TRANSLATING EVENTS, GLOSSING EXPERIENCE: EUROPEAN TEXTS AND AMERICAN ENCOUNTERS E. Michael Gerli University of Virginia [email protected] “ Effi cere tibi illas familiares” Petrarch, Secretum Abstract References to the romancero and other literary texts stemming from the medi- eval tradition in early Spanish American historical documents have been in- terpreted in two principal ways: one linguistic, the other socio-juridical. On the one hand, they are seen as evidence that the romancero was fi rmly rooted in popular language and culture, specifi cally in the colloquial usage of the six- teenth century. On the other hand, that allusions to ballads and other bellet- ristic references in these works, which belong primarily to the textual universe of the relaciones de méritos y servicios (often composed as self-serving justifi ca- tions for questionable actions), function as a means of self-engrandizement. In this way authors conformed to discursive requirements that compelled them to portray themselves as valiant, when not heroic, subjects of the Crown. Th e current article proposes a third alternative; namely, that the literary references in sixteenth-century chronicles operate at another deeper epistemological level, and constitute hermeneutical strategies rooted in medieval reading and writing practices. Specifi cally, that they operate as glosses which process and organize knowledge in a way that allows for the assimilation of new knowledge —espe- cially knowledge of the unknown— into the broader cultural context of the author and the reader. In them, we are able to discover at the level of language and rhetoric one of the basic gestures of colonialism: the urge to appropriate, inhabit the territory of, and dominate the Other through the Other’s transfor- mation into familiar images of the self. MEDIEVALIA 17 (2014), 39-55 ISSN: 0211-3473 (paper), 2014-8410 (digital) 40 E. MICHAEL GERLI Keywords Rhetorical Construction of Early European Images of America; Historia verdad- era de la conquista de la Nueva España; Bernal Díaz del Castillo; Gloss; Composi- tion; Literary References in Early Spanish American Chronicles. Resumen Las referencias al romancero y otros textos literarios de raíces medievales en los tempranos documentos históricos hispanoamericanos se han interpretado de dos principales maneras: una lingüística y otra socio-jurídica. Por un lado, se consid- eran estas referencias como testimonios de que el romancero estaba fi rmemente arraigado en la lengua y cultura populares del siglo XVI. Por otro, se toman las citas y alusiones a los romances y otros textos, sobre todo en los documentos que pertenecen al universo textual de las relaciones de méritos y servicios, como medios de autoagrandamiento que surgían de la necesidad de presentarse los autores como valientes y heroicos sujetos de la Corona. El presente estudio propone una tercera alternativa al fenómeno. Propone que las referencias beltrísticas en las crónicas del siglo XVI funcionan en un nivel epistemológico más profundo, constituyéndose como estrategias hermenéuticas cuyos orígenes se pueden encontrar en las prácticas medievales de la lectura y composición de los textos. Se propone que las referen- cias literarias funcionan a modo de glosas que permiten organizar y procesar el conocimiento de lo ignoto. Facilitan la asimilación de nuevas experiencias e ideas, especialmente la asimilación de lo completamente desconocido, al acomodar lo totalmente nuevo a un universo cultural pre-establecido, él de los autores y lectores europeos. En estas referencias literarias se descubren en el plano retórico y lingüís- tico uno de los gestos básicos del colonialismo: el deseo de apropiar, dominar, y poblar el territorio del Otro al transformar éste en una imagen de uno mismo. Palabras clave Construcción retórica de las tempranas imágenes de América; Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España; Bernal Díaz del Castillo; Glosa; Compos- ición de textos coloniales; Referencias literarias en las tempranas crónicas hispano- americanas. In a well-known passage of the Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España Bernal Diaz del Castillo writes that, while navigating along the coast of Mexico during Holy Week of 1519, several of Cortés’ men who had previously fre- quented those shores took pain to point out the mouth of the river Pedro de Al- TRANSLATING EVENTS, GLOSSING EXPERIENCE 41 varado had previously entered, and