Project No. 10-87-(Task2/Phase A-3) 11/01/13 APPENDICES For PRECISION ESTIMATES OF AASHTO T 304, AASHTO T 96, and AASHTO T 11 AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF MANUAL AND MECHANICAL METHOD OF WASHING ON SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES FINAL Report Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board National Research Council TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished only for review to members of or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Haleh Azari, Ph.D. AASHTO Advanced Pavement Research Program National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland November 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT ..............................................................................................................................2  APPENDIX A –PROFICIENCY SAMPLE DATA SHEETS AND INSTRUCTIONS ........................4  APPENDIX B - T 96 COARSE AGGREGATE GRAPHS .................................................................... 13  APPENDIX C - T 304 FINE AGGREGATE GRAPHS ........................................................................ 17  APPENDIX D - T 11 COARSE AND FINE AGGREGATE GRAPHS ............................................... 21  APPENDIX E - PRECISION STATMENTS FOR T 96, T 304 AND T 11 .......................................... 26  APPENDIX F - COARSE AGGREGATE- WASHING METHOD TABLES AND GRAPHS ......... 30  Total Material Passing Scatter Plot Graphs ...................................................................................... 31  Percent Passing Bar Graphs .............................................................................................................. 34  Summaries of Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 37  Statistical Tests of Significance ........................................................................................................ 40  APPENDIX G - FINE AGGREGATE- WASHING METHOD TABLES AND GRAPHS ............... 43  Total Material Passing Scatter Plot Graphs ...................................................................................... 44  Summaries of Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 53  Statistical Tests of Significance ........................................................................................................ 56  APPENDIX H - HOT MIX ASPHALT IGNITOIN OVEN- WASHING METHOD TABLES AND GRAPHS ............................................................................................... 59  Total Material Passing Scatter Plot Graphs ...................................................................................... 60  Percent Passing Bar Graphs .............................................................................................................. 66  Summaries of Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 72  Statistical Tests of Significance ........................................................................................................ 80  2 APPENDIX I - HOT MIX ASPHALT SOLVENT EXTRACTION- WASHING METHOD TABLES AND GRAPHS ............................................................................................... 88  Total Material Passing Scatter Plot Graphs ...................................................................................... 89  Percent Passing Bar Graphs .............................................................................................................. 93  Summaries of Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 99  Statistical Tests of Significance ...................................................................................................... 105  3 APPENDIX A –PROFICIENCY SAMPLE DATA SHEETS AND INSTRUCTIONS 4 AGC Sample Instructions for AGC 169-170 Instructions for Testing and Reporting Coarse Aggregate Proficiency Samples No. 169 And No. 170 Closing Date: October 28, 2010 All tests should be conducted on each of the two samples according to the AASHTO or ASTM Standard Test Methods indicated. To permit an estimate of single-operator precision, the same operator should conduct an individual test on both samples. It is not necessary for all tests to be performed by the same person. Please use the same set of sieves for both samples. Report the results of a single determination only, not the average of two or more. For any tests you choose not to perform, leave the appropriate spaces blank on the data sheet. Note: Please note that samples 169 and 170 are not identical. The program is designed to obtain two independent test results, one for each numbered sample, for each test method that the laboratory chooses to perform. Note also that the coarse aggregate for this round of testing (Samples #169 and #170) contains particles of various compositions. Some particles are rather fragile, especially when wet. The samples are to be evaluated as being obtained from a single source. Laboratories should take appropriate steps to prevent excessive degradation of the samples during testing. Directions for the individual tests on Samples No. 169 and No. 170 are as follows: NOTE: The following steps should be taken in handling the samples if a full series of tests is to be performed on the material provided: 1. Oven-dry the material at 110 ± 5°C (230 ± 9°F) before testing is begun. 