UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff PPeennnnssyyllvvaanniiaa SScchhoollaarrllyyCCoommmmoonnss Neuroethics Publications Center for Neuroscience & Society 2016 ““MMaatttteerr NNoo MMoorree””:: EEddggaarr AAllllaann PPooee aanndd tthhee PPaarraaddooxxeess ooff MMaatteerriiaalliissmm John Tresch Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons, and the Neurosciences Commons RReeccoommmmeennddeedd CCiittaattiioonn Tresch, J. (2016). “Matter No More”: Edgar Allan Poe and the Paradoxes of Materialism. Critical Inquiry, 42 (4), 865-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/687203 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/146 For more information, please contact [email protected]. ““MMaatttteerr NNoo MMoorree””:: EEddggaarr AAllllaann PPooee aanndd tthhee PPaarraaddooxxeess ooff MMaatteerriiaalliissmm DDiisscciipplliinneess Bioethics and Medical Ethics | Neuroscience and Neurobiology | Neurosciences This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/146 “Matter No More”: Edgar Allan Poe and the Paradoxes of Materialism John Tresch Unsettled by doubt, we reach for matter; we clutch a tool, pound a ta- ble, drive a spike into the earth. We think our grip on something solid will catapult us past uncertainty, deception, delusion. But grasping for solidity often leaves us displaced. The more anxiously we reach, the quicker terra firma recedes. This is the case when we study the “material culture” of matter itself—when historians of science, for instance, inspect devices of observation and inscription in chemistry, physics, or the earth sciences. Though often taken to be more reliable than fugitive perceptions or be- liefs, instruments in action are revealed as temperamental links in frag- ile chains of mediation, riddled with gaps. We see the sustained efforts needed to stabilize phenomena—glass, light, dirt—and the tremendous labor involved in getting people to agree that a given technical setup speaks reliably for the world.1 Looking closely at theories of matter leads to even more puzzling detours. Historians of physics gather tracings that reveal vast empty spaces in seemingly solid matter; they chase diagrams marking particles’ oscillation into and out of existence.2 Treating the mo- lecular structure of metals and crystals, we find patterns of latent motion 1. See Simon Schaffer, “Glass Works: Newton’s Prisms and the Uses of Experiment,” in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences, ed. David Gooding, Trevor Pinch, and Schaffer (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 67–104; Bruno Latour, “The ‘Pedofil’ of Boa Vista: A Photo- Philosophical Montage,” Common Knowledge 4 (Spring 1995): 144–87; Things That Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science, ed. Lorraine Daston (Cambridge, Mass., 2004); and Bill Brown, “Thing Theory,” Critical Inquiry 28 (Autumn 2001): 1–22. 2. See Karen Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, N.C., 2007); Peter Galison, Image and Logic: A Material Critical Inquiry 42 (Summer 2016) © 2016 by The University of Chicago. 00093-1896/16/4204-0009$10.00. All rights reserved. 865 This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). 866 John Tresch / Poe and Materialism and force, a molten potentiality at the heart of what appeared firm and inert; we slip into the vortices and eddies of the recurring materialism of Epicurus.3 Today’s new materialisms and object philosophies pursue such para- doxes, shaking high-modern certainties about both the merely material and the purely human.4 Yet the fact that these theories reference sources like Friedrich Schelling, Henry David Thoreau, and H. P. Lovecraft sug- gests that such novelties were old hat by the early nineteenth century, the crucible of both modernity and of modern matter.5 Tossed by revolution- ary tempests, natural philosophers debated the existence and nature of el- emental units, the forces cementing them, and the “imponderable fluids” of light, heat, electricity, and magnetism: Were these particles traveling in straight lines or undulating waves in an invisible, elastic ether?6 Some tested propositions of Joseph Priestley, Roger Joseph Boscovitch, and Im- manuel Kant that see material points as the junction of dynamic polari- ties; experimenters intoxicated by Schelling’s Naturphilosophie placed the Culture of Microphysics (Chicago, 1997); and David Kaiser, Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics (Chicago, 2009). 3. See Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, Eloge du mixte: Matériaux nouveaux et philosophie ancienne (Paris, 1998); Jane Bennett, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Durham, N.C., 2009); and Michel Serres, The Birth of Physics, trans. Jack Hawkes (Manchester, 2000). 4. See New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, ed. Diana Coole and Samantha Frost (Durham, N.C., 2010); Manuel De Landa, A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History (New York, 1997); Graham Harman, “Materialism Is Not the Solution: On Matter, Form, and Mimesis,” 24, no. 47 (2014): 94–110; and Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis, 2013). 