W EXPERIENCES OF HARRY WU AS A POLITICAL PRISONER IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBUC OF CHINA Y4.INB/16:W95 Experiences of Harrj Hu as a Politi... HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS AND HU:VIAX RIGHTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OP REPRESENTATR^S ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 1995 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations fsui U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 20-164 WASHINGTON : 1995 ForsalebytheU.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice SuperintendentofDocument.s.CongressionalSalesOttlce.Washington.DC 2(M02 ISBN 0-16-047782-4 1^^ EXPERIENCES OF HARRY WU AS A POUTICAL PRISONER IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBUC OF CHINA 4.IN8/16;W95 periences of Harry Uu as a Politi... HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 1995 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations I DEC 1 9 J995 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1995 : ForsalebytheU.S.Go\eminentPrintingOffice SuperintendentofDocunient.s.Congressi(in;ilSalesOtTice,Washington.DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-047782-4 20-164 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. OILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska HOWARD L. BERMAN, California CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York DAN BURTON, Indiana HARRY JOHNSTON, Florida JAN MEYERS, Kansas ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida Samoa CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California DANA ROHRABACKER, California DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey PETER T. KING, New York SHERROD BROWN, Ohio JAY KIM, California CYNTHIA A. McKINNEY, Georgia SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida DAVID FUNDERBURK, North Carolina ALBERT RUSSELL WYNN, Maryland STEVEN J. CHABOT, Ohio MICHAEL R. McNULTY, New York MARSHALL "MARK" SANFORD, South JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia Carolina VICTOR O. FRAZER, Virgin Islands (Ind.) MATT SALMON, Arizona AMO HOUGHTON, New York Richard J. Garon, ChiefofStaff Michael H. Van Dusen, Democratic ChiefofStaff Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, Chairman BENJAMIN A. OILMAN, New York TOM LANTOS, California WILL F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania CYNTHIA A. McKINNEY, Georgia HENRYJ. HYDE, Illinois JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia PETER T. KING, New York HOWARD L. BERMAN, CaUfornia DAVID FUNDERBURK, North Carolina ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American MATT SALMON, Arizona Samoa EDWARD R. ROYCE, California DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey Grover Joseph Rees, Subcommittee StaffDirector and ChiefCounsel Robert R. King, DemocraticProfessional StaffMember David Wagner, Professional StaffMember Stephanie E. Schmidt, StaffAssociate (II) 20-164 CONTENTS WITNESSES Page Mrs. Ching LeeWu, secretary-treasurer, Laogai Research Foundation 11 Mr. Jeffrey L. Fiedler, director, Laogai Research Foundation 13 Mr. Harry Wu, executive director, Laogai Research Foundation 16 APPENDIX Prepared statements: Mrs. Ching LeeWu 27 Mr. Jeffrey L. Fiedler 28 Mr. HarryWu 31 (III) EXPERIENCES OF HARRY WU AS A POLITICAL PRISONER IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1995 House of Representatives, Committee on International Relations, Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:07 a.m. in room 2171, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Christopher Smith (chairman ofthe subcommittee) presiding. Mr. Smith. The subcommittee will come to order. Let me begin by saying on behalf of Mr. Lantos and myself that it is a privilege and honor for us to convene this hearing, which is really the second part of a hearing that we held last April. Then as now, Mr. Harry Wu was among our witnesses, and then as now, the subject was political and religious repression in China, in par- ticular the vicious system of prison labor camps maintained for po- litical and religious dissidents in China, known as the laogai, a term that means reform through labor. Between that hearing and today, dramatic events have inter- vened. On June 19, Mr. Wu, entering China for the purposes offur- thering his historic work of documenting human rights abuses there, was detained by the Chinese police. Though is he an Amer- ican citizen, he was held incommunicado for a matter of weeks, without being allowed to be visited by his country's consul, in viola- tion ofinternational law. Before formal criminal charges were brought, Mr. Wu was pub- licly threatened with the charge of espionage, which could have brought the death penalty. In the twisted logic of totalitarianism, human rights monitors are spies. A worldwide outcry arose demanding Mr. Wu's release, and on August 23 the Chinese Government finally complied, though not without first