University of Ghent English Linguistics Master Dissertation 2007 - 2008 HHHiiillllllaaarrryyy CCCllliiinnntttooonnn vvvsss... BBBaaarrraaaccckkk OOObbbaaammmaaa AA lliinngguuiissttiicc ssttuuddyy ooff aapppprraaiissaall iinn ppoolliittiiccaall ssppeeeecchheess Promoted by PPrrooff.. DDrr.. AAnnnnee-Marie Simon-VVaannddeennbbeerrggeenn Sylvie Opstaele MMaasstteerr LLiinngguuiissttiiccss aanndd LLiitteerraattuurree EEnngglliisshh - German Content Preface 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Aim ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Data ................................................................................................................ 4 2. Presidential Election 2008 ....................................................................................... 5 2.1. The Road to the White House ........................................................................ 5 2.2. Main Issues..................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ............................................................... 10 2.3.1. Hillary Clinton .................................................................................................... 11 2.3.2. Barack Obama .................................................................................................... 13 3. Political Language ................................................................................................... 16 3.1. Institutional Discourse ................................................................................. 16 3.2. Political Language ........................................................................................ 18 3.3. Political Speech ............................................................................................ 21 4. Language of Evaluation .................................................................................... 27 4.1. Language of Evaluation ................................................................................ 27 4.2. Stance in Biber and Finegan (1989) ............................................................. 28 4.3. Attitude in Martin and White (2005) ........................................................... 31 4.4. Indirect Realisation of Attitude .................................................................... 33 5. Analysis ............................................................................................................ 33 5.1. Method ........................................................................................................ 33 5.2. Speeches: Overview ..................................................................................... 34 5.2.1. Hillary Clinton; Health Care: Remarks on American Health Choices Plan ......... 34 5.2.2. Hillary Clinton on government reform .............................................................. 35 5.2.3. Hillary Clinton on Iraq ........................................................................................ 36 5.2.4. Barack Obama on urban America ...................................................................... 36 5.2.5. Barack Obama: speech at Labor Day Rally ........................................................ 37 5.2.6. Barack Obama on tax fairness for the Middle Class .......................................... 37 5.2.7. Barack Obama on Iraq ....................................................................................... 38 5.3. Results Hillary Clinton .................................................................................. 39 5.3.1. Text 1 ................................................................................................................. 39 5.3.1.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 39 5.3.1.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 40 5.3.1.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 42 5.3.2. Text 2 ................................................................................................................. 44 5.3.2.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 44 5.3.2.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 45 5.3.2.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 46 5.3.3. Text 3 ................................................................................................................. 47 5.3.3.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 47 5.3.3.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 48 5.3.3.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 49 5.3.4. Token of Attitude ............................................................................................... 51 5.3.4.1. Text 1 ............................................................................................................ 51 5.3.4.2. Text 2 ............................................................................................................ 54 5.3.4.3. Text 3 ............................................................................................................ 56 5.3.5. Discussion Clinton .............................................................................................. 57 5.4. Results Barack Obama ................................................................................. 63 5.4.1. Text 4 ................................................................................................................. 63 5.4.1.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 63 5.4.1.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 64 5.4.1.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 66 5.4.2. Text 5 ................................................................................................................. 67 5.4.2.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 67 5.4.2.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 68 5.4.2.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 70 5.4.3. Text 6 ................................................................................................................. 71 5.4.3.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 71 5.4.3.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 72 5.4.3.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 73 5.4.4. Text 7 ................................................................................................................. 74 5.4.4.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 74 5.4.4.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 75 5.4.4.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 77 5.4.5. Token of Attitude ............................................................................................... 78 5.4.5.1. Text 4 ............................................................................................................ 78 5.4.5.2. Text 5 ............................................................................................................ 79 5.4.5.3. Text 6 ............................................................................................................ 80 5.4.5.4. Text 7 ............................................................................................................ 81 5.4.6. Discussion Obama ............................................................................................. 81 5.4.7. Final Discussion: Comparison ............................................................................ 90 5.4.7.1. Affect ............................................................................................................ 91 5.4.7.2. Judgement .................................................................................................... 92 5.4.7.3. Appreciation ................................................................................................. 92 5.4.7.4. Attitude Markers .......................................................................................... 93 5.4.7.5. Remarks........................................................................................................ 