort Jones, and Callahan. Periodic updates were provided to the Fish and Wildlife Service throughout the year. Various SRRC updates were provided to our Board of Directors, the community and other stakeholders including newsletters circulated periodically. In reaching out to managing and interested entities the SRRC held various field trips and gave several presentations to provide a general overview of the conditions and problems associated with watershed health in the Salmon River subbasin. (See Appendix # 3 - Handouts, Posters, Planning Meeting Notices, etc.) During FY 99 SRRC continued to support the 3 school’s Watershed Education Prog:..ms with data gathering technicians, technical assistance and planning and coordination. Community volunteers donated 37 person days and staff provided 29 days to this effort. SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 a t i During the planning meetings the community members, key agency specialists, Karuk Tribe of California personnel and others participated in planning, implementing and evaluating the Ecosystem Awareness Workshops, Restoration Training Workdays, Project Proposals or other SRRC restoration activities. Notices for the board and steering committee meetings were mailed and posted on all key community bulletin boards. There was a total of 19.56 volunteer days attributed to the 6 Board/Steering Committees and Vision meetings and 10.4 volunteer days attributed to the 30 planning meetings. (See Appendix # 1 - Activities Schedule, Evaluations and Participation Log \ = Community Restoration Plan In the beginning of the year the Restoration Council reviewed and updated its Salmon River Community Action Plan (Plan) and renamed it Community Restoration Plan. The Plan focuses on accomplishing associated Taisn akreass su ch 7 as; Ecosystem Planning, Education, Aquatic Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, Terrestrial Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, Ecosystem Assessment. This Plan is used as an annual guide for the staff in achieving long and short range Goals identified by the Board, steering committee and the general community. It will be updated at least every year as new information, opportunities, or directions arise. Partnership Building . The SRRC participants continued to provide assistance to the Forks of Salmon School in coordinating and implementing their watershed education program. Students learned techniques to inventory, monitor, protect, and rehabilitate natural resourcesi n SalRivmer osub-nbas in that are directly associawitthe tdh e anadromous fisheries. Again this year an AmeriCorps partner working in the schools participated. Our Stakeholders group, the Salmon Learning and Understanding Group (SLUG) continued to meet and expand to include participation by new members such as the Siskiyou County Road Department. Project Development the Community Restoration Plan and the 3-Year Work plan the SRRC has identified key projects and project areas which need funding. The SRRC Coordinators worked with specialists from the managing agencies, Karuk Tribe, the private sector, and universities in the development of a number of restoration ) proposals. In addition to submitting proposals in FY 1999 to Klamath River Fisheries Restoration Task Force, the SRRC submitted numerous restoration proposals to various funders such as: US Forest Service, California Dept. of Fish and Game, 319 (h), the Jobs-In-The Woods program, The Conservation Technology Support Program and others. NrN — OrO SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 Personne] The SRRC Coordinators and Secretary attended all of the planning meetings for which they will be compensated through their salary. In FY-99 the Staff worked for 885.25 days total to fulfill organizational commitmtoe wnatetrsshe d restoration , of which 580.25 days were paid and the other 305 were in-kind contribution. Of the total staff days for the Grant Period, (34%) were volunteered. Technical Assistance During FY 99 the SRRC received a broad range of technical support from key agency and University personnel, Tribal representatives, and private specialists at several of the planned Workshops and Workdays and other events. In addition, we received extensive technical assistance for our computer and Information Systems project, for initiation of a sub-basin-wide private landowner inventory, for proposal development, ard for general computer assistance. The SRRC continued to work on developing a comprehensive Geographic Information System (GIS) which is utilizing data from the Klamath National Forest and from other sources. The SRRC is working in conjunction with technicians from the Klamath Resource Inventory System (KRIS). The SRRC will be tracking such characteristics as: unstable soils and roads, denuded riparian and up-slope habfiuelst loaadintg assso,ciat ed with private dwellingasnd opportunities for fuel breaks, native and noxious plant species populations, areas of the river used by anadromous fish species, SRRC’s restoration sites, and other information ® Conferences/Workshops/Presentations During FY 99 SRRC participants atte~1ed a variety of workshows to increase knowledge of restoration provlem. and solutions. SRRC staff made several presento tothaer tentiitioes nsusch as: Klamath Basin Fisheries Restoration Task Force Technical Work Group, Lower Mid Klamath Restoration G:oup, Siskiyou Resource Conservation Distnct, Common Ground, California Department of Fish and