PsychTests.com advancing psychology and technology tel 514.745.8272 fax 514.745.6242 CP Normandie PO Box 26067 l Montreal, Quebec l H3M 3E8 [email protected] PPssyycchhoommeettrriicc RReeppoorrtt EEmmoottiioonnaall IInntteelllliiggeennccee TTeesstt-- AAbbrriiddggeedd Description: A 17-item test assessing emotional intelligence. Low scores indicate poor emotional IQ; high scores indicate good emotional IQ. The abridged version is a shortened version of Queendom’s Emotional Intelligence Test, which measures the ability to recognize and label one's feelings and needs, and reconcile those needs with both one's long-term goals and the needs of other people. Reference: Jerabek, I. (1998). Emotional Intelligence Test - Abridged. Queendom.com Sample Size: 84,274 Sample Description: The sample used in this study was randomly selected from a pool of nearly one hundred and fifty thousand participants. It includes men and women, aged 10 to 80, who took the test on Queendom.com website. Number of questions: 17 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 2 Descriptive Statistics Statistics N Valid 84274 Missing 0 Mean 100.0000 Std. Error of Mean 5.167E-02 Median 100.4645 Mode 110.18 Std. Deviation 15.0000 Variance 225.0003 Range 75.08 Minimum 61.16 Maximum 136.24 Percentiles 5 74.8486 10 79.2652 15 82.7984 20 85.8900 25 88.9815 30 91.6315 35 93.8397 40 96.4897 45 98.2563 50 100.4645 55 102.6728 60 104.8811 65 106.6477 70 108.8559 75 111.0642 80 113.7141 85 116.3640 90 119.4556 95 123.8722 97 126.5221 99 130.9386 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 3 Distribution for the Emotional Intelligence Test The distribution of the scores is shown in red; the normal curve is represented by the black line plotted over it. The scores are displayed on the x-axis. The y-axis corresponds to the number of respondents who fall into the relevant score range. SHORT_ST 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 y c n 2000 Std. Dev = 15.00 e u Mean = 100.0 q e r 0 N = 84274.00 F 60.065.070.075.080.085.090.095.0100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0125.0130.0135.0 SHORT_ST Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 4 Reliability and Internal Consistency Inter-Item Consistency Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: 0.8762 Split-Half Reliability Correlation between forms: 0.7929 Spearman-Brown formula: 0.8848 Guttman’s formula: 0.8837 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 5 Criterion and Construct Validity 1. Relationship between age and emotional intelligence: Question #1: What is your age? Value 1= 10-15 Value 2= 16-18 Value 3= 19-24 Value 4= 25-29 Value 5= 30-34 Value 6= 35-39 Value 7= 40-49 Value 8= 50-59 Value 9= 60+ a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects with different ages. Emotional IQ scores increased with age. The effects are robust. See Annex 1 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F = 329.542 p < 0.0001 (8,51149) EMOTIONAL IQ SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF AGE 108 106 104 102 100 T S _ T R 98 O H S of 96 n a e M 94 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 AGEGRPS Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 6 2. Relationship between popularity and emotional intelligence: Question #2: How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1- I am not popular at all 5- I’m one of the crowd (I am not bad but I’m no star) 10- By all measures, I’m a star a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects with different popularity ratings. As popularity increased, emotional IQ increased as well. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F = 998.438 p < 0.0001 (9,48663) EMOTIONAL IQ AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY RATING 110 T S 100 _ T R O H S of n a 90 e M 80 1 - I am not popular 3.00 5 - I'm one of the c 7.00 9.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10 - By all measures How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 7 3. Relationship between happiness self-rating and emotional intelligence: Question #3: Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 - completely unhappy 5 - neither happy nor unhappy 10 - completely happy a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects with different happiness self-ratings. The happier the groups are, the higher the emotional intelligence. The effects are very robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F = 3396.646 p < 0.0001 (9,49490) EMOTIONAL IQ AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING SCORES 120 110 T S _ T R 100 O H S f o 90 n a e M 80 70 Completely unhappy 3.00 I'm in the Mid-range 7.00 9.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 Completely happy Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 8 4. Relationship between how others would rate subject’s happiness and emotional intelligence: Question #4: How would others around you rate you on a happiness scale from 1 to 10? 1 - completely unhappy 5 - neither happy nor unhappy 10 - completely happy a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on how others would rate their happiness. The happier other people would think the subjects are, the higher their emotional intelligence. The effects are very robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F = 1146.787 p < 0.0001 (9,48188) EMOTIONAL IQ AS A FUNCTION OF HOW HAPPY OTHER PEOPLE WOULD RATE THE SUBJECTS 120 110 T S _ T R O H 100 S of n a e M 90 80 Completely unhappy 3.00 I'm in the mid-range 7.00 9.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 Completely happy How would others around you rate you on a happiness scale? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 9 Correlations: AGE Rate yourself How would How would SHORT_ST on a others around others around happiness you rate you you rate your scale from 1 to on a popularity in 10. happiness your social scale from 1 to group? 10? AGE Pearson 1.000 .032 -.023 -.002 .210 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) . .000 .000 .653 .000 N 51199 48476 47248 47716 51199 Rate yourself Pearson .032 1.000 .636 .380 .594 on a Correlation happiness scale from 1 to 10. Sig. (2-tailed) .000 . .000 .000 .000 N 48476 49500 47635 48018 49500 How would Pearson -.023 .636 1.000 .416 .404 others around Correlation you rate you on a happiness scale from 1 to 10? Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 . .000 .000 N 47248 47635 48198 47166 48198 How would Pearson -.002 .380 .416 1.000 .389 others around Correlation you rate your popularity in your social group? Sig. (2-tailed) .653 .000 .000 . .000 N 47716 48018 47166 48673 48673 SHORT_ST Pearson .210 .594 .404 .389 1.000 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 . N 51199 49500 48198 48673 84274 ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 10