Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 Developing a Rural Teacher Education Curriculum Package Simone White Monash University, Victoria, Australia Jodie Kline Deakin University, Victoria, Australia This paper documents the development of a new website (www.rrrtec.net.au) specifically designed to better equip teacher educators to prepare graduates to teach in rural and regional communities. The two year study (2009-2011) that informed the website’s creation included three data sources: A literature review of research into rural teacher education, a survey of pre-service students who had completed a rural practicum and interviews with teacher educators about the current strategies they used to raise awareness and understanding of the needs of rural students, their families, and communities. An analysis of the data revealed that teacher educators need to focus more on developing graduates to be not only ‘classroom ready’ but also ‘school and community ready’. This analysis provided the framework for the creation of a set of curriculum modules and resources including journal articles, film clips, websites and books that teacher educators could readily and publicly access and use in their own classroom teaching. Key words: teacher education, rural education, professional learning, curriculum. While there is a growing recognition of the financial burden as they travel and relocate to a need to prepare teachers to better understand new location for their practicum period. As a result student diversity in their classrooms, there is little the majority of students do not choose to complete focus on preparing teachers for the diversity of the a rural practicum (Halsey, 2005). While there does contexts or communities in which these teachers exist various Australian government financial might find themselves placed. Yet ‘place’ incentives to encourage graduates to work in rural particularly matters when it comes to staffing. In areas these are often not well understood by those North America as in Australia, rural schools face a who teach in the teacher education programs and greater pressure to attract and retain quality thus, this valuable information is often left for pre- teachers than their urban counterparts (Allen & service teachers to uncover for themselves (see Malloy, 2007; Bryant, 2006; Green & Reid, 2004). Reid et al., 2010; White et al., 2008). In the Australian context, there currently exists an It is clear that the lack of explicit information ‘over supply’ of teacher graduates; however, this about rural teaching opportunities to pre-service supply does not filter through to the rural, regional teachers has meant that the needs of rural students, and remote communities where they are needed their families, and communities often remain most (Tibbetts, 2008). Simplistically, the further invisible. Pre and in-service teachers are under away and inland from an Australian capital city the prepared to be successful rural teachers and are more difficult it is to recruit and retain teachers. It thus unlikely to consider a future career teaching in does not appear that simply preparing more rural areas. teachers is therefore the answer to the staffing This situation led to a study to address this needs of rural and regional communities. What is issue with the brief to focus on the development of argued and documented in this paper is the need for an inclusive, forward thinking, rural teacher a re-conceptualisation of teacher education education curriculum package aimed at specifically curriculum and a more integrated approach preparing teachers for diverse rural and regional between course work and the rural professional communities. The two year Australian study on experience (practicum). Teacher education thus which this paper reports, is now known as could be the key to solving rural, regional and RRRTEC (Renewing Rural and Regional Teacher remote staffing issues (White et al., 2008). Education Curriculum) and the history of the work Australian Teacher Education Curriculum is provided below to outline the study’s aims, the Until most recently in the Australian context, methodology, findings and the building of the the majority of universities have had little to no RRRTEC website which houses a range of explicit focus on understanding rural or regional resources designed to be used by teacher educators. communities in their teacher education programs. The website can be found at www.rrrtec.net.au. They have had rather random and ad hoc rural professional experience (practicum) opportunities offered to their students. Students who do choose to take up a rural placement usually suffer the 36 Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 The RRRTEC Study Literature Review Over four years ago, a team of teacher education The literature review revealed a growing researchers across Australia came together to number of studies into the field of rural teacher investigate the issue of recruitment and retention of education. Large Australian related studies in this teachers for rural sustainability. Two national area, include: the Rural [Teacher] Education projects grew from this meeting. In 2008, the Project (R[T]EP) (Green, 2008), funded as an Australian Research Council (ARC) funded project Australian Research Council Linkage joint project Teacher Education for Rural and Regional involving the New South Wales Department of Australia (TERRAnova) began and in 2009 the Education and Training, Charles Sturt University Rural and Regional Teacher Education