where Alvarado had plundered some 16,000 pesos worth of gold. He writes also about how Alvarado’s expedition chanced upon what they called “la Isla de los Sacrifi cios,” where they found grisly evidence of human sacrifi ce, as well as many other marvels. Shortly after, upon making the fi rst landfall at San Juan de Ulúa, Díaz del Castillo goes on, a gentleman-soldier named Alonso Hernández de Puertocarrero, who had overheard the others’ ac- count of these events to Cortés while on board, turned to the captain and said without benefi t of preamble: “Paréceme, señor, que os han venido diciendo estos caballeros que han venido otras dos veces a esta tierra: Cata Francia, Montesinos Cata Paris la ciudad Cata las aguas del Duero, Do van a dar a la mar”. Puertocarrero fi nished by admonishing, “Yo digo que miréis las tierras ricas, y sabeos bien gobernar” (Díaz del Castillo, 1972, p. 61). Puertocarrero’s lines come, of course, from the Carolingian ballad of Montesinos, which narrates a bloody tale of betrayal, abused honor, and exile. Without faltering, Cortés picked up the octosyllabic rhythm of the cautionary allusion, and responded with his own lines from an equally well-known Carolingian ballad, that of Don Gaiferos: “Denos Dios ventura en armas / Como al paladin Roldán”, he said, “Que en lo demás, teniendo a vuestra merced y a otros caballeros por señores, bien me sabré en- tender” (Díaz del Castillo, 1972, p. 61). Th e whole incident, essentially a dialogue couched in the form of references to the romancero or Castilian ballad tradition, serves to lend suspense to Diaz’s own narrative, to heighten Cortés’ self-assured- ness, and to allude to the uncertain risks of failure, treachery, and banishment run by Cortés and his men just prior to the beginning of the Conquest. Th e American landscape that lies before them, the mouth of the Jamapa river, and the fabled city of Tenochtitlan beyond it, are translated —literally moved and trans- formed— into France, Paris, and the Duero River; into the imprecise but heroic landscape of the Carolingian ballad world. Cortés in his response, of course, pre- fers to shake off all warning and identify with the righteous Roland rather than the fated Montesinos, continuing on to compare his band of companions to the Twelve Peers of France. Th e citations of the two ballads in Bernal Díaz’s text thus frame in an epic context the events that will unfold in the pages to come. Th e conquest of Mexico and the events of Bernal Díaz’s youth will be embedded in a 42 E. MICHAEL GERLI heroic plot, elevating the historical deeds of the Spaniards and Díaz’s own role in them to the level of the fabled deeds depicted in the ballad tradition.1 On another occasion, Bernal resorts yet again to the romancero, when he tells us that Cortés’ soldiers composed a ballad (En Tacuba está Cortés) to commemo- rate the events of “la noche triste,” and how Cortés in Tacuba, as he lamented the death of his men, was approached by the Bachelor Alonso Pérez, who sought to reassure him by saying that it could not be said of him what was said in the bal- lad, “Mira Nero de Tarpeya/a Roma cómo se ardía”, a reference to the Emperor Nero’s disengagement from the burning of Rome and the human tragedy that befell its citizens, as well as a trenchant comparison to the destruction of Rome and the ruin of Tenochtitlan, (Díaz del Castillo, 1972, p. 324), Th e chronicles of the sixteenth century are fraught with the invocation of bal- lad and other literary texts in the relation of events that took place in a continent that was just beginning to reveal itself to the European imagination. In addition to Díaz del Castillo, ballad allusions and citations may be found in Fernández de Oviedo’s Historia general de las Indias, where Oviedo relates the shipwreck of Alonso Zuazo in 1524 and epigrammatically seals the events ironically with the words “Buenas las traemos, señor, pues que venimos acá”, a line taken from the Romance del Rey Ramiro. Likewise, Cieza de León, relating Gonzalo Pizarro’s plot against Almagro en 1537, glosses the intrigue with “Tiempo es, el caballero, tiempo es de andar de aquí”, whose subsequent lines are left conspicuously, if elliptically, absent: “que ni puedo andar en pie,/ni al emperador servir”—a refer- ence to losing both his horse and his knightly status--, while Diego Fernández de Palencia contemptuously glosses the fl ight of the royalist army at the hands of the rebellious