The Project Gutenberg EBook of Links With the Past in the Plant World, by Albert Charles Seward This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook. Title: Links With the Past in the Plant World Author: Albert Charles Seward Release Date: June 29, 2020 [EBook #62521] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LINKS WITH PAST IN PLANT WORLD *** Produced by Tom Cosmas The Cambridge Manuals of Science and Literature LINKS WITH THE PAST IN THE PLANT WORLD « i » CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS London: FETTER LANE, E.C. C. F. CLAY, Manager Edinburgh: 100, PRINCES STREET London: H. K. LEWIS, 136, GOWER STREET, W.C. Berlin: A. ASHER AND CO. Leipzig: F. A. BROCKHAUS New York: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS Bombay and Calcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd. All rights reserved Sequoia magnifica Knowlton, in the Yellowstone National Park. (From a photograph kindly supplied by Prof. Knowlton.) See p. 104. « ii » « iii » « iv » « v » M LINKS WITH THE PAST IN THE PLANT WORLD BY A. C. SEWARD, M.A., F.R.S. Professor of Botany in the University of Cambridge Cambridge: at the University Press 1911 Cambridge: PRINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS With the exception of the coat of arms at the foot, the design on the title page is a reproduction of one used by the earliest known Cambridge printer, John Siberch, 1521 PREFACE Y object in writing this book is primarily to call attention to some of the many questions which are raised by an enquiry into the relative antiquity of existing plants, and to illustrate the nature of the evidence afforded by the « vi » « vii » records of the rocks. One may agree with the dictum, 'There is but one art—to omit,' but to practise this art is often a difficult task. While fully conscious of the incompleteness of the treatment of the subjects dealt with in these pages, and of defects in the method of presentation, I hope that I may succeed in attracting some of my readers who are already interested in living plants to the study of plants of former ages. I am greatly indebted to my colleague Dr C. E. Moss for reading the proofs and for many valuable suggestions. I wish to thank Mr and Mrs Clement Reid, Prof. MacDougal of the Arizona Desert Laboratory, Prof Campbell of Stanford University, Prof F. H. Knowlton of the United States National Museum, Washington, Mr A. G. Tansley, Prof Yapp, and Mr W. R. Welch for photographs which they have allowed me to reproduce. As on many previous occasions, I am indebted to my wife for contributing drawings. A. C. SEWARD. Botany School, Cambridge. July 1911. The numbers in brackets interspersed in the text refer to the Bibliography at the end of the volume. CONTENTS PAGE Preface vii CHAP. I.Introductory: the Longevity of Trees, etc. 1 II.The Geographical Distribution of Plants 15 III.The Geological Record 39 IV.Preservation of Plants as Fossils 56 V.Ferns; their Distribution and Antiquity 71 VI.The Redwood and Mammoth Trees of California 95 VII.The Araucaria family 106 VIII.The Maiden Hair Tree 121 Bibliography 134 Index 139 Links with the Past ERRATUM Page 78. Omit lines 5, 6, and 7, from "One" to "but" inclusive. Transcriber Note: This correction has been applied. Here is the original text with the changes indicated: — One filmy species of Todea is represented in the British flora by Todea radicans in the Killarney district of Ireland; but tThe maximum development of the genus is in New Zealand. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY: THE LONGEVITY OF TREES, ETC. 'Believe me who have tried. Thou wilt find something more in woods than in books. Trees and rocks will teach what thou canst not hear from a master.' St Bernard. The recent publication in the daily press of instances of human longevity under the heading 'Links with the Past' prompted a comparison between the length of time represented by the duration of a tree and the lifetime of a human being. The comparison of single lives suggested the further step of contrasting the antiquity of the oldest family-histories with the remoteness of the period to which it is possible to trace the ancestry of existing members of the plant kingdom. « viii » « ix » « x » « xi » « xii » « 1 » My primary object in these pages is not to deal with familiar cases of longevity in trees, but to consider in the first place some of the problems connected with the origin of the present British flora, and then to describe a few examples of different types of plants whose ancestors flourished during periods of the earth's history long ages before the advent of the human race. In dealing with plants of former ages we are confronted with the difficulty of forming an adequate conception of the length of time embraced by geological periods in comparison with the duration of the historic era. Some of the 'Selections from the Greek Papyri' recently edited by Dr Milligan (Cambridge 1910) refer to common-place events in terms familiar to us in modern letters: we forget the interval of 2000 years which has elapsed since they were written. Similarly, the close agreement between existing plants and species which lived in remote epochs speaks of continuity through the ages, and bridges across an extent of time too great to be expressed by ordinary standards of measurement. Terms of years when extended beyond the limits to which our minds are accustomed cease to have any definite meaning. While there is a certain academic interest in discussions as to the age of the earth as expressed in years, we are utterly unable to realise the significance of the chronology employed. After speaking of the futility of attempting to introduce chronological precision into periods so recent as those which come into the purview of archaeologists, Mr Rice Holmes suggests a method better adapted to our powers. He says—'Ascend the hill on which stands Dover Castle, and gaze upon Cape Grisnez, let the waters beneath you disappear; across the chalk that once spanned the channel like a bridge men walked from the white cliff that marks the horizon to where you stand. No arithmetical chronology can spur the imagination