Nota lepid. 17 (1/2) 45-52 30.XI.1994 ISSN 0342-7536 : ; Geographical variation in wing pattern of Micropterix maschukella Alphéraky, 1876 (Lepidoptera Micropterigidae) : Michail V. Kozlov LaboratoryofEcologicalZoology,DepartmentofBiology,UniversityofTurku,FIN-20500Turku, Finland Summary Five discrete types of forewing pattern can be found within populations of Micropterixmaschukella Alphéraky. In Lagodekhi, Eastern Georgia, frequen- cies ofwing pattern types were the same for males and females no differences ; were found between the two study years. The frequency of wing pattern type was therefore considered to be a population specific character and was used to study geographical variation. Phenetic resemblances of 15 samples from the Crimea and Caucasus correspond in general to the spatial proximities ofthe samplingsites. Three geographicallyconsistentunits were distinguished : northern (Crimea and Krasnodar district), south-western and eastern. A clear allopatric differentiation within the species was found, but there was no corre- spondingvariation in the male genitalia. Résumé Parmi les populations de Micropterix maschukella Alphéraky, on trouve cinq A types discrets de dessin des ailes antérieures. Lagodekhi, Géorgie orientale, la fréquence des types de dessins des ailes est la même pour les mâles et les femelles on n'a pas trouvé de différences entre les deux années de l'étude. ; Lafréquence des types de dessin des ailes a donc été considérée comme carac- téristique des populations et utilisée pour étudier la variation géographique. Les ressemblances phénétiques de 15 échantillons de Crimée et du Caucase correspondent en général aux proximités spatiales des sites des échantillons. Trois unités géographiques consistantes ont été distinguées : nord (Crimée et région de Krasnodar), sud-ouest et est. On a constaté une nette différenciation allopatrique dans cette espèce, mais pas de variation correspondante dans les genitaliamâles. Zusammenfassung In Populationen von Micropterix maschukella Alphéraky lassen sich fünf Typen der Vorderflügelzeichnung unterscheiden. In Lagodekhi, Ost-Georgien, 45 werden diese Zeichnungsmuster-Typen bei Männchen und Weibchen mit glei- cherrelativerHäufigkeitbeobachtet zwischendenbeidenUntersuchungsjahren ; gab es hierbei keine Unterschiede. Die relativen Häufigkeiten der Zeichnungs- muster-Typen wurden daher als populationsspezifisch betrachtet und als Maß fürgeographischeVariabilitätverwendet. Das Erscheinungsbildvon 15 Sammel- probenvonder Krimund aus dem Kaukasus läßtsich im allgemeinem mit den räumlichen Abstand der Fundpunkte in Beziehung setzen. Drei geographische Bereiche lassen sich unterscheiden ein nördlicher (die Krim und die Gegend : von Krasnodar), ein südwestlicher und ein östlicher. Innerhalb der Art wurde eine deutliche allopatrische Differenzierungfestgestellt, die aber nicht mit einer entsprechenden Variation der männlichen Genitalien verbunden ist. Introduction The contrasting wing pattern is typical for almost all of the approx. 70 species ofthe Palaearctic genus Micropterix Hübner [1825] (Heath, 1987). Wing pattern characteristics are widely used in determination keys (Razowski, 1975; Zagulajev, 1978; Kozlov, 1988; 1989; 1990a Whitebread, 1992), and they are of critical importance for ; the identification of females, whose genitalia are very poor in specific characters. However, variation of wing pattern characteristics has not been studied in this genus and the absence of knowledge of the extent of interpopulation and geographical variation has sometimes caused taxonomic problems. mm The small (about 8-10 wing expanse) day-active irridescent moth Micropterix maschukella Alphéraky is widely distributed and very abundant in the Crimea and Caucasus. In Eastern Georgia the moths emerge at the beginning of May in the valleys at the altitudes 1500- m ; 1700 the last specimens were observed in late July. The moths feed on the