Memorandum of Understanding on Distr: General the Conservation and Management CMS/Dugong/SS2/Report of Dugongs and their Habitats throughout their Range 08 April 2013 SECOND SIGNATORY STATE MEETING / Manila, Philippines, 19-20 February 2013 The Report of the Second Signatory State Meeting (SS2) of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of Dugongs and their Habitats throughout their Range 19-20 February 2013, Manila, the Philippines 1. Opening of the Meeting (No document) 1. The meeting was opened by the hostess, Stephany Dianne Stefanowitz, the Miss Philippines-Earth 2012 and Miss Earth Air 2012. She reminded the meeting that the Dugong was at high risk of extinction, and after the First Meeting of the Signatories in Abu Dhabi in 2010, the present gathering was another milestone in international efforts to protect the species. 2. After leading the meeting in a rendition of the Philippines’ national anthem, Ms Stefanowitz introduced Ms Theresa Mundita Lim of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources of the Philippines (DENR). 3. Ms Lim introduced the other people on the podium, namely Ernesto D. Adobo Junior, the Deputy Minister followed by Nelson P. Devanadera, the Assistant Director and Ms Donna Kwan of the CMS Secretariat. She welcomed all the delegates to Manila and expressed her delight and honour at hosting the meeting. 4. Ms Lim related the story of Joanna, the injured Dugong calf. Unfortunately all the efforts to try to save the animal were in vain, because, as was later discovered, its digestive tract had been infested with parasites. However, lessons were learned from the experience. A great many species needed concerted conservation efforts, which should address the requirements of the animals, their habitats and the human communities with which they interacted. The Dugong MOU under CMS was a source of knowledge and inspiration, bringing conservation actions to a higher level. 5. Ms Kwan (CMS) expressed her thanks to the Host Government of the meeting for its tireless support. She also thanked the Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi, which hosted the Secretariat and supported many of its activities. The presence of 17 of the 21 Signatories, several non-signatory Range States, 10 other organizations and 10 of the Technical Advisers was an encouraging sign of the international commitment to achieve the goals of the MOU. Four Range States had indicated their willingness to sign the Dugong MOU and a ceremony would take place in the course of the meeting, at which Vanuatu would also sign the CMS Sharks MOU. The Meeting of Signatories would be followed by a two-day international workshop on the GEF Dugong and Seagrass Conservation project for all the partner and supporting countries to the GEF Project. 6. Ms Kwan lamented the death in September 2012 of Lui Bell of the SPREP office in Apia, Samoa. He had been a driving force for conservation in the Pacific Islands region and would be sorely missed. 7. The participants at the meeting were made up of some old hands and some new faces. Renowned experts such as Prof. Helene Marsh and Mr John Reynolds would be making presentations and leading the Page 1 of 21 discussion on conservation needs, while Mr Nick Pilcher would present a synthesis of data gathered from this first major international survey conducted in 18 countries. Some interactive sessions had also been planned to help improve communication and to encourage the participants’ involvement in the proceedings. 8. Assistant Director, Nelson P. Devanadera, introduced the keynote speaker, Ernesto D. Adobo Junior, outlining the latter’s career which had begun as a clerk in the Philippines’ House of Representatives, then a special investigator 1992-99 in the National Bureau of Investigation, from where he was seconded to the DENR dealing with illegal logging. He then served as a special assistant to the mayor of Quezon City, before returning to the DENR as regional director and later assistant secretary for field operations until his appointment by the President as Undersecretary for DENR. 9. Mr Adobo explained the role of Dugongs in Filipino legends and science. It was evident that this species was facing a serious decline across the 48 Range States. Fossilized remains indicated that the species had been present in the Philippines for over 20 million years and just 200km from the conference venue there were 2,500 year-old human graves containing artefacts made of Dugong parts. More recently, the 1916 Act on game and fisheries afforded protection to wildlife including Dugongs. Dugong habitat was further protected in 1976 and a sanctuary was established in 1984. Aerial surveys were conducted in 1985, and the year 1986 saw the start of a captive breeding programme which was still going on 27 years later. An Executive Order had launched the Philippines’ Dugong programme with aerial surveys complemented by shore-based work, information campaigns and community activities. Field officers had by now presented hundreds of reports in part of a wide-ranging inter-agency effort. 10. More aerial surveys were carried out in 1998 and the first national Dugong workshop was held. In the twenty-first century, the DENR was continuing to implement its mandate to conserve the environment and in 2001 further Executive Orders provided for fines of up to one million pesos and imprisonment for harming Dugongs. 