REMARKS ON THE CH OF CUBIC HYPERSURFACES 2 RENE´ MBORO Abstract. This paper presents two approaches to reducing problems on 2-cycles on a smooth cubic hypersurface X over analgebraically closed field of characteristic 6=2, to problemson1-cyclesonitsvarietyoflinesF(X). Thefirstonereliesonbitangent lines of X and Tsen-Lang theorem. It allows to prove that CH2(X) is generated, via the 7 action of the universal P1-bundle over F(X), by CH1(F(X)). When the characteristic 1 of the base field is 0, we use that result to prove that if dim(X) ≥ 7, then CH2(X) is 0 generated by classes of planes contained in X and if dim(X) ≥ 9, then CH2(X) ≃ Z. 2 Similar results, with slightly weaker bounds, had already been obtained by Pan([27]). n The second approach consists of an extension to subvarieties of X of higher dimension a ofaninversionformuladevelopped byShen([30],[31])inthe caseofcurves ofX. This J inversionformulaallowstolifttorsioncyclesinCH2(X)totorsioncyclesinCH1(F(X)). Forcomplexcubic5-folds,itallowstoprovethatthebirationalinvariantprovidedbythe 2 2 groupCH3(X)tors,AJ ofhomologicallytrivial,torsioncodimension 3cycles annihilated by the Abel-Jacobi morphism is controlled by the group CH1(F(X))tors,AJ which is a birationalinvariantofF(X),possiblyalwaystrivialforFanovarieties. ] G A . h t Introduction a m Let X ⊂ Pn+1 be a smooth hypersurface of degree d ≥ 2. Let F (X) ⊂ G(r+1,n+2) C r [ be the varietyofPr’s containedin X andP =P(E )⊂F (X)×X be the universal r r+1|Fr(X) r 2 Pr-bundle. One has the incidence correspondence v 8 pr :Pr →Fr(X), qr :Pr →X. 8 4 We will be particularly interested in this paper in the case r = 1 and r = 2, d = 3. It is 4 known (see for example [14], [36]) that if X is covered by projective spaces of dimension 0 1≤r < n, that is q is surjective, then CH (X) ≃Q for i<r and for n >i≥r, there is . 2 r i Q 2 1 an inversion formula implying that 0 7 Pr,∗ :CHi−r(Fr(X))hom,Q →CHi(X)hom,Q 1 : is surjective. We recall briefly how it works: Up to taking a desingularization and general v hyperplane sections of F (X), we can assume that F (X) is smooth and q is generically i r r r X finite ofdegreeN >0. LetH =c (O (1))∈CH1(X)andh=q∗H ∈CH1(P ). Givena X 1 X r X r r cycle Γ∈CH (X) , we have NΓ=q q∗Γ and we can write q∗Γ= r hj ·p∗γ where a i hom r∗ r r j=0 r j γ ∈CH (F (X)) . Now, dq (hj ·p∗γ )=dHj ·q (p∗γ )=0Pfor j >0 since j i+j−r r hom r∗ r j X r∗ r j dH ·=i∗ i :CH (X) →CH (X) , X X X,∗ l hom l−1 hom where i is the inclusion of X into Pn+1, factors through CH (Pn+1) hence is zero. So X l C hom we get dNΓ=q p∗(dγ ) r∗ r 0 which gives CH (X) = 0 for i < r since in this range CH (F(X)) = 0, and more i hom,Q i−r generally the desired surjectivity. Working a little more, this method gives, in the case of 2-cycles on cubic fivefolds, the following result (which is a precision of [14], [26]): Proposition 0.1. Let X be asmooth cubic fivefold. Then thekernel of the Abel-Jacobi map CH (X) :=Ker(Φ :CH (X) →J5(X)) is of 18-torsion. 2 AJ X 2 hom 1 2 RENE´ MBORO Proof. Forcubichypersurfacesofdimension≥3,aftertakinghyperplanesectionsofF (X), 1 the degree of the generically finite morphism P → X is 6. If Γ ∈ CH (X) , we can use 1 2 AJ the fact that 3H ·Γ=0 in CH4(X) and thus (using the notation P, p, q in this case) X (1) 3h·q∗Γ=3(h·p∗γ +h2·p∗γ )=0 0 1 in CH4(P). As h2 =h·p∗l−p∗c in CH2(P), where l and c are the natural Chern classes 2 2 on F (X) restricted from the Grassmannian, we deduce from (1): 1 3γ =−3l·γ in CH3(F (X)). 0 1 1 Combining this with the previous argument then gives 18Γ=q p∗(3γ ·l3) where 3γ is ∗ 1 1 a codimension 2-cycle homologous to 0 and Abel-Jacobi equivalent to 0 on F (X). Finally 1 we conclude using [7, Theorem1 (i)] andthe fact thatF (X)is rationallyconnected, which 1 implies that CH2(F (X)) =0. (cid:3) 1 AJ Thedenominatorsappearingintheaboveargumentdonotallowtounderstand2-torsion cycles. On the other hand, as smooth cubic hypersurfaces admit a degree 2 unirational parametrization([8]), all birationalinvariantsare 2-torsionso that, for functorialbirational invariantconstructedusingtorsioncycles,theabovemethodgivesnointerestinginformation. Ouraiminthispaperistogiveinversionformulaswithintegralcoefficients,allowinginsome casestoalsocontrolthetorsionofthegroupofcycles,whichisespeciallyimportantforthose hypersurfaces in view of rationality problems. In this paper, we present two approaches