pollen of several plant species, usually on elder (Sambucus nigra L.) and Philadelphus caucasicus Koehne. Sometimes they also visit flowers ofRubus spp. and Rosa spp. (pers. obs.). The investigation of wing pattern variation has been prompted by the description of a new species, Micropterix maritimella (Zagulajev, 1983) based on females originatingfrom the population ofM. maschukella in Gantiadi, Abkhasia, which I had studied for some years. Material and methods The study consisted oftwo parts intrapopulation variationwas investi- : gated in Lagodekhi Natural Reserve (Georgia, formerly the U.S.S.R. ; 41°50' N, 46°20' E) geographicalvariationwas studied from specimens ; 46 collected by the author and those kept in the Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia. Moths were sampled from inflorescences of host plants by net and im- mediately anaesthetised by chloroform. Each sample was characterized by frequencies of moths with different wing pattern (see Figs 1-5) ; males and females were recorded separately. In total, about 5,500 moths were thus investigated. Samples were compared by chi-square test or, if the sample size was very small, by the non-parametric lambda criterion. Diversity (u) was calculated according to Zhivotovsky (1982) : v = vSù2 , = where Pi is the frequency ofthe /th type ofwing pattern (i 1...5). The presence of geographical variation was tested by G-statistic for hetero- geneity ofproportions (Gabriel & Sokal, 1969). Pairwise similarity R — k,l ^iVPikPil based on the ratio of frequencies (p^ of all the wing pattern types (i) in populations under comparison (k and (Zhivotovsky, 1982) was 1) calculated for all samples involved in the study similarity matrix was ; clustered on the base of mean arithmetic unweighed estimations of the similarity between clades. Results Wingpattern variation The general appearance of the golden pattern in M. maschukella includes two bands (basal and medial) and a subapical spot, sharply distinguished from the cupreous-brownish background. Five discrete types of forewing pattern were found. The first type has a large, almost rectangular subapical gold spot laying along the costal margin of the wing (Fig. 1). The second type differs from the first by having a small dark spot within this gold spot (Fig. 2). In both the third and fourth type there are two spots (small costal and large subapical) on the costal edge. These two types differ in the form of the subapical spot, which has its maximum width either at the costal margin (type 3, Fig. 3), or towards the centre of the wing (type 4, Fig. 4). The 5th type differs from the 4th due to the absence of the costal spot ; the large subapical spot is usually not connected to the costal edge of the wing (Fig. 5), although there are some exceptions. 47 mm 1 Figs 1-5. Thefive types (numbers 1-5) offorewingpattern ofM. maschukella. The two bands, although variable in form and width, did not show any clearly recognizable types. The right and left wings of the moth usually have the same type of wing pattern. However, 30.6% of specimens collected in Lagodekhi 1989 and 28.7% in 1990 were asymmetrical. But if the pattern of the right and left wing varies independently, the expected number of asym- metrical moths would be significantly (about 2 times) higher than ionbs1e9r9v0ed: e(xipnec1t9e8d95:6e.x9p%e,ctGed=6249.10.%9,,dGf==1,79P9.<1,0d.0f00=1).1,IPn s<pit0e.o0f00t1he; high percentage of asymmetrical specimens, some genetic background ofwing pattern types is assumed. But even ifthe variation is phenotypic only, it does not affect the conclusions ofthe present study. 