11. The Philippines was a Party to CMS, CBD and CITES and a signatory of the MOU on Dugongs. The Conservation and Management Plan accompanying the MOU was ambitious and comprehensive and included 9 objectives and 26 actions. To be properly implemented, it needed technical support and knowledge. The generous funding from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) channelled through the CMS Abu Dhabi Project Office had allowed national and local agencies and NGOs to carry out work on five of the Philippines’ largest islands. Many of the Range States were doing similar work and would have compatible data that could be linked up providing a better worldwide view. Digital tools enabled basic questions to be answered – such as where the Dugongs and the seagrass beds were, where hunting was taking place and what the causes of death in Dugongs were. The main challenge was to put a stop to the Dugongs’ decline while not endangering the livelihoods of local fishermen and communities. 2. Signing ceremony (No document) 12. The Hostess, Ms Stefanowitz introduced this item, calling upon the representatives of Bangladesh, Egypt, Somalia and Sudan in turn to come to the podium to sign the Dugong MOU. The representative of Vanuatu was then asked to come forward to sign the MOU on the Conservation of Migratory Sharks. 13. Mr Khaled Kassem of the Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime Transport, a member organization of the League of Arab States, then presented the DENR with a gift as a gesture of goodwill to the Philippines. 3. Adoption of the Rules of Procedure (CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.3 and CMS/Dugong/SS2/Inf.3 ) 14. Simon Woodley, the Facilitator, called the meeting to order and explained his role in the proceedings as an aide to the Chair and Secretariat. After some housekeeping announcements, he moved to the Rules of Procedure, which had been circulated the week before. He asked whether any delegations had any comments, pointing out that the Rules were based on those used by other CMS instruments, such as the Page 2 of 36 Raptors MOU. The Secretariat’s advice was to adopt the Rules as presented, including a proposed three-year cycle for the Meetings of Signatories. 15. Australia voiced support for the adoption of the Rules and particularly welcomed the proposal for holding meetings every three years. On a show of hands, the meeting adopted the Rules with no votes against. 4. Election of Officers (No document) 16. The Facilitator called for nominations for candidates to chair the meeting. The United Arab Emirates seconded by Australia proposed the Philippines. There being no other nominations, the Philippines was declared elected and Ms Lim assumed the Chair. 17. There were no nominations for Vice-Chair, and the Facilitator proposed that the meeting proceed and in the event of the Chair being indisposed a suitable solution be found. 18. Ms Kwan (CMS) also announced that all the credentials received had been found to be in order. Two Signatories, by arrangement with Secretariat, had undertaken to submit credentials after the meeting. 5. Adoption of the agenda and meeting schedule 19. The Chair thanked the meeting for the vote of confidence and welcomed the four new Signatory States. Given the very full and exciting agenda for the next two days, she proposed to make a start straight away and asked whether there were any comments on the Agenda and Schedule, both of which had been circulated in advance. 5.1. Provisional agenda and list of documents (CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.5.1) 20. The Chair proposed the adoption of the agenda. There being no dissenting voices, the Chair declared the agenda adopted. 5.2. Provisional annotated agenda and schedule (CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.5.2) 21. The Chair proposed the adoption of the annotated agenda and schedule. There being no dissenting voices, the Chair declared both to be adopted. 6. Admission of Observers (No document) 22. The Chair referred to Information Document 3, the provisional list of participants, which included a number of observers. The Chair sought confirmation that the list was complete and in the absence of any objections, declared that the observers listed would be admitted to the meeting. 7. Statements from Signatories and Observers (No document) 23. The Chair invited the delegations present to make brief statements to complement any reports submitted. 24. Australia expressed its appreciation to the Host Government and, in particular, the DENR and the Secretariat for having organized the meeting. 25. Indonesia echoed Australia’s sentiments towards those that had organized the meeting and welcomed the opportunity to attend in the capacity of observers. Indonesia was giving serious consideration to signing the MOU. Page 3 of 36 26. Bangladesh was pleased to have become a Signatory to the MOU. The Bangladeshi delegate then explained some of the details of the new wildlife law adopted in that country, which included severe penalties for transgressions. 8. Future challenges for Dugong conservation (No document) 27. Ms Kwan (CMS) then introduced the two experts who were to give the main presentation under this agenda item - Helene Marsh and John Reynolds. Presentation by Professor Helene Marsh and Mr John Reynolds 28. Prof. Marsh thanked the Philippines Government, the Secretariat and the delegates, many of whom had travelled considerable distances to attend the meeting. She explained that she would set out the challenges faced by conservationists dealing with Dugongs, while Mr Reynolds would concentrate on how those challenges could be addressed. 