Curriculum and the University of New England from 2002- (RRRTEC) project was funded by the Australian 2005; the National Survey of Science, ICT and Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC). Both Mathematics Education in Rural and Regional projects have built from each other and as such, a Australia (Lyons, Cooksey, Panizzon, Parnell & rich model of theory-practice-policy nexus has Pegg, 2006); Staffing an empty schoolhouse: emerged. attracting and retaining teachers in rural, remote Building on the research and findings of and isolated communities study conducted by the TERRAnova that highlighted that a largely metro- New South Wales Teachers Federation, (Roberts, centric ‘one size fits all’ model of teacher education 2005); the Rural Education Forum of Australia’s was not sufficient in meeting the needs of rural ‘Pre-Service Country Teaching Costings Survey’ teachers, the RRRTEC project looked at what (Halsey, 2005); and most recently the three year teacher education could do differently to prepare (2008-2010) ARC funded project, TERRAnova. teachers for the rural workforce. RRRTEC has These and smaller localised studies paint a aimed to develop a teacher education curriculum particular picture of the issues facing teachers and that is both inclusive of rural education needs and pre-service teachers working and living in rural makes visible rural and regional teacher education communities. research, curriculum resources, and pedagogical Roberts (2005), in his report Staffing the strategies for teacher education students. A Empty Schoolhouse, confirmed that Australia’s centralised rural and regional resource repository, remote, rural and regional schools are frequently the website, has been developed to assist teacher staffed with young, inexperienced teachers and educators in the preparation of pre-service teachers teacher turnover is high. Distance from family, for working in rural and regional schools. geographic isolation, weather, and limited shopping The study attempted to focus on uncovering were all reported among the main reasons teachers the differences experienced by those who worked gave for leaving rural areas (Collins, 1999). Halsey in rural contexts to establish particular gaps in (2005) specifically explored the impact for pre- knowledge and experience that teacher educators service teachers taking up a rural practicum could better address and questions such as ‘what experience, and highlighted the additional ‘social should teacher education teach to better meet the and economic costs’ pre-service teachers needs of rural students, their families and encountered in completing a rural professional communities?’ experience. Sharplin (2002) examined the perceptions of taking up a rural career from the Data Collected perspective of pre-service teachers and uncovered that for many, fears about access to resources, The RRRTEC website resource has been isolation, and cultural differences were associated developed from three main data sources. The first a with teaching in rural areas. These fears were literature search and analysis of the key research believed to be the cause of an unwillingness to projects in Australia into rural (teacher) education consider a future rural career, or even to trial a over the last two decades (1990-2010); secondly a teacher education incentive program. Other studies large longitudinal Australian survey of pre-service (Collins, 1999; Hudson & Hudson, 2008; McClure, teachers who participated in a rural practicum Redfield & Hammer, 2003) indicated further experience (2008 -2010) as part of the TERRAnova reasons for rural staffing shortages due to teachers’ project and thirdly in depth interviews with teacher (both pre-service and in-service) beliefs about educators (n=30) across Australia to investigate geographical, social, cultural, and professional their knowledge about the needs of rural students isolation; inadequate housing; and a lack of and what strategies they currently use in preparing preparation for rural multi-age classrooms. teachers for rural communities. Each data source is Classroom burnout appeared to trigger an discussed below. exodus from rural classrooms as reported in an Australian newspaper: “Younger teachers point to issues such as overwork, pay structures, being put on contract without assurance of permanency, 37 Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 community expectations, student management and teaching from the experience. They wanted more lack of social status” (The Age as cited in Hudson strategies about working with diverse learners, & Hudson, 2008, p. 67) as reasons for leaving rural particularly indigenous students. The survey areas. responses supported the earlier study by Halsey Further research undertaken by Starr and (2005) and it was clear that any subsidies were not White (2008) indicated that beginning teachers in sufficient full cost recovery for the students. The rural schools and communities were more likely to majority who went to a rural school placement deal with real and imagined perceptions of personal described wanting to try a different location and and professional isolation and questions about experience. access to professional learning and teaching Although the surveys revealed more that could resources, than their urban colleagues. Work be done from the teacher education program they conditions such as increased levels of visibility in also strongly indicated that a successful rural the community; requirements to teach ‘out of area’, practicum