Missouri Attorney General's Opinions - 2002 Opinion Date Topic Summary 39-2002 May 22 DRAINAGE DISTRICTS. An authorized representative of a corporation that owns property LEVEE DISTRICTS. within a levee district may be elected to the board of supervisors as provided in Section 245.060. There is no provision that an authorized representative of a corporation that owns property in a drainage district may be elected to the board of supervisors of a drainage district under Section 242.150. 47-2002 May 15 LOTTERY A pardon removes an impediment to a lottery license caused solely by COMMISSION. the fact of the conviction for which the pardon was granted, but the PARDONS. conduct that led to the conviction for which the pardon was granted may be considered in assessing other factors used in making licensing decisions. 63-2002 Jan 23 CITY COUNCIL. A member of a city council may run for county auditor; however, an COUNTY AUDITOR. individual may not serve simultaneously as county auditor of a first INCOMPATIBILITY OF class county and as a member of a city council within that county. OFFICES. 65-2002 May 15 CENSUS. Inmates of state correctional institutions should be included in the PRISONERS. population count of the political subdivision in which the institution exists as determined at the last previous decennial census of the United States. 69-2002 Jan 18 JOINT RESOLUTIONS. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the proposed constitutional amendment passed by the General Assembly (House Joint Resolution No. 11). 75-2002 Feb 6 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval under Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to revise the Missouri statutes submitted by the Missouri Campaign for New Drug Policies. 77-2002 Feb 6 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval under Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri Constitution submitted by Chuck Portwood. 78-2002 May 13 GOVERNOR. Section 143.183, RSMo 2000, imposes an affirmative obligation on the INCOME TAX. Commissioner of Administration to estimate the amount of state OFFICE OF income tax revenues collected which are received from nonresident ADMINISTRATION. members of professional athletic teams and nonresident entertainers. The allocation of those revenues to the various funds identified in that statute are subject to the appropriation process. Section 143.183 imposes no duty on the Governor and does not restrict the Governor's authority to prepare and submit a budget. 82-2002 Mar 1 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.334, RSMo 2000, regarding a proposed amendment to the Missouri Constitution. 83-2002 Mar 1 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition for a proposed constitutional amendment from the Missouri Campaign for New Drug Policies relating to drug and tobacco addiction and treatment policies. 85-2002 Mar 1 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition proposal relating to the Homestead Preservation Act. 88-2002 Mar 6 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend Article IV of the Missouri Constitution submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 1). 89-2002 Mar 6 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend Article IV of the Missouri Constitution submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 2). 91-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 1). 92-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 2). 93-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 3). 94-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 4). 95-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 5). 96-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 6). 97-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 7). 98-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend the Missouri statutes relating to tobacco taxes submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 8). 99-2002 Mar 14 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.334, RSMo 2000, related to an initiative petition for the Missouri Campaign for New Drug Policies. 100-2002 Mar 15 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to a proposal to amend Article IV of the Missouri Constitution submitted by Husch & Eppenberger, LLC (version 3a). 102-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 1). 103-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 2). 104-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 3). 105-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 4). 106-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 5). 107-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 6). 108-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 7). 109-2002 Mar 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to tobacco taxes (version 8). 115-2002 Apr 4 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to Motor-Fuel Transportation Fund taxes (version 1). 116-2002 Apr 4 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to Motor-Fuel Transportation Fund taxes (version 2). 117-2002 Apr 4 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition related to Motor-Fuel Transportation Fund taxes (version 3a). 119-2002 Mar 28 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.334, RSMo 2000, regarding a proposed tobacco tax initiative petition (version 2). 126-2002 Apr 8 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.334, RSMo 2000, regarding a proposed initiative petition relating to transportation (version 1). 127-2002 Apr 8 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.334, RSMo 2000, regarding a proposed initiative petition relating to transportation (version 2). 