29. Prof. Marsh’s presentation was entitled “Challenge of Conserving Dugongs”. Dugongs were powerful political animals and had been the subject of law suits brought against two US Secretaries of Defence - Rumsfeld and Gates – in relation to proposed construction of an offshore marine airbase on the island of Okinawa affecting Dugong habitat. The law suits were successful on both occasions. There was a further lawsuit brought against a multi-million dollar subsidy of fossil fuel projects in the Great Barrier Reef Region, the outcome of which was yet to be determined. As long-lived creatures that were slow to reach sexual maturity, Dugongs could not sustain high levels of human-induced mortality – with smaller populations (those counting fewer than 100 individuals) unable to sustain any at all. Threats included direct take for meat or ivory, agricultural run-offs affecting seagrass beds and bycatch. It was also extremely hard to detect population declines in smaller populations unless the drop was catastrophic and it was similarly difficult to detect signs of recovery, within normal human time spans. The range of the species was vast and most of the Range States were developing tropical countries ranked in the lower half of the Human Development Index (HDI) table, where people were hungry and Dugongs worth more dead than alive. A Dugong caught as fisheries bycatch in Mozambique (172nd of the 182 countries assessed for the HDI), for example, could be sold for its meat and ivory and raise the equivalent of several months’ wages of an artisanal fisherman. The IUCN Red List conservation status of the Dugong was uneven across the species’ range – with the population categorized as Critically Endangered in eastern Queensland, Endangered in East Africa, Sri Lanka-Southern India and from Myanmar to Vietnam, Vulnerable in Indonesia, the Philippines and Northern Queensland, Least Concern in Western Australia and Data Deficient in the Red Sea and the Gulf, Northern Australia, the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and New Caledonia. 30. The slides making up Prof. Marsh’s presentation are available on the CMS Website at the following address: http://www.cms.int/species/dugong/meeting_of_sigs_2/presentation_01_item8_helene_marsh.pdf 31. Mr John Reynolds of the MOTE Marine Laboratory gave a presentation entitled “Overcoming the challenge of conserving Dugongs” stressing that the struggle to conserve the Dugong was a fight worth fighting. The problems facing Dugongs were daunting but this should serve to inspire conservationists to do more rather than intimidate them. He said that a set of emerging tools and a reassessment of what conservation entailed provided some hope. 32. The Pew Oceans Commission (2003) gave some context. This report stated that the oceans were in crisis – both the seas themselves and the living organisms depending on them – and rather than criticize negatively called for greater efforts and improved actions. Despite their charismatic nature, 2.5 per cent of marine mammals had become extinct in the last 60 years – most recently the Baiji. There had been some spectacular recoveries (such as the Elephant Seal and the Gray Whale) but others were on the brink (the Vaquita, the Mediterranean Monk Seal and some Orca populations). In general, the balance was negative. Page 4 of 36 33. The lack of sound scientific data was not the reason for slow progress in conservation. Scientists were well placed to assist decision-makers; what was missing was a clear strategy. There were many examples of conservation work being carried out without a comprehensive scientific basis, as well as examples of no action being done despite a pressing scientific case. Mr Reynolds’ message was that people should act before it was too late. 34. Mr Reynolds pointed out that definitions of key terms such as “conservation” and “science” differed. One definition of “conservation” provided by Meffe in 1999 said that it entailed safeguarding biota and allowing human benefit for present and future generations, which might include both consumptive and non- consumptive purposes. Policy should strike a balance of how society should use finite and limited resources. Solutions had to be found and further studies undertaken while there was still time. 35. Traditional solutions tended to be based on the following principles: maintaining healthy populations; understanding population structures and dynamics, and regulating the exploitation of Dugongs accordingly; recognizing the effects of human activities on ecosystems; assessing economic, social and ecological effects of exploitation, and regulating or restricting such exploitation accordingly; and communication and education. In poorer nations (those at the lower levels of the HDI league table) other factors came into play affecting those countries’ priorities. Here, Dugongs were worth more dead than alive and conservation policies had to take account of human poverty and securing livelihoods. 