Research Paper JMC E-ISSN No : 2454-9916 | Volume : 8 | Issue : 1 | Jan 2022 CULTURE OF POLARIZATION: AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL PARTICIPATION POST #DEMONETISATION ON TWITTER Sumit Malik 1, Dr. Tarjeet Sabharwal 2 1 Officer Communications, Tata Trusts, New Delhi, India. 2Associate Professor, Delhi College of Arts & Commerce, University of Delhi, India. ABSTRACT This research presents an overview of the impact of the notification of demonetization on patterns of social participation and group polarization on twitter. It attempts to draw together in a single volume a wide range of factors that contribute to the immediate responses and reactions of people on twitter on a calamitous event. The study engages in understanding the group dynamics and the nature of different forms of communication in attitude formation. The prime focus of this research work is to throw light on the intervening variables that impact upon group polarization and uniformity in opinion forming within groups rather than looking for a unidimensional relationship between social engagement and the culture of polarization. Homophily among people remains an important tool in understanding group polarisation, attitude and interaction forms, as there is a tendency among people both offline and online to align with isomorphic groups which reinforce their existing attitudes. This scholarly work provides a detailed account of the patterns of social engagement, opinion and attitude formation on the basis of reply-pair tweets, frequency of tweets around different clusters of time and captured tweets. The study highlighted that the range of people on the spectrum of diversity gained to a large extent. Findings in this study thus provide a useful insight into the role of Twitter being a more breaking news medium than a social networking site. One of the major indications in this study to acknowledge that under specific conditions of filtering, algorithm-gate keeping~ by the socio-technical giants, group polarization may or may not produce the given impact within the framework of online social participation and engagement. KEY WORDS: Cultural Polarisation, Demonetisation, Twitter, Social networking sites, Mediated communication, Social Participation. INTRODUCTION: culation and reception. In these terms, Marshall McLuhan's notion of the 'global Every media, ever since their inventions – from the newspaper to radio to televi- village' may have become a reality, Brian McNair arguing that the rise of 'new sion – brought with themselves a new range of possibilities. What internet medi- media' technologies has engendered 'the most radical dissolution of the barriers ated communication did was to take those possibilities multiple notches higher. of time and space which have constrained human communication since we left the savannas and learnt to use language' (McNair, 2002). Room exists, however, The phrase 'new media' denotes a wide variety of recent developments in the to qualify some of the more grandiose and celebratory claims made for the fields of media and communications. It encompasses not only new forms of impact of new media technology. media delivery, but also new convergences between media technologies and new ways in which people use, and interact with, media texts. Fundamental to these The 'new' media, for example, have supplemented rather than swept away older trends has been the growing significance of digital technology in the production, formats. Significant continuities exist between 'old' and 'new', with 'new' media storage and transmission of images, text, sound and data. systems relying on existing technologies such as established TV services and tele- phone lines, while most 'new' media platforms have depended on the repackag- The history of media and communication has been punctuated by important tech- ing of older material (the success of CD sales, for instance, relying on the re-issue nological innovations and these have always had significant social and economic of artists' back catalogues). McLuhan's vision of the global media 'village', mean- consequences. Digitization, however, is seen by many commentators as repre- while, may still be a long way off since the world remains starkly divided senting an especially dramatic moment of technologically driven change. And, between the 'media rich' and the 'media poor'. certainly, the media in the 'digital age' possess features that seem to set them apart from their predecessors. Compared to analogue technology, for example, digital Today, the internet has become so indispensable that users experience a void formats allow a much greater compression of data, making it possible for broad- when they aren't able to consume their choice of media- something that is highly cast systems to carry many more times the volume of information. Digital tech- visible when social media websites are down for maintenance (Twitter) or when nology, therefore, has facilitated a shift to 'narrowcasting', with producers able to some popular applications are facing some technical error. tailor media content to specific niche (even