experience led to the graduate thinking and early professional advancement to positions of positively about applying for a rural placement. leadership without preparation at an earlier stage in Unfortunately, the survey numbers revealed only their careers all appeared to result in considerable small percentages of all pre-service teachers taking personal and professional demands on them as up a rural practicum opportunity. teachers for which they identified they were not always prepared. Each of these studies highlights Semi-structured Teacher Educator Interviews some of the differences for teachers working in The third source of data used by the RRRTEC rural communities and signifies that the design of project were semi-structured interviews of teacher teacher education curriculum needs to better equip educators across Australia (n=30). A number of graduates for these diverse contexts. teacher educators responded positively to the Halsey (2005) urgently recommended teacher invitation to participate in the study but expressed education programs to develop policies to increase that they felt ill equipped to respond to the significantly the number of pre-service country questions. Interviews were conducted between teaching placements with the view that this might 2010 and 2011. The interview questionnaire encourage beginning teachers to consider a rural featured seven open-ended items exploring career. Rural practicum however is only one questions such as: component of a teacher education program and to  What do you think are the distinctive seriously address teacher shortage and staffing features of preparing a student teacher for a churn, White and Reid (2008) argued for a closer rural career? connection between the course work and the  Where in your teacher education course (if practicum itself requiring teacher educators to take any) do you believe rural curriculum should responsibility for the periods of preparation before be embedded? and after the rural practicum.  What would you see as key or essential content to learn about if you knew your Pre-service Surveys student teacher were to take a rural teaching Alongside the literature review, pre-service teacher position? surveys (n=263) and teacher educator interviews  What are the professional learning needs of (n=30) also informed the RRRTEC resource teacher educators to deliver a rural teacher development. Pre-service students who completed a education curriculum? rural placement (August 2008 - December 2010) as part of their degree were invited to complete an on- Responses revealed two distinct groups. The line survey. The survey instrument was designed to first comprised a group of teacher educators who investigate the views of how well prepared the pre- felt they were able to discuss the needs of rural service teachers were to complete the practicum by teachers, usually based on their own experiences their teacher education program and what and because they had taught in rural settings improvements could be made. The survey analysis themselves; the second group of teacher educators revealed that pre-service teachers wanted more described themselves with no rural experience or information about how to build and sustain knowledge from which to draw and who described relationships with parents and other professions themselves as ill-equipped to respond to the beyond the classroom and the school and into the questions as a whole although they attempted to. community and they wanted to know more about This clear lack of teacher educators’ ability to meeting the needs of learners in multi-age settings. respond to the questions and discuss the needs of They wanted more information about the places rural students meant that the number of interviews they were going to and how to cope in a highly were limited and highlights the need for more visible profession. They also wanted more time to professional learning for teacher educators about share, debrief and discuss with their lecturers and rural and regional communities. their classmates about what they had learnt about 38 Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 From those teacher educators who were able to as political requirements for change and renewal. respond comprehensively to the questions, the Therefore, the rural school frequently functions as findings that emerged from the interviews were the barometer of community well-being (Halsey, similar to those from the pre-service survey data: 2005). Further, Halsey notes the school is often the Interviewees recognized the important work of largest organization in a town or area, and thus it is rural teachers in their communities. A number of often “strategically positioned to be a rallying teacher educators had created resources to better agency when the town feels under pressure, prepare their students for thinking about a rural providing a sense of connection to the past, placement. Some teacher educators had developed present, and the future” (p. 6). Understanding rural and remote field trips and simulations; others place and community are therefore important had created videos to showcase the views of answers to the question what knowledge is of most beginning rural teachers. The interview data about worth in preparing teachers for rural communities? successful strategies proved a valuable tool when it Teachers who want to be successful in a came to collating resources to be housed within the rural/remote context need to be prepared to teach RRRTEC website. students from different socio-economic and