36. Citing the example of the Bazaruto Archipelago in Mozambique which was home to the largest Dugong population in East Africa, Mr Reynolds explained that some advisers were sceptical about the usefulness of conducting aerial surveys when shark netting was going on causing bycatch. They claimed that this was tantamount to standing on the sidelines watching rather than doing anything practical. 37. The blueprint for Dugong conservation needed to have clear goals, be value-based, have a geocentric conservation ethic, recognize the role of values in policy formulation, establish appropriate principles for modern conservation policy and seek solutions to identified problems. Conservationists should seek to frame the debate, but most important try to be proactive rather than just react to events. They should also be creative, as it was seldom the case that a failed policy would work simply by repeating it. Working in isolation was also not effective, and multidisciplinary teams should be built including lawyers, economists, anthropologists as well as biologists. 38. The regulatory tools available for conservation included: protection through legislation, enforcement of such legislation (but this was often not enough) and the designation of aquatic protected areas. To work, such tools needed political will and adequate financial resources. Enabling tools included: education, community partnerships, cross species initiatives, flagship projects and cultural protocols. Mr Reynolds cited the example of a community project in Phuket, Thailand, where the rescue of one Dugong led to a better understanding on the part of fishers for the habitat and the stopping of damage to the seagrass beds. 39. Numerous research projects had been carried out (eg Moore 2010) involving interviews to assess the extent of the bycatch problem in artisanal fisheries, but there was never enough funding to allow really comprehensive surveys. 40. Mr Reynolds advised against presenting legislators with weighty volumes containing detailed reports. Politicians were more likely to respond to maps. One map could show the occurrence of Dugongs and another where the fishing effort was greatest. The overlap was likely to have the highest rate of bycatch, so was the area where most effort should be focused. Alarmingly, according to research undertaken by Pew in the USA, the environment was rated 21st out of 25 thematic areas of concern to the public. He suggested that the optimal policy was to choose one’s battles carefully. What was important ultimately was to win the war, not to fight every battle. Acting promptly often prevented a problem turning into a crisis and it was essential to take the human angle into consideration, especially in poorer countries where economic incentives were important. Page 5 of 36 41. Mr Reynolds concluded his presentation by citing the case of one determined individual who had taken a stand and made a difference. The individual concerned was Marjorie Stoneman Douglas (1890-1998) whose book on the Everglades - River of Grass (1947) had done much to help preserve that area. 42. The slides making up Mr Reynolds’ presentation are available on the CMS Website at this address: http://www.cms.int/species/dugong/meeting_of_sigs_2/presentation_02_item8_john_reynolds.pdf Questions and Comments 43. Bangladesh was planning to designate protected areas but required technical assistance. Prof. Marsh said that Bangladesh was one of the countries where information was lacking. She suggested that the best starting point would be to talk to fishermen, whose knowledge of the waters would be important. It was also important to secure their cooperation. Mr Pilcher added that 68 interviews had been conducted in Bangladesh in 2011, which had revealed few recent sightings and some historic ones. 44. The representative of UNEP asked whether there were any concrete examples of where conservation action had halted the decline of the species. Prof. Marsh cited the cases of the Marine Protected Areas in Australia along urbanized stretches of the coast where losses had been halted. Banning gillnets in hotspots was also effective, but admittedly this was more easily done in richer countries. 45. The UAE said that many projects in Arabia had science and conservation elements and asked whether there was an ideal balance. Mr Reynolds said that there was no simple answer as it would depend on the level of threat. Taking the example of the Baiji, the situation had been so critical that action should have been taken immediately and the delays contributed to the species’ extinction. 46. The United Republic of Tanzania reported on the effectiveness of incentives. When such a scheme had been started in a marine protected area (MPA), over fifty sightings were declared to the authorities and trapped specimens had been released back into the sea. The population in the MPA was increasing. 47. Sudan said that local communities along the coast neither caught nor ate Dugongs. Different nets were used in known Dugong habitats. Efforts were being made to try to determine more key sites for Dugongs and help was needed to do this and to assess the status of the population. 48. Kenya pointed out that some of the photographs used in the presentation had been taken in Northern Kenya, where, with the help of WWF, progress was being made with local fishermen through an incentive scheme through which captured Dugongs were being released. Concerns were being raised about the sustainability of the schemes with uncertainty over their future when the current funding expired. It would be necessary to ensure that there was economic benefit to communities in maintaining the presence of Dugongs in those waters. 