INDEX Volume 14 (1993) Affholter, Dennis P., Letter to the Cogliano, Janet F., see Barrick, Chris- Editor, 297-298. tina B. Assessing Young Children with Special Computer Simulation Applications: An Needs, Review by E. Alana Gowdy, Introduction, Review by Micah Dial, 91-92. 219-220. Cordray, David S. Presidential Babcock, Judith, see Sechrest, Lee. Address—Synthesizing Evidence and Bamberger, Michael, Methodology of Practices, 1-8. the World Development Report 1992: Culver, Steven M. Review of Managing Development and the Environment, the Professional Development of 275-286. Teachers, 169-172. Barley, Zoe A., Cluster Evaluation: A Method to Strengthen Evaluation in Debates on Evaluation, Review by Leslie Smaller Programs with Similar Pur- J. C. Riggin, 63-66. poses, 141-148. Design Sensitivity, Review by Jack Barrick, Christina B., Stakeholder McKillip, 77-78. Involvement: Mythology or Metho- Dial, Micah, Review of Computer dology?, 33-38. Simulation Applications: An Intro- Beaudry, Jeffrey S., Review of Human duction, 219-220. Encounter: Teachers and Children Duffy, Barbara Poitras, Focus Groups: Living Together in Preschools, The, An Important Research Technique 195-198. for Internal Evaluation Units, 133- Bender, Titus, Consortium Approach to 140. Community Needs Assesssment: A Case Study and Principles for Prac- Effect of Nonrespondents on a Self- tice and Education, 141-148. administered Mail Survey, The, Wm. Mark Krushat and John I. Molnar, Categorical Longitudinal Data: Log- 25-32. Linear Panel, Trend, and Cohort Evaluation Applications of Regression Analysis, Review by John D. Analysis with Time-seies Data, James Richards, 73-76. E. Veney, 259-274. Cluster Evaluation: A Method to Streng- Evaluation-Minded School: An Appli- then Evaluation in Smaller Programs cation of Perceptions from Program with Similar Purposes, Zoe A. Barley Evaluation, The, David Nevo, 39-48. and Mark Jenness, 141-148. Evaluation of the Grade Improvement Consortium Approach to Community Materials, “Where There’s a Will Needs Assessment: A Case Study and There’s and A”, An, Larry Weber and Principles for Practice and Education, Thomas M. Sherman, 127-132. A, Titus Bender, John McNutt, and Evaluator as “Personal Coach”, The, Emily Purdy, 149-154. Michael Hendricks, 49-56. 308 EVALUATION PRACTICE, 14(3), 1993 Evaluator as Power Merchant, The, Heinberg, John, An Interview with Edith Fein, Ilene Staff, and Sara Richard P. Nathan, 57-62. Kobylenski, 9-16. Hendricks, Michael, The Evaluator as Evaluator Collaboration across Diverse “Personal Coach”, 49-56. AIDS-Related Education Programs, Hollenbeck, Kevin, Review of From Rima E. Rudd and Associates, 243- Welfare to Work, 187-190. 250. Horm, John, see Johnson, Timothy P. Human Encounter: Teachers and Child- Fein, Edith, The Evaluator as Power ren Living Together in Preschools, Merchant, 9-16. The, Review by Jeffrey S. Beaudry, Focus Groups: An Important Research 195-198. Technique for Internal Evaluation Units, Barbara Poitras Duffy, 133-140. Improving Evaluation Theory through Foundations of Program Evaluation: the Empirical Study of Evaluation Theories of Practice, Review by Practice, Nick Smith, 237-242. Pauline E. Ginsberg, 87-90. Interview with Richard P. Nathan, An, Fremming, James L., Review of Use of John Heinberg, 57-62. Performance Indicators in Higher Invitation to Methodological Pluralism, Education, The, 173-174. An, Lee Sechrest, Judith Babcock, From Welfare to Work, Review by and Bradley Smith, 227-234. Kevin Hollenbeck, 187-190. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Jenness, Mark, see Zoe A. Barley. Review by Tamra Kinkner and Jack Jochums, Brenda L., Using the Vignette McKillip, 191-194. Method in Formative Evaluation, 155-162. Generalizability Theory: A Primer, Johnson, Paul L., see Bamberger, Donna L. Sundre, 207-210. Michael. Ginsberg, Pauline E., Review of Foun- Johnson, Timothy, Problems of Defini- dations of Program Evaluation: tion in Sampling Special Populations: Theories of Practice, 87-90. The Case of Homeless Persons, 119- Gossett, Charles W., Review of Politics 126. in Constitutional Law: Cases and Jorgensen, Margaret, Review of The Poli- Questions, 289-290. tics of Curriculum and Testing, 85-86. Gowdy, E. Alana, Review of Assessing Young Children with Special Needs, Kinkner, Tamra, Fundamentals of Item 91-92. Response Theory, 191-194. Gréndal, Gwenn W., Meta-analysis for Kobylenski, Sara, see Fein, Edith. Explanation, 293-294. Krushat, Wm. Mark, The Effect of Non- Gréndal, Gwenn W., Review of Meta- respondents on a Self-administered analytic Procedures for Social Mail Survey, 25-32. Research, 203-206. Letter to the Editor, Dennis P. Affholter, Handbook of Research Design and 297-298. Social Measurement, Review by John D. Richards, 199-202. Managing the Professional Develop- Hanford, Terry J., Review of Multiple ment of Teachers, Review by Steven Comparisons for Researchers, 215-216. M. Culver, 169-172. Index 309 Mastoroudes, Chris C., Selecting Pro- Politics in Constitutional Law: Cases jects for Ex Post Evaluation, 253-258. and Questions, Review by Charles W. McDaid, Janet, Review of Practical Gosset, 289-290. Sampling, 69-72. Politics of Curriculum and Testing, The, McKillip, Jack, Review of Design Review by Margaret Jorgensen, 85- Sensitivity, 77-78. 