RESEARCH PAPERS S PREDICTING PERSONALITY RESILIENCY BY PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND ITS COMPONENTS IN GIRL STUDENTS OF ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY By HADI KAJBAFNEZHAD * ALI KHANEH KESHI ** *_** Department of Psychology, Behbahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Behbahan, Iran. ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to predict psychological resilience by psychological well-being and its components. The research sample consisted of 216 girl students who were selected through multistage random sampling. The data were collected by implementing psychological resilience and psychological well- being questionnaire and analyzed by using Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regressions. A significant correlation coefficient was found between psychological resilience and overall psychological well – being (0.62, p<0.01). Resilience was also found to be positively and significantly related to all six dimensions of psychological well- being. The calculated determination coefficient (0.39) indicated that psychological well- being has the ability to predict psychological resilience. Results confirmed the impact of dimensions of psychological well- being on resilience among college students. It is likely that resilience and the psychological well- being reinforce one another in a cyclic manner. Individuals' psychological well- being maintained higher levels of resilient. Keywords: Psychological Well- Being, Psychological Resilience, Students INTRODUCTION important place in positivism psychological fields. In recent years the positive psychology approach has Flexibility refers to effective coping and adjustment apart been paid attention to regarding the human abilities. The from any travail, loss, failure, and misery. Studies tried to ultimate goal of this approach is identifying the methods identify the personality characteristics of people who and constructs that follow human well-being. Hereby, the regardless of facing with life problems are more adaptive factors causing more adaptation to life's needs and and progressed more. Moreover, they have special ability threats are the basic constructs of this approach for in vulnerability and resisting failure (Masten, 2001). In order studying. Psychological well-being is defined as the ability to strengthen and develop flexibility, a series of abilities in of an individual to balance many different thoughts, an individual should be provided as underlining factors to emotions, situations, to solve problem and to respond achieve faster recovery in response to stress with flexibility. stress in a healthy manner (Bradshaw, Hoelscher, & Fryborg, (2005) cited in Annalakshmi (2007), expressed Richardson (2007). Ryff and Singer (2003) argue that internal and social characteristics, support by family resilient individuals are generally able to maintain their members, friends and other supportive systems are physical and psychological health and have the important in creating and enhancing flexibility. The capacity to recover more quickly from stressful events. Positivism psychology model focuses on more flexibility in While there is a growing body of research regarding life hassles that in turn leads to well-being in all the life resilience theory, and mindfulness and its association with periods (Maginness, 2007). According to Nill (2006) due to psychological well-being, there is a paucity of empirical personal attributions, flexible individuals are not only able evidence supporting this association (Richardson et al., to overcome stressors, but also tend to experience such 1990). Flexibility and psychological well-being have an challenges as learning strategies and opportunities for development. Kumpfer (1999) suggested four effective i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol. 8 l No. 4 l February - April 2015 11 RESEARCH PAPERS S domains including cognitive, spiritual, emotional and psychological well-being. behavioral-physical as intrinsic factors of flexibility. Objectives Review of the literature The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship Werner and Smith (2002) stated that the factors such as between psychological well – being and its components feminine, being adjusted, intimacy, being patient, with resilience. progressiveness, good interpersonal relationships, high Research questions self-esteem, supportive environment, internal control, 1. Is there any relationship between psychological well – good relations to parents, positive educational climate, being and its components with resilience? high self-efficacy and life planning skills are effective in 2. To what extent does psychological well – being flexibility. predicts resiliency? Souri and Hasanirad (2011) found that resilience is able to Methodology predict psychological well-being, and optimism played a Sample minor mediation role in the relationship between resilience and psychological well-being. The results Using a Random Multistage Cluster Sampling Technique indicated that psychological well-being is influenced by 216 students from different academic fields of personal characteristics such as resilience, and the Behbahan's Islamic Azad University were selected. individual's optimism regardless of his/her degree of Participants were required to complete a package of resilience can to some extent provide for psychological questionnaires comprising of the Mental Well-being Scale well-being. Further, Souri and