UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs Systems Development Prior FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Cost To Total COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Complete Cost Total Program Element -   171.543 297.850 257.167 -   257.167 292.401 184.177 145.203 120.358 Continuing Continuing 330: Abrams Tank Improve Prog -   97.901 102.495 77.603 -   77.603 143.636 76.870 62.709 64.193 Continuing Continuing 371: Bradley Improve Prog -   73.642 76.192 73.775 -   73.775 113.999 83.848 57.647 30.846 Continuing Continuing EE2: Stryker Improvement -   -   119.163 105.789 -   105.789 34.766 23.459 24.847 25.319 Continuing Continuing Note The Stryker Improvement Program (Project EE2) was submitted under a new Program Element for the FY 2015 President's Budget. The previous Program Element was 0603653A/Project C03 and C51. The FY 2016 funding request was reduced by $55.853; Abrams (Project 330; $35.769) and Bradley (Project 371; $20.084) million to account for the availability of prior year execution balances. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Army has approved engineering change proposals for the Abrams, Bradley and Stryker programs to restore lost platform capability and host inbound technologies. This Program Element (PE) corrects vehicle deficiencies identified in Army operations; continues technical system upgrades to include the integration of applicable technologies on ground systems; addresses needed evolutionary enhancements to tracked combat vehicles; and develops technology improvements which have application to or insertion opportunities across multiple Ground Combat Systems vehicles. This PE provides combat effectiveness and Operating and Support (O&S) cost reduction enhancements for the Abrams tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Stryker Family of Vehicles (FOVs) through a series of product improvements. The strategy for Abrams and Bradley will focus on incrementally delivering capability to the warfighter to meet both near-term limitations as well as mitigating gaps and maintaining combat overmatch in the future. This effort was approved by the Army Acquisition Executive in 3Q FY 2011. The Abrams M1A2 SEP V2 and M2/M3A3 Bradley Fighting Vehicles are at or exceed Space, Weight, and Power-Cooling (SWaP-C) limitations. In order to host and restore lost platform capability, the Abrams Tank and Bradley Fighting Vehicle programs will execute a series of Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) to support the current embedded systems and to facilitate integration of technologies currently in development under other existing Programs of Record. The ECPs are not intended to exceed the operational capability outlined in current system requirements documents, but rather to ensure that the existing system performance is not further degraded and that Army mission equipment packages can be integrated on the Abrams and Bradley Platforms. Stryker Improvement Program will address Lethality, Survivability, Mobility, and Communication, Command, and Control (C3) issues with the Stryker family of vehicles. Primary focus is on the Stryker ECP 1 effort which will enable the Stryker Double-V Hull (DVH) fleet to buy back the Space, Weight, and Power-Cooling (SWaP-C) that has been lost as a result of vehicle changes required to counter the evolving threats that were present in the Theater of Operations. The ECP 1 effort will allow the DVH PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 214 Army Page 1 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs Systems Development fleet to host the future network without further degrading vehicle performance. The upgrade will increase available electrical power while ensuring adequate mechanical power, weight margin, and cooling. Combined with a digital backbone, this will ensure that the DVH fleet can host the future network while retaining its protection and mobility. Funding in FY16-20 supports continued development engineering, prototype build and testing efforts for Stryker ECP 1. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 Total Previous President's Budget 177.437 295.177 318.674 -   318.674 Current President's Budget 171.543 297.850 257.167 -   257.167 Total Adjustments -5.894 2.673 -61.507 -   -61.507 • Congressional General Reductions -   -   • Congressional Directed Reductions -   -0.127 • Congressional Rescissions -   -   • Congressional Adds -   -   • Congressional Directed Transfers -   -   • Reprogrammings -   -   • SBIR/STTR Transfer -5.894 -   • Adjustments to Budget Years -   2.800 -61.507 -   -61.507 Congressional Add Details ($ in Millions, and Includes General Reductions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Project: EE2: Stryker Improvement Congressional Add: Stryker ECP 1 Development (Engineering/Prototypes) Congressional Add -   21.755 Congressional Add: Stryker ECP 1 Testing Congressional Add -   3.918 Congressional Add: Contractor Support to Test Congressional Add -   3.327 Congressional Add Subtotals for Project: EE2 -   29.000 Congressional Add Totals for all Projects -   29.000 PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 215 Army Page 2 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs Prior FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Cost To Total COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Complete Cost 330: Abrams Tank Improve Prog -   97.901 102.495 77.603 -   77.603 143.636 76.870 62.709 64.193 Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Army has approved engineering change proposals for the Abrams program to restore lost platform capability and host inbound technologies. The strategy for Abrams will focus on incrementally delivering capability to the warfighter to meet both near-term limitations as well as mitigating gaps and maintaining combat overmatch in the future. This effort was approved by the Army Acquisition Executive in 3Q FY 2011. The Abrams vehicle is at or exceeds Space, Weight, and Power-Cooling (SWaP-C) limitations. In order to host and restore lost platform capability, the Abrams Tank will execute a series of Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) to support the current embedded systems and to facilitate integration of technologies currently in development under other existing Programs of Record. The ECPs are not intended to exceed the operational capability outlined in current system requirements documents, but rather to ensure that the existing system performance is not further degraded and that Army mission equipment packages can be integrated on the Abrams Platforms. ECP 1B (formerly ECP 2) preparation/preliminary efforts begin in FY15 with developmental contract award expected in late FY16. