Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook Friedrich Stadler Editor Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Infl uence Vienna Circle Society Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook Institute Vienna Circle, University of Vienna Vienna Circle Society, Society for the Advancement of Scientific World Conceptions Volume 22 SeriesEditor FriedrichStadler,Inst.ViennaCircle,Univ.ofVienna,Vienna,Austria AdvisoryEditorialBoard JacquesBouveresse,CollègedeFrance,Paris,France MartinCarrier,UniversityofBielefeld,Germany NancyCartwright,DurhamUniversity,UK RichardCreath,ArizonaStateUniversity,USA MassimoFerrari,UniversityofTorino,Italy MichaelFriedman,StanfordUniversity,USA MariaCarlaGalavotti,UniversityofBologna,Italy PeterGalison,HarvardUniversity,USA MalachiHacohen,DukeUniversity,USA RainerHegselmann,UniversityofBayreuth,Germany MichaelHeidelberger,UniversityofTübingen,Germany DonHoward,UniversityofNotreDame,USA PaulHoyningen-Huene,UniversityofHanover,Germany ClemensJabloner,Hans-Kelsen-Institut,Vienna,Austria AnneJ.Kox,UniversityofAmsterdam,TheNetherlands MartinKusch,UniversityofVienna,Austria JamesG.Lennox,UniversityofPittsburgh,USA ThomasMormann,UniversityofDonostia/SanSebastián,Spain EdgarMorscher,UniversityofSalzburg,Austria KevinMulligan,UniversitédeGenève,Switzerland ElisabethNemeth,UniversityofVienna,Austria JulianNida-Rümelin,UniversityofMunich,Germany IlkkaNiiniluoto,UniversityofHelsinki,Finland OttoPfersmann,UniversitéParisIPanthéon–Sorbonne,France MiklósRédei,LondonSchoolofEconomics,UK AlanRichardson,UniversityofBritishColumbia,CDN GerhardSchurz,UniversityofDüsseldorf,Germany HansSluga,UniversityofCaliforniaatBerkeley,USA ElliottSober,UniversityofWisconsin,USA AntoniaSoulez,UniversitédeParis8,France WolfgangSpohn,UniversityofKonstanz,Germany MichaelStöltzner,UniversityofSouthCarolina,Columbia,USA ThomasE.Uebel,UniversityofManchester,UK PierreWagner,UniversitédeParis1,Sorbonne,France C.KennethWaters,UniversityofCalgary,Canada GereonWolters,UniversityofKonstanz,Germany AntonZeilinger,AustrianAcademyofSciences,Austria HonoraryConsultingEditors WilhelmK.Essler,Frankfurt/M.,Germany GeraldHolton,Cambridge,MA,USA AllanS.Janik,Innsbruck,Austria AndreasKamlah,Osnabrück,Germany EckehartKöhler,Munich,Germany JuhaManninen,Helsinki,Finland BrianMcGuinness,Siena,Italy ErhardOeser,Vienna,Austria PeterSchuster,Vienna,Austria JanŠebestík,Paris,France KarlSigmund,Vienna,Austria ChristianThiel,Erlangen,Germany PaulWeingartner,Salzburg,Austria JanWolen´ski,Krakow,Poland ReviewEditor BastianStoppelkamp,UniversityofVienna,Austria EditorialWork/Layout/Production RobertKaller EditorialAddress WienerKreisGesellschaft Universitätscampus,Hof1 Spitalgasse2-4,A-1090Wien,Austria Tel.:+431/427746501(international)or01/427746501(national) Email:[email protected] Homepage:http://univie.ac.at/vcs/ Moreinformationaboutthisseriesathttp://www.springer.com/series/6669 Friedrich Stadler Editor Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence 123 Editor FriedrichStadler InstituteViennaCircle UniversityofVienna ViennaCircleSociety Vienna,Austria ISSN0929-6328 ISSN2215-1818 (electronic) ViennaCircleInstituteYearbook ISBN978-3-030-04377-3 ISBN978-3-030-04378-0 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04378-0 In co-operation with: Commission for History and Philosophy of Sciences, Austrian AcademyofSciences ©SpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG2019 Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpartof thematerialisconcerned,specificallytherightsoftranslation,reprinting,reuseofillustrations,recitation, broadcasting,reproductiononmicrofilmsorinanyotherphysicalway,andtransmissionorinformation storageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilarordissimilarmethodology nowknownorhereafterdeveloped. Theuseofgeneraldescriptivenames,registerednames,trademarks,servicemarks,etc.inthispublication doesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfromtherelevant protectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. Thepublisher,theauthors,andtheeditorsaresafetoassumethattheadviceandinformationinthisbook arebelievedtobetrueandaccurateatthedateofpublication.Neitherthepublishernortheauthorsor theeditorsgiveawarranty,expressorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontainedhereinorforany errorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.Thepublisherremainsneutralwithregardtojurisdictional claimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalaffiliations. ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbytheregisteredcompanySpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG. Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland Editorial Ernst Mach (1838–1916) ranks among the most significant natural scientists and philosophersofthenineteenthandtwentiethcenturies.Inphysics,hepavedtheway for Einstein’s theory of relativity and was sceptical about Boltzmann’s atomism; in biology, psychology, and physiology, he pioneered with an empiricist and “gestalthaft” “Analysis of Sensations”; in philosophy of science, he served as a model for the Vienna Circle with the Ernst Mach Society, as well as initiated an integrated history and theory of science. His influence extends far beyond the natural sciences—to the Vienna Medical School and psychoanalysis (R. Bárány, J. Breuer, S. Freud), to literature (“Jung Wien,” R. Musil), to politics (F. Adler, Austro-Marxism and the Viennese adult education), to arts between futurism and minimalart,aswellastosocialsciencesbetweentheliberalschool(J.Schumpeter, F. A. von Hayek) and empirical social research (P. Lazarsfeld and M. Jahoda). In today’spedagogy,hisgenetictheoryoflearningisjustasrespectedashismethod in historical epistemology. Mach’s international impact already showed during his lifetime, in American pragmatism (W. James) and French conventionalism (P. Duhem, H. Poincaré). In 2016, on the occasion of the centenary of Ernst Mach’s death,theInstituteViennaCircleorganizedaninternationalconferenceonthelife, work,andinfluenceofthisscientistandphilosopher,whoworkedattheUniversity ofViennaandtheAustrianAcademyofSciencesformanyyearsandwhoexerted significant influence on several generations of scholars and scientists, as well as of cultural and political agents. The main goal was to make a critical inventory of Mach’slifeworkinlinewithstate-of-the-artresearchandhistoriography. The Ernst Mach Centenary Conference, June 15–18, 2016, was organized by the Institute Vienna Circle, University of Vienna, and the Austrian Academy of Sciences. This was certainly the biggest international conference dealing with the life, work, and influence of one of the most fascinating men, as a scholar and scientistwithimpactsuptothepresent. We were pleased to have received an enormous amount of submissions from all over the world, from which the Program Committee chose some 60 papers, so that in addition to the invited speakers there was a presentation of nearly 90 papers in four parallel sessions, including three plenary lectures. A selection of v vi Editorial thesetalksinEnglishispresentedinthisvolume.AnothersetofpapersinGerman is being published at the same time by Springer in the series “Veröffentlichungen desInstitutsWienerKreis,”entitledErnstMach–Leben,WerkundWirkung. It was not by accident that this conference took place also on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Institute Vienna Circle as a nonprofit society and the 5th anniversary of the same Institute as a Department (subunit) of the Faculty of PhilosophyandEducationoftheUniversityofVienna.Pleasingly,alsotheVienna International Summer School—Scientific World Conceptions (USS/SWC)—has been active since its inception in 2001. As it is well known, Mach was one of the mostimportantprecursorsofthelaterViennaCirclearoundMoritzSchlick,which