ebook img

Evaluation of the grant program for rural health care transition : ninth semi-annual progress report PDF

46 Pages·1995·1.6 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Evaluation of the grant program for rural health care transition : ninth semi-annual progress report

Evaluation ofthe Grant Program for Rural Health Care Transition Ninth Semi-Annual Progress Report CMSUbra/y • C2-07-13 Ba7l5t0im0orSee,cuMriDty231!v2o<« Reportto Congress 1995 U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices HealthCareFinancingAdministration OfficeofResearchandDemonstrations CONTENTS [SIgPUBa'l^timoCrS2ee-.c0uMr7i-Dt1y32B1lv2d4.4 Chapter Page EXECUTIVESUMMARY • yi INTRODUCTION I 1 A. LEGISLATIVEHISTORYANDPURPOSE OFTHEGRANTPROGRAM 1 B. THENUMBERANDDISTRIBUTIONOF GRANTEES 3 II CONSORTIUMGRANTEES 6 A. THEROLEOFCONSORTIAAMONGRURAL HOSPITALS 6 B. AREWEAKHOSPITALSJOININGHOSPITAL CONSORTIA? 7 C. HOWWELLDOTHEMEMBERSOFRHCT CONSORTIACOMMUNICATE? 11 D. HOWWELLARETHERHCTCONSORTIUM PROJECTSPROGRESSING? 11 III SELF-REPORTEDPROGRESSOF1991GRANTEES 15 A. STATUSOF1991GRANTEES 15 B. PROGRESSOF1991 GRANTEES 15 C. PROJECTMODIFICATIONSANDPROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED 18 D. GRANTEXPENDITURES 19 ii CONTENTS(continued) Chapter Page IV SELF-REPORTEDPROGRESSOF1992GRANTEES .. 22 A. STATUSOF1992GRANTEES 22 B. PROGRESSOF1992GRANTEES 22 C. GRANTEXPENDITURES 26 V HOWDOAGINGFACILITIESAFFECTTHE HOSPITALS'OPERATIONSANDTHEIRGRANT PROJECTS? 28 A. WHYSOMEGRANTEESHAVENOTRENOVATED RECENTLY 29 B. DOESANOLDFACILITYAFFECTHOSPITAL OPERATIONS? 31 C. DOESANAGINGFACILITYAFFECTTHEGRANT PROJECTCHOICEANDPROGRESS? 32 VI SUMMARYOFPROGRAMPROGRESS 34 REFERENCES 36 iii TABLES Table Page H.i Financialandmanagementcharacter- isticsOFTHE 1990AND1991 GRANTEE HOSPITALS,BYMANAGEMENTSTRATEGY 9 11.2 COMMUNICATIONAMONGHOSPITALSINRHCT- FUNDEDCONSORTIA: 1990AND 1991 GRANTEES 12 III-1 1991GRANTEESTATUS 16 HI.2 PROJECTPROGRESSAFTER21 MONTHS,BY OBJECTIVE: 1991GRANTEES 17 IV.1 1992GRANTEESTATUS 23 IV.2 PROJECTPROGRESSAFTER9MONTHS,BY OBJECTIVE: 1992GRANTEES 25 iv FIGURES Figure page 1.1 "NUMBERANDPERCENTAGEOFELIGIBLE HOSPITALSAWARDEDRURALHEALTHCARE TRANSITIONGRANTSBETWEEN 1989AND 1992,BYSTATE 4 III.l AVERAGEGRANTEXPENDITURESAFTER21 MONTHS, 1991GRANTEES 21 EXECUTIVESUMMARY CongresschargedtheHealthCareFinancingAdministration(HCFA)withimplementing aprogramofRuralHealthCareTransition(RHCT)grants(OmnibusBudgetReconciliation Actof1987: P.L.100-203)andthenexpandingtheprogram(OmnibusBudgetReconciliation Actof1989: P.L. 101-239). Thegoalofthisprogramistohelpsmall(fewerthan 100beds) ruralhospitalsimprovetheirfinancialstabilityandmanagementcapacity. The programwasimplemented in September 1989and expanded inSeptember 1990. September1991,September1992,andSeptember1993. Sincetheprogrambegan,925RHCT grantshavebeenawarded: 184in 1989,212in 1990, 187in 1991, 163in 1992,and 179in 1993. Morethanone-thirdofthesmallrural hospitalsintheUnitedStateshavereceived program grants, and Congress has authorized $96 million over the past 5years for the program. The 1989 and 1990grantees completed their grant projects in September 1992 and September 1993, respectively. Currently, 496?.