to study the surjectivity of the map P on 1∗ cycleswithintegralcoefficientforcubic hypersurfaces. The firstoneis presentedinthe first section and uses the bitangent lines of X; it gives the following result: Theorem 0.2. Let X ⊂Pn+1, with n≥2i+1 be a smooth cubic hypersurface over an alge- k braically closed fieldk of characteristic notequalto2,containingalinear subspaceof dimen- sion i< n. Assuming resolution of singularities in dimension ≤i, P :CH (F (X))→ 2 1,∗ i−1 1 CH (X)/Z·Hn−i is surjective. i In the case where i = 2, the theorem associates to any 2-cycle a 1-cycle on F (X). As, 1 for i = 2, the condition to apply the theorem is dim (X) ≥ 5, F (X) is a smooth Fano k 1 variety hence separably rationally connected in characteristic 0. By work of Tian and Zong ([34]), CH (F (X)) is then generated by classes of rational curves. A direct consequence is 1 1 the following: Corollary 0.3. Let X ⊂Pn+1 be a smooth cubic hypersurface over an algebraically closed k field k of characteristic 0. If n ≥ 5, then CH (X) is generated by cycle classes of rational 2 surfaces. Remark 0.4. This result is true for a different reason also in dimension 4, see Proposition 2.3. In the second section, we study 1-cycles on F (X) and refine Corollary 0.3 to obtain: 1 Proposition0.5. LetX ⊂Pn+1 beasmoothcubichypersurface overan algebraically closed k field k of characteristic 0. If n≥7, then CH (X) is generated by classes of planes P2 ⊂X 2 and therefore CH (X) =CH (X) . If n≥9, then CH (X)≃Z. 2 hom 2 alg 2 Remark 0.6. Some of the results of the first two sections had already been obtained by Pan ([27]) in charateristic 0 namely the surjectivity of P : CH (F (X)) → CH (X) for 1,∗ 1 1 2 n ≥ 17, the fact that CH (F (X)) = CH (F (X)) for n ≥ 13 and that CH (X) = Z 1 1 hom 1 1 alg 2 for n ≥ 18. He has, more generally, obtained, for hypersurfaces of degree d, bounds to get similar results on the CH of the hypersurfaces and CH of their variety of lines. 2 1 The last section is devoted to a second approach to the integral coefficient problem; it consists of a generalization of a formula developped by Shen ([30], see also [31]) in the case of 1-cycles of cubic hypersurfaces. Concretely, we prove the following: REMARKS ON THE CH2 OF CUBIC HYPERSURFACES 3 Theorem 0.7. Let X ⊂Pn+1 be a smooth cubic hypersurface over a field k and Σ a “suffi- k cientlygeneral”smoothsubvarietyofX ofdimensionr. Then,denotingγ ∈CH (F (X)) Σ r−1 1 the cycle class of a hyperplane section of dimension r−1 of the subscheme of F (X) para- 1 maretrizing the bisecant lines to Σ, we have (2deg(Σ)−3)Σ+P γ =m Hn−r 1,∗ Σ Σ X for an integer m . Σ Thisinversionformulaismorepowerfulasitwillallowustolift,moduloZ·Hn−2,torsion X 2-cycles on X to torsion 1-cycles on F (X). The application we have in mind is the study 1 of certain birational invariants of X. When k = C, it was observed in [39] that the group CH3 of homologically trivial torsion codimension 3 cycles annihilated by the Abel- tors,AJ Jacobimapis a birationalinvariantofsmoothprojective varietieswhich is trivialfor stably rationalvarietiesandmoregenerallyforvarietiesadmittingaChow-theoreticdecomposition of the diagonal. This is a consequence of the deep result due to Bloch ([5], [11]) that the group CH2(Y) of homologically trivial torsion codimension 2 cycles annihilated by tors,AJ the Abel-Jacobi map is 0 for any smooth projective variety. For cubic hypersurfaces, as already mentioned, it follows from the existence of a unirational parametrization of degree 2thatCH3(X) isa2-torsiongroup. Althoughwehavenotbeenableto computethis tors,AJ group, we obtain the following: Theorem 0.8. Let X ⊂ Pn+1 be a smooth cubic hypersurface, with n ≥ 5. Then for any C Γ ∈ CH (X) , there are a homologically trivial cycle γ ∈ CH (F (X)) and an 2 tors,AJ 1 1 tors,AJ odd integer m such that P (γ) = mΓ. In particular, when n = 5, if the 2-torsion part of ∗ CH (F (X)) is 0 then CH3(X) =0. 1 1 tors,AJ tors,AJ As we will explain in Section 3.3, the group CH (F (X)) is a stable birational 1 1 tors,AJ invariantofthe varietyF (X),whichislikelytobe trivialforrationallyconnectedvarieties. 