I. INTRODUCTION The species of non-mulberry silkmoths, also known as Emperor moths, Giant silkworms, Wild-silkworms, etc. mostly belong to the family Saturniidae. Of the 1,100 species listed from the world only about 40 species are known to occur in INDiA. The Saturniidae includes medium to very large sized, brightly and strikingly ~oloured moths, some of these having the largest wing 'area of all the Lepidoptera. The adults are mostly nocturnal and short lived. The males are smaller than the females about which they assemble in large numbers. The species are univoltine to multivoltine depending upon the climatic conditions. The .family Saturniidae is of great economic importance, for it includes species which produce silk of commercial value. Whereas Andre (1907) reported only five species of Saturniidae, Cotes (1888, 1891) referred to about 30 species, and Cooper (1942) mentioned about 60 species of wild silkmoths. At present, nearly 80 species of insects are known to produce wild silks of economic value (Jolly et al., 1975), the majority of which occur in the wUd state where they feed upon various plant species. Of all these non-mulberry moths, the most important three species, exploited for yielding wild silk of commercial value, are: Antheraea paphia (L.) commonly known as the 'Indian Tasar Moth', which yields brownish tasar, A. assamensis (Helfer) called 'Indian Muga Moth', which produces golden muga silk, and Samia cyn~hia (Drury) popularly referred as the 'Indian Eri Moth' or 'Arindi Moth', which yields white or brick-red eri silk. Thus, INDIA is the only country in the world producing all the three commercial varieties of non- mulberry silks on a large scale. INDIA also occup.ies second position in the world as far as the total yield of tasar is concerned and first in respect' of eri and muga silks~ The muga silk is produced only in INDIA in the North-Eastern States, particularly Assam. Besides, Antheraea ro,!!lei Moore has recently heen exploited by Jolly (1973) for the commercial production of 'Yild silk by crossing it with Chinese species Antheraea pel'nyi Guerin-Meneville; the hybrid being named Antheraea proylei*. These experiments of breeding were conducted as early as 1882 by Wailly who in 1896 reported "that the moths of these two allied species paired together as if they were the same species and the hybrid was robust." The studies on the improvement of types of silk-producing insects have been neglected so far. The importance' of their studies,' in the world, realised only recently, is evident in the holding of the First International Seminar on Non-Mulberry Silks, in 1974, at Ranchi (INDIA). Further, "Wild silkworms are easier to exploit than the B. moti for it is a simplet, more natural work; the only matter capital though, is harvest" as expressed by Rarimanpianina (1970) is significant. The descriptions of the Indian species of wild silkmoths given by earlier workers are inadequate, as revealed in the literature, and the information on host plants scattered. More over, in the light of increasing knowledge about these insects, the family Saturniidae has undergone a considerable change as far as its classification is concerned. At present, seven • Tutt (1902) named these hybrids as Antheraea kirbyi from 0 A. pernyi X ~ A. 'roylei, and A. mool'ei from 0- A. roylei X ~ A. pernyi. As such, these o~d names viz., A. kirb1li and A. moo rei have pl'ec{ldence over A, rroylei Jolly ( 1973 ). Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India subfamilies, Rhescyntinae, Citheroniinae, Saturniinae, Agliinae, Ludiinae, Hemileucinae and Salassinae, are recognised in the world under this fa:nily against three subfamilies, recognised earlier, viz. Saturniinae, Attacinae and Ludiinae (Aurivillus, 1904). Of these seven subfamilies, Saturniinae and Salassinae are known from INOlA. It is in view of this that an attempt has been made to study Indian non-mulberry silk moths, taxonomically. Accordingly, 17 species distributed over 10 genera, including Proactias gen. nov., belonging to the subfamily Saturniinae, have been redescribed on the basis of morphological characters, including male genitalia, the need of which was felt as early as 1928 by Seitz. The distribution of the species includes the localities cited in literature as well as those of which the material was available for study. The information about the host plants of these species has also been incorporated (vide Wardle, 1881 ; Cotes, 1888, 1891 ; Watt, 1908 ; Lefroy, 