CCiittyy UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff NNeeww YYoorrkk ((CCUUNNYY)) CCUUNNYY AAccaaddeemmiicc WWoorrkkss Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects CUNY Graduate Center 10-2014 PPoolliittiiccss aass aa SSpphheerree ooff WWeeaalltthh AAccccuummuullaattiioonn:: CCaasseess ooff GGiillddeedd AAggee NNeeww YYoorrkk,, 11885555--11888888 Jeffrey D. Broxmeyer Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit you? Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/407 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] POLITICS AS A SPHERE OF WEALTH ACCUMULATION: CASES OF GILDED AGE NEW YORK, 1855-1888 by Jeffrey D. Broxmeyer A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York. 2014 © 2014 JEFFREY D. BROXMEYER All Rights Reserved   ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. PROFESSOR FRANCES FOX PIVEN ___________ ________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee PROFESSOR ALYSON COLE ___________ ________________________________ Date Executive Officer PROFESSOR JOE ROLLINS __________________________________ Supervisory Committee PROFESSOR JOSHUA FREEMAN __________________________________ Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   iii Abstract POLITICS AS A SHPERE OF WEALTH ACCUMULATION: CASES OF GILDED AGE NEW YORK, 1855-1888 by Jeffrey D. Broxmeyer Adviser: Professor Frances Fox Piven This dissertation examines political wealth accumulation in American political development. Scholars have long understood the political system selects for “progressive ambition” for higher office. My research shows that officeseekers have also engaged in “progressive greed” for greater wealth. I compare the career trajectories of four prominent New York political figures during the Gilded Age: William Tweed, Fernando Wood, Roscoe Conkling, and Chester Arthur. Using correspondence, census, tax and land records, government reports, investigations, and newspaper coverage, I explain why each political figure chose to either seize or pass up opportunities for political wealth accumulation. I also examine the principal sources of fortunes and the types of political practices that generated them. Profit-maximizing behavior during the late nineteenth century was central to the consolidation of politics as a vocation. Career-altering events such as an election loss, or alternatively, the opportunity to join a dominant party faction, often recalibrated a politician’s strategic calculation in the tradeoff between power and wealth. Furthermore, the dominant view of self-aggrandizement is that public officials either steal or extract rents, for example, in the form of bribes or loans. However, none of the large fortunes examined among my cases were built through conventional rent seeking, and peculation   iv was only a minor source of income. Instead, the great fortunes were built through marketing-making activities. Tweed, Wood, Conkling, and Arthur accumulated political wealth by securing dominant market positions, or by creating new markets altogether. These figures accumulated productive personal property, or political capital, through control over political institutions, most notably by speculating in real estate, railroads, and finance, and by the establishment of politically dependent businesses, such as banks, lotteries, newspapers, and law firms.   v Acknowledgements Portions of this dissertation first appeared as “The Boss’s Brains: Political Capital, Democratic Commerce, and the New York Tweed Ring, 1868-1871” in the Journal of Historical Sociology. I want to thank the journal editors and anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions. Earlier versions of some chapters were also presented at the Midwestern Political Science Association and the Western Political Science Association. I wish to express my appreciation to the Graduate Center for providing financial support in the form of two Doctoral Student Research Grants, an Advanced Research Collaborative Grant, a Travel and Research Grant, and a two-year Teaching Fellowship at Hunter College. Scholarly projects are truly social labors, and this dissertation is no exception. I want to thank Frances Piven, my adviser, for her tremendous support throughout the many iterations of this dissertation project. Her scholarly rigor and generosity have shaped not only this dissertation, but also the kind of academic I strive to be. My sincerest thanks are due to Joe Rollins. For years I have been the beneficiary of his support, insights, and sage advice. I also want to express my gratitude to Joshua Freeman for his willingness to serve on the dissertation committee and for graciously offering his time, comments, and critiques. I want to thank Alyson Cole for her support, and for her energy in building our program. Thanks are also due to Thomas Kessner for joining my proposal committee and providing several early suggestions about where to look in the archives. At the Graduate Center, Alex Zamalin has been a true friend, always willing to share stories and listen to my half-baked ideas. Jonathan Keller read and critiqued my original proposal, and his thoughtful suggestions helped me pass muster to Level III. Dan   vi Skinner coached many of us through the program with his hardscrabble and frank wisdom. To everyone: thank you! My family deserve special acknowledgement for their unwavering support throughout this long ordeal. Their patience and guidance throughout this intellectual adventure has sustained me through many highs and lows. To Mom, Dad, Eric, and my grandfather, Bill; to the memory of my grandparents Fran, Ann, and Dave; and also to Pam, Allan, and Orlee: please know that acknowledgement pages do not run long enough to fully express my thanks for your love and support. Finally, and most important, I want to thank Shira, who has endured with matchless grace a partner in academic purgatory for so long. You are the best.   vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………..vi List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..ix Chapter 1 – Introduction: Political Fortunes in American Political Development……….1 Chapter 2 – William Tweed’s Political Bubble………………………………………….24 Chapter 3 – The Politician’s Many Pockets: Fernando Wood’s Gilded Age……………49 Chapter 4 – Roscoe Conkling: Republican on Retainer…………………………………90 Chapter 5 – Subordinate Ambition: Chester Arthur’s Party Accumulation……………131 Chapter 6 – Conclusion: Political Capitalism in America……………………………...168 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………193   viii Tables Table 1. William Tweed: Rise and Fall……………………………………………….....29 Table 2. Fernando Wood: Recalibrated Ambition……………………………………….59 Table 3. Roscoe Conkling: Thwarted Ambition………………..………………………..94 Table 4. Chester Arthur: Subordinate Ambitions………………………………………136 Table 5. Political Ambition and Greed Tradeoffs Across Careers…………...………...177 Table 6. Political Behavior: Wealth Accumulating Practices…………………………..183   ix