TECHNOLOTGEYC THRNANOSLFOERG: FYU TNDRAAMNESNFTEARL :P IRNINNCOIPVLEAST AINVDE I SNONOLUVATTIIOVEN TSE ICNH NMICEADLI SCOILNUETIONS, 2018 1. Introduction FORMATION OF A TEAM OF PROJECT So, development of the me- Efficiency increasing of func- thodic tools complex which will EXECUTORS IN THE AREA OF CREATION tioning of high-tech enterprises provide improvement of reliabil- AVIATION TECHNIQUES which includes aviation profile ity of management of high-tech enterprise foresees the problem Olena Feoktystova projects on aviation profile en- solving of team formation by PhD1 terprises [8–10] as the part of colleagues whose level of com- [email protected] human resource management petences will provide effective by reduction of the level of un- realization of high-tech project Nastasia Rovinska certainty actual is a scientific on the one side. But on the other PhD1 problem. The decision of this hand, it carries out the rational [email protected] problem will improve efficacy distribution of human resource 1Department of Management of process of formation of team with purpose of the efficient National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute" composition of executors of realization of the all portfolio 17 Chkalova str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070 high-tech projects during ob- projects of the aviation profile jects creation of new technique Abstract: In the article there is analyzed the present condition enterprise [1]. In this article there at the expense of using of the of the problem of high-tech project management to develop are described results of model internal reserve of the aviation the new objects by the aviation profile enterprises. The anal- development and methods of profile enterprise. yses showed that for improvement of the efficiency of port- support decision making of HR folio management it should be developed special methodic and project managers to forma- 2. Methods tools of decision support system by HR and Project managers tion of team executors composi- During the research it was about executors’ composition forming of high-tech projects tion of high-tech projects on the proposed integrated process taking into account number of indicators of different charac- aviation profile enterprise. model for regulation of process ter and first of all employee competence. Specifics of the high-tech of formation of team executors Based on the analyzed results the integrated process model projects define the necessity of of high-tech projects on aviation was developed which described the main stages of team for- number of special methods ap- profile enterprise. At the begin- mation of high-tech projects executors. There is formation pliance, which based on the prin- ning of the process there are lists of expert committee of employees of aviation profile enter- ciples of competence approach at of pretenders on including to the prises for the choice of rational variant of team composition the pretenders’ choice on the in- project team and as the output is from the several alternatives; estimation of the candidates’ cluding to the team of high-tech formed project team. The pro- competencies level for the including to the high-tech project project [2, 3]. The latest years in cess of team formation is intend team, the communication level assessment of the future team Ukraine and abroad there were of realization of the next stages: participants, selection by the collective expert estimation, published a lot of papers con- formation of the requirements united variant of executive team of high-tech project. This ducted to the problem of efficien- to pretenders; formation of the model provides increasing of the level of objectivity of finally cy increasing in functioning of base of pretenders; estimation of decision about composition of team executors of high-tech high-tech projects using compe- personal qualities and level of project unlike other famous models. Practical value of pro- tence approach. competences of pretenders based posed model is in decreasing of the risks of incorrect decision The decision of indicated on the competency approach; making by HRs and project managers during the process of problem is impossible without estimation of communication formation of team executors of high-tech project. objective accounting of different opportunities of pretenders on Based on developed methodical tools, in the article there points of view of specialists-ex- including in team of high-tech is described process of formation of team executors of perts, whose knowledge and ex- project with using of fuzzy logic high-tech project on the typical aviation profile enterprises perience were formed by long- by the way of pair wise compar- PF “Space”. This company is specialized on development of terms work on organization and ison of cooperation opportunity realization high-tech projects on airdrome techniques in particular self-propelled passenger by pretenders within the frame- the aviation profile enterprises. ladder. Also in this article there are described methods and work of one team; formation of Several last years there were pub- computation effect from integration of theoretical results into alternative variants of project lished science works, so like as the practice of management