Hejazi (2014) stated from (Ryff & Keyes, 1995) and Resilience scale (Wagnild & their study on a sample including 414 students of Young, 1993). medicine (213 boys and 191 girls) a positive significant Tools correlation between optimism and resilience (r=0.38, 1. Psychological well-being scale (PWB) P<0.01) and also a positive significant correlation For evaluation of his theoretical model, Reef (1995) between optimism and psychological well-being (r= designed a self-report questionnaire to measure 0.45, P<0.01). Further, findings indicated that part of the psychological well-being, which is one of the most effect of resiliency on psychological well-being could be important scales of psychological well-being. In this applied through optimism. The findings showed that scale, the response to each question is on a six-degree regardless of the level of resilience, optimism can, range (from strongly disagree to strongly agree). facilitate psychological well-being to some extent. 2. Resilience Questionnaire (Wagnild & Young, 1993) Pidgeon's study (2014) revealed significant positive It consists of 26 items based on Likert scales. Internal relationships between mindfulness and resilience. consistency of the scale with Cronbach alpha was Regression analysis revealed that mindfulness and reported as 0.93. Also, the reliability of the questionnaire resilience predicted 51% of the variance in psychological was calculated through Cronbach alpha (r=0.91). well-being scores, with resilience accounting for the Participants' scores for psychological well-being and greatest amount of variance 47%. Results indicate that, resiliency were calculated by summing each item within when used as a dichotomous variable in the regression each scale. model, the presence of mindfulness meditation makes a Procedures significant contribution to an individual's level of mindfulness as shown by the standardized coefficient of After selecting subjects of the study by a cluster random 0.23. Therefore, the current study will explore the sampling technique, participants were asked to fill up the predictive relationship between resilience and questionnaires truly. 12 i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol. 8 l No. 4 l February - April 2015 RESEARCH PAPERS S Table 1 shows the calculated mean, Standard Deviation indicate that among the well-being components, for Psychological well being and Resilience and Table 2 Environmental mastery =0.30, t=2.86, p<0.03; and shows the correlation matrix for the predictor and criterion Purpose in life =0.19, t=2.10, p<0.05 were the best variables. The value of each Pearson's correlation predictors of resiliency, respectively. The multiple coefficient is shown with the corresponding significance coefficient of correlations of psychological well-being value. It can be noted that, Psychological well-being and (R=0.63) were significantly larger than the simple resilience are significantly correlated (r=0. 62, p<.00). correlations of each component with resiliency. Further, all components of Psychological well-being were Discussion significantly correlated with resiliency (p<0.001). The present study aimed to predict psychological well- A stepwise–regression model was run to predict resiliency being based on resilience among the girl college based on psychological well-being components. When students. Results show that psychological well-being and used as predictors in the regression model, all resilience have positive significant correlation. This finding psychological well-being components were found to is in accordance with previous research findings (e.g. have large correlations with the criterion variable as can Johnson, 2011) and supports the relation of psychological be seen by the R² values in Table 3. Furthermore, Table 3 well being and by the explanation of finding well-being shows the adjusted R² values, which were all found to be and resilience. It can be said that resilience can be either moderately sized and significant. The linear combination as a consequence of well-being and or as a reason which of Psychological well-being components accounted for may lead to higher level of well-being. We can see this 63% of the total outcome variance which explains 39 subject resilience from the point of intricacy of the percent of the variance of resiliency (R=0.63, RS=0.39). definition and processing view to resilience and Further, the linear combination of the components psychological well-being. Resilience and psychological IndicatorsPersonality traits& resiliency M SD N well-being are not the stable factors and capacities, but Positive relationships 57.36 9.24 216 they are dynamic factors, so that personality traits affect Autonomy 53.24 8.46 216 resilience, and resilience in turn enhances personality traits. One new observed result in this study was; among Environmental Mastery 56.49 9.89 216 well-being components, the environmental mastery and Personal growth 62.94 10.00 216 purpose in life could predict the changes due to resilience Purpose in life 61.55 11.40 216 in the subjects. This also is in accordance with Johnson's Self-a-cceptance 56.46 11.22 216 (2011) study and supports, the role of environmental Psychological well-being 347.63 48.30 216 mastery and purpose of life in promotion of resilience. This Resiliency 79.99 10.70 216 finding may be justified by the following explanations: Note: M= Mean Score, SD= Standard Deviation, N= Number of Participants Table 1. Number of Participants, Mean Scores, and