individualized) market segments. WhatsApp experienced an outage for around 210 minutes on 22nd April 2014 Greater dimensions of interactivity are also possible with digital technology. Dig- from 11am to 2:30 pm PST for the first time. Users around the world reported that itally-based websites, games, DVDs and TV services all allow for new, innova- they were unable to send messages and WhatsApp confirmed these problems at tive ways for audiences to participate in, perhaps even take control of, the pro- 12:16pm PST with a tweet stating “sorry we currently experiencing server cesses of media consumption. In itself, the character of the web is distinctly inter- issues. We hope to be back up and recovered shortly.” active, users creating their own 'trails' through cyberspace as they click through an infinite matrix of hypertext links. Even on previous occasions, when WhatsApp didn't work, users turned to Twit- ter. Social media, most notably, opened its users to create and share content; connect- ing them in ways never before imagined. But it would also be unfair not to #WhileTwitterWasDown was the hashtag that got popular whilst Twitter was acknowledge the fact that the individual did not have a 'voice' when considering undergoing maintenance in the night from 11th to 12th March 2014. It trended at the 'traditional' media. The radio phone-ins, letters to the editor, and similar talk- the top spot for two complete days. back mechanisms for TV- all stand testimony to this fact. But this possibility of 'a voice to the audience' was selective; only a select few and not everyone who was The internet, with its social media offering, has today become a part of a defini- a user of a particular medium could voice her/himself. The internet, by offering a tion of one's psyche. The impact that these socializing-via-internet outlets have 'voice to every user' thus became a marked departure from its traditional counter- on one's identity are so deep rooted that one sees their overt manifestation in the parts. There was a time when 'you've got mail' was enough to get one excited; daily discourse- most notably (but not limited to those) of the digital natives. today, it's doubtful if someone shares this sentiment. Words of online origin like 'lol', 'epic', or even 'facepalm' appear almost naturally in the offline/real discourse. The convergence of digital, satellite and cable technology, moreover, has trans- formed systems of media distribution, allowing producers to escape the geo- The contemporary theory on language learning and teaching embodies the graphical, cultural and regulatory boundaries that formerly governed media cir- above-mentioned concept of 'void' as: the identity of the language learner Copyright© 2022, IERJ. This open-access article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License which permits Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) under the Attribution-NonCommercial terms. International Education & Research Journal [IERJ] 12 Research Paper E-ISSN No : 2454-9916 | Volume : 8 | Issue : 1 | Jan 2022 addresses the ways in which language learners understand their relationship to researcher first describes related work in on 'media events' (Boorstin, 1961), new the social world, how that relationship is constructed across time and space, and media technologies (NMT, henceforth) and the diffusion of information (most how the learner understands possibilities for the future. (Norton, B., 2000) notably but not limited to van Dijk and Manuel Castells' writings on 'networked societies'), group behaviour, and polarization. For a deeper understanding of the reasons for such trends one needs to under- stand their very genesis; which can be explained using various paradigms and the- The researcher then describes the details of the #Demonetisation debate and the ories involved in celebrity studies. These theories would give a background to fur- methods he applies to collect data. In the results section, he describes who ther understand the hypotheses formulated in this dissertation, and also provide a tweeted, what they tweeted, to whom did they tweet and other interactions that premise in understanding the conclusions that follow. took place. He then discusses the implications of Twitter use on polarization, and concludes with implications for social media use. Technological Determinism: Also, as online communication (e.g., email; SMS; instant messaging; video chat; In view of the empirical studies mentioned above, it is evident that the presence online social communities) becomes commonplace, understanding both the pro- of homophily on twitter and other social platforms can limit their social worlds. cess of online communication as well as the product of that communicative phe- Homophily is bound to play a significant role in group polarisation, attitude and nomenon becomes important. Each online communicative act relies on the tech- interaction forms. The tendency to align with isomorphic groups may reinforce nology to translate the message from sender to receiver(s); without the technol- their existing attitudes. ogy, online communication