DOCUMENT RESUME CG 030 691 ED 449 446 Williams, Robert L.; Oh, Eun Jung AUTHOR Student Work Habits: An Educational Imperative. TITLE 2000-00-00 PUB DATE NOTE 41p. Opinion Papers (120) PUB TYPE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. EDRS PRICE Counselors; Elementary Secondary Education; *Employee DESCRIPTORS Attitudes; Intervention; Labor Force; *Prevocational Education; Productivity; School Psychologists; *Work Attitudes ABSTRACT Major problems in the American workforce are absenteeism, tardiness, disorganization, off-task behavior, and limited teamwork. Attacking such problems by promoting effective work habits in schools should be an educational priority, with teachers, counselors, and school psychologists all playing a role in the process. Student work habits that can contribute to a more effective and efficient work force are regular school attendance; the punctual accomplishment of work task; orderly management of one's school materials; persistence in on task behavior; openness to supervision; and productive teamwork. Intervention strategies that promote these work patterns include teacher modeling of effective work habits; a classroom setting conducive to good work habits; reinforcement of sound work habits; and systematic assessment of student work habits. Future studies must consider whether work habits learned in school transfer to the adult workplace. (Contains 61 references.) (Author/JDM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. P5 Student Work Habits 1 Student Work Habits: An Educational Imperative Robert L. Williams1.2 and Eun Jung Oh Running head: STUDENT WORK HABITS: AN EDUCATIONAL IMPERATIVE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND Office of Educational Research and Improvement DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION BEEN GRANTED BY CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES Points of view or opinions stated in this INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. 'Educational Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-3400 2Correspondence should be directed to Robert L. Williams, Educational Psychology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, reps TN 37996-3400. Phone number:4,21-974-6625; fax number: ..9.2-T-974- 0135; E-mail: bobwilliams®utk.edu BEST COPY AVAILABLE Student Work Habits 2 Abstract Major problem areas in the American work force are absenteeism, tardiness, disorganization, off-task behavior, and limited teamwork. Attacking such problems by promoting effective work habits in school should be an educational priority, with teachers, counselors, and school psychologists all playing a role in this process. Student work habits that could contribute to a more effective and efficient work force are regular school attendance, punctual accomplishment of work tasks, orderly management of one's school materials, persistence in ontask behavior, openness to supervision, and productive teamwork. The intervention strategies for promoting these work patterns include teacher modeling of effective work habits, a classroom setting conducive to good work habits, reinforcement for sound work habits, and systematic assessment of student work habits. KEY WORDS; Work habits; work values; work force; attendance; ontask behavior; punctuality; teamwork Student Work Habits 3 Student Work Habits: An Educational Imperative The purpose of schooling has been expanded well beyond teaching the three Rs. Social skills, emotional intelligence, and humane values are among the additional priorities for contemporary education. The development of student work habits should also be added to the mix. Although minimal research has addressed the possibility, developing favorable work habits in school could be among the most important contributors to adult success. Haberman (1997) contends that fostering pro-work values is especially important for urban students. He sees urban schools often as modeling and rewarding anti-work behaviors. The American work force has been maligned by critics both within and outside our society. A prominent Japanese politician ruffled U.S. labor by publicly characterizing the American worker tendencies as lazy (Winter, 1992). Certainly, several common within our work force do suggest less than optimal effort. Absenteeism is considered the most serious problem within both the public and private sectors (Cole & Kleiner, 1992). It affects both the professional ranks and blue-collar jobs (Fraser, 1987). The most frequent type of absenteeism is the one-day absence, which often falls on Monday or Friday. Rather than bona fide 4 Student Work Habits 4 illness, negligible commitment to one's work is a more likely cause for these absences. Even when on the job, the American workers' productivity and efficiency could be questioned. Such tendencies as arriving late, taking frequent breaks, having long lunches, overlooking details, and engaging in personal business during work hours have detracted from both the quantity and quality of work produced (Pulich, 1991). For example, one project engineer who had worked in a variety of auto plants reported that up to half of the hourly workers' time was devoted to such personal activities as reading magazines and taking naps (Winter, 1992). In some circles, peer pressure is directed more toward constraining one's efforts rather than maximizing one's work accomplishments. Performance in the work place is also curtailed by lack of literacy, technical, and social skills among American workers. For example, it is estimated that at least 5% to 10% of American auto workers are illiterate (Winter, 1992). Although able to read and write at an elementary school level, many workers cannot read well enough to follow written instructions or understand technical reports. A direct correlation between worker literacy and quality of performance is found in some industries. Student Work Habits 5 The Japanese have led the way in underscoring the importance of teamwork. Although many American companies are now instituting cooperative work groups, such companies have traditionally emphasized worker independence and competition. This mentality may lead to alienation among coworkers or even