1 The groupCH3(X) has a quotient whichhas aninterpretationin terms ofunram- tors,AJ ified cohomology. We recallthat, for a smooth complex projectivevariety Y and anabelian group A, the degree i unramified cohomology group Hi (Y,A) of Y with coefficients in A nr canbe defined (see [6])as the groupofglobalsections H0(Y,Hi(A)), Hi(A) being the sheaf associatedto the presheafU 7→Hi(U(C),A), where this last groupis the Betti cohomology of the complex variety U(C). The groups Hi (Y,A) provide stable birational invariants nr (see [10]) of Y, which vanish for projective space i.e. these groups are invariants under the relation: Y ∼Z if X ×Pr is birationally equivalent to Z×Ps for some r, s. Unramified cohomology group with coefficients in Z/mZ or Q/Z has been used in the study ofLu¨rothproblem,thatisthe studyofunirationalvarietieswhicharenotrational,to provide examples of unirational varieties which are not stably rational (see [2],[10]). In the caseofsmoothcubichypersurfacesX ⊂Pn+1,sincethereisaunirationalparametrizationof C degree 2 of X (see [8]) and there is an action of correspondences on unramified cohomology groups compatible with composition of correspondences (see [12, Appendice]), the groups Hi (X,Q/Z),i≥1,are2-torsiongroups. ItisknownthatH1 (X,Q/Z)=0forn≥2since nr nr this groupis isomorphic to the torsionin the Picardgroupof X (see [9, Proposition4.2.1]). Sinceforcubichypersurfacesofdimensionatleast2,H2 (X,Q/Z)isequaltotheBrauer nr group Br(X) (see [9, Proposition 4.2.3]), we have H2 (X,Q/Z)=0. nr As for H3 (Y,Q/Z), it was reinterpreted in [12, Theorem 1.1] for rationally connected nr varieties Y as the torsion in the group Z4 := Hdg4(Y)/H4(Y,Z) , quotient of degree 4 alg Hodge classes by the subgroup of H4(Y,Z) generated by classes of codimension 2 algebraic cycles, i.e. H3 (Y,Q/Z) measures the failure of the integral Hodge conjecture in degree 4. nr For cubic hypersurfaces X ⊂ Pn+1, by Lefschetz hyperplane theorem, the only non trivial C casewherethe integralHodgeconjecturecouldfailindegree4isforcubic4-foldsbutitwas proved to hold by Voisin in [37]. The group H4 (Y,Q/Z) was reinterpreted in [39, Corollary 0.3] for rationally connected nr 4 RENE´ MBORO varieties Y as the group CH3(Y) /alg of homologically trivial torsion codimension tors,AJ 3 cycles annihilated by Abel-Jacobi map (or torsion codimension 3 cycles annihilated by Deligne cycle map) modulo algebraic equivalence. As H4 (X,Q/Z) ≃ CH3(X) /alg, nr tors,AJ we have H4 (X,Q/Z) = 0 for cubic hypersurfaces of dimension 2, 3 (because cubic three- nr foldsarerationallyconnected)and4(because the1-cyclesoncubic4-foldsaregeneratedby lines by [30, Theorem 1.1]). So the first non trivial case is the case of codimension 3 cycles on cubic 5-folds. As suggested by work of Tian and Zong ([34]), who proved that the Griffiths group of homologically trivial 1-cycles on Fano complete intersection of index 2, modulo alge- braic equivalence is 0, and by a question at the end of Section 2 in [40], it is likely that CH (Y) /alg, which is also a birational invariant of smooth projective varieties Y 1 tors,AJ vanishing for stably rational varieties, vanishes for Fano varieties, such as F(X) when dim(X) ≥ 5, or even for rationally connected varieties. So we would expect the group H4 (X,Q/Z) to be trivial for cubic 5-folds. We have the partial result: nr Theorem 0.9. Let X ⊂P6 be a smooth cubic hypersurface. Then H4 (X,Q/Z) is finite. C nr 1. First formula Let X ⊂ Pn+1 be a smooth hypersurface of degree d ≥ 2 and dimension n ≥ 3 over k an algebraically closed field k. Let us denote F(X) ⊂ G(2,n+2) its variety of lines and P ⊂F(X)×X the correspondence given by the universal P1-bundle, and p:P →F(X), q :P →X the two projections. For a general hypersurface of degree d ≤ 2n−2, F(X) is a smooth connected variety ([21, Theorem 4.3]). LetusdenoteQ={([l],x)∈P(E ), l ⊂X orl∩X ={x}}thecorrespondenceassociated 2 to the family of osculating lines of X, and π :Q→X, ϕ:Q→G(2,n+2) the two projections. We have P ⊂Q. The following lemma is obvious: Lemma 1.1. The fiber of π : Q → X (resp. q : P → X) over any point x in the image of π (resp. of q) is isomorphic to an intersection of hypersurfaces of type (2,3,...,d−1) in P(T ) (resp. of type (2,3,...,d)). Moreover, for X general, Q is a local complete X,x intersection subscheme of P(E ) of dimension 2n−d+1. If char(k)=0, then Q is smooth 2 for X general. Proof. By definition Q is the set of ([l],x) in P(E ) over G(2,n+2) where the restriction 2 of the equation defining X is 0 or proportional to λd, where λ is the linear form defin- x x ing x in l. Let x ∈ X and P a hyperplane