cannot take place at all. Marshall McLuhan, the media guru, is famous for his saying that 'medium is the message'. He could be Hence, the nature of group polarisation on twitter on dramatic and controversial described as a 'technological determinist', in that he believes technological inno- issues constitutes an important question. These are some major gaps in the exist- vation reshapes social life and drives social change. Technology determines how ing theoretical understanding and the study addresses itself to these. society functions, rather than society determining how technology should be developed or used. In other words, the technology used to communicate a mes- In the light of the above existing literature, the presence of homophily in group sage also structures the way we think and interact and perceive the world. We are polarization seems more pronounced in both offline and online studies. The fol- beginning to see ourselves as global citizens in part because new communication lowing research questions are posed for probing in this study. technologies have enabled us to relate to each other in this way. RESEARCH QUESTION(S): Different media also relate to different ways of organizing power. For example, 1. Is Twitter a social network or a news media? print media privileges sight, education, and the media producer, correlating with a fairly impersonal, linear, rational way of thinking and relating to others. 2. Does a culture of polarization emerge with engagement on Twitter on a con- troversial news story? Newer media forms such as interactive television and computer mediated com- munication offer increasing interactivity, autonomy, and choice on the part of the 3. Does the nature and form of polarization formed through engagement rein- user and unprecedented personal control over the production, manipulation, and force the existing attitudes of the respondents? distribution of content. For these reasons the 'democratic' attributes of new media are praised for equalizing the power balance between media consumers and The specific objectives, however, are: media producers, in some cases obliterating the distinction altogether. 1. To study whether Twitter is a medium for social engagement or a breaking REVIEW OF LITERATURE: news medium Of all the technological changes that have been sweeping through the societies in the last decade, the most fundamental and pervasive in their effects on human 2. To understand the dynamics and patterns of twitter users on controversial society, has been the changes in communication (Millikan, 1961). issues in terms of the nature of engagement. Progressive changes in communication networks have not only brought distant 3. To observe whether there are diverse range of netizens---in terms of educa- cultures together in a society, but have contributed to the conception of a power- tional background, age group and socio-economic status—who engage on ful networked public space (McQuire, 2016). Underpinned by the low transac- twitter during controversial events? tion costs of networked digital communication, social participation has become a zeitgeist, a value that almost everyone seems to subscribe to. However, the 4. To investigate whether isomorphic people align themselves with those who researcher suggests that one needs to deepen our analysis to better understand hold similar opinions? what participation on a digitalized public space might involve in different set- tings and particular contexts. 5. To gain an understanding of the culture of polarization on online public space on a controversial news event. There is a critical shift in the role of the public as audience or mere onlookers in the online/digital space. The rhetoric of participation is central to the emergence HYPOTHESES: of group polarisation and group behaviour especially on issues of controversy. The following hypotheses were drawn for the study: The nature and form of engagement on the networked terrain is a concomitant process where the alignment of the individual towards collective subjects neces- 1. Diversity becomes more pronounced during controversial events. sitates an isomorphic relation of the individual with collective subjects or groups. Klapper (1960) in his reinforcement theory argues that there are particular atti- 2. The presence of homophily would have the most profound effect in group tudes and beliefs that the mass media is unlikely to change, such as radical polarization. changes and religious intolerance because attitudes are crucial to their self- images and central to clusters of related attitudes. 