93 6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 96 Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 99 Preface Having reached the end of my dissertation, I am glad to say that I do not regret the choice of my topic, because it enabled me to combine my interest in politics (four years ago I seriously considered studying political sciences) and my linguistic studies. Further, I would just like to thank everyone who supported me, not only during the realisation process of my dissertation, but also throughout the past four years. First of all I would like to thank Professor Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. After having guided me through the process of writing my bachelor paper, which proved to be an excellent dress rehearsal for the real job, she supervised my master dissertation by advising me, helping me when I was having doubts and reading the first draft. Her experience was a great help to me. Special thanks go to my family. I am grateful to my parents because they gave me the opportunity to go to university; to my father because he always knew how to cheer me up when I needed it; to my mother because she cooked my favourite meals in the exam period and because she knew exactly when to call me, and, maybe more importantly, when not to; to my late grandfather with whom I share my interest in politics; to my grandmother who picked me up at the bus stop when I came home on Fridays and who always shows great interest in what I do, just like my great-grandmother who has always believed that I would do well, especially when I was not sure of that myself. I know that university life is a world she is not familiar with, but that did not stop her from asking about my work, exams, friends. Another member of the family I must not forget is our cat, Musti aka Moesje (friends only), because she always kept me company when I was studying at home. When I was sitting behind my desk, she was lying next to me, snoozing. Who knows what knowledge she gathered when I was studying aloud. A final thank you goes to my friends; the ones in Ghent, with whom I shared the joys, but also the sorrows, of student life; and the ones at home with whom I was able to forget everything. I am going to end this preface right know before it completely turns into some kind of farewell address. I am going to leave that to President George W. Bush, who had better start preparing one, because in a couple of months’ time a brand new President will take his seat. After having spent this much time on my dissertation I will certainly follow the elections with increased attention, maybe the reader will too, after having read it. Sylvie Opstaele 10 May 2008 1. Introduction 1.1. Aim This dissertation is concerned with the language use of two Democratic politicians who are candidates for the United States presidential election of November 4th 2008, namely Hillary Clinton, senator for New York and Barack Obama, senator for Illinois. The emphasis is on how they depict themselves and others in an attempt to persuade the American voters. This dissertation focuses on how they evaluate certain events and how they evaluate themselves and others. In order to find this out I shall study the language of evaluation, more precisely attitude. The data are analysed to see which and how many attitude markers Clinton and Obama use and what this implies for the subjective meanings contained in their speeches. Their language in general and, in this dissertation, their language of evaluation contributes to the achievement of their goal, namely becoming the 44th president of the United States. Eventually, only one of these two Democrats can actually run for president. One of them will get nominated during the national party convention, following the results of primary elections, to take up the gloves against the Republican nominee and against opponents from minor parties or independent candidates. After 8 years of Republican power, there is a lot at stake for the Democratic party. The first signs, namely the Congress election in 2006, seem to be positive, since the Democrats gained a majority there (van Minnen 2006). Still, this is only a positive indication for the Democrats, nothing is sure until all votes are counted. So they can only hope that the candidate who gets nominated is able to convince the American people to vote for him/her and to choose for the Democrats following the 2006 Congress election. The pressure is high for the candidates themselves. Clinton and Obama are only two of the eight original Democratic candidates. When elected, both of them can create a unique event in American history. When becoming president, Hillary Clinton will be the first female president ever and Barack Obama the first black president ever. On top of that, pressure is raised because Clinton has a history as a former first lady and Obama is often described as being inexperienced. Until it is decided who is going to run for president, Clinton and Obama are rivals, although they are members of the same party. 3 In preparation of the elections Clinton and Obama participate in debates, are frequently interviewed and give speeches across the country. This dissertation takes a closer look at a few of their speeches, which are provided on their campaign websites. In these speeches they give the public their point of view on the main election issues, such as Iraq, health care, etc. It is very important that they give the people a clear profile, in order to do so they mark off this profile by referring to others (Republicans, present government/president, historic figures) and referring to certain events in the past (historic events, personal experience, anecdotes) and their objectives for the future. The goal is to create a positive image of themselves and hopefully a negative image of the opponents in order to persuade the American voters. Past works have studied the language use of presidential candidates to determine certain aspects of their personality and psychological state (Chung, Pennebaker et al.; 2006) or have studied the effects of metaphor on the presidential leadership and charisma with US presidents in inaugural speeches (Levin, Mio et al. 2005). Other aspects of language in political speeches that have been focussed on in the past are personal pronouns, grammatical and lexical repetition (Hillier 2004). Simon-Vandenbergen has concentrated on, for instance, modality in political interviews (1996), modal uncertainty in political discourse (1997) and, with White and Aijmer (2007), presupposition in mass communicated argument. In the present study the focus lies on the language of evaluation. The aspect of attitude has been studied and described by for instance Biber and Finegan, who actually prefer the term ‘stance’ (1989: 93-124), and by Martin and White (2005). 1.2. Data The data used for this dissertation are speeches that Obama and Clinton gave in the run up to the primary elections. The transcriptions of these speeches are made available on the campaign website1 of the candidates. The speeches that are selected, handle some of the main election issues. 1 http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/speech/ and http://www.barackobama.com/speeches/index.php 4 In total seven speeches are selected, which can be found in the appendix (1-57), three of which are Clinton’s and four of which are Obama’s. The speeches of Barack Obama are generally somewhat shorter in length in comparison to Clinton’s, which is why four instead of three speeches are chosen here. The total number of words in these seven speeches is 30,296. Together, the three speeches of Hillary Clinton contain 15,567 words and the four of Barack Obama have 14,189 words. So there is still a dissimilarity, but it is negligible for this research. The seven speeches are referred to as Text 1, Text 2, ... Text 7, also in the Appendix. Further information on these data and the method of analysis is provided in sections 5.1. and 5.2. This dissertation does not have the intention to sympathise with or react against any of the speakers. The statements and conclusions about their speeches are purely based on the results of the linguistic analysis. It has to be taken into account that the corpus collected here is limited. Moreover it only contains speeches by two different candidates. This means that in the end no general conclusions can be drawn about the speeches of presidential candidates. This dissertation deals with two individuals. When taking two other candidates the results could turn out differently. Even choosing other speeches of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama could affect the results. Therefore the conclusions drawn at the end are considered to be relative. 2. Presidential Election 2008 During the months in which this dissertation was written primaries and caucuses were held and Clinton and Obama worked on their campaign. It is however impossible to give a detailed account of the latest news on the presidential elections, because the focus of this dissertation is a linguistic analysis. Still, it is useful to depict an image of the background and the larger context of the speeches discussed in this dissertation. 2.1. The road to the White House 4 November 2008 is the day on which the American people choose a new President. Having served two terms the current president George W. Bush is not able to apply for the function again. As said in the introduction, only one candidate of each party is able to 5