not containing x. There is an isomorphism P(T ) → P given by [v] 7→ l ∩ P, where l is the line of Pn+1 determined Pn+1,x (x,v) (x,v) by (x,v). We can assume that x = [1,0,...,0] and P = {X = 0}. Let l be a line 0 throughxand[0,Y ,...,Y ]∈P the pointassociatedtol. Then, denotingf anequation 1 n+1 defining X, since x ∈ X, we can write f(X ,...,X ) = d−1Xif (X ,...,X ), 0 n+1 i=0 0 d−i 1 n+1 where fi is a homogeneous polynomial of degree i. The generPal point of l has coordinates (µ,λY ,...,λY ) where λ=λ andµ forma basisof linearforms onl. The restrictionof 1 n+1 x f to l thus writes d−1µiλd−if (Y ,...,Y ). Thus the line l is osculating if and only i=0 d−i 1 n+1 if fj(Y1,...,Yn+1)P= 0, ∀j < d. The first equation f1 is the differential of f at x and its vanishinghyeperplaneisP(T ), soweprovedthatπ−1(x)is isomorphictoanintersection X,x ofhypersurfaces oftype (2,3,...,d−1) in P(T ). We show likewise that the fiber q−1(x) X,x is isomorphic to an intersection of hypersurfaces of type (2,3,...,d). On the projective bundle p :P(E )→G(2,n+2), we have the exact sequence: G 2 (2) 0→Ω (1)→p∗E →O (1)→0 P(E2)/G(2,n+2) G 2 P(E2) REMARKS ON THE CH2 OF CUBIC HYPERSURFACES 5 The last morphism being the evaluation morphism, we see that Ω (1) is P(E2)/G(2,n+2) ([l],x) the ideal sheaf of x in l. Taking the symmetric power of the dual of (2) yields the exact sequence: 0→Symd(Ω (1))→p∗SymdE →p∗Symd−1E ⊗O (1)→0 P(E2)/G(2,n+2) G 2 G 2 P(E2) where the first morphism is the d-th symmetric power of the (first) inclusion in (2). Now,letf beanequationdefiningX;itgivesrisetoasectionσ ofp∗SymdE . Letσ be f G 2 f the section of p∗Symd−1E ⊗O (1) induced by σ . Then the zero locus of σ is exactly G 2 P(E2) f f the locus of ([l],x) where the restriction to l of the equation defining X is 0 or equal to the linear form induced by x on l to the power d. So Q is the zero locus in P(E ) of a section of 2 the vectorbundle p∗Symd−1E ⊗O (1). As this vector bundle is globallygenerated,the G 2 P(E2) zero locus of a general section is a local complete intersection (even regular if char(k)=0) subscheme of P(E ) of dimension 2n−d+1. (cid:3) 2 Theorem 1.2. Let X ⊂Pn+1 be a smooth hypersurface of degree d and let P ⊂F(X)×X k be the incidence correspondence. Assume d−1ir ≤ n with r > 0 and, if r > 3 and i=1 char(k) > 0, assume resolution of singularitPies of varieties of dimension r. Then for any cycle Γ∈CH (X) there is a γ ∈CH (F(X)) such that r r−1 dΓ+P (γ)∈Z·Hn−r ∗ X where H =c (O (1)). X 1 X Proof. Let Σ ⊂ X be an integral subvariety of dimension r > 0. By Tsen-Lang theorem ([22], [33, Theorem 2.10]), the function field k(Σ) of Σ is C . As the fibers of π : Q → X r areisomorphictointersectionofhypersurfacesoftype(2,3,...,d−1)and d−1ir ≤n,the i=1 restriction πΣ :Q|Σ →Σ admits a rational section σ :Σ99KQ. P Case 1: The rational section σ is actually a rational section of P → Σ. This means |Σ that for any x ∈ Σ, the line p◦σ(x) is contained in X. We have the following diagram of resolution of indeterminacies: Σ ❂ ❂ ❂ eτ ❂❂❂σ˜ ❂ (cid:15)(cid:15) ❂(cid:30)(cid:30) // p // Σ P F(X) Let us denote P the pull-back via p◦σ˜ of the P1-bundle on F(X), f : P → X the Σ Σ e e projection on X (which is the restrictionof q) and p :P →Σ the projective bundle. The Σ Σ e line bundle τ∗O (1) gives rise to a section η : Σ → P (given by s 7→ (p◦σ˜(s),τ(s))) of X |Σ Σ e e p . We have the decomposition Pic(P )≃Z·f∗H ⊕p∗Pic(Σ) so that we can write Σ Σ eX Σ e e (3) η(Σ)=f∗H +p∗D X Σ e forDadivisoronΣ. Weapplyf tothatequality: wehavef η(Σ)=τ (Σ)=ΣinCH (X). ∗ ∗ ∗ r Projectionformulayieldsf f∗H =H ·f (1). Finally,weseethatf p∗D =P (p σ˜ (D)). e ∗ X X ∗ e ∗ Σe ∗ ∗ ∗ So, we get Σ=H ·f (1)+P (p σ˜ (D)). X ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ Remembering that dH ·f (1)=i∗ i f (1)∈Z·Hn−r, we are done for this case. X ∗ X X,∗ ∗ X Case 2: The rational section σ is not a rationalsection of P →Σ. This means that for |Σ the general point x ∈ Σ, the line ϕ◦σ(x) is not contained in X, hence intersects X at x 6 RENE´ MBORO with multiplicity d. We have the following diagram of resolution of indeterminacies: Σ . ❂ ❂ ❂ eτ ❂❂❂σ˜ ❂ (cid:15)(cid:15) ❂(cid:30)(cid:30) // ϕ // Σ Q G(2,n+2) LetagainP bethepull-backviaϕ◦σ˜ oftheP1-bundleonG(2,n+2)andletf :P →Pn+1 Σ Σ e e be the natural morphism. Let Σ be the locus in Σ consisting of x ∈ Σ such that the line 1 ϕ◦σ˜(x) is