to flights like these(1).' On the other hand, the use in some country districts in Britain of spindles almost identical with instruments used in spinning by the ancient Egyptians, and similar survivals described by the author of a book entitled The Past in the Present(2), bring within the range of our vision an early phase of the historic era. The rude implements still fashioned by the flint-knappers of Brandon in Suffolk connect the present with the Palaeolithic age. Measured from the standpoint of historic reckoning, survivals from prehistoric days appeal to us as persistent types which have remained unchanged in a constantly changing world. In one of his essays Weismann quotes an old German saying with regard to comparative longevity, which asserts that 'a wren lives three years, a dog three times as long as a wren' and so on in a regularly ascending series: the life of a deer is estimated at three times that of a crow and an oak three times that of a deer, which means that, computed on this basis, an oak lives nearly 20,000 years(3)! This fanciful illustration of the relative longevity of an oak is the expression of a truth, namely the superiority of trees over animals in regard to the duration of life. As a seventeenth- century translator of Pliny's Natural History writes, 'In old times trees were the very temples of the gods: and according to that antient manner, the plaine and simple peasants of the country, savouring still of antiquity, do at this day consecrate to one God or other, the goodliest and fairest trees that they can meet withal.' Oaks growing in Pliny's day in the Hercynian forest are said to have been there 'ever since the creation of the world(4).' Sir Joseph Hooker, in an account of some Palestine oaks, gives a drawing of a famous tree at Mamre, known as Abraham's Oak, which is supposed to mark the spot where the Patriarch pitched his tent(5). Examples such as these, though of no scientific value, serve to illustrate the well-founded belief in the extraordinary longevity of trees. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it would be rash to deny the possibility that William the Conqueror's Oak in Windsor Forest, described by Loudon in his Arboretum Britannicum and mentioned by later writers, may be a survival from the reign of the king whose name it bears. Although it is seldom possible to state with confidence the exact age of old oaks and yews famed for length of days, there can be no doubt as to the enormous antiquity of many of our trees whose years are 'sacred with many a mystery.' The section of a trunk of one of the mammoth trees of California (Sequoia gigantea) exhibited in the Natural History department of the British Museum, shows on its polished surface 1335 concentric rings denoting successive increments of wood produced by the activity of a cylinder of cells situated between the hard woody tissue and the bark. It is generally assumed that each year a tree produces a single ring, though, as is well known, an estimate of age calculated on this assumption cannot be regarded as more than an approximation to the truth. If this giant tree, which was felled in 1890, was then 1335 years old, it had already reached an age of over two centuries when Charlemagne was crowned Emperor at Rome. The concentric rings on a tree trunk owe their existence to certain structural differences between the wood formed in the spring and in the late summer. In Sequoia, as in other members of the great class of cone-bearing trees, the wood is composed of comparatively narrow elements which serve to carry water from the roots to the branches and leaves. As spring succeeds winter the inactivity of the plant-machine is followed by a period of energetic life; opening buds and elongating shoots create a demand for a plentiful supply of ascending sap, and in response to this the tree produces a fresh cylinder of wood composed of relatively wide conducting tubes. After the first rush of life is succeeded by a phase of more uniform and gentler activity, the demand for water becomes less exacting and the wood which is formed during the rest of the growing season consists of narrower water-pipes. A period of rest ensues, until in the following spring new layers of larger tubes are laid down in juxtaposition to the narrower elements of the latest phase of the preceding summer. This alternation of larger and smaller tubes produces the appearance of concentric rings on a cross-section of a tree. It is not the pause in the active life of the plant which is responsible for the effect of rings, but the fact that the wood produced immediately before and immediately after the pause is not structurally identical. In trees grown under the more uniform conditions of certain tropical regions, the annual rings are either feebly developed or absent; for example, in some Indian oaks the wood shows no concentric rings of growth. Stated in general terms, rings of growth in the wood of a tree are the expression of a power possessed by the plant of regulating the structure of its component elements in response to the varying nature of the external stimuli. In certain circumstances, for example after the destruction of the young buds by caterpillars, the tree makes a special effort to « 2 » « 3 » [Pg 4] « 5 » « 6 » « 7 » repair the loss by producing a new set of shoots. This may be recorded by the occurrence of two concentric rings in one season. An extreme instance of departure from the normal has recently been described(6) in which a tree of Theobroma cacao (the cocoa tree), planted in Ceylon in the summer of 1893 and felled in January 1901, after a life of just over 7 years, was found to have 22 rings in its stem. In this case the tree shed its leaves three times a year, and each break in the uniformity of its vital activities was registered by the apposition of what under ordinary conditions are spoken of as spring and late-summer wood. At Aden trees stated by natives to be very old showed only five or six rings of wood, a fact connected with the almost complete lack of rain and with the uniform conditions of existence. The degree of accuracy to be allowed to estimates of age