ebook img

Opinion 1816 Lithobius piceus L. Koch, 1862 (Chilopoda): specific name conserved PDF

1 Pages·1995·0.23 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Opinion 1816 Lithobius piceus L. Koch, 1862 (Chilopoda): specific name conserved

278 Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 52(3)September 1995 OPINION 1816 Lithobiuspiceus L. Koch, 1862 (Chilopoda): specific name conserved Keywords. Nomenclature; taxonomy; Chilopoda; centipedes; Lithobiuspiceus; Europe. Ruling (1) Under the plenary powers the specific name quadridentatus Menge, 1851, as published in the binomen Lithobius quadridentatus, is hereby suppressed for the purposesofthePrincipleofPrioritybut not forthoseofthePrincipleofHomonymy. (2) The namepiceus L. Koch. 1862. as published in the binomen Litlwbiuspiceus, is hereby placed on the Official List of Specific Names in Zoology. (3) The name quadridentatus Menge, 1851, as published in the binomen Lithobius quadridentatus and as suppressed in (1) above, is hereby placed on the Official Index ofRejected and Invalid Specific Names in Zoology. History ofCase 2919 An application for the conservation of the specific name of Lithobius piceus L. Koch, 1862 was received from Dr E.H. Eason {Bourton Far Hill. Moreton-in- Marsh. Gloucestershire. U.K.) on 30 November 1993. After correspondence the case was published in BZN 51: 133-134 (June 1994). Notice of the case was sent to appropriatejournals. A note of support from ProfAlessandro Minelli Universitd di Padova. Padova, ( Italy) was published in BZN 51: 341 (December 1994). Decision ofthe Commission On 1 March 1995 the members of the Commission were invited to vote on the proposals published in BZN51: 133. At thecloseofthevotingperiod on I June 1995 the votes were as fol—lows: Affirmative votes 21: Bock, Bouchet, Cocks, Corliss, Hahn, Heppell, Holthuis, Kabata, Kraus. Lehtinen, Macpherson. Mahnert. Martins de Souza, Minelli, Nielsen, Nye. Ride—, Savage, Schuster, Starobogatov, Stys Negative votes 2: Dupuis and Thompson. No votes were received from Cogger, Halvorsen, Trjapitzin and Ueno. Bayer was on leave ofabsence. Dupuis commented that, given the apparent taxonomic doubt surrounding the three names in question (paras. 2 and 3 ofthe application), it would be betterto give Lithobius piceus L. Koch, 1862 precedence whenever they are considered to be synonyms, rather than suppressing L. quadridentatus Menge, 1851. Kabata com- mented: 'Article 79c ofthe Code seems to mandate acceptance ofthis application. I vote for it with some reluctance, however, as I think that adherence to the principle ofpriority would not result in any significant nomenclatural instability". Original references The following are the original references to the names placed on an Official List and an Official Index by the ruling given in the present Opinion: piceus. Lithuhius, L. Koch. 1862, Die Myriapodcngallung Lithobius darestelll. p. 49. quadridentatus, Lithohius. Menge, 1851,NeuesleSchrijieiiderNalurforsclienden Gesellschajiin Danzig. 4(2); 12.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.