attempts to sabotage one another's work. In many industries, labor and management have had a largely adversarial relationship. Industries have discovered, however, that teamwork not only improves worker morale, but quality of performance as well (Morley & Heraty, 1995). Students' orientation to school work could contribute to (a) exemplary work habits in school may adult work in two ways: (b) constructive work habits may lead transfer to the workplace; to academic and social skills useful in adult work. Ironically, the efficacy of student work habits has not been a popular research theme in the educational literature. This article pieces together the limited research available on this topic and highlights areas of needed research. A variety of educators must play a critical role in the promotion of effective work habits in school. For example, the academic or behavioral problems referred to school psychologists may have work habits components that could be addressed more 6 Student Work Habits 6 readily than students' intellectual or emotional characteristics. Work habits also would seem to be a highly relevant issue in the counselor's discussion of career possibilities. Additionally, counselors can help students examine the impact out of school activities (e.g., watching TV, playing video games, and working part time) on their success in school. The teacher, most of all, is on the front line every day in dealing with the immediate consequences of student work habits. Problem Areas in Student Work Habits In general, how could the work habits of most American students best be characterized? Although some students are repeatedly, disruptive and others consistently ontask, a majority have been characterized as passively compliant (Spaulding, 1992). They do the bare minimum, showing little initiative and enthusiasm about learning. If they exhibit that same orientation in the work place, they will hardly be valued employees. Student Characteristics One of the most mysterious work tendencies is what Bruns (1992) calls "work inhibition." This construct is operationally defined as consistently failing to complete school assignments in all subjects for at least two years. Bruns contends that as many as 20 percent of public school children may fall in this 7 Student Work Habits 7 category, with 3 out of 4 work-inhibited students being boys. The pattern seems to be unrelated to socioeconomic level and typically does not include a high level of disruptive behavior. The paradox of work inhibition is that virtually everyone in the child's support network tries to promote the child's achievement. Parents, in particular, may make herculean efforts to get the child academically mobilized. Another student characteristic that undermines learning is procrastination. By putting things off, students make tasks increasingly difficult and'fail to maximize the benefits of task completion. A task completed belatedly may not produce the same dividends as one completed on time. Procrastination has been operationally defined as failure to turn in at least 25% of one's work (Morse, 1987). Procrastinators usually have good intentions, worry about what they have not done, ignore negative feedback, and resent being reminded of work yet to be done (Broadus, 1983). They appear to inflate the difficulty of tasks or, perhaps, underestimate their ability to meet task demands. Such phrases as "this is too hard" and "I can't do this" are common. Whether such phrases primarily reflect low self-efficacy regarding work tasks or antipathy to hard work is difficult to say. A fundamental Student Work Habits 8 impediment to work initiatives appears to be the lack of an organized strategy for attacking tasks. Giving up easily is a characteristic closely linked to procrastination. Unfortunately, children who give up easily in one situation are likely to do so in other situations (Hamilton & Gordon, 1978; Stipek, Roberts, & Sanborn, 1980). Thus, the tendency to give up in the face of difficulty may be more of a trait than a state. On the other hand, children who persist at tasks learn more than those who give up when tasks become arduous (Stipek, 1983). Out of School Choices Student choices about their use of time outside of school can undermine their effectiveness in the classroom. One of the most critical choice areas is television viewing--both how much TV is viewed and what programs are viewed. Regrettably, children who watch TV the most also are the most likely to watch programs having little educational value (Fetler & Carlson, 1982). Students from a lower socioeconomic background are most inclined to follow this pattern. Nonetheless, heavy TV viewing may produce a greater decrement in the academic achievement of students from professional families than in the achievement of students from less educated families (Fetler, 1984). Perhaps there is a greater 9 Student Work Habits 9 contrast between TV viewing and other options (e.g., books, magazines) readily available to children in professional families than there is for children in less educated families. Overall, it is heavy TV viewing, rather than moderate viewing, that is counter to academic performance. In fact, viewing up to 10 hours a week has been positively linked to school achievement. As students progress to the high school years, increasing numbers are working part-time--with work being a major priority for many of these students (Kablaoui & Pautler, 1991). Part-time work experience can be vocationally beneficial if students have an opportunity to develop skills useful in future employment (Stern, Finkelstein, Stone, Latting, & Dornsife, 1995). 43Ina..n if jobs available to students involve repetitive tasks and low pay, one might assume that part-time work would sensitize students to the importance of preparing for better job opportunities. Regrettably, many teenagers who work part-time may not be thinking long-term, but rather seeking short-term monetary payoffs (Jesse & Marquart, 1992). They often spend most of their pay on personal luxuries and drugs (Greenberger & Steinberg, 1986) . Working part-time has not contributed consistently to performance in school. Heffez (1997) attempted to improve 10