founded on the number of 'annual' rings is, however, of secondary importance in comparison with the enormously greater hold on life possessed by trees as contrasted with the higher animals. Early in the nineteenth century the Swiss botanist A. P. de Candolle expressed the opinion that trees do not die from senile decay, but only as the result of injury or disease. Trees are constructed on a plan fundamentally different from that underlying the structure of the highly complex human organism, and are thus endowed with a sort of potential immortality. It has been suggested that some of the large corals in the Red Sea which are still tenanted by living polyps may have been growing in the days of the Pharaohs. The coral polyp represents the growing portion of a lifeless mass of rock which is constantly extended by the activity of the organism at the summit of each branch. Between a coral-reef and a tree there are many essential differences, but a rough analogy may be recognised. A tree, unlike the higher animals, does not reach a stage at which the whole of its substance attains a condition of permanence and fixity. It consists of a complex branching-system in which each shoot increases in length by virtue of the youthful vigour of its apex: to a large extent the tree as a whole consists of lifeless material incapable of further growth, as is the case of the older portions of a coral-reef; but the regular increase in girth of the trunk and its branches demonstrates that this comparison is only partially true, and that the power of growth in a tree is not confined to the extremities of the youngest shoots. The tip of every twig is composed of minute cells endowed with a potentiality of development like that which characterises the embryonic tissues of a seedling just emerged from the seed. In the course of its growth, each branch, by means of its living and dividing cells, contributes to the several parts of the complex mechanism of the tree. While the greater number of cells acquire a permanent form and lose the power of further development, there remains a cylinder of cells endowed with perpetual youth. This cylinder of living cells, known as the cambium, extends between the wood and bark from one end of the tree to the other: by its periodic activity it adds new layers of tissue each year and thus, by increasing the amount of conducting tubes for the transport of water and for the distribution of elaborated food, it enables the tree to respond to the increasing demands which are the necessary accompaniment of increasing size. It has already been pointed out that in the spring when the sap flows most vigorously the cambial cylinder produces larger tubes, and afterwards when the tree settles down to its normal life, these are succeeded by narrower and stronger tubes. These later formed elements serve also an important mechanical purpose; by the strength of their walls they increase the supporting power of the tree and enable it to sustain the added burden of the annual increase in the weight and extent of its spreading branches. It is the persistence of permanently juvenile tissue in certain regions of a tree, together with the remarkable power of repairing injuries and shedding effete parts, that constitute some of the most striking contrasts between the higher animals and plants. The embryo oak in the earlier stages of development consists entirely of actively growing cells; by degrees differentiation of the embryonic tissues results in the localisation of regions of cell-production at the tips of the elongating stem and root. These apical groups of cells are, in fact, portions of the embryonic organism which persist so long as the plant lives. This continuity between the growing tip of an old oak stem and the cells of the undifferentiated embryo affords one of the most remarkable examples in nature of a link between the past and the present. If we pass beyond the stretch of time represented by the life of a single tree, a few successive generations suffice to carry our retrospect back to the days when forests of oaks, birches, and other trees impeded the progress of the Roman invaders, and, a stage farther back, to the age of Neolithic man whose remains are occasionally found in our heaths and moors and in the submerged forests round our coast. The blocks of oak and beech, some of which are as sound as when first felled, recently discovered below the foundations of parts of Winchester Cathedral constructed at the end of the twelfth or in the opening years of the thirteenth century, are relics of Norman forests. In the course of some excavations at Brigg in Lincolnshire in 1886 a dug-out boat was found nearly 50 feet long and from 4 to 5 feet in breadth. The stem of the oak from which the canoe had been fashioned shows no sign of branching for a length of over 40 feet, a fact which points to the growth of the tree in a forest where the race for light induced the development of clean columnar stems. The Brigg 'dug-out,' now in the Hull Museum, was discovered in an old alluvial valley of the Ancholme river, formerly connected with the Humber, and it may be that it was used by Neolithic man as a ferry for river-service(7). From the period claimed by archaeologists we pass by gradual stages into the domain of the geologist. As Huxley wrote, 'when even the dim light of Archaeology fades, there yet remains Palaeontology, which... has brought to daylight once more the exuvia of ancient populations, whose world was not our world, who have been buried in river beds immemorially dry, or carried by the rush of waters into caves, inaccessible to inundation since the dawn of tradition(8).' The length of time represented by a succession of long-lived individuals of the same species becomes enormously extended when we pass to the history of families, and disinter from the sediments of other ages the remains of extinct types. As we descend the geological series familiar types gradually disappear, and through a succession of changing floras we penetrate to the fragmentary records contained in the older rocks until the absence of documents sets a limit to our quest. « 7 » « 8 » « 9 » « 10 » « 11 » « 12 » Fig. 1. Pinus sylvestris Linn, in the Black Wood of Rannoch. (Photograph by Mr A. G. Tansley.) The Scots pine shares with the oak, the beech, the aspen, the yew, and several other trees the right to be included in the native flora of Britain. In the peat-beds of Scotland even up to 3000 feet above sea-level the stumps of pines occur in abundance, and in many places recent researches have revealed the occurrence of successive forests of pines, oaks, and spruces separated from one another by the accumulations of swampy vegetation(9). The spruce fir has long ceased to be a member of the British flora, but in a few localities in the Scottish Highlands patches of primeval pine forests remain. The accompanying photograph (Fig. 1), taken by my friend Mr A. G. Tansley, in the Black Wood of Rannoch in north-west Perthshire, shows a few trees of Pinus sylvestris growing in their native soil: the form of the older tree (A) suggests comparison with that of a well-grown beech such as we are familiar with in English plantations. This spreading dome-shaped habit seems to be a peculiarity of the Highland tree, and is one of the characters which have led some botanists to regard it as a variety (Pinus sylvestris var. scotica) of the ordinary Scots pine. Though it is doubtful if any relics of primeval pine woods are left in England, abundant evidence of the former existence of the Scots pine is afforded by the submerged forests exposed at low-tide on many parts of the English and Welsh coasts and at the base of some of the English peat moors. During the construction of the Barry docks on the north coast of the Bristol Channel a few years ago, the exposed sections of peat and forest beds were investigated by Dr Strahan and by Mr Clement Reid. There is evidence of a subsidence of the land to an extent of 55 feet since the formation of the lower peat-beds containing oak, hazel, willow, and other trees. The pine, unknown in Wales during the historic period, was recognised in the Barry cutting. The occurrence of a polished flint implement assigns a date to the uppermost portion of this old land-surface(10). It is impossible within the limits of a small volume to discuss in detail the evidence furnished by the records of the rocks as to the relative antiquity of the different constituents of the present vegetation of Britain. In later chapters a few selected plants are described which are pre-eminently ancient types. Before passing to the consideration of the data on which the geological history of plants is based, brief reference may be made to one of the most interesting and difficult problems of botanical research, namely the history of the British flora. CHAPTER II THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANTS 'No speculation is idle or fruitless that is not opposed to truth or to probability, and which, whilst it co-ordinates a body of well established facts, does so without violence to nature, and with a due regard to the possible results of future discoveries.' Sir Joseph Hooker. In the vegetation of the British Isles the leading rôle is played by that large group to which the term Flowering Plants is frequently applied. This group, including the two sub-divisions Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons, is known by the name Angiosperms, a designation denoting the important fact that the seeds are developed in an ovary or protective seed-case (ἁγγειον, a vessel or box). The fact that these highly elaborated products of development made their appearance, so far as we know, at a comparatively late stage in the history of the plant-world, attests their efficiency as a class and demonstrates the rapidity with which they have overspread the surface of the earth as successful competitors in the struggle for existence. As Darwin wrote in a letter to Sir Joseph Hooker in 1881, 'Nothing is more extraordinary in the history of the vegetable kingdom, as it seems to me, than the apparently very sudden or abrupt development of the higher plants(11).' In another letter (1879) to the same friend we read, 'The rapid development as far as we can judge of all the higher plants within recent geological times is an abominable mystery(12).' Making allowance for the probability, or indeed certainty, that the imperfection of the geological record tends to exaggerate the apparent suddenness of the appearance of this vigorous class, and allowing for the fact that our knowledge of the records of the rocks in which the highest plants first occur is very incomplete, we cannot escape from the conclusion that this recently evolved group spread with amazing rapidity. Various reasons may be suggested in explanation of the « 12 » « 13 » « 14 » « 15 » « 16 » dominant position which the Angiosperms hold in the floras of the world. As an instance of their rapid increase during the Cretaceous epoch[1], the period which has furnished the earliest satisfactory records of Flowering Plants, the following statement by an American writer may be quoted:—'The rapidity with which it [i.e. the group of Flowering Plants] advanced, conquering or supplanting all rivals, may be better understood when we remember that it forms 85% of the flora of the Dakota group '; that is a series of sedimentary rocks in Dakota referred by geologists to the middle of the Cretaceous period(13). In the Wealden rocks of England, which are rich in the remains of Lower Cretaceous plants, no undoubted Flowering Plant has so far been found. For the position of the Cretaceous and other systems in the geological series, see the table on page 42. The more efficient protection of the ovules, the germs which, after fertilisation, become the seeds, the extraordinary variety in the floral mechanisms for assisting cross-pollination, the arrangements for nursing the embryo, and the structural features of the wood in relation both to rapid transport of water and to the storage of food, are factors which have probably contributed to the success of the Angiosperms. The degree of weight to assign to each contributing cause cannot as yet be satisfactorily determined, but the general question raised by the recent origin of these latest