128-2002 Apr 8 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.334, RSMo 2000, regarding a proposed initiative petition relating to transportation (version 3a). 140-2002 May 28 INITIATIVE AND Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary REFERENDUM. statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.160, RSMo 2000, REFERENDUM. regarding a referendum to be held on Senate Bill Nos. 915, 710, and 907. 141-2002 May 28 INITIATIVE AND Review and approval of legal content and form of the fiscal note REFERENDUM. summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.170, RSMo, regarding a REFERENDUM. referendum to be held on Senate Bill Nos. 915, 710, and 907. 146-2002 June JOINT RESOLUTIONS. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary 26 statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.160, RSMo 2000, regarding Senate Joint Resolution 24. 147-2002 June JOINT RESOLUTIONS. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note 26 summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning Senate Joint Resolution No. 24. 164-2002 Dec 5 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval pursuant to Section 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition relating to amending Chapter 640, RSMo, by adding one new section to be known as Section 640.887, the Consumer Clean Energy Act. 169-2002 Dec 19 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a fiscal note summary prepared pursuant to Section 116.175, RSMo, concerning the initiative petition proposal to revise Chapter 640 by adding one new section, Section 640.887. 170-2002 Dec 20 INITIATIVE PETITION. Review and approval of legal content and form of a summary statement prepared pursuant to Section 116.334, RSMo 2000, regarding an initiative petition proposal to revise Chapter 640 by adding one new section, Section 640.887, Consumer Clean Energy Act. DRAINAGE DISTRICTS: An authorized representative of a corporation that LEVEE DISTRICTS: owns property within a levee district may be elected to the board of supervisors as provided in Section 245.060. There is no provision that an authorized representative of a corporation that owns property in a drainage district may be elected to the board of supervisors of a drainage district under Section 242.150. OPINION NO. 39-2002 May 22,2002 Honorable Lanie Black Representative, District 161 Room 116-1, State Capitol Building Jefferson City, MO 65101 Dear Representative Black: You have submitted to this office a request for an opm10n "whether corporate/partnership membership qualifies as ownership in accordance with RSMo sections 242.150, 245.335, and 245.060, ..." From the infonnation that you have submitted, it appears that an individual was removed who had been elected as a supervisor of a drainage district because he did not personally own land within the district but had been a corporate representative of a corporation that did own land within the district. Because the information you have supplied indicates the issue involves whether a corporate representative may serve on a board of supervisors, we have limited our response to that question and not to whether a partnership representative can so serve. Chapter 242 deals with drainage districts, while Chapter 245 deals with levee districts. The provisions regarding qualifications to be a member of the board of supervisors of a levee district vary slightly from those to be a member of the board of supervisors of a drainage district. The board of supervisors for a drainage district created by a circuit court are elected under the provisions of Section 242.150,1 which provides in pertinent part: Within thirty days after any drainage district shall have been organized ... the circuit clerk ... shall, ... call a meeting 'Unless otherwise specified, all statutory references are to RSMo 2000. Honorable Lanie Black Page 2 ofthe owners real estate or other property situate in said district, ... for the purpose of electing a board of five supervisors, to be composed of owners of real estate in said district, two of whom at least shall be residents of the county or counties in which such district is situate, or some adjoining counties; ... at such election each and every acre ofland in the district shall represent one share, and each owner shall be entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for every acre ofland owned by him in such district, and the five persons receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected as supervisors; ... Drainage districts may also be formed under Chapter 243. The board of supervisors are elected in the same fashion as in Chapter 242. See Section 243.470.4, RSMo. If a drainage district organized by a circuit court is consolidated with one organized by a county commission, a new board of supervisors is elected as provided in Chapter 242. See Section 243.475.2(2). Levee districts may be created pursuant to Chapter 245. The election of a levee district board of supervisors is governed by Section 245.060, which provides in pertinent part: Within thirty days after any levee district shall have been organized and incorporated under the provisions of section 245.025 the circuit clerk ... shall, ... call a meeting of the owners of real estate or other property situate in said district, including the authorized representative of any corporation which owns real estate or other property situate in said district, ... for the purpose of electing a board of five supervisors, to be composed of owners of real estate in said district, which may include the authorized representative of any corporation which owns real estate or other property in said district, two