ebook img

Heavy Quarkonia Production in p+p Collisions from the PHENIX Experiment PDF

0.1 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Heavy Quarkonia Production in p+p Collisions from the PHENIX Experiment

Heavy Quarkonia Production in p+p Collisions from the PHENIX Experiment Abigail Bickley for the PHENIX‡ Collaboration 7 0 Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado,80309-0390,USA 0 2 E-mail: [email protected] n a Abstract. Quarkonia provide a sensitive probe of the properties of the hot dense J medium created in high energy heavy ion collisions. Hard scattering processes result 2 2 in the production of heavy quark pairs that interact with the collision medium during hadronization. These in-medium interactions convey information about the 1 fundamental properties of the medium itself and can be used to examine the v 7 modification of the QCD confining potential in the collision environment. Baseline 3 measurements from p+p and d+Au collision systems are used to distinguish cold 0 nuclearmattereffectswhilemeasurementsfromheavyioncollisionsystemsareusedto 1 quantify in-medium effects. The PHENIX experiment has the capability of detecting 0 7 heavyquarkoniaat1.2<|η|<2.2viatheµ+µ−decaychannelandat|η|<0.35viathe 0 e+e− decaychannel. Recentruns haveresultedin the collectionofhighstatisticsp+p / x data sets that provide an essential baseline reference for heavy ion measurements and e allow for further critical evaluation of heavy quarkonia production mechanisms. The - l latest PHENIX results for the production of the J/ψ in p+p collisions are presented c ′ u and future prospects for ψ , χc and Υ measurements are discussed. n : v i X 1. Introduction r a The study of quarkonia in p+p collisions provides a useful tool for probing heavy quark production mechanisms. Heavy quarks are predominantly generated in hadronic collisions via hard processes involving gluonic diagrams, but the details of hadronization remain unclear. Several theoretical models, with varying degrees of success, have been proposed to explain how a heavy quark pair evolves to form a bound quarkonium state. The color-singlet model generates J/ψ particles from color singlet cc¯ pairs that are in the same quantum state as the final J/ψ [1]. However, the J/ψ production cross section is underestimated by an order of magnitude [2]. The NRQCD color-octet model [3] includes color-octet state cc¯pairs in addition to color-singlet state pairs that radiate soft gluons during hadronization to form a J/ψ. Contrary to expectation, the color-octet matrix elements, derived from experimental data, are found to be non-universal [4]. Additionally, a large transverse polarization is predicted at high pT that is not observed ‡ For the full list of PHENIX authors and acknowledgements, see Appendix ’Collaborations’ of this volume Heavy Quarkonia Production in p+p Collisions from the PHENIX Experiment 2 in the data. The color evaporation model provides a phenomenological approach to hadronization [5]. The charmonium states are formed in proportions determined by experimentforanycc¯pairbelowtheDD¯ thresholdandhadronizationoccursthroughthe emission of soft gluons. To date, the most successful model of quarkonia production is a perturbative QCD approach involving 3-gluon mechanisms which is able to reproduce both the experimentally observed J/ψ cross section and polarization [6]. Within this model, the hadronization mechanism includes a channel involving the fusion of a symmetric color-octet state with an additional gluon. The measurements reported in this paper provide further tests for these production mechanisms. 2. PHENIX Experiment The PHENIX experiment is designed to detect heavy quarkonia at forward rapidity (1.2 < |η| < 2.2) via the µ+µ− decay channel and at mid-rapidity (|η| < 0.35) via the e+e− decaychannel[7]. Atforwardrapiditythemuondetectorsarecomposedofcathode strip tracking chambers in a magnetic field and alternating layers of steel absorber and Iaroccitubeplanes thatallowmuons tobetracked andreconstructed over anacceptance ◦ of ∆φ = 360 . At mid-rapidity the central arm tracking detectors, composed of drift ˇ chambers, ring imaging Cerenkov detectors, and electromagnetic calorimeters, are used ◦ to detect electrons in two arms each covering ∆φ = 90 in azimuth. During the 2005 run of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider the PHENIX experiment sampled 3.8 pb−1 of p+p collisions. From this data set a total of 8000 (1500) J/ψ have been reconstructed in the dimuon (dielectron) channel [8]. 3. Transverse Momentum Dependence of the J/ψ Cross section As shown in Fig. 1, the transverse momentum dependence of the J/ψ cross section can be mapped to 9 GeV/c using the new high statistics data. A comparison of the spectral shapes at mid and forward rapidity reveals that the pT spectrum is softer at forward rapidity. This is likely a result of the increased longitudinal momentum at forward rapidity, consequently there is less energy available in the transverse direction. The spectra are fit with the functional form, A×(1+(pT/B)2)−6, to extract the hp2i. At mid-rapidity hp2i = 4.14 ± 0.18±0.30 (GeV/c)2 and the χ2 per degree of T T 0.20 freedom (χ2/ndf) is 23/19. At forward rapidity hp2i = 3.59±0.06±0.16 (GeV/c)2 and T the χ2/ndf is 28/17. If the exponent in the fit function is allowed be a free fit parameter a slightly better fit is achieved at forward rapidity, χ2/ndf = 20/16, but the hp2i is T not significantly modified, hp2i = 3.68 (GeV/c)2. The previous results from the 2003 T run [9] yielded a significantly lower hp2i at forward rapidity, even though within errors T the pT spectra agree. The increased statistics of the 2005 data allow for an improved understanding of the shape of the pT spectrum due to the extended range in pT and the finer binning at low pT. The 2003 p+p results have been revisited and it was found that the systematic error was underestimated. A reanalysis of the 2003 run d+Au data Heavy Quarkonia Production in p+p Collisions from the PHENIX Experiment 3 s22] [nb/(GeV/c)/dydpBdT 1110100-10-221 GGlloobbaall ssccaallee uunncceerrttaaiinnttyy:: 1100..11%% 222 > [0-5GeV/c] (GeV/c)<p c] (GeV/c)T 246868 pCA+uup++ AC|ACpyuu+|uu˛ |p+P+[y1 A|rC|˛.ey2uul[|i,1< m |P2.y02 .|r|.2,<y3e ]2|05l˛i.m.2[31] 5.|2y,| <20.2.]35 pT 10-3 GeV/ 4 p 1/2 10-4 ||yy||˛<[01..325,2.2]; x10 2> [0-5pT 2 < 0 2 4 6 8 0 100 200 300 p (GeV/c) N T part Figure 1. Left: The J/ψ differential cross section times di-lepton branching ratio versus p at mid and forward rapidity. The vertical error bars are the statistical T and point-to-point uncorrelated error and the boxes are the point-to-point correlated systematic error. The solid lines are the fits [8]. Right: The J/ψ hp2i truncated at 5 T GeV/c plotted versus N in p+p, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions [8, 10, 11]. part is underway to determine how this effects the interpretation of that data set. A comparison of the hp2i found in p+p collisions with that found in Au+Au and T Cu+Cu collisions as a function of centrality is shown in Fig. 1 [10, 8, 11]. Because the heavy ion pT spectra only extend to 5 GeV/c the calculation of the hp2Ti is truncated at 5 GeV/c for all data sets. Good agreement is found between the peripheral heavy ion data and the p+p measurements. 4. Rapidity Dependence of the J/ψ Cross section The rapidity dependence of the J/ψ cross section has been mapped over the range −2.2 < y < 2.2, Fig. 2. The data exhibit a slight flattening over the rapidity range |y| < 1.5. However, the systematic errors on the mid and forward rapidity points are independent, thus a narrower distribution is not excluded. A comparison of the shape of the distribution with various parton distribution functions and model calculations [6, 12, 13] shows that many of the models, including the perturbative QCD approach involving 3-gluonmechanisms, areinconsistent withthesteepness oftheslopeatforward rapidity and the slight flattening observed at mid-rapidity. 5. Other Quarkonia In addition to the J/ψ, the PHENIX detector has the capability of measuring the Υ, χc ′ and ψ quarkonia states in p+p collisions. Preliminary PHENIX measurements of the Υ as a function of rapidity and collision energy are available [14]. The analysis of the ′ χc and ψ states is still ongoing. The 2006 p+p run provides a factor of 3 improvement in the statistics available for these measurements and the results will be forthcoming. Heavy Quarkonia Production in p+p Collisions from the PHENIX Experiment 4 b) 4600 Global scale uncertainty: 10.1% b) 4600 Global scale uncertainty: 10.1% n n y ( y ( d d s/d JJ//yy -->> mm ++mm -- s/d JJ//yy -->> mm ++mm -- B20 JJ//yy -->> ee++ee-- B20 JJ//yy -->> ee++ee-- PPyytthhiiaa -- GGRRVV9988LLOO NNRRQQCCDD -- MMRRSSTTHHOO PPyytthhiiaa -- GGRRVV9944HHOO xx ssccaalliinngg NNRRQQCCDD -- CCTTEEQQ55MM FF gg((gggg))++ FFeeeedd--ddoowwnn NNRRQQCCDD -- CCTTEEQQ66MM ss 0 0 -2 0 2 -2 0 2 y y Figure 2. J/ψ crosssectioninp+pcollisionsasafunctionofrapidity[8]plottedwith variouspartondistributionfunctionsandmodelcalculationsforcomparison[6,12,13]. 6. Summary With the existing high statistics data the PHENIX experiment has entered an era of precision J/ψ measurements. The p+p data exhibit several features that provide challenges for production models. The pT spectrum has been measured over the range 0 < pT < 9 GeV/c and is softer at forward rapidity than at mid-rapidity. Furthermore, an improved assessment of the J/ψ hp2i is possible with the 2005 data set and good T agreement is found between the peripheral heavy ion data and the p+p measurements. The J/ψ cross section as a function of rapidity is slightly flat and falls off rapidly at forward rapidity. This behavior is not well reproduced by the available model calculations. FuturePHENIXdatawillshedlightontheseprocessesandopenadditional exciting avenues of quarkonia measurements. References [1] R. Baier et al., Phys. Lett. B102, 364 (1981). [2] F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 572 (1997); [3] G. T. Bodwin et al., Phys. Rev. D51, 1125 (1995); erratum Phys. Rev. D55, 5853 (1997). [4] J. K. Mizukoshi, SLAC-PUB-8296,hep-ph/9911384(1999). [5] R. Gavai et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10, 3043 (1995). [6] V. A. Khoze et al. , Eur. Phys. J. C39, 163 (2005). [7] K. Adcox et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A499, 469 (2003). [8] A. Adare et al., hep-ex/0611020(2006). [9] S. S. Adler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 012304(2006). [10] A. Adare et al., nucl-ex/0611020(2006). [11] H. Pereira Da Costa, Nucl. Phys. A774, 747 (2006). [12] R. Vogt, Heavy-Ion Phys. 25, 97 (2006) and private communication. [13] E. L. Bratkovskayaet al., Phys. Rev. C67, 054905(2003). [14] M. Leitch, J. Phys. G32, S391 (2006).

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.