products of evolution offers a promising field for work. While admitting our inability at present to do more than suggest possibilities, we may encourage research by speculation. The members of the Vegetable Kingdom placed next to the Flowering Plants are the Gymnosperms or naked- seeded (γυμνὁς, naked) plants, including (i) the Conifers, e.g. pines, firs, larches, the yew, etc., (ii) a small group of plants known as the Cycads, whose existing members, now almost confined to a few tropical regions, are the descendants of a vigorous race represented by many species in the floras of the Mesozoic epoch. A third sub-division of the Gymnosperms, the Ginkgoales, is represented by a single survivor, which is described in a later chapter as one of the most remarkable links with the past in the plant kingdom. The Gymnosperms are geologically very much older than the Angiosperms. Members of this class played a prominent part in the vegetation of the Coal age and it is certain that they existed in the still older Devonian period. The only other group to which reference is made in later chapters is that of the Ferns, one of the sub-divisions of a large class known as the Vascular Cryptogams or Pteridophyta. These plants, like the Gymnosperms, are represented in the oldest floras of which recognisable remains have been preserved. The main groups of the vegetable kingdom, founded on existing plants, are distinguished by well-defined differences; they are comparable with separate twigs of a tree springing from larger branches and these again uniting below in a common trunk. The vegetation of to-day represents only the terminal portions of the upper branches. As we descend the geological series, records of extinct types are found which enable us either to trace the separate branches to a common origin or to recognise a convergence towards a common stock. Were a botanist to find himself in a forest of the Coal age he would experience great difficulty in assigning some of the plants to their systematic position: characters now regarded as distinguishing features of distinct groups would be met with in combination in a single individual. It is by the discovery of such generalised types, which serve as finger-posts pointing the way to lines of evolution, that the student of pre-existing plants has been able to throw light on the relative antiquity of existing forms, and to trace towards a common ancestry plants which now show but little indication of consanguinity. Confining our attention to the dominant group of plants in the British flora, namely the Flowering Plants, we may profitably consider the question, though we cannot satisfactorily answer it,—which members of this group are entitled to be regarded as the most ancient inhabitants? The past history of our native plants, and their geographical range, not only in the British Isles but on the Continent of Europe, are subjects well worthy of the attention of field-botanists whose interests are apt to be confined within too narrow bounds. There are numerous problems relating to the composition of the present vegetation of Britain which might be discussed in reference to the relative antiquity of plants; but in a single chapter it is impossible to do more than call attention to certain considerations which are frequently overlooked by students of British species. It is customary to speak of the British flora as consisting for the most part of species introduced into this country by natural means, while some plants owe their introduction to human agency or are 'escapes' from cultivation. It is by no means an easy task in some instances to decide whether a species is native or introduced, but in some cases, a few of which are mentioned, there is no doubt as to the alien nature of the plants. The term 'native' needs a word of explanation. It is not intended to convey the idea that a plant so designated came into existence on British soil and spread thence to other regions; but by native species we mean such as have reached this country by migration from other lands, or it may be in some instances have actually originated in this part of Europe. One of the best known aliens in Britain is the American water-weed, Elodea canadensis (or Anacharis alsinastrum), which was discovered about sixty years ago in a canal near Market Harborough in Leicestershire(14). In all probability this North American species was introduced into England with timber. Once established, it spread through the waterways with alarming rapidity and became a serious pest. Elodea affords an admirable instance of the serious interference with the balance of Nature by the introduction of a new competitor into an environment conducive to vigorous development. Another foreign water- plant, Naias graminea, for the importation of which Egyptian cotton may be responsible, has been recorded from the Reddish canal near Manchester(15). This African and Asiatic species occurs in Europe only as a colonist; it is said to have been introduced into Italy with East Indian rice. A more recent case of alien immigration due to unintentional human agency is that of Potamogeton pennsylvanicus, a pond-weed of Canada, the United States, Jamaica, and « 17 » [1] « 18 » « 19 » « 20 » « 21 » elsewhere. Specimens of this species were first noticed in 1907 in a canal near Halifax close to the effluent from a cotton mill. Since its discovery the plant has slightly extended its range. It is suggested by Mr Bennett, who first identified the alien, that its fruits were brought to this country in goods from the United States(16). Of the introduction of these and other foreign plants we have satisfactory records; but there are many others which may owe their presence to man's agency, though we have no information as to their arrival. It has long been recognised that several members of the British flora are related to Scandinavian species. The Scandinavian flora, as Sir Joseph Hooker says in his well-known paper on the 'Outlines of the Distribution of Arctic plants,' 'not only girdles the globe in the Arctic Circle, and dominates over all others in the North Temperate Zone of the Old World, but intrudes conspicuously