Game, Klamath Resource Information System Forum, Siskiyou County Public Works Department and the Wildlands Conference in Davis. SRRC participants attended various conferences and training sessions which include: Fire Ecology Symposium in Orleans, Scott River CRMP fieldtrip, Bioassessment Training at College of the Siskiyous, GIS Training in San Diego, Kris/GIS Training with the schools, USFS South Fork Watershed Analysis Public 7 SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 Meeting, USFS Taylor Creek Decommissioning Meeting, Technical Work Group Sub-basin Planning Committee Meeting (host), Fire Training Week (host), Scott Valley CRMP Meeting with PFMCp resentation, Klamath/Salmon Fishermen and Guides Associaantdi otohenrs . = ORtheer storaCotunciil oPrnojec ts Other specific projects :ncluded in SRRC's activities this year were: 1) The Salmon River Understanding and Learning Group (SLUG) and 2) Jobs In The Woo- d/Ripsari an Restoration and Protection projects, 3) Memorial Day Recreationalist Outreach Booth at Nordheimer Campground, 4) Sediment Source Analysis (Roads with USFS), 5) Spotted Knapweed Eradication, 6) CALVEG Data Layer verification (See Appendix # 1 - Activities Schedule, Evaluations and Participation Log E) RESULTS AND DISCUSSION During the Ecosystem Awareness Workshops and Volunteers Restoration Training Workdays, a cooperative local forum was provided whereby community members, agency personnel, tribal representatives, resource specialists and the general public interacted through information exchange, open discussion and in on-the-ground traini dinversie wnategrshe d rehabilitation, protection, and moniatnd oinverntoiry nprogjec ts. This year the Salmon River Community RestProograrm caonttinueid too enxpa nd. SRRC held 54 Workshops/Workdays during FY98, as well as 32 planning and committee meetings, 12 outreacahn d assessment activities, and 3 office septic repair workdays. That volunteer support worth over $110,000 was given to SRRC by staff, community members and others during FY99, demonstrates not only growing for our efforts, but that we are making a real contribution toward the recovery of the Salmon River ecosystems. (See Appendi# x2 ® Workshop/Workday Evaluations & Notices) F) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION This has been an eventful and rewarding year for the SRRC. The SRRC will contot takie tnhe luead erole in heightening community awareness, enlisting local support, and promoting cooperative land and resource management among all stakeholders. This is necessary to effectively rehabilitate the Salmon River watershed and specifically the fisheries resources. In its task to enlist potential partners in watershed management, the SRRC realizes that this may be done more efficiently by coordinating restoration and protection activities with SALMON RIVER COMMUNITY RESTORATION PROGRAM (SRCRP) FINAL REPORT FY 99 management and regulatory agencies, local resource protection entities, private landowners, and education facilities that already exist within and outside the sub- basin. The SRRC is working to increase its effectiveness on a local level, as exemplified by the 3 Salmon River Schools Watershed Education Program. In addition to working with the 3 schools, the SRRC coordinated its projects with the Forks of Salmon Fire and Rescue and the Sawyers Bar Water Board. It provided technical assistance by performing coordinated activities in areas such as fire prevention, fuels inventory, and erosion control. The SRRC will continued to give educaatndi inofornmaatiolna l preseton grtoupas wtithiin oandn oustsi de the sub-basin. The SRRC is working on a cooperative project with the US Forest Service (Ukonom and Salmon River District’s) with support from the Karuk Tribe to develop a strategy for restoration in the Salmon River sub-basin prioritizes key areas to protect and prescribes types of projects needed. A major challenge facing the Salmon River Restoration Council, tied to the Restoration Strategy, is to develop a Cooperative Fire Management Strategy for the Salmon River in which all stakehoarled inevorlvsed . Another critical organizaatndi coomnmuanilt y challenge will be to provide the staff and other community membwiethr ensoug h income to sustain their pro-active work for the In conclusion, the health of these aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems are the single most important factor in determining the ecological and economic well being of our rural riverine community. Coopceommurnitay etfforits svuche as the Salmon River Restoration Council are the best vehicle to achieve watershed/fisheries recovery with a minimum of dislocation to existing economic and social activities. As is evidenced by the SRRC’s annual accomplishments, there exists a consistent expansion of community commitment to the protection and restoration of the Salmon River sub-basin and in particular its anadromous fisheries resource. Without the support of the watershed residents and various associated stakeholders the recovery and maintenance of the watershed and fishmaye nort ibe eposssibl e. Due to the Salmon River sub-basin’s remoteness and management access problems, the government agencies must have the active cooperation and support of the communities to expediently recover the fisheries resources associated with the Salmon River. The SRRCb eliethvat estsron g community partnerships are essential to the recovery of the natural envirando sunstaimnablee snocital caondiltio ns.