5. See Bennett, The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics (Princeton, N.J., 2001); Harman, Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy (Alresford, 2012); Iain Hamilton Grant, Philosophies of Nature after Schelling (London, 2008); and Ben Woodard, On an Ungrounded Earth: Towards a New Geophilosophy (Brooklyn, N.Y., 2013). See discussions of Poe in Eugene Thacker, Horror of Philosophy, 3 vols. (Alresford, 2011–15), esp. vol. 2, Tentacles Longer Than Night. 6. Robert Fox, “The Rise and Fall of Laplacian Physics,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 4 (1974): 92. JOHN TRESCH is associate professor of the history and sociology of science at the University of Pennsylvania. His research focuses on the cultural history of science and technology in the modern world. His book, The Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon, won the 2013 Pfizer Prize for outstanding book in history of science. In 2011 he coedited a special issue of Grey Room Quarterly, “Audio/Visual,” on media in the sciences and the arts. He is currently working on two books: The Reason for the Darkness of the Night: Edgar Allan Poe and the Forging of American Science and Cosmograms: How to Do Things with Worlds. This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). Critical Inquiry / Summer 2016 867 empirical into contact with the transcendental, noumenal, and supernat- ural. Such uncertainties saturated European and American public culture in the 1830s and 1840s, tingeing science, the arts, and theology.7 Edgar Allan Poe’s writings crystallized within these restless solutions. His “Ultima Thule” daguerreotype of 1848—where the nattiness of his moustache and garb are undercut by his shattered gaze—is fixed in col- lective memory, thanks in part to his translator, Charles Baudelaire, who framed him as the poet of an otherworldly beauty and of a “love as eternal and mute as matter” (fig. 1).8 This essay aims to melt this frozen, otherworldly Poe and put him into motion. Gilles Deleuze once asked his readers to imagine “a philosoph- ically bearded Hegel, a philosophically clean-shaven Marx.”9 In a similar spirit, we will contemplate a Poe without a moustache and perhaps even stranger, a Poe with sideburns—as he appears in early sketches and in his first daguerreotype portrait.10 Similarly shorn, he appears in one of the first interior photographs taken in the US, inside Philadelphia’s Academy of Natural Sciences, accompanied by skull-collector Samuel Morton and future paleontologist Joseph Leidy. Neither floating in a realm of ideal forms nor sunk into a gutter of infamy, here he sits in smart striped trou- sers amidst the skeletons, displays, instruments, and professionals of the expanding natural sciences, the light from his form captured by a dazzling new device (fig. 2).11 The momentum given to Poe’s work by the scientific and technological maelstrom of the early nineteenth century has yet to be fully reckoned.12 Anticipating today’s media theory and new materialisms, Poe deployed 7. See Immanuel Kant, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. and ed. Michael Friedman (Cambridge, 2004); John Yolton, Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Minneapolis, 1983); and Friedman, “Kant—Naturphilosophie—Electromagnetism,” in Hans-Christian Oersted and the Romantic Legacy in Science, ed. Robert Brain, Robert Cohen, and Ole Knudson (Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 135–58. 8. Charles Baudelaire, “La Beauté,” Les Fleurs du mal (Paris, 1857), p. 46. 9. Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton (London, 1994), p. xx. 10. See Kevin Hayes, “Poe, the Daguerreotype, and the Autobiographical Act,” Biography 25, no. 3 (2002): 477–92. 11. See Benjamin McFarland and Thomas Peter Bennett, “The Image of Edgar Allan Poe: A Daguerreotype Linked to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia,” Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, no. 147 (1997): 1–32. 12. Among the works that have examined this influence, see Carroll Dee Laverty, “Science and Pseudo-Science in the Writings of Edgar Allan Poe” (PhD diss., Duke University, 1951); Maurice Lee, “Probably Poe,” American Literature 81 (June 2009): 225–52; John Limon, The Place of Fiction in the Time of Science: A Disciplinary History of American Writing (Cambridge, 2009); The Science Fiction of Edgar Allan Poe, ed. Harold Beaver (Harmondsworth, 1976); Edward Sugden, “Simultaneity-across-Borders: Richard Henry Dana Jr., Alexander von Humboldt, Edgar Allan Poe,” J19 2, no. 1 (2014): 83–106; and many others cited below. This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). 868 John Tresch / Poe and Materialism FIGURE 1. “Ultima Thule” daguerreotype (contemporary copy) of Edgar Allan Poe, 9 November 1848. Morgan Library. and reflected on the printed word as a power just as concrete and effec- tive—and ultimately as elusive—as a scientific instrument or machine.13 In constant movement among poetic, philosophical, technical, and scientific 13. See Adam Frank, “Valdemar’s Tongue, Poe’s Telegraphy,” English Literary History 72, no. 3 (2005): 635–62. This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). Critical Inquiry / Summer 2016 869 FIGURE 2. Left to right: Samuel Morton, Joseph Leidy, and Poe (seated), in Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1840s; see McFarland and Bennett on attribution. Courtesy Academy Natural Sciences. registers, Poe’s experiments push past current inquiries into the material basis of meaning and the demiurgic powers of media to probe the depths of matter itself.14 Poe’s poetics, and his politics—especially regarding mass culture and race and his national and transnational positioning—are still being ex- plored as flares into the obscurities of an emerging commercial and mili- tary empire.15 Such fruitful inquiries can be taken further. Poe demanded 14. See Friedrich A. Kittler, Discourse Networks 1800/1900, trans. Michael Metteer and Chris Cullens (Stanford, Calif., 1992), and Daniel Tiffany, Toy Medium: Materialism and Modern Lyric (Berkeley, 2000). 