Reliance of the Traveller Revised Edition The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law 'Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller amana publications Beltsville, Maryland U.S.A CONTENTS Introduction vii Documents xiii Warrant of Sheikh 'Abd al-Wakil Durubi Warrant of Sheikh Nuh 'Ali Salman Report of the International Institute of Islamic Thought Certification of al-Azhar Abbreviations xxii A. Sacred Knowledge 1 B. The Validity of Following Qualified Scholarship 15 C. The Nature of Legal Rulings 27 D. Author's Introduction to 'Umdat ai-Salik 47 E. Purification 49 F. The Prayer 101 G. The Funeral Prayer 220 H. Zakat 244 I. Fasting 277 J. The Pilgrimage 297 K. Trade 371 L. Inheritance 460 M. Marriage 506 N. Divorce 554 O. Justice 578 P. Enormities 649 Q. Commanding the Right and Forbidding the Wrong 713 R. Holding One's Tongue 726 S. Delusions 777 T. A Pure Heart 796 U. The Gabriel Hadith 807 V. Belief in Allah and His Messenger 816 W. Notes and Appendices 826 X. Biographical Notes 1019 Y. Works Cited 1116 Z. Indexes 1128 A comprehensive table of contents precedes each section. v IN TIlE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE INTRODUCTION Praise to Allah Most High, who inspired His slave Muhammad the Koran and Wisdom, as a mercy unto the worlds, Allah bless him and give him peace, Thc four Sunni schools of Islamic law, Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and HanbaJi, are identical in approximately 75 percent of their legal conclusions, while the remaining questions, variances within a single family of explainers of the Holy Koran and prophetic sunna, are traceable to methodological differences in under standing or authentication of the primary textual evidence, differing viewpoints sometimes reflected in even a single school. The present volume, 'Umdat al-salik [The reliance of the traveller], represents one of the finest and most reliable short works in Shafi'i jurisprudence, a school with perhaps fewer scholarly differences on rulings than others because its main resource is the recension of Imam Nawawi, the great thirteenth-century Shafi'i hadith scholar and jurisprudent who upgraded the work of previous generations in terms of the authenticity and appli cation of hadithevidence, The author of' Umdat al-salik, Ibn Naqib, closely fol lows the order and conclusions of Nawawi's encyclopedic al-Majmu': sharh al-Muhadhdhab [The compendium: an exegesis of "The rarefaction"] with its addendum, al-Takmila [The completion], by Ibn Naqib's own sheikh, Taqi ai-Din Subki. The present volume is virtually an index of the conclusions of the Majmu', and readers interested in the evidence from Koran and hadith for the rulings of the present volume can find them there, or, Allah willing, in a forthcoming sister work to be called The Guidance a/the Traveller,_ In an age when some Muslims are calling for an end to the four schools of jurisprUdence in order to make way for a single school exclusively taken, it is claimed, from the texts ofthe Koran and hadith,it might be wondered: why offer Muslims a book from a particular school at all? The answer, in part, is that each school does not merely comprise the work of a single Imam, but rather represents a large collectivity of scholars whose research in Sacred Law and its ancillary dis ciplines has been characterized by considerable division of labor and specializa tion over a very long period of time, Among the specialists in the field of hadith, for example, who were Shafi'is are such scholarll as Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Nasa'i, Ibn Majah. Abu Dawud. Ibn Kathir, Dhahabi, and Nawawi; while the school has also had many Koranic exegetes, scholars of the sciences of Arabic, and legal specialists, most of whom were actively involved in contributing to the school's jurisprUdence, The resuh of this division of labor has been a body of legal vii Introduction texts that are arguably superior in evidence, detail, range, and in sheer usefulness to virtually any recent attempt to present Islam as a unified system of human life. For most nontraditional works seen up to the present have been one-man efforts, while the classic texts have been checked and refined by a large number of schol ars, and the difference is manifest. At the same time, it is fairly safe to say that there is no single work from any ofthe schools that.has everything, and an impar tial student of jurisprudence must surely feel that the research of the schools should not only be learned and transmitted, but also sorted out and recast into a form accessible and suited to Muslim needs today. Regarding this need for relevance, it will be nqticed that the basic text 'Umdat al-salik is by no means the only thing in the present work. Three introduc tory sections in the form of a "user's guide to Sacred Law" precede the basic text, which is likewise followed by eight major appendices on subjects ranging from personal ethics and character (akhlaq) to Islamic spirituality and tenets of faith, while a final