86. McKillip, Jack, see Kinkner, Tamra. Posavac, Emil, Review of Processing McNutt, John G., Review of Public Data: The Survey Example, 163-166. Policies for Environmental Protec- Practical Sampling, Review by Janet tion, 79-80. McDaid, 69-72. McNutt, John G., see Bender, Titus. Practical Sampling, Review by William Meta-analysis for Explanation, Gwenn M. Stallings, 67-68. W. Gréndal, 293-294. Problems of Definition in Sampling Special Populations: The Case of Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research, Review by Gwenn W. Homeless Persons, Timothy P. John- Gréndal, 203-206. son, Anandra Mitra, Ramona New- Methodology of the World Develop- man, and John Horm, 119-126. Processing Data: The Survey Example, ment Report 1992: Development and Review by Emil Posavac, 163-166. the Environment, Michael Bamberger Public Policies for Environmental and Paul L. Johnson, 275-286. Protection, Review by John G. Mitra, Anandra, see Johnson, Timothy McNutt, 79-80. rs Purdy, Emily, see Bender, Titus. Molnar, John I., see Krushat, Wm. Mark. Regan, Ellen, see Ross, John A. Multiple Comparisons for Researchers, Regression Diagnostics, Review by Review by Terry J. Hanford, 215-216. Matthew J. Zagumny, 183-186. Multiple Regression: Testing and Inter- Richards, John D., Review of Hand- preting Interactions, James M. Sina- book of Research Design and Social core, 167-168. Measurement, 199-202. Richards, John D., Review of Categor- Nevo, David, The Evaluation-minded ical Longitudinal Data: Log-Linear School: An Application of Percep- Panel, Trend, and Cohort Analysis, tions from Program Evaluation, 39- 73-76. 48. Richards, John D., Review of School- Newman, Ramona, see Johnson, centered Management Training, 217- Timothy P. 218. Richards, John D., Review of Studying Oromaner, Mark, Review of The Use of Fammilies, 81-84. Performance Indicators in Higher Riggin, Leslie J. C., Review of Debates Education, 175-178. on Evaluation, 63-66. Ross, John A., Using Program Evalua- Pershey, Edward J., see Jochums, tion to Inform the Assignment of Brenda L. Clients to Treatments, 17-24. Politics and Evaluation: A Reprise with Rudd, Rima E., Evaluator Collabora- Mellower Overtones, Carol H. Weiss, tion across Diverse AIDS-Related 107-110. Education Programs, 243-250. 310 EVALUATION PRACTICE, 14(3), 1993 Scale Development: Theory and Appli- Using Program Evaluation to Inform the cations, Review by David M. Shan- Assignment of Clients to Treatments, non, 179-182. John A. Ross and Ellen Regan, 17-24. School-centered Management Training, Use of Performance Indicators in Higher John D. Richards, 217-218. Education, The, Review by James L. Selecting Projects for Ex Post Evalua- Fremming, 173-174. tion, Chris C. Mastoroudes, 253-258. Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Sechrest, Lee, An Invitation to Metho- Education, The, Review by Mark dological Pluralism, 227-235. Oromaner, 175-178. Shannon, David M., Review of Scale Using Program Evaluation to Inform the Development: Theory and Applica- Assignment of Clients to Treatments, tions, 179-182. John A. Ross and Ellen Regan, 17-24. Sherman, Thomas M., see Weber, Larry. Using the Vignette Method in Formative Sinacore, James M., Review of Multiple Evaluation, Brenda L. Jochums and Regression: Testing and Interpreting Edward J. Pershey, 155-162. Interactions, 167-168. Smith, Bradley, see Sechrest, Lee. Veney, James E., Evaluation Applica- Smith, Nick, Improving Evaluation tions of Regression Analysis with Theory through the Empirical Study Time-series Data, 259-274. of Evaluation Practice, 237-242. Staff, Ilene, see Fein Edith. Weber, Larry, An Evaluation of the Grade Stakeholder Involvement: Mythology or Improvement Materials, “Where Methodology?, Christina B. Barrick There’s a Will There’s an A”, 127-132. and Janet F. Cogliano, 33-38. Weiss, Carol H., Politics and Evaluation: Stallings, William M., Review of Prac- A Reprise with Mellower Overtones, tical Sampling, 67-72. 107-110. Studying Families, Review by John D. Weiss, Carol H., Where Politics and Richards, 81-84. Evaluation Research Meet, 93-106. Sundre, Donna L., Review of General- Where Politics and Evaluation Research izability Theory: A Primer, 207-210. Meet, Carol H. Weiss, 93-106. Synthesizing Evidence and Practices, Williams, David D. Review of Teachers David S. Cordray, 1-8 as Collaborative Learners: Challeng- ing Dominant Forms of Supervision, Teachers as Collaborative Learners: 211-214. Challenging Dominant Forms of Supervision, Review by David D. Zagumny, Matthew J., Review of Williams, 211-214. Regression Diagnostics, 183-186.