subjecting Mr. Wu to a rapid fire criminal trial and the issuance of a 15-year sentence and the humiliation of a formal expulsion from China. This subcommittee is deeply honored that Mr. Wu is able and willing to come before us again. The timing of his release and of Congress' return to Washington were the only factors that deter- mined the scheduling ofthis hearing. However, I am not at all dis- pleased that this hearing ends up taking place simultaneously with (1) the Fourth World Conference on Women, which is continuing even as we speak in Beijing. Many Members of Congress from both sides of the aisle have called attention to the absurdity of holding a human rights con- ference in the capital ofa country that is among the world's leading human rights violators. This absurdity could only be redeemed if the conference were used at least in part as an occasion for the leaders of the free nations to issue China-specific denunciations of the human rights abuses that take place there. Mrs. Clinton's speech went part of the way toward doing that. She should be particularly commended for her denunciation of forced abortion and forced sterilization. However, she did stop short ofusing the crucial word "China" in connection with any ofthe violations she so rightly denounced. However, the testimony that Harry Wu and his associates con- tinue to give about conditions in China go far beyond that con- ference. Political and religious repression has been the rule in China for almost halfa century. While many tyrannical governments in other parts of the world were swept away in 1989 and in the 1980's, the Communist oligarchs of China showed the world via Tiananmen Square that it cares neither for human rights nor for world opinion when its survival is at stake. Today that oligarchy is still in power, imprisoning nuns, monks and dissidents in forced labor camps, and forcing unwilling women into abortion tents, and men and women into sterilization clinics. All the while, the same oligarchy wants to be seen by the rest of the world as a valuable trading partner and a coequal member of the community of civilized nations. All too often we in the West have been willing to indulge them. Harry Wu, together with Ching Lee Wu and JeffFiedler, provide us with a much needed dose ofmoral reality. When Harry Wu last testified before our subcommittee last April, his long experience in the Chinese gulag was long behind him. Today he is here again with his most recent brush with that system only a few weeks be- hind him. So let me say for myself and for my colleagues. Republicans and Democrats alike, who had "free Harry Wu" posters on their doors and wore the yellow ribbons and spoke out on behalf of resolutions and made 1-minute speeches on the floor and everywhere else we could gain an audience, that we are so pleased and so happy to have this champion of human rights again here in Washington, a free man, to tell his story. I would like to recognize my very distinguished colleague, Mr. Lantos, for any opening comments he would like to make. Mr. Lantos. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Let me first pay tribute to my colleague and neighbor. Congress- woman Nancy Pelosi, Congressman Wolf, and yourself, for leading the fight so effectively on behalf of Harry Wu. This has been a magnificent example ofbipartisan cooperation. As those of us who have been committed to the cause of human rights know, there are no differences between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to fundamental human rights issues. The case ofHarry Wu dramatically demonstrated that all ofus who feel so deeply about this man of tremendous integrity and courage and principle worked together. We were together at that hastily called press conference when we discovered that he had just been ar- rested. All of our colleagues at that press conference spoke with deep conviction from the heart and we were all hoping that there would be such a happy and glorious conclusion to our efforts. It is rare for those ofus who are humble workers in the vineyards of human rights to celebrate victories. And Harry Wu's return in a sense is reminiscent ofAnatoli Scharansky's emergence from prison and his walk across that bridge. And I can't remember how many times my wife and I were at press conferences with Scharansk3ps wife at a time when he was languishing in the Soviet gulag. And it was so wonderful to see Ching Lee since Harry's return. She has always been a beautiful woman but she now looks 25 years younger since Harry's return. It rarely happens that a man or a woman committed to human rights puts his own life on the line. The great hero ofthe holocaust during the Second World War, Raoul Wallenberg, did that. He left behind the comfort and safety and security of neutral Sweden to go to Budapest to save lives and to point to an unspeakable evil. His story did not have a happy ending, as Harry Wu's does. But there is a