was also acknowledged by the naming of the “Verein Ernst Mach” (Ernst Mach Society)inparallel.ThiswasonlyonereasonwhytheInstituteViennaCircleserved as the main local organizer for this huge event. In this regard let me thank again Sabine Koch and Robert Kaller, together with the members of the organizational staff(JosefPircher,OlgaRing,SaskiaHaber,andErenSimsek). One day before the official opening, the conference was started with a public lecture in the main building of the University of Vienna (Wiener Vorlesungen, organized by the City of Vienna) with a panel discussion on Mach’s undeniable significancefortherelationbetweennatural,cultural,andsocialsciences,especially his contributions toward an interdisciplinary approach in the age of a growing specialization and differentiation in the sciences was on the agenda. In this regard thehistoricalandempiricistconceptionofhis“neutralmonism”opensstillfurther developmentsandinnovations.Independently,Mach’ssignificanceinphysicsisstill alivewiththenamingoftheFraunhoferInstituteforHigh-SpeedDynamics,Ernst- Mach-Institut, in Freiburg/Br. (Germany), where his archives were located before its transfer to the German Museum in Munich. It is not possible to focus on the numerous contributions to both proceedings, which are dealing more or less with mostoftheseaspectsofMach’slifework,mainlyfromacriticalandpresentpoint ofview. I am grateful to the co-organizers and sponsors of the Centenary Conference: the University of Vienna, especially to the Rectorate and to the Deans of the seven faculties for their support of this representative conference, above all the Faculty of Philosophy and Education as the leading organizational unit, with its Dean,ElisabethNemeth.Furthermore,IthankAntonZeilinger,thePresidentofthe AustrianAcademyofSciences,whoenabledthecooperationandco-hostingofthe conference.ThiswasplausiblegiventhefactthatErnstMachwasaprofessoratthe University of Vienna and also a long-term member of the “Kaiserliche Akademie derWissenschaften”(ImperialAcademyofSciences).Therefore,theconferenceran undertheauspicesofRectorHeinzEnglandPresidentAntonZeilinger.Pleasingly, the ÖAW had established a new “Commission for the History and Philosophy of Sciences,”whereMachisoneofthetopicstobeinvestigatedfollowinghishistorical approach in the philosophy of science. Last but not least, it was the pleasing cooperation with Johannes Feichtinger and his collaborator, Cornelia Hülmbauer, fromtheInstituteofCultureStudiesandTheatreHistoryoftheÖAWthatfacilitated a smooth and productive planning and organization. It is not by accident that this Editorial vii Institute is running the so-called Ernst Mach-Forum for the sciences in dialogue. In this regard it is worth mentioning that the Austrian Agency for International CooperationinEducationandResearch(OeAD)isawardingannuallyaworldwide ErnstMachstipend. Ernst Mach was also a professor at the Charles University of Prague (where he had served as a Dean and Rector before the division in a German and Czech university). In this regard we could experience a continuous appreciation of Mach in Czechoslovakia, where in February 2016 another commemorative plaque was unveiled in the centre of Prague by the Czech and European Physical Society, in addition to the already existing memorial site at Mach’s birthplace in Chrlice near Brno. In this context, special thanks go to Martin Cernohorsky and his team in Brno for all these initiatives (e.g., the recurring “Ernst Mach Days”) and their cooperation with our conference by contributing papers and the cultural tour to Mach’sbirthplaceandtothebeautifulCityofBrnoattheendoftheconference. Another cooperation was organized by Anastasios Brenner from the University of Montpellier, a symposium on Mach, Pierre Duhem, and French philosophy of science as part of the conference, also on the occasion of the centenary of the death of this renowned French