of whom at least shall be residents of the county or counties in which said district is situate, or some adjoining counties; ... at such election each and every acre of land and each and every mile of right-of-way of every corporation owning a franchise in the district shall represent one share, and each owner shall be entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for every acre of land or mile of right-of-way owned by him in such district, and the Honorable Lanie Black Page 3 five persons receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected as supervisors; ... provided, that if the levee district be located within a third or fourth class city of this state, or within any city in this state under fifty thousand population operating under a special charter then the owner of each lot, tract, parcel or subdivision thereof, as set forth in the final decree ofthe court creating and incorporating said levee district, shall be entitled to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each lot, tract, parcel or subdivision thereof, owned by him. (Emphasis added.) An old levee district may be reorganized by a county commission. See Sections 245.285 to 245.545. When such a levee district is reorganized, appointment is made pursuant to Section 245.335, which provides: At the term of the county commission at which said levee district may be laid off, or at any subsequent term thereof, the said commission shall appoint three directors of levees, who shall be landholders within the county for the levee district of which the county is the whole or part thereof,. one of which directors shall hold his said office for the term of one year, one for the term of two years, and one for the term of three years, and until their successors are duly appointed and qualified; and the said commission shall annually thereafter appoint one director to take the place of the director whose official term expires, possessing the same qualifications as the director first appointed, who shall hold his office for the term of three years. When a meeting is called to select members of the board of supervisors of a levee district, the circuit clerk is specifically directed to contact "the authorized representative of any corporation which owns real estate or other property situate in said district." Section 245.060. No such language appears in the statutory framework for drainage districts. The legislature is presumed to know the provisions of one statute when enacting another one. Bushell v. Schepp, 613 S.W.2d 689 (Mo. App. 1981). The issue presented is whether a representative of a corporation can serve as a member of the board of supervisors of either a drainage district or levee district. The Honorable Lanie Black Page4 qualifications to serve on the board in a drainage district include ownership of real estate within the district, with at least two members residents of a county within the district. See Section 242.150. For levee districts, board members are "to be composed of owners of real estate in said district, which may include the authorized representative of any corporation which owns real estate or other property in said district." Section 245.060. It appears from the statutory framework that the legislature has decided that a corporate representative may be elected to the board of supervisors of a levee district but not for a drainage district. Because there is a strong presumption that statutes are constitutional, we assume that this distinction between levee districts and drainage districts would withstand any challenge. Cocktail Fortune, Inc. v. Supervisor ofL iquor Control, 994 S. W.2d 955 (Mo. 1999). CONCLUSION An authorized representative of a corporation that owns property within a levee district may be elected to the board of supervisors as provided in Section 245.060. There is no provision that an authorized representative of a corporation that owns property in a drainage district may be elected to the board of supervisors of a drainage district under Section 242.150. ·LOTTERY COMMISSION: A pardon removes an impediment to a lottery PARDONS: license caused solely by the fact of the conviction for which the pardon was granted, but the conduct that led to the conviction for which the pardon was granted may be considered in assessing other factors used in making licensing decisions. OPINION NO. 47-2002 May 15, 2002 Honorable Robert M. Clayton, III State Representative, District 10 State Capitol Building JeffersonCity, MO 65101 Dear Representative Clayton: We are in receipt of the following for an opinion from this office: Does a gubernatorial pardon remove any impediment to receipt of a lottery license by a person who had been convicted of a felony? While the pardon removes impediments caused by the fact of conviction, it does not remove any other impediments the applicant may have, including those that exist by reason of the conduct that led to the conviction. The Director of the State Lottery is authorized to issue licenses for lottery game retailers pursuant to rules and regulations adopted by the Lottery Commission. Section 313.255, RSMo. The Director is statutorily barred from licensing any person as a lottery game retailer who has been convicted of a felony. Section 313.260, RSMo. There are additional statutory and regulatory factors that are considered in issuing a lottery license. You have inquired about an individual who was convicted of a felony--burglary and stealing--and received a pardon from Governor Roger B. Wilson on January 8, 2001. The question you posed is whether that pardon removes "any impediments" to the individual being issued a lottery game retailer license.