49. Mr Reynolds said that the way forward was to adopt multiple use approaches and to develop schemes based on the presence of a healthy Dugong population. Ms Kwan said that incentive schemes did not necessarily have to be based on direct financial inducements, and the Secretariat was working with the Technical Advisers on alternatives. 50. Prof. Marsh commented that most countries had banned the taking of Dugongs but implementation was uneven across the range and enforcement often unsatisfactory. The top-down regulatory approach was not effective. 51. Mozambique reported that in addition to marine protected areas, two marine reserves had been developed as well as Marine Parks. Myanmar had conducted studies in 2010 working together with fishermen to survey coastal areas. In 2011 incentives had been offered to fishermen to provide information. Page 6 of 36 52. Summarizing, the Chair commented that it was encouraging that new incentive schemes were operating to complement traditional conservation measures. 9. Report of the Secretariat: Operations CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.9 53. As delegates had had ample opportunity to read the report before the meeting, the Chair asked Ms Kwan (CMS) to highlight the key points from Document 9. 9.1. Finances CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.9/Annex 1 54. Ms Kwan (CMS) explained that the Secretariat was generously supported by the government of the United Arab Emirates through the Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi (EAD), which also funded the CMS MOU on raptors. The Secretariat was made up of a small core staff contingent with some short-term contractors and an intern programme. The Executive Coordinator, Mr Lahcen el Kabiri had retired in December 2011, and since that time Ms Kwan had served as Officer-in-Charge. The new Executive Coordinator, Mr Lyle Glowka, was due to enter on duty on 3 March 2013. 55. While the post of Project Officer for raptors had been vacant, the Dugongs MOU had benefitted from the undivided attention of shared staff at the Secretariat. Since the arrival of Nick Williams as the Programme Officer, however, the Raptors MOU had claimed its due proportion of support staff time. The funds freed by having two professional level posts vacant had been redeployed to engage temporary staff. 56. Document 9 contained details of a number of meetings attended and missions undertaken by Ms Kwan. Many activities focussed on the sub-regional level. 57. While the funding from the UAE fully covered the staff contingent and some programme activities, voluntary contributions were sought from Signatories to allow further work to be undertaken. The Seychelles had provided US$10,000 for a sub-regional meeting held in October 2012. Following a visit to Palau by H.S.H. Prince Albert in February 2012, Monaco had made two grants. The Seagrass Communities Project was another opportunity for the Secretariat to seek additional funding. Signatories were also welcome to provide in kind contributions, as the Philippines was doing in supporting the current meeting. 58. Australia sought clarification that the budget contained in Annex I of Document 9 referred to the CMS Abu Dhabi Project Office in general and not to the Dugong MOU in particular and whether the Signatories were being asked to endorse a budget. The Secretariat confirmed that the indicative budget presented indeed related to all operations of the Abu Dhabi Project Office and in the absence of a fully costed Work Programme, the Signatories’ endorsement was not being requested. 9.2. Additional sources of funding CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.9 59. Ms Kwan (CMS) said that additional funding sources were being sought to complement the generous contributions made by the UAE. Other Signatories were invited to provide resources either in cash or in kind, but at this stage the Secretariat was seeking approval of the general approach rather than firm commitments to provide money. 60. Australia was generally in favour of the idea of indicative voluntary contributions and asked that a table be provided so that Signatories could obtain a clearer idea of how much they might be expected to pay. It would also be preferable if the Secretariat produced a list of the extra activities that would be funded through such contributions. Ms Kwan added that a similar approach had been adopted by the Raptors MOU. 61. France pointed out that its plan for the Overseas Département of Mayotte for 2012-16 included an element of international cooperation. The funding available for the plan’s implementation might be used to help participation in the MOU. France however opposed the use of the UN scale to provide indicative levels of voluntary contributions, emphasizing that this scale was used for calculating assessed, compulsory Page 7 of 36 contributions. The financial position of the Ministry varied from year to year, so it was difficult to commit to specific amounts. 62. It was pointed out that after long debate, another of the CMS MOUs, the one covering marine turtles in the Indian Ocean and South-East Asia, had adopted a funding mechanism whereby Signatories were asked to make voluntary payments equivalent to assessed contributions calculated under the UN scale. 