BR.J. ENT, NAT. HIST.. 14:2001 47 methods during 1999. This enabled small populations of sea rocket and prickly saltwort to colonise areas where residual algal deposits were left undisturbed. The resultwasthat sanddartlarvaerecolonised almost immediatelyand were found to be abundant, even in areas where only a few plants had colonised the strandline. However, such rapid recolonisation is only likely to occur where there are extant populations close by, in this case the population at Crymlyn Burrows undoubtedly facilitated rapid recolonisation. This example does demonstrate that with sympathetic management, it is possible for local authorities (and other land- managers) to accommodate both human interests and those ofthe strandline fauna without compromising health and safety, tourism and other key issues. Sensitive UK areas elsewhere in the should be identified and damaging activities minimised if sustainable populations of the sand dart and other scarce species are to remain features of our beaches. References Hallet, H. M. 1917. The Lepidoptera of Glamorgan, Transactions ofthe CardiffNaturalists Society, 50: 55. Llewellyn, P. J. & Shackley, S. E. 1996. The effects of mechanical beach-cleaning on invertebrate populations, British Wildlife, 7: 147-155. Llewellyn, J. T. D. 1866. Captures of Lepidoptera in South Wales, Entomologists Monthly Magazine, 3: 263. Tutt, J. W. 1994. PracticedHintsfor theFieldLepidopterist, A Facsimile Reprint,The Amateur Entomologist, 23. Waring, P. 1999. National Moth Conservation Project, News Bulletin JO, April 1998-March 1999, Butterfly Conservation. SHORT COMMUNICATION — More observations of dotted chestnut moths. I recently reported finding adult dotted chestnut moths, Conistra rubiginea D & S., in the nest of the ant Lasius fuUginosiis (Latr.) (Formicidae); see Denton (1998. An unusual encounter with dotted chestnut moths Conistra rubiginea. British JournalofEntomology andNatural History 10 (4): 209). I revisited the same nest onThursley NNR, Surrey on 4.ix.l998, and found two lepidopteran pupae next to the nest carton, c.40cm below ground inside the base ofa hollow oak. I took these home and adult C. rubigineaemerged on & the 25. 29.ix. L. fiiliginosusis a fairlylarge ant, but workers rarely bringlarge insects to thenest. However, it does defend its nest against intruders, and the caterpillars must have a way ofpacifying oravoiding theworkers on theirwaydowninto the nest. The adults found within the nest in 1997 were completely ignored by the ants, which were agitated by my presence. Further investigation ofthis colony in 1999 revealed several old pupae deep in the nest chamber but no evidence of larvae. The caterpillars of C. rubiginea are very hairy, unlike others in the genus and it is tempting to suggest that it might be myrmecophilous, as its range is within that ofL.fuliginosus. Both favour woodland, and wooded heaths. In captivity the larvae are not very fussy about their food plant, and will eat withered leaves. Perhaps the caterpillar is somehow protected by the ants, which offsets the need foracontinual supply offreshvegetation. It is surprising that others, especially the arch ant-nest investigator Horace Donisthorpe—, didn't come across this moth in the many nests examined across the country. JONTY Denton, 2 Sandown Close, Ahon, Hants GU34 2TG