Hernández Girón at Chuquinga, Perú, in May,1554, with a mocking ballad citation “no van a pie los romeros, que en buenos caballos van” (cited in González Pérez, 2000, pp. 23-24). In each of these instances we see the applica- tion of the verses and plots of the romancero to the new social, historical, and ideological contexts off ered by the American landscape in an eff ort to make the latter familiar and produce a deeper understanding of the meaning of the events that are related. In this way, the romancero, or the Hispanic ballad tradition, is very much a presence in the texts of voyages, conquest, and discovery, which leads us to ask the question, Why is this so? and more importantly, What does it mean? On all the occasions I have just described adventurers in uncertain circumstances turn 1 For a detailed review of the relevant earlier scholarship on Díaz del Castillo’s Historia ver- dadera, see Beckjord (2007, pp. 128 ff .). TRANSLATING EVENTS, GLOSSING EXPERIENCE 43 to ballads or other imaginative texts to help them not only relate but reference, fl esh out, perceive, frame, and make familiar the events at the center of narratives that purport to recreate experience. Th e textual references serve, in eff ect, as a gloss to a lived experience, framing it within a known cultural and epistemologi- cal context, assimilating the event to the discourses of the European imagination. Th ese are not mere literary evocations, but rather textual recollections that pro- vide a grid of references (a Foucauldian dispositif) which facilitates the transla- tion, repositioning, or recodifi cation and understanding of something unknown in terms of something known and familiar. Via the borrowed literary references, experience undergoes a semantic transformation in the pursuit of relating the sense of an entirely new reality that seems to elude easy integration. Th rough these references, new peoples, landscapes, and geographies are rendered into a European code and are moved into familiar territory, making known strange events through analogy and a process of re-cognition, or a mental reprocessing by which new knowledge can be used and understood. Literary and textual theory over the last thirty years has permitted us to see the cultural and intellectual problematic implicit in historical writing and in testimonial texts like the ones just reviewed. Th e work of individuals like H. White and L. Gossman, for example, has led to the realization that the historical text fails to carry a singular meaning, and that even texts that are the product of direct experience are fi rst rendered, fi ltered, and structured by the imagina- tion; by processes beyond the face value of their words, and by forces beyond the workings of the conscious mind of the writer. Put simply, the historical text teems with hidden subtexts and motivations, and reveals a complex intellectual economy in its attempt to re-present experience. In an essay titled “Th e Histori- cal Text as Literary Artifact,” White notes that the writer of history “makes sense of a set of events which appear strange, enigmatic, or mysterious in its immediate manifestations by encoding the set in terms of culturally provided categories, such as metaphysical concepts, religious beliefs, or story forms. Th e eff ect of such encodations is to familiarize the unfamiliar” (White, 1978, p. 86). White goes on to say that: “How a given historical situation is to be confi gured depends on the historian’s subtlety in matching up a specifi c plot structure with a set of historical events that he wishes to endow with a meaning of a particular kind. Th is is essentially a literary, that is to say fi ction-making operation [...] the encodation of events in terms of such plot structures is one of the ways that a culture has of making sense of both personal and public pasts” (White, 1978, p. 84). 