63. Ms Kwan stressed that any contributions would be voluntary and the UN scale used only to provide Signatories with purely indicative amounts. She pointed out that other possible funding mechanisms were set out in the Secretariat’s Document (paragraphs 7b and 7c). 64. Noting the position of France in opposing the use of the UN Scale as a basis for suggested voluntary contributions and France’s expression of doubts about in kind support, the Chair summarized by saying that the Meeting otherwise supported the various approaches set out in the Secretariat’s Document, which did not imply any commitment on the part of the Signatories to provide funding. 65. No decision was taken regarding regular contributions from the Signatories in the light of the differences of opinion expressed at the meeting, with Australia supporting use of the UN scale as an indicative measure, and France opposing. 9.3. Work Programme for 2013-2015 CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.9 66. Ms Kwan (CMS) outlined the Work Programme for 2013-2015, highlighting the main components as outlined in the supporting paper. 67. Ms Kwan described a project relating to net fisheries in the Gulf as an example of a project that could attract additional funding from signatories. The project had been under development all the previous year and the participating Range States were now being consulted on how to raise the requisite funds. 68. Regarding the GEF project on Dugongs and Seagrass, donors and strategic partners were being sought to raise the matching funds required by GEF. 69. Some countries and regions had benefitted from particular attention, notably Sri Lanka and East Africa. It was intended to shift the focus to other regions, such as the North-West of the range around the Gulf, where some of the Signatories had financial resources of their own, but where the Secretariat could still provide technical assistance. 70. The United Arab Emirates reported on the bycatch survey being conducted in the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. Data collection was proceeding well. 10. Report of the Secretariat: MOU implementation CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.10 71. The Facilitator called upon Ms Kwan (CMS) to present the Secretariat’s report on progress made towards implementing the MOU. 10.1. Status of signatures CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.10 Benefits, entitlements and obligations of signing the MOU Annex I 72. Ms Kwan (CMS) welcomed the signatures of Bangladesh, Egypt, Somalia and Sudan and the positive statement from Indonesia about possibly signing in the future. She assured the meeting that the Secretariat made every effort to encourage more Range States to sign the MOU. 10.2. Dugong MOU Focal Points CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.10 73. The List of Designated Focal Points of the Dugong MOU could be found as Annex II to the Document. Signatories and Range States were urged to check that details of contact points held by the Secretariat were accurate. Page 8 of 36 74. The Dugong MOU Focal Point Designation Form could be found as Annex III. It could be adapted for use by non-Signatory Range States. 75. The Terms of Reference for Focal Points of the Dugong MOU could be found as Annex IV. These had been drafted to be as consistent as possible with those of other similar instruments under CMS. 76. The representative of Bangladesh confirmed that he would be the Focal Point of his country and the Terms of Reference were indeed similar to those used by other CMS instruments. 10.3. Communications CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.10 77. See Section 15. 10.4. Meetings and other activities CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.10 78. Ms Kwan (CMS) drew specific attention to sub-paragraph 13a of the Secretariat Document on implementation of the MOU. This sub-paragraph dealt with the Pacific Year of the Dugong and the contribution to the campaign’s success made by the late Lui Bell was mentioned. Many countries in the region had organized events. 79. Ms Kwan acknowledged the valuable contributions by many signatories in assisting the Secretariat over the past two years. India had organized and participated in a sub-regional Workshop on Dugong in Tuticorin, India in June 2011. The Government of Mozambique and the Natural Museum had helped with the Bazaruto Archipelago Pilot project, while the Secretariat stood ready to engage with Range States in the Gulf concerning a project to address net fisheries in that sub-region. 80. Malaysia pointed out that the section of the report concerning the South-East Asia Sub-Regional Meeting on Dugongs and the Workshop on Developing Standardized Analysis Protocols for Dugong Questionnaire Survey Project Data for South-East Asia held in July 2011 contained a mistake. The reference to “Lawas, Sarawak, Indonesia” should have read “Lawas, Sarawak, Malaysia”. The Secretariat apologized for this error. 81. In summing up, the Facilitator said that the Secretariat report had been duly noted, Signatories and Range States had been asked to provide contact details of their National Focal Point and their endorsement had been given to the draft Terms of Reference. 