15. See Joan Dayan, “Amorous Bondage: Poe, Ladies, and Slaves,” American Literature 66, no. 2 (1994): 239–73; Poe and the Remapping of Antebellum Print Culture, ed. J. Gerald Kennedy and Jerome McGann (Baton Rouge, La., 2012); McGann, The Poet Edgar Allan Poe: Alien Angel (Cambridge, Mass., 2014); Teresa Goddu, “Rethinking Race and Slavery in Poe Studies,” Poe Studies/Dark Romanticism 33, no. 1–2 (2000): 15–18; Terence Whalen, Edgar Allan Poe and the Masses: The Political Economy of Literature in Antebellum America (Princeton, N.J., This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). 870 John Tresch / Poe and Materialism to be contextualized in the broadest possible terms: “An infinity of error,” he wrote, “makes its way into our Philosophy, through Man’s habit of con- sidering himself a citizen of a world solely—of an individual planet—in- stead of at least occasionally contemplating his position as a cosmopolite proper—as a denizen of the universe.”16 At stake in Poe’s work, like that of many of his contemporaries, was the cosmological order of modernity. In the press and in popular lectures, rivals fretted the proper order and relations among humans, divinities, and nonhumans, as well as the do- main and definition of matter itself. In projects for building institutions and empires, they sought to define and impose the contents, categories, and best means of knowing the universe. These contests were thoroughly cosmopolitical in the sense advocated by Isabelle Stengers, Bruno Latour, and Stephen Toulmin.17 In the early nineteenth century, a recognizably modern notion of sci- ence and nature was coalescing, forged of three key elements: mechanism, materialism, and objectivity—or MeMO for short.18 Although this image of truth was given strength by technical, political, and military conquests that presented themselves as the result of scientific rationality, it was in many respects an unstable synthesis. Each term had its own twisted ge- nealogy, drawing on multiple sources, splitting into diverse streams; the reach and character of the compound they formed varied by speaker, sect, discipline, and region.19 Such a cosmological orientation could never se- cure the universal assent, completeness, or infallibility that its promoters or critics habitually attributed to it; even if it reached hegemonic status by the middle of the twentieth century, it was constantly threatened both by its internal blind spots and by external challenges.20 Other traditions and 1999); Jonathan Elmer, Reading at the Social Limit: Affect, Mass Culture, and Edgar Allan Poe (Stanford, Calif., 1995); Dana D. Nelson, “The Haunting of White Manhood: Poe, Fraternal Ritual, and Polygenesis,” American Literature 69 (Sept. 1997): 515–46; Kennedy, “ ‘A Mania for Composition’: Poe’s Annus Mirabilis and the Violence of Nation-building,” American Literary History 17 (Spring 2005): 1–35; and Jennifer Rae Greeson, Our South (Cambridge, Mass., 2010). 16. Edgar Allan Poe, “Marginalia 15,” Southern Literary Messenger 15 (June 1849): 267. 17. See Isabelle Stengers, “The Cosmopolitical Proposal,” in Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, ed. Latour and Peter Weibel (Cambridge, Mass., 2005), pp. 994– 1003; Latour, Politics of Nature (Cambridge, Mass., 2009); and Stephen Toulmin, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (Chicago, 1992). 18. In this mnemonic, readers may hear echoes of memo, the official, xeroxed, anonymous diktat from the head office; meme, as in the impersonal, self-replicating unit of predatory evolutionism; and Nemo, Greek for “no-one,” name of Jules Verne’s submarine captain, both technocrat and anarchist, invisibly and anonymously at work in the depths. 19. On the entwining of the histories of mechanism and objectivity, see Daston and Galison, Objectivity (New York, 2007); on materialism, see nn. 1–6 above. 20. See Latour, We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, Mass.,1993); Paul Forman, “On the Historical Forms of Knowledge Production and Curation: Modernity Entailed This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). Critical Inquiry / Summer 2016 871 alliances have continuously proposed cosmic inventories and cosmogra- phies at odds with MeMO’s image of truth.21 Yet, by the early nineteenth century, powerful scientific reformers and institution builders were aggressively proposing MeMO-based represen- tations of the cosmos as the only true basis not only for nonhuman nature but for human thought, government, and religion. Historians of science have exposed the complexities, gaps, and internal contradictions within these “major” visions of science. They can also be juxtaposed with the many “minor” cosmographies flourishing outside, alongside, and at times within the emerging imperial centers of scientific authority.22 In the US in an era that