by the high-tech projects on the team composition from selected [4–6], which describe ways of aviation profile enterprises. candidates; receiving of individ- construction of special theory of Practice value of received results is in creation of science me- ual experts evaluations by alter- multicriteria decision making in thodic basis in aggregate models view and methods of deci- natives; estimation of the extent conditions of uncertainty based sion making support of HR and project managers for the for- consistency of results of collec- on the utility theory. Applica- mation of team executors’ composition of high-tech projects. tive expert review and according tion of this approach defines of These results can be used in portfolio management not only of level of consensus of experts necessity of addition of existent on the aviation profile enterprises but in any other innovation evaluation is apply method by methodic by special stages for companies. Dempster-Shafer (in case of ab- the forming of executors’ team of Keywords: aviation profile enterprises, high-tech project, solutely original alternatives) or high-tech projects. On these stag- competency-oriented assessment, complex process model. method of Dezert-Smarandache es it will be collection of experts’ (in case of single identity of dif- information, it analyses and pro- ferent alternatives). The process cessing with purpose of improve efficacy of decision objectivity of team formation involves argumentations base foundation which are made about pretenders’ selection on including to the with using of rough set theory about changes in experts’ commis- team of high-tech project and also formation of executors’ team [7]. sion composition if the results of their activity will be negative. 52 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING For the formation of generalized evaluation of experts’ and estimations of the compatibility level. If the experts’ evi- commission activity results about choice of variants of team dences are separate (untied) then recast of experts commission. executors’ compound of high-tech project. 6. Depending to level of compatibility of the experts’ evi- Theoretical base for this is the chain of several special the- dences applies by the Dempster combining rule or following ories. There is evidence theory by Dempster-Shafer, theory of of the conjunctive consensus basis on the Dezert-Smarandache plausible and paradoxical reasoning by Dezert-Smarandache combining rule. and rough set theory. 7. Calculation of the overall scale X by thetotal result of gee Let’s consider that experts’ evidence presents in numerical commission work. with using of absolutely scale. Then in formalization view the So method of formation of the overall scale of estimation of procedure of receiving generalized result of experts’ work can composition variants of team executors of high-tech project on be described in the next interpretation: the aviation profile enterprises was synthesized. The method includes three types of situations in experts’ commission work, x11 x12 … x1j … x1n X1 wsishteenn tt ohre uanssteiesdsm. ents of individual experts are agreed or con- … … … … … … …     For the precision (efficacy) definition of the total estimating (X )=x x … x … x  ⇒ X  ⇒ X , (1) of experts; commission of composition of high-tech project ij  i1 i2 ij in  j gee … … … … … … ⇑ … ⇑ there were used an approach which is based in calculation of xm1 xm2 … xmj … xmn[p1]Xm[p2] rdeelxia wbihliitcyh i nch tahrea cfoterrmiz eosf “qturaulnitcya toefd s mtrueacntu”.r aTthioant iat nsdo cfoalllloewd iinng- aggregation of estimates which received by the expert’s commis- where is the each element x of the matrix X is marked of the sion. Mean-square error of the truncated mean is: ij ij i-experts by the j-variant of team executors by high-tech project (i=1,…, m; j=1,…, n); e = SS(a) , (2) T(a) (n−2g)(n−2g−1) X ={x ,x ,...,x,...,x } j 1 2 j m where n – the data sample size which assesses; the value of g is aggregated of experts’ personal evaluations by j-variant; X definition by the ratio g=[αn]; [αn] – the largest integer among gee is generalized experts’ evaluation; [p] is operator of processing values of sample; SS(a) – sum of squares of deviations. i by the experts personal evaluations which is ordered a set of The feature of this approach is that the mean-square error of methods for collective expert assessment. the truncated mean depends of evaluable data sample size (the Procedure realization is provided for implementation of the bigger sample size, the less mean-square error). Mean-square next steps: error measures in the same units that standard deviation. So 1. The formation of the commission of experts the less value of the mean-square error is more effective and more precision to estimate truncated mean and accordingly the Ε={E |j=1,m}. quality of collective experts’ estimation of alternative variants of j high-tech project team. 2. Set presentation Α={A |i=1,n} to the members of ex- i perts commission and receiving of the set of personal experts’ 3. Results assessments In the researching process there were developed several methodology tools which raise the effective of process of for- X ={x ,x ,...,x,...,x }. mation of project team consisting on establishment of