2. Perform T11/C117 and T27/C136 on the entire sample. 3. Recombine all the plus 4.75-mm material and then select a representative test sample for T85/C127. 4. Recombine the material from T85/C127 with the remaining material from Step 3. 4. Oven-dry the recombined material at 110 ± 5°C (230 ± 9°F). Then, separate the material into size fractions by sieving, and obtain test samples for T96/C131 and T104/C88 in accordance with those test methods. Materials Finer Than 75-μm Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing, AASHTO T11-05 (Procedure A) or ASTM C117-04 (Procedure A): After oven drying, wash the entire sample in plain water. (Do not use a wetting agent.) Report the percentage finer than the 75-μm (No. 200) sieve to the nearest 0.01 percent. Upon completion of this test, the total oven dry sample mass determined before washing is to be used for the sieve analysis (T27/C136). Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, AASHTO T27-06 or ASTM C136-06: Report, to the nearest 0.1 percent, the total material passing each of the following sieves: 25.0, 19.0, 12.5, 9.5, and 4.75 mm. Calculate percentages passing on the basis of the total mass of the initial dry sample. If T11 or C117 was performed, include the mass of the material finer than the 75-µm (No. 200) sieve by washing in the sieve analysis calculation; in other words, use the total oven dry sample mass that was determined prior to washing in T11 or C117 as the basis for calculating all the percentages. Use the same set of sieves for both samples. Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, AASHTO T85-10 or Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, ASTM C127-07: Oven-dry the samples at 110 ± 5°C (230 ± 9°F) and determine the bulk, the bulk (SSD) and the apparent specific gravities. [ASTM C127 refers to these results as Relative Density (OD), Relative Density (SSD), and Apparent Relative Density, respectively.] Report these to the nearest 0.001 units. Determine the absorption and report it to the nearest 0.01 percent. Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine, AASHTO T96-02 or ASTM C131-06: Perform the B grading using 11 steel spheres. In determining the loss, wash the material retained on the 1.70-mm (No. 12) sieve and oven-dry at 110 ± 5°C (230 ± 9°F) to a constant mass. Report the percentage of loss by abrasion and impact to the nearest 0.01 percent. Soundness of Aggregate by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate, AASHTO T104-99 or ASTM C88-05: The test may be performed using sodium or magnesium sulfate, or both solutions if desired. Perform five cycles on the following size fractions: passing the 19.0-mm and retained on the 9.5-mm sieve; passing the 9.5-mm and retained on the 4.75-mm sieve. For each size fraction, report the material finer than the designated sieve, expressed to the nearest 0.01 percent of the original weight of the fraction. Do NOT compute the weighted average or weighted percentage loss. 5 AGC Sample Data Sheet for AGC 169-170 AASHTO MATERIALS REFERENCE LABORATORY (AMRL) Coarse Aggregate Proficiency Sample Data Sheet Closing Date: October 28, 2010 We encourage you to use the online data entry system. Or, you may fax (301) 975-8208 or mail your data sheet to: Ron Holsinger, AMRL / NIST, 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8619, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8619. If your laboratory is not registered to submit results online, or if there are questions, contact AMRL at [email protected] or call 301-975-5450. Enter Test Results in Rows (1) to (15) Below Materials Finer Than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve by Washing: T11 or C117 Sample 169 Sample 170 Mark the Box at the Right to Show the Method Used – T11 , C117 Washing Method? Manual , Mechanical Washing Apparatus If Mechanical, Time for Wash?_____________ (minutes) Percentage of material finer than the 75-μm sieve by washing (nearest 0.01 percent) ..................... (1) Sieve Analysis: T27 or C136 (Report the total material PASSING each sieve.) Mark the Box at the Right to Show the Method Used – T27 , C136 Total Material Passing the 25.0-mm (1-in.) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) ............................................ (2) Total Material Passing the 19.0-mm (3/4-in.) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) ......................................... (3) Total Material Passing the 12.5-mm (1/2-in.) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) ......................................... (4) Total Material Passing the 9.5-mm (3/8-in.) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) ........................................... (5) Total Material Passing the 4.75-mm (No. 4) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) .......................................... (6) Specific Gravity (or Relative Density) and Absorption: T85 or C127 Mark the Box at the Right to Show the Method Used – T85 , C127 Bulk Specific Gravity [or Relative Density, OD for C127] (nearest 0.001) .......................................... (7) Bulk Specific Gravity, SSD [or Relative Density, SSD for C127] (nearest 0.001) .............................. (8) Apparent Specific Gravity [or Apparent Relative Density for C127] (nearest 0.001) .......................... (9) Absorption (nearest 0.01 percent) .................................................................................................... (10) Los Angeles Abrasion: T96 or C131 Mark the Box at the Right to Show the Method Used – T96 , C131 Percentage of Loss by Abrasion and Impact, B Grading (nearest 0.01 percent) ............................. (11) Sulfate Soundness Test: T104 or C88 Mark the Box at the Right to Show the Method Used – T104 , C88 Enter results for SODIUM SULFATE testing in rows (12) and (13) Percentage of 19.0 to 9.5-mm fraction passing 8.0-mm sieve (nearest 0.01 percent) ..................... (12) Percentage of 9.5 to 4.75-mm fraction passing 4.0-mm sieve (nearest 0.01 percent) ..................... (13) Enter results for MAGNESIUM SULFATE testing in rows (14) and (15) Percentage of 19.0 to 9.5-mm fraction passing 8.0-mm sieve (nearest 0.01 percent) ..................... (14) Percentage of 9.5 to 4.75-mm fraction passing 4.0-mm sieve (nearest 0.01 percent) ..................... (15) Please complete the information below to identify your laboratory. Lab Name: Lab Number: City, State: Tested By: Lab Phone: Comments: 6 AGF Sample Instructions for AGF 171-172 Instructions for Testing and Reporting Fine Aggregate Proficiency Samples No. 171 and No. 172 Closing Date: March 10, 2011 All tests should be conducted on each of the two samples according to the AASHTO or ASTM Standard Test Methods indicated. To permit an estimate of single-operator precision, each individual test should be performed on both samples by the same person, but it is not necessary that all tests be performed by the same person. Please use the same set of sieves for both samples. Report the results of a single determination only, not the average of two or more, except in cases where an average is called for in the method. For any tests you do not choose to perform, leave the appropriate spaces on the data sheet blank. Note: Please note that samples 171 and 172 are not identical. The program is designed to obtain two independent test results, one for each numbered sample, for each test method that the laboratory chooses to perform. Also, the samples for sieve testing are provided in small plastic bags (each weighing approximately 500 g) and were processed differently. Sieving sample 171 is air-dried and sample 172 is wet. Please remember to oven dry both samples before testing. PLEASE USE THE SAMPLES IN THE SMALL PLASTIC BAGS FOR T11/C117 AND T27/C136. Materials Finer Than 75-µm Sieve by Washing (Procedure B using a wetting agent), AASHTO T11-05 or ASTM C117-04: Oven dry the gradation sample (in the small bag), weigh it, place it in the container, add water and wetting agent, and wash it over the 75-µm (No. 200) sieve (as directed by T11/C117, Procedure B). Determine the amount of material finer than the 75-µm sieve by washing. Report the percentage finer than the 75-µm (No. 200) sieve to the nearest 0.01 percent. Sieve Analysis, AASHTO T27-06 or ASTM C136-06: Oven dry the remaining gradation material again (after the wash) and sieve it (as directed by T27/C136). Report to the nearest 0.1 percent the total material passing each of the following sieves: 4.75-mm, 2.36-mm, 1.18-mm, 600-µm, 300- µm, and 150-µm. Report the percentage passing the 75-µm sieve to the nearest 0.01 percent. Calculate the percents based on the total original oven dry mass before the gradation sample was washed. (The intent is to follow the test methods exactly as written.) Use the same set of sieves for both samples. PLEASE USE THE LARGE SAMPLES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TESTS BELOW. Specific Gravity (Relative Density) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate, AASHTO T84-10 or ASTM C128-07a: Oven dry the sample at 110 ± 5°C (230 ± 9°F) and determine the bulk specific gravity, the bulk specific gravity (SSD) and the apparent specific gravity [or relative density (OD), relative density (SSD), and apparent relative density for C128]. Report these to the nearest 0.001 units. Determine the absorption and report it to the nearest 0.01 percent. Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and Soils by Use of the Sand Equivalent Test, AASHTO T176-08 or ASTM D2419-09: Report the average of the three sand equivalent determinations. Special Instructions: After test specimens are obtained (Specimens may be obtained using either the Air Dry or Pre-Wet method according to AASHTO Alternate Method No.1 or No.2, or ASTM Procedure A or B), dry each test specimen to constant mass at 110 ± 5°C (230 ± 9°F) and cool to room temperature before testing. (Moist test specimens produce lower sand equivalent values than corresponding oven dry specimens. We are asking laboratories to oven dry the prepared test specimens before pouring them into the plastic cylinder in order to obtain more consistent results for between laboratory comparisons.) Sulfate Soundness by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate, AASHTO T104-99 or ASTM C88-05: The test may be performed using sodium or magnesium sulfate, or both solutions if desired. Perform five cycles on the following sizes: passing the 2.36-mm and retained on the 1.18-mm sieve; passing the 1.18-mm and retained on the 600- µm sieve; passing the 600-µm and retained on the 300-µm sieve. For each size fraction, report the amount of material finer than the designated sieve as a percentage of the original mass of the fraction to the nearest 0.01 percent. Do NOT compute the weighted, or weighted average, loss. Uncompacted Void Content, AASHTO T304-08 or ASTM C1252-06: Perform Method A on both samples and complete two test runs on each sample. Calculate the uncompacted voids for each test run and record each result to the nearest 0.01 percent. Calculate the average uncompacted voids of the two test runs and report the average to the nearest 0.01 percent. 7 AGF Sample Data Sheet for AGF 171-172 Contact AMRL at [email protected] or call 301-975-5450 if there are questions. Fine Aggregate Proficiency Sample Data Sheet Closing Date: March 10, 2011 We encourage you to use the online data entry system. Online data entry enables you to submit data, revise data, and receive confirmation. Please check the confirmation page to be sure that the results are entered correctly. Or, you may fax (301) 975-8208 or mail your data sheet to: ron holsinger, amrl / nist, 100 bureau dr., stop 8619, gaithersburg, md 20899-8619. Contact amrl at [email protected] or call 301-975-5450 if there are questions. Enter results in rows (1) to (23) below Materials Finer Than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve by Washing: Method Used? – T11 , C117 Sample 171 Sample 172 (Use the approximately 500-g sample in the small plastic bag.) Washing Procedure? Manual , Mechanical Washing Apparatus If Mechanical, Time for Wash?_____________ (minutes) Total Oven Dry Mass of Specimen Before Washing (nearest 0.1 g) (1) Percentage Finer Than the 75-μm Sieve by Washing (nearest 0.01 percent) (2) Sieve Analysis: Method Used? –T27 , C136 (Use the approx. 500-g sample in the small plastic bag and report the total material PASSING each sieve.) Total Material Passing the 4.75-mm (No. 4) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) (3) Total Material Passing the 2.36-mm (No. 8) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) (4) Total Material Passing the 1.18-mm (No. 16) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) (5) Total Material Passing the 600-μm (No. 30) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) (6) Total Material Passing the 300-μm (No. 50) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) (7) Total Material Passing the 150-μm (No. 100) Sieve (nearest 0.1 percent) (8) Total Material Passing the 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve (nearest 0.01 percent) (9) Specific Gravity (Relative Density) and Absorption: Method Used? – T84 , C128 Procedure Used? Gravimetric (Pycnometer) , Volumetric (Le Chatlier Flask) Bulk Specific Gravity [or Relative Density, Oven Dry for C128] (nearest 0.001) (10) Bulk Specific Gravity, SSD [or Relative Density, SSD for C128] (nearest 0.001) (11) Apparent Specific Gravity [or Apparent Relative Density for C128] (nearest 0.001) (12) Absorption (nearest 0.01 percent) (13) Sand Equivalent: Method Used? – T176 , D2419 (See Special Instructions for Testing and Reporting) Sand Equivalent Value (whole number) (14) Sulfate Soundness Test: Method Used? – T104 , C88 SODIUM Material Finer Than the 1.18-mm Sieve, Na (nearest 0.01 percent) (15) Material Finer Than the 600-μm Sieve, Na (nearest 0.01 percent) (16) Material Finer Than the 300-μm Sieve, Na (nearest 0.01 percent) (17) MAGNESIUM Material Finer Than the 1.18-mm Sieve, Mg (nearest 0.01 percent) (18) Material Finer Than the 600-μm Sieve, Mg (nearest 0.01 percent) (19) Material Finer Than the 300-μm Sieve, Mg (nearest 0.01 percent) (20) Uncompacted Void Content: Method Used? – T304, Method A , C1252, Method A Uncompacted Voids, Test Run # 1 (nearest 0.01 percent) (21) Uncompacted Voids, Test Run # 2 (nearest 0.01 percent) (22) Uncompacted Voids, Average of Two Runs (nearest 0.01 percent) (23) Please complete the information below to identify your laboratory. Lab Name: Lab Number: City, State: Country: Tested By: Lab Phone: 8 HMAIO Sample Instructions for HMAIO 19-20 9 HMAIO Sample Data Sheet for HMAIO 19-20 10