1909 ; Fletcher, 1914 ; Klaue, 1931-32; Ayyar, 1940 ; Cooper, 1942 ; Roonwal, 1954; Bhasin and Roonwal, 1954; Bhasin, Roonwal and Singh, 1958 ; a~d Mathur and Singh, 1959, 1960 and 1961). II. HISTORICAL REVIEW Linnaeus (1758) was the first to describe two of the present day 'Wild-silkworms' under the group "Bombyx" of Phalaena, as Phalaena Bombyx atlas and Phalaena Bombyx paphia. Although he stopped using the word "Bombyx" after having erected the genus Atlacus and included the two species under the group Phalaena Attacus, the name Bombyx was constantly being used nearly till the beginning of the 19th century when Hubner (1820) erected Antheraea to include paphia of Linnaeus (loe. cit.). In the meantime Drury (1773) described cynthia under Phalaena Attacus as Phalaena Attacus cynthia. The next century brought to light several species of wild silkmoths, some of which have been synonymised with the present day fauna. Whereas Hubner (1806), Doubleday (1847), Westwood (1848) and White (1859) added one species each viz., selene, maenas, katinka and edwardsii respectively, Helfer (1837) added two species, assamensis and trifenestrata before Mo~re (1859, 1877) who added as many as five species which are recognised good and valid species even to-day: these are Antheraea frithi, A. roylei, A. andamana, A. helferi and Rhodinia newara. At the end of 19th century one species was added by Hampson (1892), Antheraea knyvelli, and another by Rothschild (1899), Antheraea compta. Although Boisduval (1834, 1840) proposed the term 'Tribus Saturnides', Duponchel (1846) treated the Saturniid fauna under 'Attacidae', and Herrich-Sch':ffer (1850) under the family 'Saturniidae'. Later, Smith (1886) classified the family into two distinct subfamilies viz., Attacinae and Saturniinae which was, however, not followed by Hampson (1892) who maintained status quo so far as the Indian Saturniid fauna Was concerned. The opinions differed as to the practical applicability of the proposed systems and till the middle of 20th century several classifications were proposed, such as by Aurivillus (1904) who subdivided Saturniidae into three subfamilies viz., Saturniinae, Attacinae and Ludiinae, which was followed by Gaede (1927) and Sch'-issler (1933~36). The latter catalogued the world species under Saturniidae except the genera Actias Macleay and Sonthonnaxia Watson which were treated separately under the family Syssphingidae (Ceratocampidae ·or Citheroniidae of others). Jordan (1922) proposed three subfamilies viz., Saturniinae, Agliinae and Ludiinae, obviously including ~ll the Indian species of Attacinae and Satq.rniinae (of Smith 10:;. cit.) under the single subfamily ARORA & GUPTA: On Indian non-mulberry silkmoths Saturniinae and included one more family Ceratocampidae with two subfamilies viz., Ceratocampinae and Rhescyntinae under his superfamily Saturnioidea. Michener (1952), however, sub-divided Saturniidae into seven subfamilies viz., Saturniinae, Agliinae, Ludiinae, Salassinae, Citheroniinae, Hemileucinae and Rhescyntinae and has been followed, as such, by Ferguson (1971-72), and in the present work. The whole of the Indian Saturniid fauna, including about 40 species, is represented by two subfamilies viz., Saturniinae and Salassinae. In the present work 1 7 species distributed over ten genera belonging to subfamily Saturniinae have been dealt with here for taxonomic studies. III. MATERIAL AND METHOD OF STUDY The material before us consists of some 400 specimens belonging to 17 species distributed over ten genera namely Actias (1 sp.), Sonthonnaxia (1 sp.), Proactias (1 sp.), Rhodin:·a (1 sp.), Oricula (2 spp.), Loepa (1 sp.), Antheraea (7 spp.), Attacus (1 sp.), Archaeoattacus (1 sp.) and Samia (1 sp.). The material is deposited in the National Zoological Collections at Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta. The wing venation was studied by applying toluene with the help of a fine sable-hair brush without damaging the scales. Similarly, toluene was employed for studying antennae, tibial spurs, tarsal spines, etc. Other morphological structures were studied after treating with 10% Potassium hydroxide solution. For this the head, legs and apical half of the abdomen were kept in 10% KOH solution for the necessary treatment; then the material was washed thoroughly with distilled water, dissected for study, and sketches made. The material was later passed through various grades of alcohol and preserved in 90% alcohol. The morphological characters