philosopher-scientist. Furthermore, we are looking forward to another promising cooperative project, the electronic publication of Mach’s correspondence at the Leopoldina in Halle/S. (Germany) conducted by KlausHentschel. InthiscontextIwanttorefertotherunning“ErnstMachStudienausgabe”(Ernst MachStudyEdition)publishedbythesmallBerlinpublisherXenomoiVerlag,for thepublicationofMach’ssixmainbooksinGermantodate. In the meantime, we had to mourn the death of three prominent Mach scholars who passed away during the preparation of the proceedings: Erik C. Banks, Hayo Siemsen and his father, Karl Hayo Siemsen. These colleagues contributed significantlytotheresearchonMachbetweenepistemologyandgeneticpedagogy. Wearehonoredthattheirlastmanuscriptsarebeingpublishedinthisvolumeasa sortoftestimonyoftheiruniqueexpertiseinthisfield. The publication of both volumes of the proceedings was realized with the help of Robert Kaller and Josef Pircher, to both of them whom I am grateful for their continuouscollaboration.Thanksgoalsototherepresentativesandtheproduction teamofSpringerPublishers. Vienna,Austria FriedrichStadler October2018 Contents PartI MachandAustrianPhilosophy 1 OnlyaPhilosophical“HolidaySportsman”?–ErnstMachas aScientistTransgressingtheDisciplinaryBoundaries................. 3 FriedrichStadler 2 The Specter of “Austrian Philosophy”: Ernst Mach andaModernTraditionofPost-Philosophy............................. 23 KatherineArens 3 Brentano’s Lectures on Positivism (1893–1894) and His RelationshiptoErnstMach ............................................... 39 DenisFisette 4 FromBrentanotoMach.CarvingAustrianPhilosophyatitsJoints . 51 GuillaumeFréchette 5 Mach,Wittgenstein,ScienceandLogic.................................. 63 JohnPreston 6 Mach’s“Sensation”,Gomperz’s“Feeling”,andthePositivist Debate About the Nature of the Elementary Constituents ofExperience.AComparativeStudyinanEpistemological andPsychologicalContext................................................. 91 DavidRomand PartII Mach,Methodology,andPhilosophyofScience 7 ErnstMach:ScienceandBuddhism.AMisunderstanding UnderGlobalization’sSignature.......................................... 111 UrsulaBaatz 8 SomeRemarksonMach’sPhilosophicalDoctrines .................... 123 SandyBerkovski ix x Contents 9 Mach’sPost-KantianEmpiricism.ForaNewConceptofGivenness. 135 AlexandreCouture-Mingheras 10 The Transdisciplinary Legacy of Ernst Mach: From theAnalysisofSensationstotheGPSInsidetheBrain ................ 145 David Dahmen, Ronald Villa, René J. Campis, andEduardoBermúdezBarrera 11 Mach’sCriticism,oraDiscourseontheMethod ....................... 157 ElenaD’Amore 12 MachandPanqualityism .................................................. 165 TomášHrˇíbek 13 CanMonismbeNeutral?.................................................. 177 GerminalLadmiral 14 Intentionalityvs.PsychophysicalIdentity ............................... 187 DenisSeron 15 Economical Unification in Philosophy of Science Before andAfterErnstMach...................................................... 199 AvrilStyrman 16 TalkingPastEachOther:MachandHusserlonThoughtEconomy . 213 IulianD.Toader PartIII OnMach’sImpactandInfluence 17 AppraisalandInfluenceofMach’sWorksinSouthAmerica......... 225 Eduardo Bermúdez Barrera, David Dahmen, René J. Campis, andRonaldVilla 18 ErnstMachinPragueandtheDawnofGasDynamics................ 235 RudolfDvorˇák 19 ErnstMachandJohannesKesselinPrague1871–1874................ 245 RüdigerHoffmannandLutz-PeterLöbe 20 The “Mach Argument” and its Use by Vladimir Fock toCriticizeEinsteinintheSovietUnion ................................. 259 Jean-PhilippeMartinez 21 TheScientificWorld-ConceptionintheMaking:Towardsthe IdeologicalRootsofLogicalEmpiricisminBerlin andinVienna ............................................................... 271 GüntherSandner 22 Mach’sReceptioninPre-revolutionaryRussia ......................... 283 DanielaSteila