3. Active twitter users may respond and react /proactively and engage with those who hold different/varied opinion from their own. Close to this theory, is the principle of homophily, which states that interactions between similar people occur more often than among dissimilar people The following terms have been operationalized for the study: (Lazarsfeld & Merton, 1954). Many online communities are structured around groups of socially similar individuals. On Twitter, however, people are exposed 1. Cyber Culture: a unique set of habits, values and other elements of culture to multiple, diverse points of view through the medium's public timeline. that have evolved from the use of computers and the Internet. Contemporary media and the Internet have 'abetted' a culture of polarization, in 2. Social Participation: all varieties of informal interactions on twitter with indi- which people primarily seek out points of view to which they already subscribe viduals and within groups. (Sunstein, 2001). People's opinions have been shown to become more extreme simply because their view has been corroborated, and because they grow more 3. Public Space: a social place open and accessible to people to interact and confident after learning of the shared views of others (Sunstein, 2008). enjoy their coexistence and represent their collectivity without losing or disaggregating their diversity. The presence of homophily can limit people's social worlds in ways that have implications for the information they receive, the attitudes they form, and the 4. Polarisation: division into two sharply contrasting groups of opinions or interactions they experience. In the online world (and off it too), polarization hap- beliefs. pens when the members of a deliberating group move toward more extreme views. 5. Hashtag: a word or phrase preceded by a hash sign (#), used on social media websites, especially on twitter, to identify messages on a specific topic. In the backdrop of these arguments and the interplay between online communi- ties on public space and nature and form of communication, this research exam- 6. Controversial: giving rise or likely to give rise to a lot of disagreement or ines the culture of group polarisation on Twitter on controversial news events. argument about something that usually affects or is important to people. This work draws from Sunstein's seminal research on online polarization. The 13 International Education & Research Journal [IERJ] Research Paper E-ISSN No : 2454-9916 | Volume : 8 | Issue : 1 | Jan 2022 METHODOLOGY: Initial findings reveal that, unlike other recent seemingly-polarized studies (e.g. Population: the “ABP+Neilson's study of Uttar Pradesh's prospective voters (regarding the The population for this study will comprise of all tweets from the tweeples (a port- Samajwadi Party 'crisis'), had majority of respondents saying “neither” to the manteau of the words Twitter+people); in this case, those holding a twitter questions regarding the Akhilesh-Mulayam split), most people have an opinion account who responded to the topic of #Demonetisation in India* within the first on the # Demonetisation debate. 24 hours. Unit of analysis: A tweet The sampling frame for the study has been restricted to the first 24 hours follow- ing the demonetization announcement. This has been done because the Data presentation: The data has been interpreted and also presented with tables, researcher is interested in analysing the dynamics of immediate engagement and bar graphs, process lists, pie diagrams etc. reactions amongst users. The Rationale of the study can hence be summarized as: Sample size: 100 tweets “The study aims to gain an understanding of cyber culture and the culture of polarization on online public space on a controversial news event; more particu- larly, examining the effects of Twitter use on group polarization and extremism.” Web of Polarisation: Indeed, new media has abetted a culture of polarization, in which people seek out points of views to which they already subscribe. Once their views have been cor- roborated and once, they learn of the shared views of others, they grow more con- fident of their views. This is primarily underlying genesis of the phenomenon of group polarization; wherein people end up in more extreme positions than what they began with. Studies have shown polarization exhibited in offline situations too. (the study of voters who had a Leftist ideology who when engaged in a discussion voters with a Rightist ideology were shown to have ended up in more extreme positions than what they began with.) This work is not the first in examining polarization online. Previous research has examined polarization, hate speech and extremism in early online communities such as Schafer's - in as early as 2002; little is known as to how it happens in con- temporary media outlets, esp, Social Networking Sites (SNS, henceforth), such as Twitter. Figure 1: Methodology - Step One & Mass Communication In his book, Republic.com, Sunstein, (who happens to be the most frequently Sampling technique: A probability sampling technique—the cluster sampling cited American legal scholar by a wide margin [in studies conducted from 2009- – will be applied, and 100 tweets will be identified for analysis. This is a multi- 2014]) writes in the preface, stage technique and will be applied in the following manner. “In a democracy, people do not live in echo-chambers or information cocoons. The news broke out at 20:15 IST on 9th November 2016. They see and hear a wide range of topics and ideas. They do so even if they did not, and would not choose to see and to hear those topics and those ideas in Since