including those of male genitalia which were considered of taxonomic importance during the present studies are as follows :- Frons: The frons may be flat or convex next to eyes or rarely convex throughout as in Samia and Archaeoattacus ; laterofrontal suture mayor may not be distinct. Antennae: The antennae are quadripectinate both in male as well as in female except for a few apical-segments. However, the ramii in ma1es are invariably long and equal as compared to those of female which are shorter and generally unequal. In majority of the cases the ramii are beset with a few terminal and subterminal bristles. In majority of the genera distal ramii of one segment are quite apart from the basal ramii of the subsequent segment (Text-fig. 1, H). However, in Loepa these ramii are close to each other and form a very good distinguishing character (Text-fig. 1, K). Mouth parts: The labial palpi were found to be quite variable, being large and one segmented as in Attacus (Text-fig. 2, A), small and one-segmented as in Oricula (Text-fig. 1, H) ; two-segmented as in Sonthonnaxia, Actias and Proactias (Text-fig. L A, C & E), and three segmented in others. Similarly, reduced proboscis is also important taxonomically since it is present in a few genera like Antheraea, Samia etc. It is completely absent in Attacus. It may exhibit sexual dimorphism as in Samia, being fringed in male, annular and not fringed in female. Mernoir8 oj the Zoological Survey oj India If'1"ng venation: This is fairly constant except for the radials which are reduced to four as in Antheraea and Sonthonnaxia because of the coincidence of veins'R'l and R The cell • 3 of the fore wing may be completely closed as in Saturniini, except in Rhodinia where it is only , 2mm c / E K D I I I I, W ~. o F J M Tex.t-fig. 1. Labial pall>i and hind tibial spurs of S01£thonnQ.3;ia maenas (A and B), Actias selene (0 and D), Proactias sinensis (E and F); (G) Labial palpus of Rhodinia newa,'a ; {H} antenna, (I) labial palpus, (J) hind tibial spurs of Anthei'aEa paphia; (K) antenna, (L) labial palpus, (tV£) hind tibial spurs of Loe~a katin7ca ; (N) labial palpi of 01'icula andrei (all except H of the same mag.). partly closed, or completely open as in the Attacini. The vein M~ has been considered as absent in accordance with the studies made by Turner (1946). The outline of both the wings is also variable i.e., fore wings are falcate in Antke?'aea, A.ttacu8, Archaeoattacu8 and Samia ; and hind wings are produced into tails as in Actias, Sonthonn.axia and Proactias. ARORA &. GUPTA: On Indian non-mulbe1'1'Y silkmoth.s Legs: The epiphysis of the fore tibia is quite variable. There is a single pair of short terminal spurs on mid and hind tibia except in the genus Attacus. Although the spurs are short with the margins partly but minutely serrate, the shape is variable, being generally narrow and gradually tapering, or bulbous basally (Text-fig. 1, B) as in Sonthonnaxia. The tarsal spines are, usually, present, sparsely on 1-4 segments, rarely absent on 4th segment, however the tarsi ate without spines in Loepa and 01'icula. The fourth tarsal segment of females of Antheraea, Attacu8 (Text-fig. 2, B) and Samia (Text-fig. 2, G) is produced laterally and ends in a spine. The claws are usually with a well-developed arolium and pulvilli. c .~~ ~ G F Text-:fig. 2. (A) labial palpus, (B) female fore tarsal segments (3rd to 5th) of Attacus atlas; (0) la.bial palpus, (D) hind tibial spurs of Arcllaeoatlacus ed'Wm'd~ii; (E) labial palpus, (F) hind tibial spurs, (G) female fore tarsal segments (2nd to 5th) of Samia cynthia (all of same mag.), Male genitalia: The uncus is quite useful in differentiating various genera. Although it is usually bifid apically, it assumes various shapes; as for example it may be elevated mid dorsally and serrated as in Actias selene. The gnathos may be absent or present, the gnathal arms may be free as in Loepa and Oricula, or united mid .. ventrally in others. The presence of labides in Anthet'aea is a very characteristic feature not noticed in any other genera presently Memoirs of the Zoological Survey oj India 6 studied. The shape of the valvae, juxta, transtilla, and aedeagus with vesica are helpful in distinguishing genera as well as species. Mehta (1933) and Klots (1956) have been consulted for the studies on male genitalia. IV. TAXONOMIC ACCOUNT Family SATURNIIDAE The family Saturniidae is characterised by the absence of a tympanum, frenulum, and in the hind wing of a bar