Fermi AGN: Open Questions and Looking Forward Lukasz Stawarz KIPAC/SLAC Stanford University Special thanks to R.D. Blandford, as well as to my Fermi colleagues C.C. Cheung, J. Kataoka, G. Madejski, and D. Paneque, for many discussions. Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) • AGN activity is powered by the enhanced accretion unto supermassive black holes (SMBHs) residing in galaxy centers. As such, AGN enable us to study the extreme physics of SMBHs, their accretion disks, and their surrounding media. • AGN activity is triggered by galaxy mergers/interactions. As such, AGN activity is directly linked to the structure formation in the Universe. But AGN are not only passive witnesses/by-products of galaxy formation! Outflows, jets, and high-energy radiation produced in AGN may substantially influence the surrounding (galactic and intergalactic) medium, modifying therefore the structure formation itself via some complex feedback process. Studying how AGN evolve with redshift is therefore important for understanding cosmological evolution of galaxies in general. • AGN are established sources of broad-band electromagnetic emission, and the high-energy γ-ray photons in particular. Maximum energies of ultrarelativistic particles produced thereby exceed by orders of magnitude maximum energies accessible in our accelerators. As such, AGN enable us to study fundamental properties of subatomic particles, cosmic-ray acceleration, and the physics of ionized collisionless magnetized plasma, which is not accessible in our laboratories, but which constitutes a significant part of the baryonic Universe. I. AGN Zoo AGN come in many many flavors… They differ in the properties of their large-scale environments, in the properties of their host galaxies, in the accretion rates and accretion fuels, in the structure and state of the circumnuclear matter, and finally in the properties of their outflows: • Quasi-Stellar Objects (quasars or QSOs; ~ 10-7 Mpc-3) Radio-quiet quasars (RQQs) Radio-loud quasars (RLQs) Flat Spectrum vs Steep Spectrum Radio Quasars (FSRQs vs SSRQs) • BL Lacertae Objects (BL Lacs; ~ 10-7 Mpc-3) • Radio Galaxies (RGs; ~ 10-6 Mpc-3) Broad Line vs Narrow Line Radio Galaxies (BLRGs vs NLRGs) Fanaroff Riley class I vs class II (FR Is vs FR IIs) - but not only! WATs, NATs, XRGs, DDRGs, HYMORS, GPS/CSOs, CSS/MSOs… • Seyfert Galaxies (Sys; ~ 10-4 Mpc-3) Type 1 Seyferts - Type 2 Seyferts (Sy 1s - Sy 2s) Narrow-Line Seyferts (NLSys) • Low-Luminosity AGN (LLAGN; > 10-3 Mpc-3) Low-Ionization Nuclear Emission-Line Region Galaxies (LINERs) “Regular” Spiral Galaxies… AGN Unification GENERAL OPEN QUESTIONS: What controls the observed diversity of AGN? Is our current understanding of the AGN unification sufficiently good? Why only some AGN are radio loud? What controls jet production efficiency in different types of AGN? Urry & Padovani Unification Scheme(s) • anisotropic obscuration of a nuclear emission (Sy 1s  Sy 2s) • relativistic beaming of a jet emission (FSRQs/BL Lacs  SSRQs  BLRGs  NLRGs/FR Is) • accretion rate (QSOs/FR IIs  BL Lac/FR Is) • black hole mass (Sys  NL Sys) • age of a radio structure (CSOs  MSOs  RGs) • Spin of SMBHs (RL  RQ) OPEN QUESTIONS FOR FERMI (I): What are the γ-ray properties of different types of AGN? Are radio quiet AGN γ-ray emitters at some level? Is the γ-ray emission of RL AGN shaped by the jet properties (on small and large scales) and/or by the properties of the accreting matter? (Fermi AGN: FSRQs, BL Lacs, FR Is, NLSys) AGN Phenomenon 1) All galaxies host SMBHs in their centers (106-1010M )  2) All SMBHs accrete at some level, and all show some AGN-like activity (1036-1048 erg/s) 3) Radio quiet AGN are not radio silent! PG 0157+001 Mrk 766 Mrk 279 Seyferts, LINERs & Spirals: nuclear and extended radio emission Radio Quiet Quasars: nuclear radio emission due to the due to the jet or the starburst actvity? [Ho et al.] jet activity, accretion disk/disk coronae, or uncollimated slow disk outflows? E1821+643 1045+352 Broad Absorption Line Quasars, believed to be radio quiet as a class, do produce relativistic jets Radio Quiet Quasars may be sometimes associated [Siemiginowska et al.] with relatively low-power FR I jets [Blundell et al.] Broad-Band AGN Spectra 4) All AGN are established sources of radio-to-X-ray emission (a mixture of different thermal and non-thermal components). However, the energy range >100 keV is hardly explored in this context… ? Template γ-ray spectra for different types of AGN Koratkar & Blaes constructed with Fermi/LAT? GeV Need for a careful investigation/identification of low-flux Fermi/LAT sources, stacking analysis for different classes of AGN, etc. γ-ray Emission of RQ AGN? One can indeed expect some γ-ray emission from non-jetted AGN due to the efficient particle acceleration taking place in the turbulent and magnetized accretion disks/disk coronae, as possibly observed in some Galactic sources. Zdziarski et al. Cygnus X-1 detected at radio, 1-10 MeV and possibly also 0.1-1 TeV photon energies Galactic Center Sgr A* detected at radio, near infrared, X-ray, and TeV photon energies Liu et al. Already Detected? EGRET source 3EG J1736-2908 has been claimed to be associated with radio quiet Seyfert 1 galaxy GRS 1734-292. This claim has not been confirmed, however. Still, any meaningful upper limits in the GeV photon energy range, offering robust constraints on the population of relativistic particles in the accretion disks/disk coronae of nearby bright Seyferts, are extremely important. Di Cocco et al. Fermi/LAT has detected Narrow Line Seyfert galaxy PMN J0948+0022. Previously, NL Sys have been considered as radio quiet in general. The particular source PMN J0948+0022 is radio loud, being characterized by a flat-spectrum radio core. So it is “just” a blazar. The X-ray-to-γ-ray emission of PMN J0948+0022 is modeled in a framework of the blazar scenario (compact relativistic jet close to the SMBH). Foschini/Fermi γ-ray Loud Blazars Most of the detected γ-ray loud AGN are blazars (FSRQs and BL Lacs). missing BL Lacs? It may seem that some general correlations for those have been already established. Is it indeed the case? Ce we already assure we are not missing some steep- spectrum low-power BL Lacs? FSRQs BLLac - LSP BLLac - ISP BLLac - HPBs What seems to be a robust finding, is that missing BL Lacs? we do not miss powerful blazars (FSRQs) with flat GeV spectra, Γ < 2. This implies γ that the mean electron energies in those sources are relatively low, <E > < GeV. e Is it simply due to the intense circumnuclear photon field in FSRQs, and therefore the enhanced radiative cooling of jet electrons? It may be also noted that BL Lacs form very diverse population with respect to their broad-band spectral properties! γ-ray Loud Radio Galaxies Perseus A Centaurus A Finke, Cheung/Fermi Virgo A The γ-ray emission detected by Fermi/LAT from Virgo A, Centaurus A, and Perseus A radio galaxies is modeled Kataoka/Fermi in a framework of the blazar scenario (compact jet close to the SMBHs) with moderate beaming. All three radio galaxies are unusual FR Is: nearby, bright and moderately beamed sources with different circumnuclear environment, different Cheung/Fermi large-scale environment, and complex large-scale radio morphologies due to the recurrent jet activity. We need a larger sample to address common properties of γ-ray loud RGs!