ebook img

Francesco Paolucci, PhD.* John Armstrong, Wynandvan de Ven PDF

46 Pages·2011·1.1 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Francesco Paolucci, PhD.* John Armstrong, Wynandvan de Ven

Risk equalisation in voluntary health insurance markets: a three country comparison Francesco Paolucci, PhD.* John Armstrong, Wynandvan de Ven, Heather McLeod *Research Fellow, ACERH, The Australian National University Adjunct Lecturer, iBMG, Erasmus University Rotterdam [email protected] THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Special Issue in ‘Health Policy’ Outline: 1. Editorial: „Risk equalisation in voluntary health insurance markets‟ (Armstrong, Paolucci, van de Ven); 2. „Risk equalisation and voluntary health insurance markets: The case of Australia‟ (Connelly, Paolucci, Butler, Collins); 3. „Risk equalisation and voluntary health insurance in Ireland‟ (Armstrong); 4. „Risk equalisation in the South African voluntary health insurance market‟ (McLeod, Grobler); 5. Risk equalisation in voluntary health insurance markets: a three country comparison. Agenda 1. Overview of health financing in the 3- countries; 2. Voluntary private health insurance (VPHI) and risk-equalisation (RE) in the 3- countries; 3. Conclusions and discussion. Part 1. Overview of health financing in the 3-countries Australia (1)  Mix of public-private financing & deliveryof health services: • Public health insurance (Medicare, 1984). (68% of THE). • Out-of-pocket payments. (24% of THE). • Competitive VPHI. (8% of THE). Australia (2)  Medicare (1984): • Tax funded universal mandatory coverage; • „Free‟ treatment as a public patient in a public hospital; • Subsidies for private medical services (Medicare Benefits Schedule) and pharmaceuticals (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme). Australia (3)  Competitive VPHI: • Supplementary coverage for (parts of) the costs of services not covered by Medicare (e.g. hospital charges levied by private hospitals); • Duplicate coverage for the costs of services (partly) covered by Medicare; • Non-substitutive; • Individual-based insurance;  Out-of-pocket payments: • VPHI-Deductibles, POS-copayments. Ireland (1)  Public/private mix of funding & delivery of healthcare (almost identical to Australia): - Tax-funded public health insurance scheme; - VPHI market; - Out of pocket expenditures. Ireland (2)  VPHI marketcommenced in 1957 with establishment of Vhi Healthcare & provides: • Duplicative coverage to universal entitlement of public hospitals*; • Substitutive GP-care coverage for non- Medical Card holders; • Supplementary coverage. • Employer based schemes (60%) or directly by individuals. South Africa (1)  Public/private financing & delivery of healthcare: Public sector (40% of THE) Private sector (60% of THE) Universal tax-funded with allocated budgets for VPHI market (1889) known as „medical public healthcare facilities. schemes‟ since 1967 covering on a voluntary basis 15% of the population (i.e. high-income groups) 64% of the population depends on it for all A further 21% of the population use private conventional healthcare services GP and pharmacies on OOP-basis and for the rest relies on the public scheme Salaried staff FFS Care is virtually „free‟ at the point of service for Deductibles and copayments unemployed and low-income people (e.g. user charges with exemption policies)

Description:
THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Francesco Paolucci, PhD.* John Armstrong, Wynandvan de Ven, Heather McLeod *Research Fellow, ACERH, The Australian National University
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.