contained in X. We have an equality of r-cycles e e e (4) (f P ) =dΣ+R ∗ Σ |X e in CH (X), where the residual cycle R is supported on the r-dimensional locus P , or r Σe1 rather its image in X. It is clear that R is a cycle in the image of P so that (4) proves the ∗ result in this case. (cid:3) In the case of smooth cubic hypersurfaces of dimension ≥ 3, F(X) is always smooth and connected ([1, Corollary 1.11, Theorem 1.16]). We have the following result which is essentially Theorem 0.2 of the introduction: Theorem 1.3. Let X ⊂Pn+1, with n≥3 and char(k)>2, be a smooth cubic hypersurface k containing a linear space of dimension d≥1. Then, for 1≤i≤d and 2i6=n, P :CH (F(X))→CH (X)/Z·Hn−i ∗ i−1 i X is surjective on 2CH (X)/Z·Hn−i. i X If moreover, n≥2r+1 for a r >0 and resolution of singularities holds of k-varieties of dimension r, then P :CH (F(X))→CH (X)/Z·Hn−i is surjective for any i6= n, 1≤ ∗ i−1 i X 2 i≤r. Proof. According to [8, Appendix B], X admits a unirational parametrization of degree 2 constructed as follows: for a general line ∆ in X, consider the projective bundle P(T ) X|∆ over∆andtherationalmapϕ:P(T )99KX whichtoapointx∈∆andanonzerovector X|∆ v ∈T associatedtheresidualpointtox(xhasmultiplicity2)intheintersectionX∩l X,x (x,v) of X with the line of Pn+1 determined by (x,v). The indeterminacy locus Z correspondsto the(x,v)suchthatl ⊂X. Ithascodimension2forgenerallines. Indeed,if∆isgeneral, (x,v) itisgenerallycontainedinthelocuswerethefibersoftheprojectionq :P →X arecomplete (sinceP hasdimension2n−d)intersectionoftype (2,3)intheprojectivizedtangentspaces so that the general fiber of Z → ∆ has dimension n−3. Choosing a sufficiently general ∆, we can also assume that Z is smooth. Then, blowing-up P(T ) along Z yields the X|∆ ^ resolution of indeterminacies; let us denote τ : P(T ) → P(T ) that blow-up, E the X|∆ X|∆ ^ exceptional divisor and ϕ˜: P(T )→X the resulting degree 2 morphism. For 1≤ i≤ d, X|∆ by the formulas for blowing-up, we have the decomposition CH (P^(T ))=τ∗CH (P(T ))⊕j τ∗ CH (Z)⊕j (j∗ϕ˜∗H )·τ∗ CH (Z). i X|∆ i X|∆ E,∗ |E i−1 E,∗ E X |E i As τ is flat, we can see that ϕ˜ j τ∗ identifies with the composition of the mor- |E ∗ E,∗ |E phism CH (Z) → CH (F(X)) (induced by the restriction of natural morphism P(T ) → ∗ ∗ X G(2,n+2)) followed by the action P . ∗ So let Γ ∈ CH (X), with 2i 6= n, be a cycle on X. As X contains a linear space i of dimension i and H2(n−i)(X,Z ) = Z (∀ℓ 6= char(k)) by Lefschetz hyperplane sec- ´et ℓ ℓ tion theorem (n 6= 2i), for any P ≃ Pi ⊂ X, Γ−deg(Γ)[P] is homologically trivial and ϕ˜ ϕ˜∗(Γ − deg(Γ)[P]) = 2(Γ − deg(Γ)[P]). As P(T ) is a projective bundle over P1, ∗ X|∆ CH (P(T )) =0 so, from the above discussion, we conclude that there are a (i−1)- ∗ X|∆ hom cycle γ ∈CH (F(X)) and a i-cycle D ∈CH (F(X)) such that i−1 hom Γ i hom 2(Γ−deg(Γ)[P])=P γ+H ·P D . ∗ X ∗ Γ REMARKS ON THE CH2 OF CUBIC HYPERSURFACES 7 ItremainstodealwiththetermH ·P D . Forthis,letj :Y ֒→X beahyperplanesection X ∗ Γ with one ordinary double point p as singularity. Then H ·P D =j j∗P D . 0 X ∗ Γ ∗ ∗ Γ We have Y ⊂Pn and if we choose coordinates in which p =[0:···:0:1], the equation 0 of Y has the following form: F(X ,··· ,X ) = X Q(X ,··· ,X )+T(X ,··· ,X ) 0 n n 0 n−1 0 n−1 where Q(X ,··· ,X ) is a quadratic homogeneous polynomial and T(X ,··· ,X ) is a 0 n−1 0 n−1 degree3homogeneouspolynomial. ThelinearprojectionPn 99KPn−1centeredatp induces 0 a birational map Y 99K Pn−1 ≃ [p ] where [p ] denotes the scheme parametrizing lines of 0 0 Pn passing through p . The indeterminacies of the inverse map Pn−1 99K Y are resolved 0 by blowing-up Pn−1 along the complete intersection F (Y) = {Q = 0}∩{T = 0} of type p0 (2,3). The varietyoflines ofY passingthroughp isisomorphictoF (Y) andwe havethe 0 p0 following diagram: P]n−1Fp0(Y) Pn(cid:15)(cid:15)−χ1▲▲▲▲▲▲▲q▲▲▲▲▲▲//&&Y By projection formula, (j◦q) (j◦q)∗P D =P D ·j q 1=P D ·[Y]=P D ·H and ∗ ∗ Γ ∗ Γ ∗ ∗ ∗ Γ ∗ Γ X (j◦q)∗P D isahomologicallytrivialcycleonP]n−1Fp0(Y). ButsincetheidealCH (Pn−1) ∗ Γ ∗ hom of homologically trivial cycles on Pn−1 is 0, from the decomposition of the Chow groups of a blow-up, we get that (j ◦q)∗P D can be written j χ∗ w for a cycle w on ∗ Γ EFp0(Y),∗ |EFp0(Y) F (Y) so that H ·P D = j q j χ∗ w which can be written P i w p0 X ∗ Γ ∗ ∗ EFp0(Y),∗ |EFp0(Y) ∗ Fp0(Y),∗ where i : F (Y) ֒→ F(X) is the inclusion. Finally, P is