44 E. MICHAEL GERLI Th e references to the romancero and other literary texts in early American historical documents have been interpreted in two principal ways. On the one hand, they are seen largely as evidence that that the romancero was: “arraigado en la expresión coloquial de los hombres del siglo XVI ya que en ese momen- to la cultura tradicional está plenamente vigente y posee una dinámica que le permite acompañar al hombre en todas sus actividades, no sólo en el momento de la reunión o la fi esta o el trabajo, y ello es válido aún en el nuevo ámbito apenas conocido de esa tierra sorprendente y maravillosa que es América” (González Pérez, 2000, 23-24); and on the other hand, that it and other belletristic references that one fi nds in these works, which belong primarily to the textual universe of the relaciones de méritos y servicios, serve to self-engrandize and interpellate the author, who com- poses the text in a quest for civic recognition, and thus must conform to a de- manding discursive “process by which ‘Th e State’ compels individuals to identify with the images of perfect subjects of His Majesty” (Folger, 2009, p. 15).2 Reports and letters to the Crown about a person’s performance in the New World aimed at documenting achievements, often composed as self-serving justifi cations for questionable actions, led to a proliferation of rhetorically adorned relaciones cir- cumscribed by, and embellished with, heroic literary texts and subtexts. Th e use of the ballad tradition in Bernal Díaz, with its stories of courageous deeds, treacherous acts, bloody encounters, and unimagined adventure refl ects both the linguistic and social rationales just mentioned, as well as something more. In addition, it provides the pre-text, or the framing plot structure for many of the life encounters recollected by Bernal Díaz, Zuazo, Cieza de León, and many others who tell of the American experience. Its presence in their writ- ings reveals the intricate mechanics of similitude that governs the construction of meaning and the hermeneutics of their texts, which search for sense in personal occurrences and events by constantly bringing forth resemblances. Writing in Th e Order of Th ings about the forces which shape the matrix of the pre-Cartesian mind, Michel Foucault notes that analogy is central to the process for making sense of the world: “it makes possible the marvelous confrontation of resemblances across space, but it also speaks of adjacencies, of bonds and joints. Its power is immense, for the similitudes of 2 See also Pastor (1992). TRANSLATING EVENTS, GLOSSING EXPERIENCE 45 which it treats are not the visible, substantial ones between things themselves; they need only be the more subtle resemblances of relations” (Foucault, 1973, p. 21). Bernal Díaz clothes his Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España in what is thus recognizable attire: the texts of heroic romances and other identifi - able forms of European vernacular fi ction. Now how and why does he do this? Quite simply, by enveloping novel, unfamiliar experiences in recognizable nar- ratives. Since the appearance of William H. Prescott’s History of the Conquest of Mexico in 1845, the latent importance of literary texts and literary discourse to Bernal Díaz’s history has been acknowledged. Th e blind Prescott paraphrasing Díaz del Castillo in 1843 had clearly seen the signifi cance of the literary and cul- tural residues that shaped the Historia verdadera: “All round the margin, and occasionally far in the lake, they beheld little towns and villages, which, half concealed by the foliage, and gathered in white clusters around the shore, looked in the distance like companies of white swans riding quietly on the waves. A scene so new and wonderful fi lled their rude hearts with amazement. It seemed like enchantment; and they could fi nd nothing to compare it with, but the magical pictures in the Amadis de Gaula. Few pictures, indeed, in that or any other legend of chivalry, could surpass the realities of their own experience. Th e life of the adventurer in the New World was romance put into action. What wonder, then, if the Spaniard of that day, feeding his imagination with dreams of enchantment at home, and with its realities abroad, should have displayed a Quixotic enthusiasm,-a romantic exaltation of character, not to be com- prehended by the colder spirits of other lands.” (Prescott, 1981, III: 8: pp. 291-92). Díaz’s comparison, and Prescott’s seizure of it, should not surprise us: the chron- iclers lived experiences so unique that comparable scenes could only be found in the storehouse of imaginative literature, the world of the familiar fantastic—that is, in the collective literary imagination of medieval European civilization. On every page in the literature of discovery experience is mediated not just by spoken lan- guage, memory, and the imagination but by a vivid recollection of an established textual tradition. We see that tradition of texts constantly at work, falling back upon itself