Standard Those who have more sense of mastery and are more Deviations for Psychological Well-being and Resiliency efficient in managing their surrounding, have more Criterion variable Resiliency purpose in life. This ability provides the change in Predictors r-value Sig background of persons' overt behavior in coping with Positive relationships 0.38 0.000* Autonomy 0.41 0.000 stress for a faster recovery. Those who work with students Environmental Mastery 0.60 0.000 may get new insights in order to help the students to cope Personal growth 0.48 0.000 with stressors, more compatibility and enjoying from the Purpose in life 0.57 0.000 study at the university by focusing on the relation of Self - acceptance 0.52 0.000 Psychological well - being 0.62 0.000 psychological well-being and resilience. It is necessary Note: *p<0.001 that individuals learn skills to think and behave in a flexible Table 2. Pearson Correlation Coefficients for Predictor and Criterion Variables way to cope with stressors and difficulties. By training i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol. 8 l No. 4 l February - April 2015 13 RESEARCH PAPERS S Indicators Predictors R R2 FP Regression coefficients 1 2 3 4 5 6 Positive relationships 0.37 0.14 35.09 b=0/44 t=5/92 P<0/000 Positive relationships 0.48 0.23 31.08 b=0/31 b=0/37 Autonomy t=4/1 t=4/84 P<0/000 P<0/000 Positive relationships 0.61 0.37 40.72 b=0/1 b=0/17 b=0/53 Autonomy Environmental t=0/84 t=2/1 t=6/86 mastery P<0/04 P<0/03 P<0/000 Positive relationships 0.61 0.37 31.38 b=0/1 b=0/17 b=0/46 b=0/13 Autonomy Environmental t=0/60 t=1/98 t=5 t=1/6 mastery Personal growth P<0/55 P<0/05 P<0/001 P<0/11 Positive relationships 0.62 0.39 27.32 b=0/010 b=0/53 b=0/33 b=0/49 b=0/29 Autonomy Environmental t=0/131 t=1/9`1 t=3/28 t=0/58 t=2/69 mastery Personal growth P<0/896 P<0/058 P<0/001 P<0/56 P<0/008 Purpose in life Positive relationships 0.63 0.39 23.05 b=0/003 b=0/14 b=0/30 b=0/05 b=0/19 b=0/096 Autonomy Environmental t=0/05 t=-1/68 t=2/86 t=0/60 t=2/10 t=1/20 mastery Personal growth Purpose in life P<0/96 P<0/09 P<0/05 P<0/55 P<0/03 P<0/23 Self - acceptance Table 3. The Regression Model of Criterion variable on Predictor Variables (Psychological well-being and its components) students can enhance their resilient potentials which lead Development: Positive Life Adaptations. NY: Plenum to academic achievement and efficacy. Finally, since Publishers. personality variables show a long diary of efficacy on [4]. Maginness, A. ( 2007). “Development of Resilience – A resilience as an index of quality of life, it is necessary to pay Model”. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of attention on variables which are effective on resilience, to Philosophy in Psychology, University of Canterbury . provide mental health and for the identification of the [5]. Masten, A.S. (2001). “Ordinary magic: Resilience health state of juveniles and students. processes in development”. American Psychologist, Vol. References 56(3), pp. 227-238. [1]. Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). [6]. Neill, J. (2006). “What is Psychological Resilience”? An index of child well-being in the European Union. Social Retrieved December 02, 2008, from Indicators Research, Vol. 80, pp. 133-177. doi: 10.1007/s http://www.wilderdom.com/psychology/resilience/Psych 11205-006-9024-z ologicalResilience.html006. [2]. Johnson, E. (2011). “Protective Factors And Levels of [7]. Richardson, G. E., Neiger, B.L., Jensen, S., & Kumpfer, Resilience Among College Students”. A Dissertation K.L. (1990). “The resilience model”. Health Education, Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Vol.21, pp.33-39. doi: 10.1080/00970050.1990. degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of 10614589 . Educational Studies in Psychology, Research [8]. Ryff, C.D., & Singer, B. (2003). “Flourishing under fire: Methodology, and Counseling in the Graduate School of Resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving”. In C.L. The University of Alabama . Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology [3]. Kumpfer, K.L. (1999). “Factors and processes and the life well-lived, (pp. 15-36). Washington, DC: contributing to resilience: the resilience framework”. In American Psychological Association. M.D. Glantz, and J.L. Johnson (Eds), Resilience and 14 i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol. 8 l No. 4 l February - April 2015 RESEARCH PAPERS S [9]. Ryff, C.D., & Keyes CL. (1995). “The structure of Psychology, Counseling and Guidance, Volume 30, psychological well-being revisited”. J. Perso and Soci pp.1541–1544. Psych; Vol. 69: pp. 719–727. [12]. Wagnild, G., & Young, H. (1993). “Development and [10]. Souri, H & Hejazi, E.(2014). “The Relationship psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale”. Journal between Resilience and psychological well-being: The of Nursing Measurement, Vol. 1(2), pp. 165-178. Mediating Role of Optimism”, Knowledge and Research [13]. Werner, E.E. & Smith, R.S. (2002). “Journey's from Applied Psychology, Vol. 15(55): pp. 5-15. Childhood to Midlife: Risk, Resilience and Recovery”. NY: [11]. Souri, H. &Hasanirad, T.(2011). “Relationship Cornell University Press. between Resilience, Optimism and Psychological Well- Being in Students of Medicine”, 2nd World Conference on ABOUT THE AUTHORS *_** Department of Psychology, Behbahan Branch, Islamic Azad university, Behbahan, Iran i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol. 8 l No. 4 l February - April 2015 15