in Im(P ) so we have: Fp0(Y) p0 ∗ 2Γ=2P +P (γ+i w) which proves that 2CH (X) is in the image of P . ∗ Fp0(Y),∗ i ∗ When n ≥ 2r +1, we can also apply Theorem 1.2; we get, for any cycle Γ ∈ CH (X), a i cycle γ′ ∈CH (F(X)) such that 3Γ+P γ′ ∈Z·Hn−i in CH (X). i−1 ∗ X i (cid:3) Proposition 1.4. Let X ⊂Pn+1, with n≥4 and char(k)>2, be a smooth cubic hypersur- k face. Then Hn−2 ∈ Im(P : CH (F(X)) → CH (X)). In particular, by Theorem 1.3, for X ∗ 1 2 n≥5, P :CH (F(X))→CH (X) is surjective. ∗ 1 2 Proof. Since, according to [25, Lemma 1.4], any smooth cubic threefold contains some lines of second type (lines whose normal bundle contains a copy of O (−1)), X contains lines P1 of second type. Let l ⊂ X be a line of second type. According to [8, Lemma 6.7], there 0 is a (unique) Pn−1 ⊂ Pn+1 tangent to X along l . So, when n ≥ 4, we can choose a 0 P ≃P3 ⊂Pn+1 tangent to X along l . Then S :=P ∩X is a cubic surface singular along 0 0 0 l which is ruled by lines of X. Indeed, for any x ∈ S\l , span(x,l )∩S is a plane cubic 0 0 0 containing l with multiplicity 2; so that the residual curve is a line passing through x. So, 0 we can write S = q(p−1(D)) for a closed subscheme of pure dimension 1, D ⊂ F(X) so, in CH (X), we have Hn−2 =[S]=P ([D]). (cid:3) 2 X ∗ Here is one consequence of this proposition: Corollary 1.5. Let π : X → B be a family of complex cubic hypersurfaces of dimension n≥5 i.e. π is a smooth projective morphism of connected quasi-projective complex varieties with n-dimensional cubic hypersurfaces as fibers. Then, the specialization map CH (X )/alg →CH (X )/alg 2 η 2 t where X is the geometric generic fiber and X := π−1(t) for t ∈ B(k) any closed point, is η t surjective. Proof. The statement follows from Proposition 1.4 and the following property, essentially written in the proof of [38, Lemma 2.1] Proposition 1.6. ([38,Lemma 2.1]). Let π :Y →B be a smooth projective morphism with rationally connected fibers. Then for any t ∈ B(t), the specialization map CH (Y )/alg → 1 η CH (Y )/alg is surjective. 1 t 8 RENE´ MBORO Proof. We just recall briefly the proof: by attaching sufficiently very free rationalcurves to it(sothattheresultingcurveissmoothable),anycurveC ⊂Y isalgebraicallyequivalentto t a (non effective) sum of curves C ⊂Y such that H1(C ,N )=0. Then the morphism i t i Ci/Yt of deformation of each (C ,Y ) to B is smooth. So we have a curve C ⊂Y where K is i t i,η Ki i a finite extension of the function field of B, which is sent by specialization in the fiber Y , t to C . (cid:3) i Appying this proposition to the relative variety of lines F(X) → B, yields a surjective map: CH (F(X ))/alg →CH (F(X ))/alg. TheuniversalP1-bundleP ⊂F(X)× X gives 1 η 1 t B the surjective maps P :CH (F(X ))/alg → CH (X )/alg and P :CH (F(X ))/alg → t,∗ 1 t 2 t η,∗ 1 η CH (X )/alg and they commute ([15, 20.3]). (cid:3) 2 η 2. One-cycles on the variety of lines of a Fano hypersurface in Pn Throughout this section, k will designate an algebraically closed field. According to [21, Theorem 4.3], for a general hypersurface X ⊂ Pn+1 of degree d ≤ 2n−2, the variety of lines F(X)issmooth, connectedofdimension2n−d−1. Inthe caseofcubic hypersurfaces of dimension n ≥ 3, we even know, by work of Altman and Kleiman ([1, Corollary 1.11, Theorem 1.16], see also [3]) that for any smooth hypersurface X, F(X) is smooth and connected. We recall that, for a smooth hypersurface X ⊂ Pn+1 of degree d, when F(X) has the k expected dimension 2n−d−1, it is the zero-locus in G(2,n+2) of a regular section of Symd(E ), where E is the rank 2 quotient bundle on G(2,n+2) and its dualizing sheaf, 2 2 given by adjunction formula ([17, Theorem III 7.11]), is −((n + 2) − d(d+1))) times the 2 Plu¨ckerline bundle onG(2,n+2) restrictedto F(X). In particular,when F(X) is smooth, connected and d(d+1) <(n+2), F(X) is Fano so rationally connected. 2 Fromnow,weassumethattheconditiond(d+1)<2(n+2)holdsandthatX ⊂Pn+1 isa k smoothhypersurfacesuchthatF(X)issmoothandconnected. Thenthe followingtheorem applies to F(X) if char(k) = 0 or, when char(k) > 0, if F(X) is, moreover separably rationally connected: Theorem 2.1. ([34, Theorem 1.3]). Let Y be a smooth proper and separably rationally connected variety over an algebraically closed field. Then every 1-cycle is rationally equiva- lent to a Z-linear combination of cycle classes of rational curves. That is, the Chow group CH (Y) is generated by rational curves. 