cultural backgrounds to themselves. They need to approach Identifying Themes the decision to teach in a rural community by looking at the benefits of the community rather Key themes of the differences of working in than from a deficit viewpoint (Thompson, 2002). rural and regional contexts emerged from across They need to acknowledge and match learning the data sources. Understanding the knowledge and experiences that significantly build on the rich and skills required to work in a particular rural place diverse lives of rural and regional students; to be appeared vital for new graduates’ preparation. The prepared to teach different developmental stages visibility of teachers working in a smaller town was and ages in any one learning experience or also identified in the data. As Reid et al. (2009) classroom setting. Rural teachers also need to know observed, “the reality and nature of working in how to work in teams using technology to develop rural communities is that the distances between their own professional learning. While all of these towns and settlements means teachers must live skills, understanding, and knowledge might alongside or close to the children and families that arguably be necessary for all teachers, their value is they serve” (p. 3). Survey responses highlight the increased for those who work in rural, regional and need for pre-service teachers to be better prepared remote contexts. and equipped to understand the very public face of a teacher working in a small town. One respondent Developing the Conceptual Framework noted: The data analysis and themes revealed that They [future teachers] need to realise that teacher education programs require a curriculum when they are going into a rural community or developed with an understanding of diversity of a remote community, it can be very small and contexts, including an understanding of rurality and very different from living in a large all that it means in terms of living and working in metropolitan area where they can blend in and different rural, remote and regional places and live in one suburb and go and teach in another contexts. Based on the rich array of studies and and no-one necessarily knows anything about data collection and analysis from both TERRAnova their life. In a rural community, student and RRRTEC, as well as from close consultation teachers are basically in the eyes of the with the reference group of RRRTEC, which community all the time so they have to be very included fellow academics, practitioners and policy professional in what they do both socially and makers, a conceptual framework was developed professionally. (White, 2010). The conceptual framework developed Pre-service teachers need to know that rural highlighted that the preparation of (rural) teachers communities perceive rural teachers as leaders needed to encompass three overlapping fields of earlier on in their careers than their urban the classroom, school and community. In each field colleagues. Thus, teachers in rural areas must view a focus on the teachers’ work and the student themselves a leaders within the community as well learning is important. This working framework in as have the ability to communicate with a range of turn underpinned the module and resource different ‘stakeholders’ in a language that can development. break down rather than create barriers to The current focus on classroom readiness educational choice and opportunity. The rural alone clearly is problematic in preparing teachers school is often identified as the traditional heart of to work in rural schools and their communities. The its community; often it operates at the focus point heavy focus on classroom preparation that of external economic and social influences, as well permeates current models of teacher education is at 39 Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 odds with a broader view of teaching that locates  know, understand, and appreciate how the work of a teacher in the wider school community change and renewal impacts community. Prospective teachers for rural areas upon rural and regional education. need to develop a tri-focus, that is, an  know, and understand historical and understanding of the links between the classroom, contemporary issues and policies related to the school, and the wider rural community and their educational provision, specifically with place across these three different contexts—a regard to the employment and retention of different set of issues from those that the traditional teachers in rural and regional contexts. model of a teacher education and professional  know about, understand, and have experience currently provides. considered strategies to access information relating to community and school roles and Creating the RRRTEC Resource expectations in rural and regional contexts.  know about, understand, and have Using the conceptual framework of the fields considered strategies to work and live of classroom, school and community, five areas successfully in a rural or regional context. were selected to focus on. A range of strategies  know about and have strategies to work related to how to work collaboratively with collaboratively with colleagues, school colleagues, school support staff, other support staff, other professionals and professionals and community‐based personnel to community‐based personnel to enhance enhance student learning and wellbeing in rural student learning and wellbeing in rural and and regional communities were then developed. regional contexts. The five areas are:  appreciate the opportunities and challenges of teaching in rural and regional contexts. 