<*t;"e grantees have 3-yeargrants and are progressingwiththeirprojects. The legislation mandated that the HCFA Administrator report to Congress every 6monthsontheprogram'sprogress. Thisdocumentistheninthsemi-annualprogressreport. In it,wedescribetheprogressofthe 1991 granteesafter21 monthsandthe 1992grantees after9months. Thisreportisbasedonmonitoringreportssubmittedbythegrantees. We alsofocusontwospecialtopics: theroleoftheruralhospitalconsortiaamongthegrantees, andtheeffectofagingfacilitiesonthehospitals'operationsandtheirgrantprojects. These special topics are included because data are now available from a consortia supplement questionnaire for the 1991grantees and from supplemental interviews conducted for 40selected 1991 and 1992grantees. SPECIALFOCUS:THEROLEOFCONSORTIAINTHERHCTGRANTSPROGRAM Manypolicyexpertsagreethatinareaswithscarcehealthresources,healthcareproviders should work cooperatively, not competitively. The RHCT grants program promotes cooperationbyencouragingapplicationsfromruralhospitalsintendingtoformaconsortium orpursueaconsortiumproject. Hospitalconsortiaarerelationshipsthatprovideaframeworkforhospitalstoundertake jointactivitiesandtakeadvantageofeconomiesofscale,butallowhospitalstomaintainlocal autonomy. Developingeffectiveruralhospitalconsortiacanbedifficult. Thesmall,financially vi distressed hospitalshavethemosttogainfromaconsortiumrelationship. Thesehospitals havefewresourcestobuymanagementexpertise,andinsufficientpatientbasestosupport manyservices. Byworkingtogetherinaconsortium,thesehospitalscoulduseeachotheras managementresourcesandprovidejointservices. Buttheseweakhospitalsaretheleastlikely tohavethetime,resources,ormanagerialexpertisetoformruralhospitalconsortia. Thegrantprogramishelpingsmall,financiallyweakhospitalsovercometheseresource constraints;theyarejoiningRHCT-fundedconsortiadisproportionately. TheRHCT-funded consortiumhospitalsstaff30bedsandhave6physicians,onaverage,whiletheindependent hospitalsstaff39bedsandhave10physicians. TheRHCT-fundedconsortiummembers,also have loweroperatingmargins,generatelessrevenuefromtheirworkingcapital,and have olderfacilities. Inaddition,theRHCT-fundedconsortiaarelesslikelytohaveaphysicianon theirhospitalboardsthanarenon-RHCT-fundedconsortia-amanagementcharacteristicthat hasinthepastcorrelatedwithgoodconsortiumprojectadoption. Thus,theRHCTgrants programispromotingconsortiumformationamongthesmall,financiallyweakhospitalsthat maynothavethemanagementstructureneededtoensureprojectsuccess. Despitethedifficultiesfacingtheconsortiumgrantees,theyreporttheircommunication iseffective,andthusfartheyaremakingprogress. Thevastmajority(98percent)ofthe grantees in consortium projects funded in 1990 and 1991 felt that their consortium communicationiseffectiveallormostofthetime. Ofthe21 consortiareportingprogress, 9haveimplementedconsortiaprojects,and7haveformedtheirconsortia(althoughtheyhave notimplementedanycollaborativeprojects). However,sixoftheconsortiahavestopped pursuingthehospitals'collaborativeprojectsandarepursuingprojectsindividually. SPECIALFOCUS: THEEFFECTSOFAGINGFACILITIES Toexploretheeffectsofagingfacilitiesonhospitaloperationsandprojectprogress,we interviewed the 40grantees with the oldest facilities-those that most recently renovated between1951and1973. Thesegranteesaregenerallysmallpublichospitalslocatedprimarily intheMidwestthatfacesomestartlingphysicalconstraints. Afewarewoodenstructuresthat donotmeetfiresafetycodes,somelackhandicapped-accessibleentrances,andseveralhave placedtheiradministrativeofficesinformerclosetsbecauseoflackofspace. The 40granteescited twomajor reasonswhytheyhave notrenovated theirfacilities. Theseare:(1)thehospitalcouldnotaffordtorenovate,orcouldnotaccesscapitalfinancing toundertakearenovation;and(2)thehospitaladministrationfeltrenovationwasunnecessary. Two-thirdsofgranteesfelttheirfacilitiesneededsometypeofrenovation,and38percenthad planstorenovate orwereintheprocessofrenovation. Therenovationsincludedadding space for additional outpatient services and long-term care services and consolidation of servicestoimprovehospitalstaffingpatternsandpatientflow. vii