1 Corollary 2.2. (i) When char(k)=0 and X is a smooth cubic hypersurface of dimension ≥5, F(X)is separably rationally connected; then Proposition 1.3 together with Theorem 2.1 yields that CH (X) is generated by classes of rational surfaces. In positive characteristic, 2 the same is true for smooth cubic hypersurfaces X whose variety of lines F(X) is separably rationally connected. (ii)When k = C and X is a smooth cubic hypersurface of dimension 5, the group of 1- cycles modulo algeraic equivalence, CH (F(X))/alg is finitely generated. Thus CH (X)/alg 1 2 is finitely generated. In particular, the group H4 (X,Q/Z) is finite. nr Proof. (ii)Accordingto[21,Theorem5.7],anyrationalcurveisalgebraicallyequivalenttoa sumofrationalcurvesofanticanonicaldegreeatmostdim (F(X))+1. Astherearefinitely k manyirreduciblevarietiesparametrizingrationalcurvesofboundeddegree,CH (F(X))/alg, 1 is finitely generated. Proposition 1.4 tells us that P : CH (F(X))/alg → CH (X)/alg ∗ 1 2 is surjective so that CH (X)/alg is finitely generated. Now, by work of Voisin ([39]) 2 H4 (X,Q/Z)≃CH (X) /alg ⊂CH (X)/alg so it is finitely generated. On the other nr 2 tors,AJ 2 hand,weknowthat,sinceX admitsaunirationalparametrizationofdegree2,H4 (X,Q/Z) nr is a 2-torsion group so it is a finitely generated Z/2Z-vector space hence H4 (X,Q/Z) is nr finite. (cid:3) REMARKS ON THE CH2 OF CUBIC HYPERSURFACES 9 Actually, by completely different methods using a variant of [37, Theorem 18], the first item of Corollary 2.2 turns out to be true for cubic 4-folds also in characteristic 0. Proposition 2.3. Let X ⊂P5 be a smooth cubic hypersurface. Then CH (X) is generated C 2 by classes of rational surfaces. Proof. IntheproofbyVoisinoftheintegralHodgeconjectureofcubic4-folds([37,Theorem 18]), one can replace the parametrizationof the family of intermediate jacobians associated to a Lefschetz pencil of X, with rationally connected fibers given by [23]and [20] the family of elliptic curves of degree 5) by the one given by [16, Theorem 9.2] (the family of rational curves of degree 4); her proof then shows that any degree 4 Hodge class is homologically equivalenttotheclassofacombinationofrationalsurfacesswept-outbyafamilyofrational curves of degree 4 in X parameterized by a rational curve. Finally, since X is rationally connected and the intermediate jacobian J3(X) is trivial, Bloch-Srinivas [7, Theorem 1] applies and says that codimension 2 cycles homologically trivial on X are rationally trivial so that we have proved that any 2-cycle on X is rationally equivalent to a combination of rational surfaces. (cid:3) 2.1. One-cycles modulo algebraic equivalence. In this section, we apply the methods of [34, Theorem 6.2], using a coarse parametrization of rational curves lying on F(X), to study 1-cycles on varieties F(X). Our goal is to prove: Theorem 2.4. Let X ⊂Pn+1 be a smooth hypersurface of degree d, with d(d+1) <n, such k 2 that F(X) is smooth, connected. Then every rational curve on F(X) is algebraically equiv- alent to an integral sum of lines. In particular (assuming moreover that F(X) is separably rationally connected if char(k) > 0), any 1-cycle on F(X) is algebraically equivalent to an integral sum of lines and thus CH (F(X)) =CH (F(X)) . 1 hom 1 alg We start with some preparation. Let V be a (n+ 2)-dimensional k-vector space and X ⊂ P(V) ≃ Pn+1 a smooth hypersurface of degree d. A morphism r : P1 → G(2,V) such k that r∗O (1)≃O (e), with e ≥1, is associated to the datum of a globally generated G(2,V) P1 rank2vectorbundleonP1,whichisaquotientofthetrivialbundleV ⊗O i.e. toanexact P1 sequence V ⊗O →O (a)⊕O (b)→0 P1 P1 P1 with a,b≥0 and a+b=e. So a natural parameter space for those morphisms is P:=P(Hom(V∗,H0(P1,O (a))⊕H0(P1,O (b)))). P1 P1 Given [P ,...,P ,Q ,...,Q ] ∈ P, where the P ’s are in H0(P1,O (a)) and the Q ’s 0 n+1 0 n+1 i P1 i are in H0(P1,O (b)), the points in the image in P(V) of Im(P1 → G(2,n + 2)) un- P1 der the correspondence given by the universal P1-bundle are of the form [P (Y ,Y )λ + 0 0 1 Q (Y ,Y )µ,...,P (Y ,Y )λ+Q (Y ,Y )µ] where Span(Y ,Y )=H0(P1,O (1)). Let 0 0 1 n+1 0 1 n+1 0 1 0 1 P1 Πn+1Xαi ∈H0(Pn+1,O (d)) be a mononial with n+1α =d. Then the induced equa- i=0 i Pn+1 i=0 i tionontheimageinPn+1ofthemorphismP1 →G(2,nP+2)associatedto[P0,...,Pn+1,Q0,...,Qn+1] has the following form: d α ( Πn+1 i Pαi−liQli)λd−kµk i=0(cid:18)l (cid:19) i i Xk=0 0≤l0≤α0,...X,0≤ln+1≤αn+1 i Pili=k so that, denoting P , the closed subset of P parametrizingthe [P ,...,P ,Q ,...,Q ] X 0 n+1 0 n+1 whoseimageinPn+1iscontainedinthehypersurfaceX ofdegreed,isdefinedby d (a(d− k=0 k)+bk+1)= homogeneous polynomials of degree d on P. P TheclosedsubsetB ⊂PparametrizingtheM ∈P(Hom(V∗,H0(P1,O (a))⊕H0(P1,O (b)))) P1 P1 whose rank is ≤2 has dimension 2(e+n)+3. Now, we have the following lemma: Lemma 2.5. ([18]). Let Y be a subscheme of a projective space PN defined by M homoge- neous polynomials. Let Z be a closed subset of Y with dimension <N −M−1. Then Y\Z is connected. 10 RENE´ MBORO The closed subset B∩P of P has dimension X X dim (F(X))+2(a+1)+2(b+1)−1=2n−d−1+2e+3=2(e+n)−d+2 k since it parametrizes (generically) a point of F(X) and over that point 2 polynomials in H0(P1,O (a))and2polynomialsinH0(P1,O (b)). ApplyingLemma2.5withY =P and P1 P1 X Z =B∩P ,sothatN =(n+2)(e+2)−1andM = d (a(d−k)+bk+1)=d+1+ed(d+1), X k=0 2 yields the following condition for the connectednessPof PX\(B∩PX): d(d+1) (5) e(n− )>1 2 Proof of Theorem 2.4. We proceed by induction on the degree of the considered rational curve, following the arguments of [34, Theorem 6.2]. LetD ⊂Pbetheclosedsubsetparametrizing2(n+2)-tuples[P ,...,P ,Q ,...,Q ] 0 n+1 0 n+1 that have a common non constant factor. Assume e ≥ 2. Let p ∈ P \(P ∩(B ∪D)) be X X a point parametrizing a degree e morphism P1 → F(X) generically injective. As e ≥ 2, P \(P ∩B) is connected; so there is a connected curve γ in P \(P ∩B) connecting X X X X p to a point q = [P ,...,P ,Q ,...,Q ] of P ∩D\(P ∩B). Factorizing out 0,q n+1,q 0,q n+1,q X X the common factor of (P ,Q ) , we get a (P′ ,Q′ ) which parametrizes i,q i,q i=0...n+1 i,q i,q i=0...n+1 a morphism P1 → F(X) of degree < e (finite onto its image), since q ∈/ B. So, approching q from points of γ outside D and using standard bend-and-break construction, we get from q a morphism from a connected curve whose components are isomorphic to P1 to F(X) such that the restriction to each component yields a rational curve of degree < e (or a contraction). So the rational curve parametrized by p is algebraically equivalent to a sum of rational curve each of which has degree < e. We conclude by induction on e that the rational curve parametrized by p is algebraically equivalent to a sum of lines. (cid:3) 2.2. One-cycles modulo rational equivalence. Fromnow on, we will assume that X ⊂ Pn+1 is a smooth hypersurface of degree d>2, with d(d+1)/2<n, and that char(k)=0. k The following is proved in [13, Proposition 6.2]: Proposition 2.6. Assume char(k) = 0 and X ⊂ Pn+1 is a smooth hypersurface of degree k d>2, with d(d+1)/2<n. Then, F(X) is chain connected by lines. Proceeding as in [34], we get the following result: Theorem2.7. LetX ⊂Pn+1 beasmoothhypersurface ofdegreed>2over an algebraically k closed field of characteristic 0, with d(d+1) < n, such that F(X) is smooth and connected. 2 Then CH (F(X)) is generated by lines i.e. any 1-cycle is rationally equivalent to a Z-linear 1 combination of lines. Proof. Let γ be a 1-cycle on F(X). According to Theorem 2.4, there is a Z-linear com- bination of lines m l such that γ − m l is algebraically equivalent to 0. Then, i i i i i i using [34, ProposiPtion 3.1], we know therPe is a positive integer N such that for every 1- cycle C on F(X), NC is rationally equivalent to a Z-linear combination of lines. As the groupCH (X) of 1-cycles algebraicallyequivalent to 0 is divisible ([4, Lemme 0.1.1]),we 1 alg conclude that γ− m l is rationally equivalent to a Z-linear combination of lines. (cid:3) i i i P This provides us the following results for cubic hypersurfaces (cf. Proposition 0.5): Corollary 2.8. Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 and X a smooth cubic hypersurface. We have the following properties: (i) if dim (X) ≥ 7, then, CH (X) is generated (over Z) by cycle classes of planes con- k 2 tained in X and CH (X) =CH (X) ; 2 hom 2 alg (ii) if dim (X)≥9, then, CH (X)≃Z k 2 Proof. Item (ii) is an application of Proposition 1.4 and Theorem 2.7. (iii)ThevarietyoflinesF(F(X))ofF(X)isisomorphictotheprojectivebundleP(E ) 3|F2(X) overF (X)⊂G(3,n+2), where E is the rank 3 quotientbundle onG(3,n+2) andF (X) 2 3 2 isthe varietyonplanesofX,sincea line inF(X)correspondto the lines ofPn+1 contained