into every other temperate flora, whether in the northern or southern hemisphere, or on the Alps of tropical countries'(17). The view generally held is that during the Glacial period this Arctic flora was driven South, and aided by land-bridges, which were afterwards submerged, many of the northern migrants found a more congenial home in Britain. It is however by no means improbable that this conclusion may have to be considerably modified. Mr and Mrs Reid, as the result of their careful analysis of the Pre-Glacial Flora of Britain, express the opinion that 'the pre-glacial plants suggest climatic conditions almost identical with those now existing, though slightly warmer' (27, 2). It is noteworthy that the list of plants given in their paper does not include any typical Arctic species. The occurrence on the mountains of Scotland and elsewhere of such plants as Silene acaulis, Dryas octopetala, Saxifraga oppositifolia and other Saxifrages, Rubus chamaemorus (the Cloudberry), and the dwarf Birch illustrate the Arctic-Alpine element in our flora. The opinion is held by many Swiss botanists that their Alpine species have in large measure been derived from non- glaciated parts of the Pyrenees, that is from a region which was presumably able to retain its flora at a time when more northern lands were exposed to extreme Arctic conditions. My friend Dr Moss believes that some of the so-called Scandinavian plants came to Britain from Central Europe after the retreat of the ice; if this view is correct it means that some at least of our Arctic-Alpine plants reached these islands by a southern rather than by a northern route. Interesting examples of far-travelled northern plants recently described by Professor Engler of Berlin afford additional illustrations of the general principles enunciated many years ago by Sir Joseph Hooker. A species of flowering Rush, Luzula spicata var. simensis, occurs at an altitude of 3600 metres in Abyssinia and on Kilimanjaro. Luzula spicata is found in the whole of the Arctic and Subarctic belt in Scotland, Auvergne, the Jura mountains, and elsewhere. The species probably began its career in the northern hemisphere where it grew abundantly on the higher ground in the Arctic Circle: it eventually travelled along the North American Andes and appeared in Mexico under a guise sufficiently distinct to warrant the use of another name, Luzula racemosa. In an eastern direction it reached the Himalayas and is represented in Abyssinia by a closely allied form. From Abyssinia to Kilimanjaro Luzula spicata 'had to travel a long distance; but it is not impossible that it either still exists or has existed previously on a few of the high mountains between Abyssinia and Kenia, from which, having advanced to the Kilimanjaro, it again produced new forms.... At any rate, it is impossible to do without distribution of seeds of alpine plants by air-currents or by birds from one mountain to the other in explaining the history of distribution'(18). The majority of British plants are identical with species in Central and Northern Europe: of these, some are among the most widely spread English species, e.g. the Daisy and Primrose, while others, such as the Oxlip (Primula elatior), are confined to the Eastern counties, and others, such as the Cheddar Pink (Dianthus caesius), are restricted to Western counties. Before considering a small section of the British flora which is the most interesting from the point of view of origin, a short digression may be allowed in order to call attention to the importance of a branch of science which Darwin spoke of as 'that grand subject, that almost keystone of the laws of creation, geographical distribution,' and in 1847 referred to as 'that noble subject of which we as yet but dimly see the full bearing.' It was largely as the results of his study of distribution in the Galapagos Islands that Darwin determined to 'collect blindly every sort of fact which bears anyway on what are species.' The acceptance of the view 'that each species was first produced within a single region'(19), raises the subject of geographical distribution to a far higher plane than it occupied in pre-Darwinian days. Although most people are familiar with some of the commoner means by which plants are able to colonise new ground through the adaptation of their fruits and seeds to various methods of transport, the conception of a plant as a stationary organism tends to prevent due allowance being made for the comparative facility with which, in the course of successive generations, a species is able to wander from place to place. The individual animal is endowed with powers of locomotion enabling it to seek new feeding-grounds and to avoid enemies; but with the exception of some of the simplest forms a plant cannot move—'le matin la laisse où la trouve le soir.' The rate of travel may or may not be rapid, but in a comparatively short time, if the conditions are favourable, a tree may spread over a wide area. Mr Ridley, Director of the Botanic Gardens, Singapore, writes as follows in reference to the rate of travel of one of the common Malayan trees (Shorea leprosula), which bears winged fruits particularly well adapted to wind-transport: 'If we assume that a tree flowers and fruits at 30 years of age and the fruits are disseminated to a distance of 100 yards, that the furthest fruits always germinate and so continue in one direction, it will be seen that under such most favourable circumstances the species can only spread 800 yards in 100 years, and would take 58,666 years to migrate 100 miles'(20). There is, however, one type of distribution—what is called discontinuous distribution—to which special attention « 22 » « 23 » « 24 » « 25 » « 26 » should be directed on account of its intimate association with questions relating to the past history of living organisms. Many examples might be quoted from both the animal and plant kingdoms in support of the view that discontinuous distribution is a criterion of antiquity. When identical or very nearly identical plants occur in regions separated from one another by areas in which the particular species is unknown, the inference