population for this study is all those who tweeted on demonetisation, the advance. These claims raise serious questions about certain uses of new tech- sampling frame will be the number of tweets on demonetisation in the first 24 nologies, above all the internet, and about the aston- ishing growth in the power hours. to choose—to screen in and to screen out.” The tweets will be divided into four clusters based on the time interval. The first Learning of news events: cluster comprised of tweets between 8 pm to 2 am. The second from 2 am to 8 am. Before examining where we are today, let's see how we came to where we are. The third cluster constituted tweets from 8am to 2 pm and the fourth cluster from Let's take Indira Gandhi's assassination, for example. Shailaja Bajpai writes, in 2pm to 8 pm. (11th November 2106 to 12th November 2016) “The riots that could not be televised”, in The Indian Express: “On October 31, 1984, DD was the last one to give us the news of Mrs Gandhi's death. That was typical and expected: nobody turned to TV for the latest news, then; it was radio and BBC that told us what happened in our own backyard. Think it was Salma Sultan who first announced it on DD's evening news, more than 10 hours after she was shot.” If Radio was to Indira Gandhi's assassination, JF Kennedy's was word of mouth. The Vietnam War became the “First Televised War”. Changes in technology have altered how people first learn of news events. As a sign of the times, people are increasingly turning to social media for learning of news events. It's no wonder then, that when the 26/11 Mumbai attacks of 2008 unfolded, not only did the information spread via Face book and Twitter, but people used Google maps. As Figure 2: Methodology - Step Two Golder, 2009 notes, “during [such] time sensitive events, people's use of Twitter bursts with an astonishing frequency and intensity”. In the next stage 25 tweets were selected from each cluster applying the simple random sampling technique. A total of 100 tweets formulated the sample size. Yardi & boyd, quote Gantz and Trenholm, when identifying the four reasons as to why people share news about critical events: They write: Research Design: The qualitative research method was applied to the study. 1. To satisfy informational and interest needs Netnographic research was undertaken to seek answers to the research questions. Since the research technique applied here is Netnography, the process of analys- 2. To establish social status, that they are superior to other people in some ing the objectives will include content analysis, semiotic visual analysis (if manner any+primarily, but not limited to visual responses such as videos, pictures and GIFs) and textual analysis. The content analysis technique and the constant com- 3. To express affection and parative technique will be applied to understand the nature of tweets and group dynamics represented. 4. To initiate social contact, to talk with others. The researcher manually coded Twitter users for their respective “issue- Emotional response triggers a range of behaviours: the need for comfort and position” (Kelly, et al., 2005) on #Demonetisation. Despite the availability of social support is also a reason for talking with others about threatening or tragic studies that apply linguistic markers to study levels of agreement, the researcher events. Kubey and Peluso reported that people who shared news of the Chal- is not confident about how they would lend themselves to this study – a one lenger explosion were more likely to say that talking with others made them feel which seeks to analyse 140 character squeezed forms of textual expression! The better (Kubey & Peluso, 1990). Ibrahim et al. found that individuals who con- selected tweets from the users are then analysed. tacted others on September 11 were more likely to report that they sought social International Education & Research Journal [IERJ] 14 Research Paper E-ISSN No : 2454-9916 | Volume : 8 | Issue : 1 | Jan 2022 support and coped by discussing the events (Ibrahim, Ye, & Hoffner, 2008). An Anti-Common Web ~ A Genesis of Group Polarization online Sunstein has been amongst the pioneers in writing on polarization and filters of the web; many more scholars have followed suit. The researcher can't do better, but quote their findings: Kelly et al. have written about the effect of how group polarization unfolds in an online space. The Internet has been termed as a kind of an "anti-commons" that allows its users to consume information and relate with others on the basis of shared values and interests only. (Kelly et al., 2005). However, it must be Figure 3: A Google trend report showing a sharp spike in the usage of pointed out that public institutions in the world around us----- information" the Demonetization term. commons" or the mainstream mass media--- keep in check our individual pref- erences --- in which people are exposed to a wider spectrum of viewpoints However, #demonetization, in itself is a neutral hashtag, speaking nothing of which they would not otherwise encounter as the Internet is less public (Kelly user's stand