in the quest to order and stabilize the volatile images off ered up by the world of lived experience. Only writing and references to written texts provided a medium that allowed the relation of such novel events (the pun is intended). Literary references and actual occurrences converge as a result of the desire to interpret what has occurred, forging narratives that, it could be argued, are the precursors of that prodigious blend of reality and fantasy critics of Latin Ameri- 46 E. MICHAEL GERLI can fi ction have termed magic-realism, in which certain truths seem stranger than fi ction and can only be believed by displacing them toward the realm of known fantasy. Th e methods and strategies of fi ction provide, paradoxically, the means for relating the vivid novelty of the New World in Bernal Díaz’s Historia verdadera. Diaz’s discursive invocation of the truth paradoxically relies on his readings of medieval imaginative literature. In his book, we see America through a rhetoric of Spanish fi ction since only the texts of fi ction and fantasy could suf- fi ce to depict, highlight, dramatize, and claim his story for European history. On one occasion, for example, Díaz del Castillo recreates a dialog between doña Marina with an old Indian woman, in a text that impresses the literate reader as redolent with echoes of Celestina. It is dark, the air is fi lled with an odor of sus- picion and conspiracy; the old woman, who had hoped to arrange an advantageous marriage for her son with la Malinche, takes Doña Marina aside, urges her to fl ee, and whispers that there is a conspiracy afoot among the papas to kill everyone in the Spanish camp at Cholula. As subtle and perspicacious as Celestina herself, doña Marina thanks the old woman and artfully wins her confi dence, as she probes and cajoles to uncover the details of the Aztec plot kill Cortés and his men: “¡Oh, madre, qué mucho tengo que agradeceros! Eso que decís, yo me fuera con vos, pero no tengo aquí de quiém me fi ar mis mantas y joyas de oro, ques muchos; por vuestra vida, madre, que aguardéis un poco vos y vuestro hijo, y esta noche nos iremos que ahora ya véis que estos teules están velando, y sentirnos han” (Díaz del Castillo, 1972, pp. 146-147). Having won time through persuasive deception, Doña Marina promptly in- forms Cortés of the plot. It is clear, of course, that neither the old Aztec woman nor Doña Marina ever spoke in the way Díaz describes their encounter. It is abundantly clear, also, that Doña Marina’s dissimulation and the old crone’s stratagem to sow doubt among the Spaniards through the transparent excuse of marrying her son to la Malinche resonate with irony and the discursive subter- fuges of the dialogs in Celestina. Díaz del Castillo artfully weaves in intertextual echoes from Celestina at this juncture not only to lend verisimilitude to his work, but to cast the crucial meeting between these two native women in a linguistic universe that was fraught with conspiratorial overtones and was already more than familiar to his readers.3 3 Th e reader’s privileged ironical perspective, Doña Marina’s false gratitude, and her bogus rhe- torical endearment (“¡Oh, madre, qué mucho tengo que agradeceros!”), highlight the air of mutual betrayal that frames the scene and would doubtless have immediately resonated with echoes of TRANSLATING EVENTS, GLOSSING EXPERIENCE 47 Similarly, in what is perhaps the most vivid portrait of Moctezuma to be found in the literature of the Conquest of Mexico, we see Díaz’s quest for a means to describe the Aztec King come to rest upon the paradigm of the biographical portrait, or descriptio, as it was defi ned in medieval Castilian historiography fi rst by López de Ayala in his chronicles, but above all later by his nephew, Fernán Pérez de Guzmán in his Generaciones y semblanzas, which was available to Bernal Díaz in printed form since the 1512 Valladolid edition: “Era el gran Montezuma de edad de hasta cuarenta años y de Buena estatura e bien proporcionado e cenceño, e pocas carnes, y la color ni muy Moreno, sino propio color e matiz de indio, y traía los cabellos no muy largos, sino cuanto le cubrían las orejas, e pocas barbas prietas e bien puestas e ralas, y el rostro algo largo y alegre, e los ojos de buena manera, e mostraba en su persona en el mirar, por un cabo amor e cuando era menester gravedad; era muy polido e limpio, bañábase cada día una vez a la tarde” (Díaz del Castillo, p. 166).4 Th