between veins Sc and Rs. The fore wing mayor may not possess all the radials; Ml arises from the upper angle of cell; Ma absent ( vide Turner, 1946 ) ; Ms from the lower angle of cell; CUa absent; and 2nd anal forming a fork with 1st ana:!. In the hind wing CUa is absent and usally one anal vein is present. The mouth parts are reduced, proboscis lacking, or, if present, very short. Ocelli absent. Antennae heavily scaled at the base but with the shaft and ramii unsealed or sparsely scaled; the antennae are quadripectinate in all the Indian genera with the ramii generally longer in the male than those in the female. The epiphysis on the fore tibia long, rarely reaching as far as the apex of the fore tibia; mid and hind tibia usually with a pair of short terminal spurs (except. in Attacus). The tarsal spines mayor may not be present; the last tarsal segment bearing claws, with well-developed arolium pad and paired pulvilli. In the male genitalia the uncus is usually bifid apically, the gnathos may be absent, or, if present, the gnathal arms may be free or meet mid-ventrally. The transtilla may be absent or stx:ong1y developed, sometimes bearing a large median plate, or it may also be produced into large lobe-like structures, labelled here as labides. Michener (1952) subdivided the family Saturniidae into seven subfamilies, four of which, viz., Saturniinae ( World-wide ), Agliinae (EURASIA), Ludiinae ( AFRICA) and Salassinae (ASIA) are confined mainly to the Old World whereas the other three, Rhescyntinae, Hemileucinae and Citheroniinae, belong to the New World mainly AMERICA, and can be separated from one another on the basis of the adults by the following key ( adapted from Michener loco cit. ) ( page 372 ) :- Key to the seven SubfamHies of SATURNlIDAE based on Adults 1. Pilifers with strong bristles, or, if absent, bristles are present on clypeal margin between pilifers (AMERICA) Rhescyntino,e Pilifers and clYFell margin without bristles 2 2. Frons con vex at sides so that laterofrontal sutures are completely hidden from front view ; antennal cones..simple (AMERICA) Citheroni';'no,e Frons flat at sides, or, if convex, the antennal cones are multiple 3 3. Frontal protuberance present, though often a. mere transverse ridge (absent in Polythysania and a few Hylesia) ; tarsal spines usually absent except those of penultimate fore tarsal segment of female; anepisternal suture usually not slan ~ing down ward posteriorly 6 Frontal protuberance absent (sometimes there is a. superficially similar clypeal protuberance) ; tarsal spines usually present; anepisternal suture variable 4 4. Anepisternal suture slanting down posteriorly; Rs of fore wing usually arising from anterior apical angle of discal cell 5 Anepisternal suture horizontal or slanting upward posteriorly; Rs ~f fore wing leaving discal cell well before apex of latter (world-wide) So,turniinae ARORA &. GUPTA: On Indian non-mulberry silkmotks 7 O. Vein ~1., [l\:I,] of fore wing arising in front of middle of apex of discal cell ; antennal cones simple (EURASIA) Agliinae Vein l\:I. [1\:[ ,] of fore wing arising near middle of apex of discal cell ; antennal cones sometimes multiple (AFRICA) Ludiinae 6. Antennal cones present, simple, rarely ( Polythysania) reduced to blunt projections; Rs of fore wing usually arising from anterior apical angh of discal ce1l (AMERICA) HemileucinaB Antennal cone3 absent; fore wing with Bs leaving dis cal cell well before a pax of latter (ASIA) Salassinae Subfamily SATURNIINAE The characteristics given below are based primarily on the Indian material: Frons convex or flat laterally; the laterofrontal suture mayor may not be visible; frontal protube rance generally absent. Antennae quadripectinate in both the sexes, with the bases of ramii ( i. e. distal ramii of one segment and basal ramii of the next segment) usually well separated with the exception of Loepa in which they are adjacent to each other, ramii shorter in female, antennal cones always multiple. Mid and hind tibiae with terminal spurs usually short and not longer than diameter of the tibia, except in Attacus where tibial spurs are abs~nt; hind tibiae without subapical spurs. Ferguson (1972) refers to the presence of characteristic patches of colour near the apex of fore wing "the marking may be in the form of a nearly apical patch or streak ( Saturniini tribe ), or as a more definite, sub circular ocellate spot (Attacini tribe). These marks are modified remnants of the submarginal band. Only Actiaslacks such marks entirely, and io. Rothschildia the ocellate spot may by reduced or broken up. In some Attacini both kinds of markings may be present. The apical patch or streak in Saturniini consists of various combinations of black, white, red or pink; the ocellate spot· of Attacini is black, or blue and black. Old world members of these two tribes have the same markings". Distn:bution.