48 1. Krasnolesye 2. Jalta X 4. Alushta 6. Crimsk 3. Gursuf 5. Staryi Crim c 7. Gorjatchyi Kljuch 8. Gantiadi 12. Sukhumi 14. Nalchik 13. Besengi 15. Lagodekhi 9. Tkvarcheli 10. Kobuleti 11. Borshomi 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Fig. 6. Dendrogram based on the similarity between samples of M. maschukella in wingpatternfrequency. In spite of the very low (about 10%) proportion of males in samples obtained from the inflorescences of elder in Lagodekhi, I succeeded in obtaining samples of 15-25 males from six local populations dif- = ; ferences between sexes appeared to be non-significant (lambda 0.04- 1.10). Differences between samples obtained in Lagodekhi in 1989 and 1990 from the same local populations were also not significant. Thus, I concluded that the frequencies of wing pattern types are relatively stable in time, and therefore the samples collected in different years can be compared when studying geographical variation. To increase the sample size, males and females were pooled when counting wing pattern frequencies. Geographicalvariation The 15 localities inthe Crimeaand Caucasus, significantlyheterogeneous inwingpatternfrequencies (n= 5242, G= 1383.6, df= 52, P < 0.0001), were included inthe analysis. Clustering ofthe similarity matrix showed that the phenetic resemblances of samples correspond in general to their spatial proximities (Fig. 6). Three geographically consistent units were distinguished northern (Crimea and Krasnodar district), south- : western and eastern (Fig. 7). 49 80r% 60 40Il 20 "13 5 morphs X J, _ Nalchik _ otchi JiAiil k ix? ^J 3\*^ „D Sukhumi^l2 JcJ" 11 \ 15 —100 km 1 ^Byatumi 11 »Tbilisi iFnigt.he7.CGreiomgeraapahnidcaCla—uvcaarsiuast.ionLoci=anliwtiinegs :pa1t—ternK—rfarsenqouleenscyiees(s=oafmpMl.e msiazsecnhu=ke—l94l,amAoltphhs. (conl—l=ect7e2d,in1918938)4); ;52— SJatla=trayi(nCri5m4,(n198=3—)3;6,3 191G3u)r;su6f=—(n Cr6i0m,s1k98(5n) ;=—4 36,Al1u9s90h)ta; 7 =Gorjatchyi Kljuc—h (n 22, 1988)=; 8 Gantiadi (n— 42, 1978) ; 9 = Tkvarcheli (1n2 — 1S4u,k—h19u8m0i) (;n1=0 26,K1o9=b8u0l)et;i13(n— Be6s6e,ng1i97(3n)=; 1710, 198B9o)r;s1h4om—i N(nalchi4k6,(n1=8985)4,; i1n98F9i)g.;61.5GroLuapgsodofekphoipu(lnatio4n55:0,A1—990n)o.rCtohnetronu;rBsc—oreraesstpeornnd;tCot—hescoluutshte-rwsesitdeerntni.fied Samples from the northern group demonstrated the lowest observed intrapopulation diversity (coefficient of diversity u < 2.5) about 90% ; of individuals belonged to the fourth type of wing pattern. This group was heterogeneous (n = 416, G = 59.4, df = 28, P < 0.0005) because ofthe most southern sample (from Gantiadi), which had an intermediate ratio of wing pattern types. If this sample is excluded from the consi- deration, the northern group becomes homogeneous in relation to wing pattern frequencies (n = 374, G = 28.3, df= 24, P < 0.251). Both the south-western and eastern groups are significantly hetero- geneous (n = 126, G = 30.1, df = 8, P < 0.0005, and n = 4700, G = 168.2, df = 12, P < 0.0001, respectively), and more diverse than = the northern one (u 3.5-4.5). In the south-western group the pattern number five was most abundant, in contrast to the eastern group where the second and fourth types had highest frequencies. The small number of localities being compared did not allow investigation of the geo- graphical variation ofwing pattern within these groups. 50 Discussion Like leafminers ofthefamily Nepticulidae (Menken, 1990), M. maschu- kella bear characteristics which appear to facilitate rapid speciation : they occur in small isolated populations, the detritophagous cater- pillars and pollen-eating adults have only a few (if any) competitors, and their food resources are highly predictable. But, in contrast to sympatric speciation in Nepticulidae and Yponomeutidae (Menken, 1990 Menken et al, 1992), Micropterigidae demonstrate mostly geo- ; graphical (allopatric) differentiation. No differences in genitalic structure were found between males of M. maschukella with different wing patterns, or between local populations in Lagodekhi area and between populations from different geographical groups (Kozlov, 1990b and unpublished data). According to the re- cognition concept of species argued by Paterson (1985), this may be due to visual recognition of