CCoovveerr iimmaaggee:: Student walking rock fence along Coryell City Road that divided the Hill Top Campus from the recreation field, Gatesville State School. Undated, circa early 1960s. Courtesy of Texas State Library and Archives The most tragic aspect of the delinquency docket is that more often than not the conditions which bog a youngster's feet in this sordid path are not of his own making ... [H]uman values call for some sort of organized effort by organized society to see that the child shall have at least the chance of normal life, or education, happiness and usefulness. ~ Austin American-Statesman July 6, 1950 AAuutthhoorr William S. Bush, Ph.D. Department of History Texas A&M University - San Antonio EEddiittoorr Isela Gutiérrez Juvenile Justice Initiative Director Texas Criminal Justice Coalition DDeessiiggnn Kim Wilks We would like to extend our gratitude to Molly Totman, Ann Raber and Samuel Gunter for their invaluable editing, research and writing assistance. SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 22000088 Working towards real solutions to the problems facing Texas' criminal and juvenile justice systems © 2009 Texas Criminal Justice Coalition. All rights reserved. Any reproduction of the material herein must credit the Texas Criminal Justice Coalition. Copies of this report are available for free at www.TexasCJE.org. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction: High Hopes, Hard Realities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i II. Reform and Resistance, 1950-1967 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Efforts at State-Community Partnerships for Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A New Deal for Girls' Reform. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Discipline, Budgetary Problems and the Gradual Shift Back to Institutions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Population Trends in the 1950s and 1960s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 TYC Becomes an Independent State Agency, 1957 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Mountain View, 1962 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 III. The Discovery of Children's Rights, 1967-1971. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Inre Gaultand the Due Process Revolution in Juvenile Justice. . . . . . . . 19 Criticisms of TYC from All Sides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 The Legislature Investigates TYC, 1968 - 1969 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Growing Media Scrutiny of TYC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 IV. Morales v. Turmanand a "Right to Rehabilitation". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Roots in El Paso Complaints of Due Process Violations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Shift to a Conditions of Confinement Case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Youth Testimony and the Issue of Believability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Claims and Findings of Rampant Abuse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 The Ruling, 1974 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 V. The Pendulum Swings Back in the 1980s and 1990s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 VI. Scandal Again, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 VII.Conclusion: Breaking the Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 INTRODUCTION HIGH HOPES, HARD REALITIES Where Part One of this report describes the evolution of juvenile justice in Texas as a system distinct from its adult counterpart, Part Two begins with the inauguration of the Texas State Youth Development Council (TYC) in September, 1949. The creation of TYC was the culmination of a half-centu- ry of nearly continuous complaints from juvenile court judges, child wel- fare advocates, civil rights organizations, elected officials, parents, and youth themselves. From the inception of the juvenile justice system, reformers had argued that childhood and adolescence represented a period of life when immature individuals - particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds - were prone to rash and even violent behavior, yet still amenable to rehabilitation. By the middle of the 20th century, a growing body of social science had begun to back those claims. The development of TYC was part of a nation- al movement to apply new scientific knowledge about child and adolescent development, as well as a statewide governance model, to the administration of juvenile justice. Nearly 60 years later, one can still sense the optimism in the public announcements of TYC's creation. In a February 6, 1949, signing ceremony for the enabling legislation, Texas Governor Beauford T. Jester lauded TYC as "the most extensive youth program ever developed" in the state's history.1 This program envisioned a state agency that worked closely with local juve- nile justice authorities, child welfare agencies, and community groups to keep at-risk youth out of the juvenile justice system altogether. National and state experts believed that juvenile offenders who remained impervious The development of TYC was part of a national movement to apply new scientific knowledge about child and adolescent development, as well as a statewide governance model, to the administration of juvenile justice. i Texas Criminal Justice Coalition Governor Beauford H. Jester signing House Bill 705, July 5, 1949, creating the Texas State Youth Development Council (standing). Courtesy of Texas State Library and Archives to the new preventive measures could be housed in smaller facilities locat- ed nearer to the urban areas from which most delinquent youth came. The new legislation promised an end to large, prison-like institutions such as the Gatesville Juvenile Training School in Coryell County and the Gainesville Training School for Girls in Cooke County. By 1950, TYC was commended by the nation's leading child welfare experts and juvenile justice professionals as a model for other states. At long last, proclaimed TYC chairman Walter K. Kerr, "many children and youth will have a fairer opportunity for development of a healthy personality."2 The optimistic rhetoric surrounding TYC's launch raised public expectations that the state's "most precious resource" - its youth - would indeed receive reha- bilitative treatment for their delinquent behavior instead of the brutal pun- ishment of the past. Those promises would never be fully realized, however. In a pattern famil- iar from the early years of the system, public funding and enthusiasm for the new initiatives quickly waned. Within less than a decade, the new agency had become yet another glorified caretaker for the state's controversial juvenile training schools, and starting in the late 1960s, it came under increasing pub- lic scrutiny for abuses of juveniles in its training schools. Once again, legisla- tive investigations of TYC demonstrated quite clearly that little had changed ii from the pre-TYC era. When no action was taken by the legislature, advo- cates, youth and their parents took matters into their own hands, filing Morales v. Turmanin 1971, a class action lawsuit that built on federal court decisions extending adult civil rights to juvenile offenders. That case pro- duced a landmark ruling in 1974 which marked the end of a troubled era in TYC's history. Forced to close its largest, most controversial institutions - Mountain View and Gatesville - TYC moved toward a more community- based treatment model, even as the legislature created the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission to further expand the state's services to at-risk and delinquent youth in their home communities. As a new, more reform-minded regime took charge of TYC, public expecta- tions again were raised, but, as before, were met only temporarily. In the 1990s, under the pressure of new demands to "get tough" on juvenile offend- ers, TYC once more began relying heavily on secure, prison-like institutions - "youth prisons" in current parlance. Two of these youth prisons - the West Texas and Evins facilities - became the sites for abuse scandals that rocked TYC in late 2006 and early 2007, and resulted in the agency being placed under conservatorship. The concluding section of this report surveys the historical and contemporary landscapes of Texas juvenile justice, and urges policy-makers to move beyond this cycle of unrealized reform efforts. iii Texas Criminal Justice Coalition