-Worldwide in distribution. Remarks.-The Indian species of the wild silkmoths, referable to Saturniinae have been further 'classified into two tribes viz., Saturniini and Attacini, and have been dealt with under seven and three genera, respectively. The first group of 'tailed' saturniins includes Sonthonnaxia maenas ( Doubleday), Actias selene (HGbner) and Proactias sinensis (Walker), the second group includes the remaining 11 species, seven of which belong to Antheraea, one species each to Rhodinia and Loepa, and two to Gricula. All the three species of 'tailed group', till 1912, were included in the genus Actias when maenas was treated separately under a new genus Sonthonnaxia by Watson (1912). The present study has revealed that s'inensis neither belongs to Actias nor to the genus Sonthonnaxia and has been separated under yet another new genus viz., Proutias. Of the remaining four genera of Saturniini, the genus Rhodinia is of considerable taxonomic impor tance, almost functioning as a link between the two tribes because of partly closed cell (also vide Watson, 1913) in both wings which have a completely closed cell in the Saturniini and open cell in the Attacini. The remaining three genera, Attacus, Archaeoattacus and Sa·rn·ia, belong to Attacini, each represented by a single species. Although the genus Archaeoattacus was erected as early as 1914 by Wa.tson, the species Archaeoattacus edwardsii ( White) is still usually placed in the 8 Memoirs oj the ZoologicaZ Survey oj India genus Attacus along with atlas ( Linn.) (vide Seitz, 1926 : Pruthi, 1969 ; Nayyar et a~., 1976 ; Richards & Davies, 1977 etc.). The present studies differentiate these three genera from each other taxonomically. Key to the Tribes of the Subfamily SATURNIINAE. Fore and hind wings with the cell cOl~pletely or partly closed SATURNUNI Fore and hind wings with the cell completely open ATTAClNI Tribe SATURNlINI Key to the Genera of the Tribe SATURNllNI 1. Hind wing tailed 2 Hind wing not tailed 4 2. Hindwing tail longer than costa of fore wing in lnale ; fore wing with four radials only. Saccus in male genitalia long Sonthonnax'ia Watson Hindwing tail shorter than costa of fore wing in male; fore wing with s five radials. Saccus in male genitalia short 3. Frons convex at sides next to eyes. Antennae in male as long as thorax. Uncus in male genitalia ele\'ated Actias M:acleay Fl'ons fiat at sides next to eyes. Antennae in male longer t~an thorax. Uncus in male genitalia not elevated Proactias g~'n. noy. 4. Fore wing with the discocellulars in curved and not closing the discocellulal' cell; R6 stalked with l\I beyond the upper angle of cell; hind wing with I only lower discocellulal' present Rhodinia Staudinger Fore and hind wings with the discocellulars completely closing the cell ; Rb arising before the upper angle of cell 5 5. Fore wing with four radials. Gnatbos in male genitalia only rudimentary; transtilla absent; labides well developed; aedeagus without cornuti on vesica Antheraea Hubner Fore wing with five radials. Gnathos and transtilla present; labides absent; aedeagus with cornuti on vesica 6 6. Frons con yex and raised above the 1e,e1 of eyes; antennae with distal ramii of one segment close to basal ramii of the succeeding segment Loepa lIoore Frons fiat at sides next to eyes; antennae with ramii of one segment well separated frOln ramii of the succeeding segment Oricula Walker Genus Sonthonnaxia Watson 1912. Sonthonnaxia Watson, The Wl,Zd Silkmoths of the World. 1928. Sonthonnaxia, Bou,ier, Bull. Hill Mus., 2: 138 1936. Sonthonnaxia, Schussler, Lepid. Oat., 70: 48. Type-species.