Mostofthegranteesfelttheiragedfacilitiesnegativelyaffectedtheirhospitaloperations. Themostfrequentproblemisthatthebuildingsweredesignedtomeetinpatientcareneeds, andasaresult,areinefficientforprovidingoutpatientservices. Severalgranteesalsofelttheir agedfacilitieshurtphysicianrecruitmenteffortsanddamagedcommunitysupport. Theseagedfacilitiesdonotappeartoaffecteitherthehospitals'choiceofaprojector theproject'sprogress. Onlyfiveoftheinterviewedgranteeswereusingtheirgrantfundsfor construction projects-a proportion comparable to the rest ofthe grantees. In addition, comparedwithallgrantees,aslightlyhigherproportionofthegranteeswithagedfacilities wereonschedulewiththeirgrantprojects. GRANTEESTATUS Amongthe350hospitalsawardedgrantsjn1991and1992,316arestillactiveand34no longerhavegrants.Fiveofthe34inactivegranteesdiscontinuedtheirgrantsbecausethey closed. Duringthepastbmonths,17granteeslefttheprogram. Twohospitalsclosed,eightleft thegrantprogramafterbeingreclassifiedasurban,andsevenvoluntarilyrelinquishedtheir grants. Thestatusof1989through 1993granteesasofSeptember30,1993isasfollows: GranteeStatus 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 MonthsSinceAward 24 12 Continuing 162 154 179 Completed 174 181 DiscontinuedGrant 6 26 22 7 HospitalClosed 4 5 3 2 TotalAwards 184 212 187 163 179 TotalFiscalYearFunding(Millions) $83 $17.8 $24.4 $23.0 $22.8 viii 1991GRANTEES: PROGRESSAFTER21 MONTHS After21 months,themajorityof1991 granteesareonschedule,andmorereportedbeing onschedulethan6monthsearlier. Themostfrequentgrant-supportedactivitiesarerecruiting (63percent of grantees), staff training and development (60percent), and equipment purchases (58percent). Grantees have finished some activities, especially establishing inpatientservicesandaddingswingbeds. Despitetheirprogress,thegranteesreportedbeing behindscheduleinsomeactivities,includingrecruitinghealthprofessionals. Theinabilityto recruithealthprofessionalshasbeenaconstantproblemforthegranteessincetheprogram began. 1992GRANTEES: PROGRESSAFTER9MONTHS Ninemonthsintotheirprojects,the1992granteeshavemadeconsiderableprogress.The majority(59percent)wereonoraheadofschedule. Similartothe 1991grantees,themost frequently pursued project activities are purchasing equipment (72percent), recruiting (68percent),andstafftraininganddevelopment(59percent). Theactivitygranteesmost frequentlyreportedasbehindscheduleisestablishinginpatientservices. Thisactivityrequires thecooperationofnonhospitalpersonnel,whichleadstodelaysintheearlystagesofaproject. IX I. INTRODUCTION A. LEGISLATIVEHISTORYANDPURPOSEOFTHEGRANTPROGRAM Congressionalconcernsaboutthefinancialandoperationalviabilityofruralhospitalsand theaccessofruralresidentstohealthcareledtotheenactmentoftheGrantProgramfor RuralHealthCareTransition. Inthelegislation,CongressmandatedthattheHealthCare FinancingAdministration(HCFA): Establish a program of grants to assist eligible small rural hospitals and their communitiesintheplanningandimplementationofprojectstomodifythetypeand extentofservicessuchhospitalsprovideinordertoadjustforoneormoreofthe followingfactors: (1) Changesinclinicalpracticepatterns (2) Changesinservicepopulations (3) Decliningdemandforacute-careinpatienthospitalcapacity (4) Decliningabilitytoprovideappropriatestaffingforinpatienthospitals (5) Increasingdemandforambulatoryandemergencyservices (6) Increasingdemandforappropriateintegrationofcommunityhealthservices (7) Theneedforadequateaccesstoemergencycareandinpatientcareinareasin whichanumberofunderutilizedhospitalbedsarebeingeliminated... Each demonstration project . . . shall demonstrate methods ofstrengthening the financial and managerial capabilityofthe hospitals involved toprovide necessary services.1 'OmnibusBudgetReconciliationActof1987(P.L. 100-203,Section4005[e]). 1

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.