biographical section tells readers who the figures mentioned through out the book's legal texts are. Though these separate parts cover a considerable range of topics within the Islamic ethic, the aim in gathering them has been to achieve a unitary reference work that is eclectic in neither subject matter nor scholarly sources. As for subject matter, the emphasis of the book is on the path we now travel, to paradise or hell, and it is this that unites the work and determines the relative importance of the questions treated; why, for example, a legal discussion from Nawawi's Kitab al-adhkar [The book of the remembrances of Allah] on unlawful slander (ghiba) must be given equal weight to a section on the sunnas of ablution (wudu) from 'Umdatal-salik, and so on. As for sources, the authors translated are, with few exceptions, well-known scholars of the Shafi'i school of jurisprudence and Ash'ari school of tenets ot faith. as appears in their biographies. The many who were Sufis were of the strictest observance of the Sacred Law. While such affiliations, and indeed much of what can be termed traditional Sunni Islam, have not been spared the criticism of cer tain post-caliphal Muslim writers and theorists. the authors of the present volume and their positions do represent the orthodox Muslim intellectual and spiritual heritage that has been the strength of the Community for over a thousand years, and the means through which Allah has preserved His religion, in its purest and fullest sense, to the present day. THE INTERPRETIVE METHOD The style of translating the basic text is an explanative one with interlinear commentary. The reason for commentary, briefly, is that this book, like others in Islamic law, is less the achievement of a particular author than the shared effort of a whole school of research and interpretation in explaining rules of divine ori gin. The cooperative nature of this effort may be seen in the multilayered charac ter of its texts, whose primary authors often merely state the ruling of an act, law ful or unlawful, leaving matters of definition, conditions, and scriptural evidence for the commentator to supply, who in turn leaves important details for both writ ers of marginal notes and for living sheikhs to definitively interpret when teaching the work to their students. The sheikhs form a second key resource of textual commentary, a spoken one parallel to the written, and in previous centuries of viii Introduction traditional Islamic learning it was well known that no student could dispense with it. Living teachers were and are needed to explain terminological difficulties, eliminate ambiguities, and correct copyists' mistakes, The present translator was no exception to the need for instructors, but went to sheikhs to learn, studying with them during the course of preparing the translation, asking, and listening to their explanations of matters of Sacred Law, many of which are recorded below. The entire book's Arabic texts have been reviewed separately with each of the scholars, Sheikh 'Abd al-Wakil Durubi and Sheikh Nuh 'Ali Salman. Both ably represent the tradition, links in an unbroken succession of masters leading back to the founder of the school himself. Sheikh 'Abd al-Wakil acquired his Shafi'i jurisprudence in the course of eighteen years of instruction with his own teacher, Ibrahim al-Ghazzi, before becoming imam of the Darwishiyya in Damascus, while Sheikh Nuh spent a similar number of years reading and studying the law with various sheikhs before his appointment as mufti in Jordan. Few Western vocations require as much specialized learning. If it be objected that their com ments are not part of the original text, or 'even intrusive, the reply is that such teaching is recommended by long Islamic tradition with good reason, as may he seen by readers who compare the clarity, for example, of the present work's sec tions on estate division (L4 to LlO) with any English translation of comparable sections from other works, Moreover. care has been taken throughout the volume to assign each statement to the person who said it. Finally, close contact with these scholars as Muslims leaves one with a firm impression of godfearingness, the first condition of real knowledge and its most important fruit. SOME POINTS ABOUT THE BOOK Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) is the author of the basic text, 'Umdat al-salik wa 'uddat al-nasik [The reliance of the traveller and tools of the worshipper] (y89), which is vowelled in the Arabic. Not a single omission has been made from it. though rulings about matters now rare or nonexistent have been left untranslated unless interesting for some other reason. Parts un trans lated are enclosed in brackets. 