1. Experiencing rurality The areas and modules are briefly outlined below. 2. Community readiness 3. Whole school focus 1. Experiencing Rurality 4. Student learning and the classroom Module 1 - Understanding rurality 5. Preparing for a rural career 2. Community readiness Each focus area is described in the website and Module 2 - Understanding place is unpacked in terms of key theories and concepts for teacher educators to consider in their classroom 3. Whole school focus teaching. The model of the rural social space (Reid Module 3 - Understanding rural teacher et al., 2010) which has been developed as part of identity and teachers' work the TERRAnova project for example is provided Module 4 - Understanding working with rural under the focus area of ‘Experiencing rurality’. The and regional communities rural social space model can inform how pre- service teachers can think about places to which they are going from the three aspects - 4. Student learning and the classroom demography, geography and economy. A series of Module 5 - Getting to know rural students' resources is also provided in each area for example lives film clips of rural teachers discussing their place, to Module 6 - Professional Experience: Modes - photographs and images of different rural places, to Guest speaker, Remote contact, Simulation and virtual and simulated places on the website. All are scenario, Site visits, Field trips and Practicum offered for teacher educators to show their students how they can learn about diversity of place and 5. Preparing for a rural career how they might prepare pre-service teachers to find Module 7 - Advice for working rural/regional out more about a rural location they might be settings placed to. The curriculum writing team used the themes Each module draws from theory and provides and areas to develop a series of modules (activities practical activities. For example, as the data and resources) and outcomes for pre-service highlight, further concepts such as teacher identity, teachers. The modules collectively aim to prepare leadership, and professional learning are important pre-service teachers to: in thinking through how rural teachers connect with  know and understand the diverse distinctions their colleagues both within the whole school between definitions of metropolitan, rural context, across schools, and within their and regional communities as they relate to communities. It appears imperative from the data educational policy, resourcing and sources that there is an emphasis on leadership experience. skills and an ability to communicate across sectors. As professional learning opportunities are reported 40 Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 to be more difficult for rural and regional teachers accessible and linked to each mode via the website due to access and geographic isolation, a more in university classrooms. explicit teacher education curriculum that prepares graduates to mobilise their own professional Conclusion learning by working closely with teacher and community mentors and requires the use of This paper has documented the development of technology to support professional learning is a teacher education curriculum package to better needed. In Module 3, 4 and 7 these concepts are prepare teachers for rural communities. The explored in teaching scenarios. different phases of the study show the rich A series of modes within Module 6, theoretical and conceptual development on which Professional experience, has also been developed. the curriculum modules, modes, and teaching The modes refer to different approaches to resources were created. The next phase of the work experience learning about rural places, for example will focus on the professional learning of teacher field trips, simulations and scenarios, or listening to educators to know about the resource and have the guest speakers. While the physical experience of opportunity to use the materials in their classrooms. completing a rural practicum cannot be replaced, a The website is newly launched and it is hoped series of modes of learning have been offered to that further activities and resources will be added provide teacher educators with different ways to over time. The authors of this paper are keen to assist pre-service students learn about rural hear about how the website is used and what teaching. One mode, for example, provides short improvements can be made by those interested film clips of experienced rural principals providing scholars and researchers in all countries. This can advice for future rural teachers on working and be done by going to the website www.rrrtec.net.au living in rural communities. Another mode focuses and completing the survey link on the bottom left on simulations in order to connect coursework to corner on the homepage. the practicum. All resources such as the film clips and simulations have been designed to be quickly References http://www.theage.com.au/news/education- Allen, T., & Malloy, W.W. (2007). Teacher news/classroom-burnout-triggers-teacher- retention in a teacher resiliency-building rural optout/2007/02/24/1171734032304.html school. The Rural Educator, 28, 19-27 Hudson, P., & Hudson, S. (2008). Changing Bryant, B.J. (2006). Chat wrap- up: Teacher supply preservice teachers' attitudes for teaching in and demand. Education Week ,25(36), 36-36. rural schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Collins, T. (1999). Attracting and retaining Education, 33(4), 67-77. teachers in rural areas. ERIC Clearinghouse Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., on Rural Education and Small Schools, Digest & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and EDO-RC-99-7. Mathematics Education in Rural and Regional Green, B., & Reid, J.A. (2004). Teacher education Australia. The SiMERR National Survey for rural-regional sustainability: Changing prepared for the Department of Education, agendas, challenging futures, chasing Science and Training. National Centre of chimeras? Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Science, ICT and Mathematics Education for Education 32(3), 255-273. Rural and Regional Australia. Armidale: Green, B. (2010). Rethinking the representation University of New England. problem in curriculum inquiry. Journal of McClure, C., Redfield, D., & Hammer, P. (2003). Curriculum Studies, 42(4), 451- 469. Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers Green, B. (Ed.) (2008). Spaces and places: The in rural areas. Charleston, WV: Edvantia. NSW rural (teacher) education project. Retrieved from WaggaWagga, NSW, AU: Centre for www.ael.org/page.htm?&pd=abo6721&id=764 Information Studies, Charles Sturt University. Monk, D. H. (2007). Recruiting and retaining high- Halsey, R. J. (2005). Pre-service country teaching quality teachers in rural areas. Future of in Australia: What’s happening—what needs to Children, 17(1), 155-174. happen? Paper presented at the 21st Society Reid, J., Green, B., Cooper, M., Hastings, W., for the Provision of Education in Rural Lock, G. & White, S. (2010). Regenerating Australia Conference. Darwin, NT. rural social space? Teacher education for rural- Hogan, B. (2007). Classroom burnout triggers regional sustainability. Australian Journal of teacher optout. Retrieved from Education, 54(3), 262-276. Reid, J., Green, B., White, S., Cooper, M., Lock, G., & Hastings, W. (2009). Understanding complex ecologies in a changing world. Paper 41 Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 submitted for inclusion in the Symposium on Tibbetts, J. (2008, January 30). Teacher shortage Education Practice and Rural Social Space, turning into over supply, Canwest News Rural Education SIG, AERA Annual Service. Retrieved from Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA. http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html? Roberts, P. (2005). Staffing an empty schoolhouse: id=277562#ixzz163I3wlyT attracting and retaining teachers in rural, White, S. (2010) Creating and celebrating place remote and isolated communities. Surry Hills, and partnerships: A key to sustaining rural NSW: New South Wales Teachers Federation. education communities. Keynote address for Roberts, P. (2007). Shaping future staffing systems the Society for the Provision of Education in to support students in rural, remote and Rural Australia (SPERA), 15-17th of isolated communities. Australian College of September. University of the Sunshine Coast, Educators. Retrieved from Sippy Downs. http://www.austcolled.com.au/articlepurchase/s White, S., Green, B., Reid, J., Lock, G., Hastings, haping-future-staffing-systems-support- W., & Cooper, M. (2008). Teacher education students-rural-remote-and-isolated- for rural communities: A focus on 'incentives', communities.html Proceedings of the 2008 Australian Teacher Sharplin, E. (2002). Rural retreat or outback hell: Education Association Conference, Australian Expectations of rural and remote teaching. Teacher Education Association, Melbourne, Issues in Educational Research, 12. Retrieved Victoria. from White, S., & Reid, J. (2008). Placing teachers? http://www.iier.org.au/iier12/sharplin.html Sustaining rural schooling through place Starr, K., & White, S. (2008). The small rural consciousness in Teacher Education. Journal school principalship: Key challenges and of Research in Rural Education, 23(7), 1-11. cross-school responses. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 23(5), 1-12 42 Rural Educator Volume 33, Number 2 Winter, 2012 About the Authors Simone White is the Head of School and Associate Dean of Education at Monash University, Gippsland campus, Victoria, Australia. Her publications, research and teaching are focused on the key question of how to best prepare teachers for diverse communities. Professor White's current research focus is on rural and regional teacher education curriculum, early career teachers in diverse settings, teacher professional learning and on developing effective university-school/community partnerships. Jodie Kline is a research fellow with the Centre for Research in Educational Futures and Innovation at Deakin University and holds an honorary fellowship with the Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Her research and scholarship focus on teacher education and exploration of the intersections between schools and local communities. Acknowledgments The RRRTEC project has been supported by the Australian Teaching and Learning Council (ALTC). The RRRTEC Team The RRRTEC project team consisted of Professor Simone White (Monash University), Dr Jodie Kline as Research Fellow (Deakin University), Dr Wendy Hastings (Charles Sturt University) and Dr Graeme Lock (Edith Cowan University). The RRRTEC curriculum writing team consisted of Professor Simone White (Monash University), Dr Wendy Hastings (Charles Sturt University), Dr Elaine Sharplin (University of Western Australia), Dr Pauline Taylor (James Cook University) and Dr Jan Page (Charles Sturt University). 43