11. Progressing Dugong conservation: Dugong, Seagrass and Coastal CMS/Dugong/SS2/Doc.11 82. Ms Kwan (CMS) made a brief introductory intervention, which was followed by three presentations on the Standardized Dugong Catch/Incidental Catch Survey Tool, the GEF Dugong and Seagrass Conservation Project and the Global Dugongs Genetics Project. These projects had been conceived in 2012 in Abu Dhabi to address the concern that the actions being undertaken were not proving to be as successful as had been hoped by developing further tools to complement financial and other incentives. Working in collaboration with the IUCN Sirenian Specialist Group, more data were being gathered, capacity building initiatives undertaken and conservation hotspots were being identified. Two pilot projects had begun, one in Papua New Guinea (and with the expected arrival of the delegate from that country the following day, it was hoped that more information would become available) and one in Bazaruto, Mozambique. The latter had been absorbed within the proposed GEF project. 11.1. Standardized Dugong Catch/Incidental Catch Survey Tool: No document Presentation by Mr Nicolas J. Pilcher 83. For the benefit of those delegates that had not attended the First meeting of Signatories, Mr Pilcher explained the background to the bycatch questionnaire. Page 9 of 36 84. The tool being used enabled rapid results to be produced based on spatial elements which generate maps. The questionnaire was a low-cost method of securing a wide-scale picture of actual events on the ground, with typical expenditure of US$5,000 in each country. Using student volunteers helped reduce the overheads. The first draft of the questionnaire contained 100 questions, which proved to be too long and prevented rapid analysis. In the end, a better balance had been reached, although the final survey was still longer than some wanted. The survey went beyond Dugong bycatch and generated other biological, cultural and socio-economic information, including the identification of “hotspots” of interactions between fishers and Dugong that could be further investigated. It also asked about the respondents’ perceptions. Seventy per cent of respondents agreed to spend a further ten minutes answering the sections on other species such as marine turtles and other marine mammals. 85. The questionnaire had been designed with a quality control feature to help filter out unreliable responses. For example, while one individual had admitted to catching hundreds of marine turtles each month, others claimed never to have any bycatch. The interviewer had to assess the interviewee’s honesty as well as their competence in identifying the species being asked about, as confusion sometimes existed between Dugongs and dolphins. The questionnaire began with an ethical statement and disclaimer, the questions were designed to be answered using a tick box system, with maps for sightings to be located. 86. In total 4,553 questionnaires had been completed and returned from 17 countries, with some forms still coming in from India and Sri Lanka. Processing the data was proving to be a massive task, but had been made simpler by using Excel spread sheets which were widely known and used. Some boxes had limited range of answers with the gender question requiring either “M” or “F” and the age box requiring a numeric entry. The draft questionnaire had been tested to ensure that the questions had been phrased correctly to acquire the optimum response. The survey included perceptions recorded through questions such as “Is it legal to capture Dugong on purpose?” Updates 87. The tool had been adapted and was being used in Peru for surveys of river dolphins and in the Caribbean for manatees. Hidden formulae in the Excel spreadsheet facilitated the creation of charts and graphs for data such as whether the interviewee’s parents were also fishermen, the number of years’ fishing experience, the type of motor on the boat, target species, types of net usage (night and day/attended or unattended). The charts automatically updated when new data were added. 88. A new chapter used Google Earth maps so that pins (sightings) and areas (fishing) could be plotted. By overlaying maps of sightings with areas of high fishing effort, danger hotspots could be identified. Maps could be generated a relatively short time after new data were received. Graphics were constantly improving and the standard was now very good. 89. The survey could be used in countries with poor underlying data and the technique was relatively inexpensive, with costs confined to travel expenses if student volunteers were used to do the interviews. Questions and Comments 90. Prof. Marsh warned that the findings should lead to further questions. Possibly low rates of bycatch could mean that the local population had been extirpated, while a high level of sightings might indicate an individual animal that was habituated to humans. Mr Pilcher agreed and supported the use of follow-up surveys while constantly reviewing the questionnaire to iron out any faults. Attention had to be given to the phrasing of questions – “how many Dugongs have you caught?” might be too direct and accusatorial - but interestingly the level of refusals was very low. Although some respondents might give false answers, these were likely to be a minority and would not distort the overall findings. 91. Australia asked how much the survey had cost and where the funding had been found. Mr Pilcher said that essentially the survey was a labour of love with some of the work integrated into other projects. Page 10 of 36