parallel, because Harry Wu left behind the comfort and security and safety of the area that Nancy Pelosi and I call home, northern California, and voluntarily returned to Communist- controlled China, taking enormous risks and for a while losing. For a while he become a prisoner in the Chinese prison system. And it is, I think, an index of his courage and integrity that knowing full well what might be his fate, Harry chose to undertake the continuation of his heroic mission to document the slave labor system in China. And all of us in the Congress across the board salute him and his courageous wife, and Jeff Fiedler who has played such a key role in all ofthis on behalfofthe American labor movement. I think a special word of thanks is due to the much-maligned American labor movement, because it was the American trade union movement, the AFL-CIO, which stood behind Harry's work. And some of my colleagues who take such delight in bashing the AFL-CIO should at least have the decency to say thank you to the American labor movement for providing the backing, logistical sup- port, the funding, and the basic framework in which Harry's work unfolded. There is yet another person that I think deserves a special com- mendation. We had a hearing here not long ago on the then-forth- coming conference in Beijing. And there was some Hillary bashing as part ofthat hearing. And I took it upon myself to defend the First Lady and her com- mitment to women's rights and human rights. I can't tell you, Mr. Chairman, how proud I am of the First Lady's performance at the conference. She did us proud. She spoke for all American women, and indeed she spoke for all Americans in underscoring our unshakeable commitment to human rights and women's rights. I wish there were be a willingness on the other side, without res- ervation and without qualification, to applaud Hillary Clinton for what she did for the cause of human rights at the Beijing con- ference. No First Lady could have done better. No First Lady could have done a more eloquent, intelligent, effective, and powerful job ofpresentation than did Hillary Clinton. Now that Harry is back, our task ofcourse is to continue to focus on the ongoing suppression of human rights and fundamental free- doms in China. There is always a danger when a highly visible symbol of human rights such as Harry Wu is free again. We re- joice. When Sharansky was freed from the Soviet gulag, there were celebrations across the globe. And when Harry returned to San Francisco International Airport, we were all overjoyed. It was al- most like a dream that we never expected to dream, becoming a re- ality. But the reality plagues us. The Chinese gulag continues. Forced abortions, forced sterilizations, the suppression of the Tibetan peo- ple, the destruction of fundamental women's rights and human rights in China goes on unabated. And I think it would be the ultimate irresponsibility on the part of all of us who are committed to human rights to blot out the background, because in the background there are untold numbers of men and women whose names are not as well-known as Harry Wu's names, who wake up every morning in a rotten prison, who wake up every morning to look forward to a nightmare of a day and a night and a day and a night and the months and a year and another year of deprivation of freedom and deprivation of human rights. So as we salute and rejoice with Ching Lee in the return of her husband and our hero, Harry Wu, we must immediately turn to the ongoing task, because China has clearly not changed. This was a cold and calculating move, reached after much deliberation at the highest levels of the Chinese Government. The system could not take one more crisis, the Harry Wu crisis. The Chinese overreached on the issue ofthe President ofTaiwan. They went ballistic when this distinguished alumnus of a fine American University was allowed to visit his alma mater, and they are still going ballistic over this issue. They went ballistic over the denial ofholding the 2,000 Olympics in Beijing. And they keep pressing their new military prowess by aggressive moves in the waters along the northern coast of Taiwan. So they felt Harry Wu being kept in prison was just too much for the Unit- ed States-China relationship to absorb. Let me send a word to our Department ofState. We owe the Chi- nese nothing for allowing this American citizen to regain his free- dom. There is no quid pro quo to be had for having released Harry Wu. If there is a quid pro quo, we are the ones who are demanding something for this outrageous act of arresting an American citizen in China. And those in the business community and elsewhere, whose commitment is only to the bottom line and nothing else, bet- ter understand that it is not they who freed Harry Wu, but it is Nancy Pelosi and Chris Smith and Congressman Wolf and myself and those of us who truly believe in human rights and individual dignity who fought for this.