objects of j 1 2 j m new techniques on aviation enterprise type. 3. The check of set X on consensus in personal experts’ as- The calculation of efficiency of these methods was realized j sessments. If the number of experts is not more than two, then on the example of creation of new model of self-propelled pas- level of consensus estimates like a coefficient of Spearman’s senger ramp SPT-154 on the typical enterprise of the aviation rank correlation. Otherwise the level of consensus estimates like type PF “Space”. a coefficient of Candel-Smith concordance. By the results of the analyze of the staff PF “Space” taking 4. If the level of consensus by the personal assessments is into account employment of the staff were formed the team of admissible, then the calculation of the overall scale by the value the 7 people Ε={E |i=1,7}, whose qualities gave opportunity i averaging of set elements to realize estimation of variants alternative of team composition of developers of mooring complex equipment. Theoretically ex- X ={x ,x ,...,x,...,x } perts can be not only company employees but involved experts, j 1 2 j m too if the TOP-management of the company will find this way basis on Cemen’s median advisable. In progress of experts’ commission work there were nec- l essary to estimate the alternatives which were formed by HR Arg min∑d(a,a). a i=1 i Ai∈K, i=1,12 or found the best alternative groups { } 5. If the level of consensus of the personal experts assess- X = A |i=1,s , s≤12, X ⊆K. k i k ments is insufficiently then passes of alternatives ranking After that it was defined the level of privileges in the frame R :{A (cid:27)A (cid:27)…(cid:27)A (cid:27)…(cid:27)A }∨ tot 1 2 j n of the given scale according to each of other alternatives of team ∨{A (cid:27)A ~A (cid:27)…(cid:27)A ~A (cid:27)…(cid:27)A } composition of developers of mooring complex (at the set K). 1 2 3 j−1 j n 53 TECHNOLOTGEYC THRNANOSLFOERG: FYU TNDRAAMNESNFTEARL :P IRNINNCOIPVLEAST AINVDE I SNONOLUVATTIIOVEN TSE ICNH NMICEADLI SCOILNUETIONS, 2018 In the result of experts’ interview were found groups of mate of experts were found similar and agreed and that’s why alternative X ⊆K from the set K and it was defined level of the most reliable. The results were received by the ranking and k privileges found groups of alternative (Table 1). clustering of the expert’s estimations. Table 1 4. Discussion The value of the measures of the average level of assessments of the options The calculation of efficiency of developed meth- for the composition of the mooring complex equipment of development ods was realized on the example of creation of moor- team considered by the expert committee ing complex equipment for the SPT-154, at the same Index of Alternative variants of the team composition time was used the method of α – truncated mean. expert’s Calculation gave opportunity to choose variant of estimation A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 team composition developers of mooring complex equipment from 12 alternative variants with the big- α– truncated 37 50,8 56,2 40,4 42,8 52,3 81,9 64,1 50,1 50,5 57,2 42,8 gest value of reliability function. Applying of designed mean results had improved of reliability of evidence base for person, which makes decision about the ratification of The value of α – truncated mean which described in the the final team composition of developers of mooring complex Table 1 gave opportunity to define the variant of team A such equipment due to consecutive reduce of the level of uncertain- 3 as most advisable, because only of this cluster inside the esti- ty in the aspects of imperfection, fuzziness and inaccuracy. References 1. Sobchak, A., Shostak, E., Tseplyaeva, T., Popova, O., Firsova, A. (2016). Designing an approach to building the teams of high technological projects performers at virtual instrument-making enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technol- ogies, 3 (2 (81)), 47–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71493 2. Zimnyaya, I. A. (2003). Klyuchevye kompetencii – novaya paradigma rezul’tata obrazovaniya. Vysshee obrazovanie segod- nya, 5, 34–42. 3. Kibanov, A. Ya. et. al. (2014). Koncepciya kompetentnostnogo podhoda v upravlenii personalom. Moscow: NIC INFRA-M, 156. 4. Archibal’d, R.; Bazhenov, A. D., Aref’ev, A. O. (Eds.) (2004). Upravlenie vysokotekhnologichnymi programmami i proektami. Moscow: Kompaniya AyTi; DMK Press, 472. 5. Gavva, V. N. (2004). Ocenka potenciala predpriyatiya i otrasli. Kharkiv: KhAI, 287. 6. Rovinska, N. Yu., Vykhodets, Yu. S. (2016). Method of decision making in project scope management. Systemy upravlinnia, navihatsiyi ta zviazku, 4 (40), 108–113. 7. Shostak, E. I. (2015). Forming teams of performers on innovative high-tech projects enterprises using expert assessment sce- narios. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriya: Mekhaniko-tekhnolohichni systemy ta kompleksy, 36 (1145), 57–63. 8. Il’ina, E. P. (2007). Ocenka i ispol’zovanie pokazateley kachestva ekspertnogo resheniya problemy. Problemy programmiro- vaniya, 1, 38–49. 9. Beshelev, S. D., Gurvich, F. G. (1974). Matematiko-statisticheskie metody ekspertnyh ocenok. Moscow: Statistika, 159. 10. Margolin, E. (2006). Metodika obrabotki dannyh ekspertnogo oprosa. Poligrafiya, 5, 14–16. 54