is either that the surviving individuals are remnants of a large number formerly distributed over a wider continuous area, or that in the course of evolution similar conditions in widely separated areas led to the production of identical types. The former view is much the more probable: it is consistent with the conclusions arrived at on other grounds as to the connexion between discontinuous distribution and ancient lineage. The explanations of the widespread occurrence among different races of similar objects or legends afford an analogous case. As Dr Andrew Lang points out in Custom and Myth, it is held by some students that the use of the bull roarer—to cite a specific instance—by different peoples denotes descent from a common stock, though he considers the more probable explanation to be that similar minds, working with simple means towards similar ends, might evolve the bull roarer and its mystic uses anywhere. The Cedars of Lebanon afford an interesting example of discontinuous distribution. They illustrate how a species, which may be assumed to have originated in one region, in the course of its wanderings may undergo slight changes until, at a later stage when the plants have disappeared from parts of the once-continuous area, the remaining outlying groups of individuals are spoken of under different specific names. The cedars of Lebanon, known as Cedrus libani, occur as isolated groups on the Lebanon hills as outliers of the larger forests of the Taunus 250 miles distant. The African cedar, Cedrus atlantica, is separated from the Lebanon cedar by a distance of 1400 miles. Approximately the same distance divides the Lebanon cedar from the deodar, Cedrus deodara, which extends from Afghanistan along the Himalayas almost to the confines of Nepal. Sir Joseph Hooker regards the three cedars as varieties of one species which once formed a continuous forest: he attributes the present discontinuous distribution, in part at least, to the effects of a warmer succeeding a colder climate. The less favourable conditions drove the vegetation of the lowlands to seek more congenial habitats at higher altitudes. In this connexion it is interesting to find that in Algeria the cedar is confined to the higher ground where the snow lies long in the spring(21). The Tulip Tree of North America and Central China affords one of many examples of existing flowering plants which illustrate the close connexion between present distribution and past history. The genus Liriodendron, often cultivated in the south of England, is now represented by two species, the best known of which—the Tulip Tree, Liriodendron tulipera—extends from Vermont to Florida and westwards to Lake Michigan and Arkansas. The leaves bear a superficial resemblance to those of the Sycamore, but are as a rule easily distinguished by the truncated form of the apex; the specific name was suggested by the tulip-like form of the flowers. Fossil leaves of Liriodendron are not uncommon in the Cretaceous rocks of Disco Island in latitude 70° N., where they occur with other flowering plants which bear striking testimony to the mildness of the Cretaceous climate in high northern latitudes. One of the associated flowering plants is a species of Artocarpus, described by Dr Nathorst as Artocarpus Dicksoni which bears a close resemblance to A. incisa the bread-fruit tree of the southern tropics of the Old World. Without attempting to deal fully with the past history of Liriodendron, it may be confidently stated that the records of the rocks are consistent with the idea of antiquity suggested by the present distribution of the two surviving species. Islands such as Great Britain and Ireland, situated a short distance from a continent, contain many plants which are widely spread in different parts of the world, together with a very small number peculiar to the British Isles though closely allied to species on the neighbouring continent or to plants farther afield. The occasional recognition of species previously believed to be confined to Britain tends to reduce the short list of our endemic types. An enquiry into the origin of an island flora involves a consideration of the data in regard to changes in level and relative distribution of land and water in the course of geological evolution. It is generally agreed that at no distant date, in a geological sense. Great Britain and Ireland were united to the continent. There is, however, another fact to reckon with, namely the prevalence of Arctic conditions in northern Europe when a thick sheet of ice spread over the greater part of the British Isles. There can be no doubt that the severity of the climate during the Glacial period was such as to destroy a large proportion of the vegetation. The question is, were all the flowering plants destroyed or were some of the hardier species able to survive, either on the higher peaks which kept their heads above the level of the ice or on the southern fringe of England beyond the ice-covered region? It is impossible to give a definite answer: the probability is that nearly all the pre-Glacial species were destroyed, but it is not impossible that some Alpine-Arctic plants escaped extinction, while others retreated to more southern and less Arctic areas by means of a land-connexion with France or crossed the intervening sea by ocean-currents, by animal agency, or by wind. Although we possess but imperfect information as to the extent and duration of land-bridges between Britain and the continent, there are no special difficulties in the way of accounting for the presence of Scandinavian, Germanic, and other elements in the British flora. There are, however, other and more difficult problems to consider in reference to a small group of flowering plants which are met with in the west and south of Ireland, also, to a less extent, in Cornwall and in a few other localities in the south-west of England. In Connemara in the west of Ireland, where hard frosts are unknown and winter snows are rare, there are three kinds of Heath, St Dabeoc's Heath (Daboecia polifolia), the Mediterranean Heath (Erica mediterranea) and Erica Mackaii which are not found elsewhere