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Title: Abrams Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 1A 87.844 87.692 33.038 Description: The improvements implemented through the Abrams ECP 1A Program will restore lost power generation and distribution, mitigate impending obsolescence, and incorporate inbound technologies currently under development in other existing Programs of Record. Incorporation of force protection improvements will counter evolving threats. FY 2014 Accomplishments: The Critical Design Review (CDR) occurred 3Q FY14. The system baseline was finalized to include the technology integration of Handheld Manpack Small (HMS) radios and Joint Battle Command-Platform (JBC-P) to enable network compatibility, Power Generation/Distribution (battery monitoring system, increased amperage generator, slip ring), auxiliary power unit, ammunition data link, armor protection upgrade, Counter Remote Control Improvised Explosive Device (RCIED) Electronics Warfare System (CREW) Duke V3, and Line replaceable modules. Began the nine (9) prototype vehicle builds. FY 2015 Plans: FY2015 efforts will consist of completing prototype builds, component qualification testing, contractor vehicle testing, and initial prototype handoff for government testing. Production contract preparation will begin. FY 2016 Plans: A System Verification Review and Production Readiness Review will be held in FY 2016. The ECP 1A Technical Data Package (TDP) will be approved in 2Q FY2016 to support a production contract award in late FY2016. United States Government (USG) PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 216 Army Page 3 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Production Prove-out Test (PPT) will continue throughout FY2016. Engineering will complete root cause and corrective action work as test incident reports arise. Logistics Support Analysis (LSA), technical manual development/updates, Level of Repair Analysis (LORA), and Source of Repair Analysis (SORA) will continue. Preparation for Next Evolution Armor installation into prototypes for live fire testing will also begin. Title: ECP 1A Training Device Updates -   -   0.300 Description: Development and design of training device upgrades to reflect the ECP 1A upgrades to the vehicle. FY 2016 Plans: Development engineering for the Common Driver Trainer (CDT) upgrades to reflect the ECP 1A vehicle configuration. Title: Abrams Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 1B (formerly ECP 2) - Lethality ECP -   0.250 23.590 Description: The Abrams ECP 1B (formerly ECP 2) program consists mainly of lethality improvements. The primary focus is the integration of Improved Forward Looking Infrared (IFLIR) and the integration of Ammunition Data Link (ADL) for the Advanced Multi-purpose (AMP) round. Additional improvements to the target acquisition sensors consist of inclusion of color cameras and laser capabilities. Other potential improvements consist of an improved environmental control system, laser warning receiver, and vehicle smoke generation. Trade studies/analysis will be performed to evaluate other potential improvements. FY 2015 Plans: Begin contract development efforts on ECP 1B (Lethality improvements) to support late FY2016 contract award with continued synchronization with Product Managers (PMs) Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Ground Sensors, and Large Caliber Ammunition Systems. Trade studies/analysis will be performed to evaluate Improved Forward Looking Infrared (IFLIR) integration and the integration of Ammunition Data Link (ADL) for the Advanced Multi-purpose (AMP) round, as well as other potential improvements. FY 2016 Plans: Contract development efforts will continue on ECP 1B (lethality improvements). Contract award is expected in late FY2016. Continue synchronization with Product Managers (PMs) Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Ground Sensors, and Large Caliber Ammunition Systems. Trade studies/analysis will be performed to evaluate Improved Forward Looking Infrared (IFLIR) integration and the integration of Ammunition Data Link (ADL) for the Advanced Multi-purpose (AMP) round, and other potential improvements, i.e. environmental controls, smoke generation and other potential force protection elements. Requirements decomposition and traceability efforts will start in FY2016. Title: Program Management Office (PMO) Support 8.906 7.463 6.137 Description: Program Management Office Support includes Systems Engineering and Government and Contractor salaries, travel and other support costs required to effectively manage the program. PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 217 Army Page 4 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2014 Accomplishments: Continued Government Systems Engineering and Program Management Office Support in FY14. This included labor, travel, training, supplies and equipment to effectively manage the program. FY 2015 Plans: Continue Government Systems Engineering and Program Management Office Support in FY15. This will include labor, travel, training, supplies and equipment to effectively manage the program. FY 2016 