nurtured Mormons, Shakers, Baptists, African Methodist Episcopalians, Swedenborgians, Gileadists, phalansterians, mesmerists and spiritualists, we can see Poe’s as among the most striking of these other natures. Their alternative cosmographies are worth retrieving now. An exagger- ated faith in MeMO has made industrial exploitation, economic growth, and a realpolitik of material interests seem inevitable, hastening the great acceleration of economic and industrial expansion of the past sixty years. The ensuing destabilization of our ecological and economic systems puts cosmopolitical questions directly before us. As each day jolts us with dis- turbing evidence of a nature both at our mercy and out of our hands, we would do well to consider cosmological dispositions other than MeMO. Poe’s consistently inconsistent natural philosophy, like other occulted tra- ditions, can speak to us again.23 Disciplinarity, Postmodernity Entails Antidisciplinarity,” Osiris 27, no. 1 (2012): 56–97; and Paul Erickson et al., How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality (Chicago, 2013). 21. As Marshall Sahlins put it: “Just as Galileo thought that mathematics was the language of the physical world, so the bourgeoisie have been pleased to believe that the cultural universe is reducible to a discourse of price—despite the fact that other peoples would resist the one idea and the other by populating their existence with other considerations” (Marshall Sahlins, “Cosmologies of Capitalism: The Trans-Pacific Sector of `the World System,’” in Culture/Power/ History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, ed. Nicholas B. Dirks, Geoff Eley, and Sherry B. Ortner [Princeton, N.J., 1994], p. 416). For a recent example, see Marisol de la Cadena, “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections beyond ‘Politics,’” Cultural Anthropology 25, no. 2 (2010): 334–70. 22. See James Secord, Visions of Science (Chicago, 2015), and John Tresch, The Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon (Chicago, 2012). 23. See Will Steffen, Paul J. Crutzen, and John R. McNeill, “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?” AMBIO 36, no. 8 (2007): 614–21; Dipesh Chakrabarty, “The Climate of History: Four Theses,” Critical Inquiry 35 (Winter 2009): 197– 222; and Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain, Vapor, Ray, ed. Katrin Klingan et al. (Cambridge, Mass., 2014). This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). 872 John Tresch / Poe and Materialism The material technologies of the sciences—with their power to isolate, capture, freeze, compare, and measure phenomena, to establish equiv- alences, to chart relations—are tools for world making. So are the me- dia of communication. For Poe, plotting the cosmos meant navigating a mercurial institutional landscape and interrogating the physical slip- pages of a decentered, newly mechanized information order. To follow him means crossing disciplinary and ontological boundaries as well as the Mason-Dixon line; it also means stepping across disintegrating maps in which new realities were proposed, stabilized, and unraveled. Matter out of Place The second quarter of the century saw heightened transnational en- tanglement of imperial projects on both sides of the Atlantic. Political rev- olutions were followed and provoked by an industrial revolution.24 Histo- rians of science speak, too, of a second scientific revolution at this time, marked by precision measurement, expansive views in geology and as- tronomy, standard languages and methods, new principles of order in comparative anatomy, and a growing professional identity.25 These combined revolutions—and the likelihood of more to come— summoned the sciences to an expanded role in public life. European sa- vants sought to make the conduct of reason an activity exclusive to sanc- tioned bodies for teaching, research, and publicity: academies, universities, and national and international professional societies. While many worked to promote a “major” scientific cosmology, other “minor” knowledges vied for authority in a range of settings. These cosmopolitical challenges were frequently allied to political unrest in the wake of the Napoleonic Wars, where rising demands of workers and ascendant middle classes challenged established institutions and doctrines. One of the most incendiary notions, associated with godless philo- sophes and revolutionaries, was that of a self-organizing vital matter. It challenged the existence not only of an independent, eternal soul but of the omnipotent creator. Joseph Priestley, chemist and Unitarian, spelled out his views in Disquisitions on Matter and Spirit, denouncing Angli- can theologians for presenting matter as base and stupid and denying its power in deliberate analogy with their treatment of the lower classes.26 In 24. See Christopher Bayly, The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons (Oxford, 2004). 25. See From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science, ed. David Cahan (Chicago, 2003). 26. See Joseph Priestley, Disquisitions Relating to Matter and Spirit: To Which Is Added the History of the Philosophical Doctrine Concerning the Origin of the Soul, and the Nature of Matter This content downloaded from 158.130.200.004 on February 16, 2017 12:37:26 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).