'Umar Barakat (d. after 13(711890) wrote the text', commentary, Fayd al Ilah ai-Malik fi hall alfaz 'Umdat al-salik wa 'uddat ai-nasik [The outpouring of the Sovereign Divinity: an interpretation of the words of "The reliance of the travel ler and tools of the worshipper"] (y27). from which excerpts have been selected and introduced into the basic text by the translator. These are parenthesized in the Arabic and unvowelled, and distinguished in the English by parentheses and the capital letter O. Similarly, the comments of Sheikh Nuh . Ali Salman are parenthesized in both languages. in the Arabic unvowelled and introduced by the letter ha' (C ), and in the English by the letter N. The comments of Sheikh 'Abd al-Wakil Durubi are presented in the same way, but marked in the English with the capital letter A, and in the Arabic, where given, by the letter 'ayn ( t). Notes from the sheikhs that are not given in the Arabic text are from discussions (often partly in colloquial Arabic) recorded at the time in English alone, whose precise classical Arabic wording the translator did not try to reconstruct, though they have been well understood, and the English, Allah willing, adequately conveys their meaning. The translator's own remarks are parenthesized, and introduced by a lowercase n in the English and by the letter ta' (.::-) if given in Arabic. ix Introduction Other supplementary texts begin with the author's name at the first of the quote, and finish with the source's title, volume, and page number at the end of it, with the addition in the English of the work's reference number from the present volume's bibliographical section, book y. All works cited about Islamic faith or practice are by Muslim authors. Biographical information on those quoted or mentioned throughout the present work is given in book x, where they are listed alphabetically, first name first. The rulings of the text have been numbered both to increase the work's acces sibility to users of the tables of contents and to facilitate cross-reference, since the definition and range of many important terms are governed by conditions and stipulations classical authors typically mention but once, their students master ing such definitional points by prodigious memories, for which a system of cross reference is, in our own times. perhaps the only effective substitute, Within the rulings themselves, columns of necessary conditions or integrals, meaning that all of them must be present for the ruling to hold true, are itemized by letters: (a), (b), (c), etc. An example is the conditions for the validity of the prayer, which must all be met for the prayer to be valid. Columns of examples or instances of a ruling's applicability are itemized by numbers: (1), (2), (3), etc., indicating that not all need exist but anyone of them suffices to apply the ruling. such as the things which invalidate fasting, the existence of any of which invali dates it. EDITING THE TEXTS The editorial preferences of The Chicago Manual of Style have generally been followed in preparing the texts of the present volume, though by the nature of their special challenges, the manner of citing the texts differs from the manual's recommendations for handling quotations in the following ways: (I) The old Arabic texts were free of need for any punctuation because of the language's syntactic precision, and were originally written without it, whife it was introduced in a somewhat haphazard manner in comparatively recent times, attested to by the books printed within the last hundred years in the Arab world, which show wide discrepancies in both the extent to which punctuation is used and in the meaning of such devices as quotation marks, commas, semicolons, paren theses, brackets, and the rest. In editing the Arabic of the present volume, the translator has standardized its punctuation according to the practice of most Arab publishers in the 1980s, with the exception of the use of parentheses and brackets, which Arab writers often use for emphasis, while the translator has employed them as in English, for the purposes of interlinear commentary and indicating un translated passages, as described above. (2) The Arabic chapter and section titles extant in the original texts have been shortened to the name of the topic alone, for example, from Bab al-Hiba ("Chapter of Gift Giving") to al-Hiba (HGift Giving"), and so forth. Passages introducing a new topic that is not separately distinguished in the original Arabic, or merely distinguished by the word fasl ("section") have been separated into sections and given English titles, such as section n6, "Doubts About the Faet of Having Divorced," and subsection titles have been added x Introduction where expedient, such as before j17.9, "Hunting." The reason for this retitling and regrouping was to improve the work's accessibility to English-speaking users, to whom an effective reference tool is worth more than a well-kept antique. The Arabic titles of such sections were supplied by Sheikh Nuh after their English titles had been written, according to the expressions he felt best summarized the sections' contents, not by way of translating the English titles, so there is not always a strict correspondence between the titles of the two languages. "Hunt ing," for example, became "The Rulings of Hunting" (Ahkam al-Sayd) in