the opposite sex in this moth species. In this respect M. maschukella is similar to butterflies, which often de- monstrate strict interspecific differentiation in wing pattern features, while male genitalia are quite similar, i.e. in the genus Erebia Dalm. (Warren, 1936). Thus, the data obtained showed clear allopatric differentiation within the species, which, however, demonstrated no corresponding variation in male genitalia structure. It is possible that a complex of subspecies or even sibling species may exist under the name Micropterix maschu- kella, but at the present level of knowledge the differentiation in wing pattern is not sufficient to ascribe a taxonomic rank to geographically separated populations. Acknowledgements I am very grateful to V. Pavliashvili and all the staff ofthe Lagodekhi reserve for their hospitality during my stay in Georgia. I am greatly indebted to M. Motorkin for his assistance in collecting the moths, E. Zvereva for fruitful discussion, E. Haukioja, N. P. Kristensen, M. R. McClure and T. Vuorisalo for their helpful comments and improvement of the text. The work was sup- ported by the Plant Protection Institute (St. Petersburg, Russia) and the University ofTurku Foundation (Finland). References Gabriel, K. R. & Sokal, R. R., 1969. A new statistical approach to geo- graphicvariation analysis. Syst. Zool 18 259-278. : 51 Heath, J., 1987. A check list ofthe genus Micropterix Hübner, [1825] (Lepi- doptera Zeugloptera, Micropterigidae). Entomologist's Gaz. 38 205-207. : : Kozlov, M. V., 1988. Short review and key for determination of Micropterix Hbn. (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae) species of the Palaearctic. 1. Mor- phological description and results of investigation of Dr. H. G.Amsel type material. Vest. Zool. 1988 (4) : 8-14. [In Russian] Kozlov, M. V., 1989. Short review and key for determination of Micropterix Hbn. (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae) species of the Palaearctic. 2. Key for determination [pt 1]. Vest. Zool. 1989 (6) : 26-31. [In Russian] Kozlov, M.V., 1990. Short review and key for determination of Micropterix Hbn. (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae) species of the Palaearctic. 3. Key for determination [pt 2]. Vest. Zool. 1990 (2) : 21-26. [In Russian] Kozlov, M. V., 1990b. Variation of Micropterix maschukella Alph. (Lepi- doptera, Micropterigidae) in local populations ofAbkhasia and Eastern Georgia. In Problemy sovremennoi biologii [Problems of modern biology], pp. 29-33. VINITI, Moscow (Dep. No. 641-B90). [In Russian] Menken, S. B. J., 1990. Population structure and evolution in sexual and parthenogenetic leafmining moths (Lepidoptera, Nepticulidae) why so : little speciation? Symp. Biol. Hung. 39 : 349-353. Menken, S. B. J., Herrebout, W. M. & Wiebes, J. T., 1992. Small ermine moths (Yponomeuta) their host relations and evolution. A. Rev. Ent. : 37 41-66. : Paterson, H. E. H., 1985. The recognition concept ofspecies. In Vrba, E. S. (Ed.) : Species and speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4, pp. 21-29. Pretoria. Razowski,J., 1975. Motyle(Lepidoptera) Polski, II. Homoneura. Monografie fauny Polski5 1-96. : Warren, B. C. S., 1936. Monograph of the genus Erebia. 407 p. + 104 pi. London. Whitebread, S.E., 1992. The Micropterigidae of Switzerland, with a key to their identification. Nota lepid. Suppl. 4 129-143. : Zagulajev, A. K., 1978. Fam. Micropterigidae. In Medvedev, G. S. (Ed.) : Key for determination of insects of the European part of the U.S.S.R. 4 (1), pp. 40-43. Leningrad. Zagulajev, A. K. 1983. New and little known species of moth families Tineidae, Micropterigidae and Pterophoridae(Lepidoptera) ofthe USSR and adjacent countries. Ent. Obozr. 62 106-122. [In Russian] : Zhivotovsky, L. A., 1982. Population characteristics based on polymorphic traits. In Fenetica populjatsij [Phenetic of populations], pp. 38-44. Moscow. [In Russian] 52