Plans: Continue Government Systems Engineering and Program Management Office Support in FY16. This will include labor, travel, training, supplies and equipment to effectively manage the program. Title: Test & Evaluation 1.151 7.090 14.538 Description: Test and Evaluation to support the ECP 1A program will occur in two phases: Production Prove-out Testing (PPT), FY2015 - FY2018, and Production Qualification Test (PQT), FY2018 - FY2020. Contractor testing will be conducted in a structured environment determined by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Government testing will be conducted by the U.S. Army Test and Evaluaton Center (ATEC). FY 2014 Accomplishments: Test & Evaluation efforts to support component level test events and planning and development of test documentation (Test Evaluation Program Plan (TEPP) and Test Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP). FY 2015 Plans: Continue Test & Evaluation efforts to support component level test events and planning and development of test documentation. Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) testing to include software, mobility, communications, and slope and grade testing will be conducted. Firing functionality of the main gun and secondary weapon systems will occur at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD and Yuma Proving Grounds, AZ. FY 2016 Plans: Continue Test and Evaluation to support vehicle level test events and planning and development of test documentation. In 1Q FY16, gun firing and production prove-out testing as well as Automotive/Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) testing will begin. Electromagnetic Interference/Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI/EMC) Testing will begin in 3QFY16. These test and evaluation events will occur at various test sites (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Yuma Proving Ground, and White Sands Missile Range). Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 97.901 102.495 77.603 PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 218 Army Page 5 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Cost To Line Item FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Complete Total Cost • Abrams Upgrade 90.000 120.000 -   -   -   -   -   -   -     -     210.000 Program: Abrams Upgrade Program (GA0750) WTCV • M1 Abrams Tank Mod 178.100 237.023 367.939 -   367.939 489.437 606.014 451.773 496.647 16,622.398 19,449.331 (GA0700): M1 Abrams Tank Mod (GA0700) WTCV Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy Abrams Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 1A: Research & Development Contract - Sole Source, Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF); ECP 1B - Research & Development Contract - Sole Source, Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) E. Performance Metrics N/A PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 219 Army Page 6 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Product Development ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total Contract Target Method Performing Prior Award Award Award Award Cost To Total Value of Cost Category Item & Type Activity & Location Years Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Complete Cost Contract Abrams Engineering General Dynamics Change Proposal (ECP) SS/CPIF Land Systems : 152.324 87.844 Mar 2014 87.692 Mar 2015 33.038 Mar 2016 -   33.038   -     360.898   -     1A Sterling Heights, MI ECP 1A Training Device PEO, STRI : MIPR 0.000 -   -   0.300 Mar 2016 -   0.300   -     0.300   -     Upgrades Orlando, FL General Dynamics Abrams ECP 1B - Lethality SS/CPIF Land Systems : 0.000 -   0.250 Jan 2015 23.590 Jun 2016 -   23.590   -     23.840   -     ECP Sterling Heights, MI Subtotal 152.324 87.844 87.942 56.928 -   56.928 -   385.038 -   FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Support ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total Contract Target Method Performing Prior Award Award Award Award Cost To Total Value of Cost Category Item & Type Activity & Location Years Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Complete Cost Contract Program Management PMO Support MIPR 42.660 8.906 Dec 2013 7.463 Jan 2015 6.137 Jan 2016 -   6.137 ContinuingContinuingContinuing Office (PMO)Support Offices : Various Subtotal 42.660 8.906 7.463 6.137 -   6.137   -       -       -     FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total Contract Target Method Performing Prior Award Award Award Award Cost To Total Value of Cost Category Item & Type Activity & Location Years Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Complete Cost Contract Aberdeen Proving Ground; Yuma Government Testing MIPR Proving Ground; 11.173 1.151 Jan 2014 3.208 Jan 2015 11.650 Jan 2016 -   11.650 ContinuingContinuingContinuing White Sands Missile Range, : Various Contractor Testing Various Various : Various 0.000 -   3.882 Mar 2015 2.888 Mar 2016 -   2.888   -     6.770   -     Subtotal 11.173 1.151 7.090 14.538 -   14.538   -       -       -     PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 220 Army Page 7 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs Target Prior FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2016 Cost To Total Value of Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total Complete Cost Contract Project Cost Totals 206.157 97.901 102.495 77.603 -   77.603   -       -       -     Remarks PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 221 Army Page 8 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 222 Army Page 9 of 26 R-1 Line #172 UNCLASSIFIED Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 Appropriation/Budget Activity R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) Project (Number/Name) 2040 / 7 PE 0203735A / Combat Vehicle 330 / Abrams Tank Improve Prog Improvement Programs PE 0203735A: Combat Vehicle Improvement Programs UNCLASSIFIED 223 Army Page 10 of 26 R-1 Line #172