in the British Isles or in the whole of northern Europe, but reappear in the Pyrenees. The London Pride (Saxifraga umbrosa), another Pyrenean plant, grows on the south and west coast of Ireland from Waterford to Donegal. Arbutus Unedo, the Strawberry tree, which flourishes in the Killarney district of County Kerry and occurs in neighbouring localities, has a wide distribution in the Mediterranean region. Devonshire and Cornwall possess two other Heaths, Erica ciliaris, « 27 » « 28 » « 29 » « 30 » « 31 » which extends into Dorsetshire and occurs in north Brittany, and Erica vagans, both Pyrenean species, while a Mediterranean plant. Gladiolus illyricus, grows in the New Forest. In 1846 Edward Forbes dealt with the problems presented by the distribution of British plants in an essay which has exercised a far-reaching influence. When Forbes published his work, comparatively little was known as to the possibilities of transport of seeds and fruits across barriers of water(22). His conviction that the known means of dispersal were insufficient to account for the presence of Mediterranean or Lusitanian plants in Ireland led him to turn to geology for a solution of the problem. He was thus led to put forward the view that in the course of the Tertiary period when, as we know from palaeontological evidence, the climate of north and west Europe was much warmer than it is now, and long-before the beginning of the climatic changes which culminated in the Glacial period, there was a land- connexion between the west of Ireland and the south-west of the continent. Mr Praeger, whose work on the Irish flora is well known to systematic botanists, agrees with the conclusions of Forbes, and sees in the Portuguese and Mediterranean plants 'relics of a vegetation which once spread along a bygone European coast-line which stretched unbroken from Ireland to Spain'(23). If this explanation is correct it entitles Arbutus, St Dabeoc's heath and other members of this southern group to be regarded as a very old section of our flora. There is, however, another side to the question: granting that a certain number of Irish plants were able to withstand the rigours of an Ice age, it is hardly likely that the strawberry tree and other southern types, which it is admitted flourish in the south-west of Ireland because of the mildness of the climate, were of the number of those which endured an extreme Arctic phase. Moreover, if these Mediterranean species are survivals from the Tertiary period, if they have been isolated since pre-Glacial days as an outlier of a southern flora, we might fairly expect that during the long interval between their arrival and the present day new forms would have been produced closely related to, though not identical with, the parent types. This, however, has not been proved to be the case. Darwin in speaking of Forbes' Essay in a letter to de Candolle in 1863 says that he differs from most of his contemporaries 'in thinking that the vast continental extensions of Forbes, Heer, and others are not only advanced without sufficient evidence, but are opposed to much weighty evidence'(12). The alternative view is to regard Arbutus and its compatriots as post-Glacial arrivals and not as survivals from a widely spread Tertiary flora. A recently published account of the New Flora of the volcanic island of Krakatau furnishes an instructive and remarkable demonstration of the facility with which a completely sterilised island, separated by several miles of ocean from neighbouring lands, may be restocked with vegetation(24). In 1883 the island of Krakatau, then densely covered with a luxuriant tropical vegetation, was partially destroyed by a series of exceptionally violent volcanic explosions. After this catastrophe only a third of the island was left: the surface was deeply covered by pumice and volcanic ash and no vestige of life remained. In 1906 a party of botanists who spent a few hours on Krakatau collected 137 species of plants: the vegetation was in places so dense that it was with the greatest difficulty they penetrated beyond the coastal belt, and some of the trees had reached a height of 50 feet. The seeds and fruits of this new flora have been carried by ocean-currents, by wind, and by the agency of birds from other islands in the Malay Archipelago. The nearest islands, except the small island of Sebesi, about 12 miles distant, are Java and Sumatra, separated from Krakatau by a stretch of water about 25 miles in breadth. It is reasonable to wonder whether, had Forbes known of this and similar modern instances of the capabilities of plants as travellers, he would have adopted the view he did. In this connexion it may be added that in recent years the glaciation of Ireland has been shown to be more extensive than it was believed to be when Forbes wrote his essay. There would seem to be no insuperable objection to the conclusion that the Mediterranean plants in Ireland and in the south of England reached their present home after the retreat of the ice at the end of the Glacial period, and after Ireland became an island. A full consideration of the problem is beyond the scope of this book, but I have briefly stated the case, not with the authority of an expert but in order to draw attention to a particularly fascinating study in plant- migration. « 32 » « 33 » « 34 » « 35 » Fig. 2. Eriocaulon septangulare With. West Connemara. (Photograph by Mr W. R. Welch.) In a volume by W. Canton entitled A Child's book of Saints a story is told in which the presence in Ireland of Mediterranean species receives a more picturesque explanation. The Monk Bresal was sent to teach the brethren in a Spanish monastery the music of Irish choirs. In later years Bresal longed for a sight of his native land, though he loved his home and 'every rock, tree, and flower' in his adopted country. After returning to Ireland, his thoughts reverted to Spain; 'it appeared to him as though he was once again in a granite nook among the rocks beside the Priory'; he saw the ice-plant with its little stars of white flowers sprinkled with red (the London Pride) and a small evergreen tree from which he had often gat...