e texts, subtexts, and explicit references we have examined are, in eff ect, two things: on the surface, they are the spontaneous recollections and associa- tions of authors and chroniclers; and at a deeper level, they constitute an inter- pretive paradigm and a hermeneutical strategy that is fi rmly rooted in a textual tradition, an established epistemology, or a way of processing and organizing knowledge —especially knowledge of the unknown— that permits the justifi - cation and assimilation of new images into the broader cultural context of the enunciative voice of the text and the reader. Beyond the relation of events, one of the roles of these texts is to mold attitudes and beliefs that draw members of a society together in solidarity. Th e references to known plots and motifs thus may be seen as sites of collaboration between the writer and his intended readers where statements of common interests and aspirations are displayed and become instruments in the establishment and articulation of a group dynamic vital to the construction of the earliest European images of America. Th ey are parenthetical references that break the basic syntax of the narrative —the nature and sequence of the events described— to call attention to certain common points of reference Celestina to Díaz’s readers in 1575, when the manuscript of the Historia verdadera fi rst began to circulate in Spain. On the Celestinesque references in the Historia verdadera, see Johnson (1981, 1997) and Montaudon (2007). 4 Th e portrait of Montezuma drawn by Díaz should be compared, for example, to the one of King Juan II penned by Pérez de Guzmán (Pérez de Guzmán, 1965, p. 117-18). Th e rhetorical similarity is striking. 48 E. MICHAEL GERLI that remind both reader and writer that, although what is represented is meant to be seen as astonishingly new, it is not so new as to not be somehow déjà vu. If Díaz draws upon the romancero, the romances of chivalry, and other modes of European imaginative literature, he does so to move the events he describes closer to his own and his reader’s cultural realm, to make the European mind grasp their uncanniness by reference to an already familiar universe of discourse. It is a strategy, as Freud might say, to make the Unheimlich Heimlich. To give examples or comparisons is always an attempt to off er a commentary that seeks to extract a larger meaning. As such the comparisons and examples that Díaz del Castillo draws upon become constitutive elements of his narrative that serve as strategies to organize, domesticate, and explain the events that he relates, as well as to open up a common space for dialog with his public. Th ey are invitations to the larger interpretive possibilities of his text, and they beckon the reader to add to its surplus, as Marie de France’s famous formulation of in- terpretive reading put it.5 Th ey bring the events that are told closer to the reader’s understanding, pointing out things that were known by the reader before picking up Díaz’s history, thus charging his text with hermeneutical possibilities. Th eir understanding depends not so much on the events of the text itself, than on the ready recognition of it by readers as something that belongs to their cultural universe. At the same time, of course, the American experience Díaz relates for- feits the full possibility of being unique as it moves toward the chivalric world; it renounces the claim that it might be something entirely new and independent as it is transformed into an amplifi cation of Europe. Th e narrative, in this way, is understood as an extension of the chivalric world, even though the point of comparison belongs entirely to the realm of imaginative literature. Th us fi ction off ered the power to convey, make known, and transform something that was nameless into something that could be named. In yet another description fraught with comparisons, we see how the town of Mezquiqui for Díaz and his companions becomes Venezuela, a small representa- tion of Venice on the lake, and how ultimately, as they neared Tenochtitlan, the shining towers of the metropolis and the landscape itself could only be captured through the lens of Amadís: 5 “Custume fu as anciens,/ Ceo testimoine Precïens,/ Es livres ke jadis feseient,/ Assez oscure- ment diseient/ Pur ceus ki a venir esteient/ E ki aprendre les deveient,/ K’i peüssent gloser la letter/ E de lur sen le surplus mettre” (Marie de France, 1978, lines 9-17).