-Actias maenas Doubleday (1847). Frons convex at sides next to eyes. Eyes large. Antennae in male slightly shorter than the thorax, quadripectinate to a little before the apex, cones simple, with the ramii equal, beset with a few terminal and subterminal bristles; shaft with scales on the upper side; antennae in female with ramii unequal, basal ramii beset with terminal and subterminal bristles and distal ramii without such bristles. Labial palpi short and two segmented. Hindwing tail narrow, longer than, the length of fore wing in male but shorter than the length of fore wing in female. Legs with the fore tibia having a well developed epiphysis in both sexes, reaching apically three-fourths of tibia; mid and hind tibial spurs with their basal ARORA & GUPTA: On Indian non-mulberry silkmotks 9 halves dilated and tapering distally, with the margins sclerotised and minutely serrated; tarsi with spines except on the fifth segment of the fore tarsus in the female; claws with arolium and pulvilli well developed. Fore wing with four radials; Rl very short; Ri and R3 coincident; R5 arising before angle of cell; M from upper angle of cell and discocellulars excurved. j Uncus produced at the apex into a pair of processes, dorsally as well as ventrally. Gnathal arms meeting to form a small rectangular plate. Saccus very long. Anellus with straight and backwardly directed processes. Valva with a well developed spine. Aedeagus very long (not cylinderical and funnel like). Distribution.-INDIA; BHUTAN; BANGLADESH; BURMA; THAILAND; N. VIETNAM; INDONESIA ; and CHINA. Remarks.-Schnssler (1936) recorded three species under this genus, including 'Sonthonnax·ia sinensis' which has since been separated presently to Proactias gen. nov., thus leaving only two species. This genus comes under the tailed group of Saturniini along with other two genera viz., Actias and P1'oactias, from which it differs in the presence of four radials in the fore wing, having a hindwing tail longer than costa of fore lving and in a longer saccus in the male genitalia. 1. Sonthonnaxia maenas (Doubleday ) (PI. I, nos. 1-4 ; Text-figs. 1, A-B; 3, A-I) 1847. Actias maenas Doubloday, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 19: 95, pl. 7, fig. 1 (Type locality. -Sylhet). 1848. Sat'llrnia leto Doubleday, Trans. ent. Soc. L'J nd. , 5: 51, pI. 15 (Syn. vide Hampson 1892). 1855. Tropaea maenas, Walker, Cat. Lep. Het. Brit. Mus., 6: 1263. 1862. Actias leta, ~Ioore, Trans. ent. Soc. Land., (3) 1 (4): 317. 1877. Actias ignescens ~Ioore, Proc. zool. Soc. Lond.: 602. 1892. Argema maenas, Kirby, Syn. Cat. Lep. Het., 1: 767. 1912. Sonthonnaxia 'maenas, Watson, The Wild Silkmotlzs of the World. 1928. Sonthonnaxia maenas, Bouvier, Bull. Hill Mus., 2: 138. 1936. Sonthonnaxia maenas, Schussler, Lepid. Cat., 70 : 49-50. 1954. Actias maenas, Roepke, TiJdschr. Ent., 97 (4): 257. "Anterior wings pale greenish yellow, the costa, except at the apex, ferruginous, sprinkled with cinereous ; outer margin rufescent: near the base of transverse narrow band of the same colour, and beyond the middle a not very distinct flexuous streak: a large lunule at the end of the cell connected with the costal vitta, of the same colour with this at its origin, then much paler externally, nearly black internally, marked with a very delicate white line. Posterior wings of the same colour as the anterior, tailed, the tails very long, wrinkled at the extremity, sprinkled with ferruginous from the base nearly to the middle, the outer margin of the wing and of the basal half of the tail ferruginous; disc with a small black lunule divided by a white line resting on a faint cloud, darkest on the inner side : between this and the margin a very obsolete waved sttiga. Below, the anterior wings want the basal striga, the costa is paler, the lunule wants the black, and the flexuous band is more distinct, as it also is on the posterior wings. Head and antennae pale. Thorax greenish yellow, the front part broadly ferruginous, sprinkled with cinereous, legs vinous red, with pale spots. 2 10 Memoira oj the Zoolo1ical Survey oj IMia Abdomen pale greenish yellow. In the Collections of the British Museum and W. W. Saunders Esq. This fine insect is easily distin~uished from Act. Selene by its peculiar greenish colour, the flexuous external striga, the want of the white band on the prothorax, the great length of the tails, and the more rounded anterior wings". (original quoted vide Doubleday, 1847). teg ,,,' " c ... ... Text-fig. 3. Sonthonnaxia maena,s : A, fore wing venation; B, hind wing venation; 0, lateral view and D. disto-dorsal view of uncus; E, lateral view of male genitalia j F, inn~r view of right valva j G, gnathos; H, lateral view of anellu3 ; I, aedeagus lA and B of sam.e mag. ; 0-1 of same mag.) Venation.-(Text-fig. 3, A - B). Fore wing with vein R, very short ending just a little before the apex ; veins R and Rs coincident, ending just below the apex; and vein R. long" j ending in between veins R~ +3 and R4•