Arabic, and so forth. As for major regroupings, books d through 0 of the present volume corres pond to the books of 'Umdat al-salik with only three exceptions: book d, "The Author's Introduction"; the sections of book L on bequests (Ll-3), which have been moved there from book k ("Trade "); and "The Book of Dowry" (Kitab al Sadaq), originally from mS to n12, from whiCh book n ("Divorce") has been sepa rated, since it seemed fitter to include dowry, wife support, and so forth, under the rubric of marriage, and place matters connected with divorce in a separate book. (3) As previously mentioned, parts of the Arabic left untranslated into English are distinguished in the Arabie alone by square brackets. For the sake of fluency and readability, such untranslated portions are not marked by ellipsis points ( ... ) in the English, as the existence of the contents of the ellipsis in the parallel column of Arabic was felt to suffice in their stead. The occasional use of ellipsis points in the English has been confined to indicating editorial omissions in the Arabic, and where such an ellipse is not indicated in the English, the ellipsis points appear in brackets in the facing column of Arabic alone. (4) In the course of editing the commentary and some of the supplementary material of the present volume, though not the basic text, the sequence of some passages has occasionally been altered for the sake of coherence of argumenta tion, thc need for which will not be lost on anyone familiar with medieval Arabic texts, whose authors sometimes seem to have not reedited their work with a view towards logical sequencing or eliminating digressions. Passages in which this has bccn done have been reviewed and checked by both Sheikh 'Abd al-Wakil and Sheikh Nuh, like the other texts of the present work, and are indicated at the end of their Arabic texts by the words bi raqdim wa ta'khir ("put ahead and behind") as is done by Muslim scholars when a passage is quoted in this way. OTHER DETAILS As an aid to non-Arabie-speakers, transliteration section wI has been added to help people pronounce the supplications (du'a') and invocations (dhikr) mentioned in the course of the book, with the observation that it is best to also tape-record a native speaker of Arabic reading the texts so as to master them by imitating the tape, and to facilitate this there is an index of the relevant Arabie texts atw2. The untranslatability of the Holy Koran i~ fully acknowledged by the trans lator, whose only effort whcre it is quoted in the present volume has been to ex plain the significance of its verses, giving a map as it were to the wide lands of its XI Introduction magnificent Arabic. The English by no means purports to be or to imitate the word of Allah Most High. It is related that Imam Shafi'i (Allah have mercy on him) rechecked his mas terpiece on legal principles, al-Risala, forty times before he finally said, "Allah has refused to give divine protection from error ('isma) to anyone besides His prophets." The matter is as he said, and one can only strive one's utmost for accu racy and ask Allah to forgive one's mistakes and oversights. If reade~s benefit from these pages, perhaps they will pray for those who had a hand in them and thank Allah Most High, who attributes all that exists t'o" Himself by saying, ,t. . ," , "This is Allah's creation, so show me what IJ .l.:i.1~~ .j.J;1J <ill J.l.:i.1.L., those besides Him have created:' (Koran 31:11). . [' \ : i)L..li] ~~.J; ~ ~+il May Allah Most High bless His beloved, Muhammad, and give him peace, and his folk and Companions one and all. * xii www.islamicbulletin.com DOCUMENTS xiii Documents www.islamicbulletin.com [WARRANT OF SHEIKH 'ABD AL-WAKIL DURUBI] IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds. Allah bless our liegelord Muham mad, his folk, and his Companions and give them peace. The writer of these words, 'Abd al-Wakil Durubi, says: Brother Nuh Ha Mim Keller has heard from me all the chapters of this book, whose basic text is 'Umdat al-salik wa 'uddat al nasik, together with the additions he has made to the text from the commentary entitled Fayd al-Ilah ai-Malik, as well as other chapters on principles of law and faith (usul) and particular rulings (furo') that he has placed before and after the main work; he understands the texts of this volume and is qualified to expound it and translate it to his native English. This took place in sessions, the first of which was in the month of Rajab, AH. 1405, and the last of which was in the month of Sha'ban. A.H. 1408. Written by the slave in need of Allah Most High, Sha'ban, A.H. 1408 [April, 1988] 'Abd al-Wakil Durubi [stamped] Imam of the Mosque of Darwish Pasha Damascus, Syria Witnessed by the needy of Allah Most High, Yasin 'Arafa. I attest to what the teacher and sheikh Yasin 'Arafa has witnessed [signed] Muhyiddin Mahmalji. I attest to what the teacher and sheikh 'Abd al-Wakil Durubi (Allah Most High protect him) has written. I am the needy slave, 'Abd ai-Rahman Shaghouri [signed]. xiv