on the issue. Hence, instead of seeing tweets from a follower network et al,2005). Furthermore, Adamic et al.'s a study of political blogs showed that of mostly likeminded people, the researcher decided that people who followed the NY Post, The WSJ Opinion Journal and the Washington Times receive the the public search stream (i.e. search.twitter.com) were exposed to a diverse set of majority of their links from right leaning blogs, while the LA Times, the New viewpoints about the story. Republic and the Wall Street Journal were largely linked by left leaning blogs (Adamic & Glance, 2005) The researcher examines these by looking at how people found and propagated news about the Demonetization, who they discussed the issue with, and how A similar trend has been observed in studies of book sales on Amazon indicat- extreme their views were. ing that purchasing patterns are strongly clustered by political parties (Krebs,2000). However, results of studies group polarisation differ; a study of Debates around a political move this scale are deeply personal and cultural in agreement levels in different genres of blogs by Gilbert et.al suggested that nature. This is primarily why the researcher did not anticipate a dramatic shift in entertainment blogs and technology inspired less polarization than lifestyle, people's views, based merely on what other people posted. The researcher was, politics and blogs about blogs (Gilbert, Bergstorm & Karahalios, 2009). In yet hence, simply interested to know, do people who tweeted about the #demonetisa- another subsequent study on political blogs revealed that widely read political tion debate become more extreme in their posts, and is detecting patterns in bloggers have a greater possibility of linking and connecting to others who behavior and network externalities possible, that may have influenced the kinds share their political views; but that bloggers across the political spectrum of things they said? respond to each other's writing substantively, both favourably and unfavour- ably( (Hargittai, Gallo, & Kane, 2008). Similarly, a study by Kelly et.al on This research work is hence centred around examining the effects of Twitter use political groups indicated that discussions were more likely to occur across on group polarization and extremism. like-minded clusters of groups rather than within them (Gilbert, et al., 2009). It emphasised that people go online to argue, rather than agree. It can be Why Twitter? inferred that deliberation and argumentation online are particularly important This research is different from prior work on homophily and online polarization when political, emotionally charged or controversial issues are discussed. in a few ways. Firstly, Twitter conversations differ from other online outlets such as Usenet (see (Kelly, Fisher, & Smith, 2005)) where people come to the discus- What the FAQ just happened!?* sion intentionally; On Twitter, however, people (it's users) simply witness a con- Ÿ The 2016 Indian Banknote Demonetization of ₹ 500 & ₹ 1,000 Mahatma versation and are drawn into it. Gandhi series The Government of India announced the demonetisation of all Rs. 500 Add to it the 140 character 'constraint' as well as the speed at which topics flow, (US$7.70) and ₹ 1,000 (US$15) banknotes of the Mahatma Gandhi Series on 8 which further distinguishes Twitter from blogging sites such as WordPress and November 2016. This initiative, the government claimed would help to curb the BlogSpot. shadow economy and crack down on the illegal and illicitly held counterfeit cash used to fund terrorism. This unexpected and sudden notification and the pro- Finally, Twitter's public timeline offering, is how it is starkly different from a longed cash shortages in the weeks that followed- lead to a significant disruption Facebook news feed ~ which is public only to a local neighbourhood within one's throughout the country posing a threat to economic output. This move was highly network, while Twitter conversations (excluding protected accounts) are public criticised as it was poorly planned and unfair and met with strikes, protests and lit- to anyone who looks (Yardi & boyd, 2009). Through hashtags and the public igation. timeline, people can witness public conversations they otherwise might not, and can participate in conversations they otherwise may not have. This has implica- An unscheduled live televised address on 8th November at 20.00 Indian Standard tions for access to resources and diversity of information. Time (IST) saw the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi announcing the demonetisation of all ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 banknotes of the Mahatma Gandhi Series Learning(s) from the Masters: would be invalid past midnight. In his announcement, Modi declared that new ₹ This tiny chapter is a list of the research findings and ground-breaking works (of- 500 and ₹ 2000 banknotes of the Mahatma Gandhi New Series would be issued in ten seminal) in the fields of sociology, communication and technology. (The exchange for the old banknote. researcher included this as a separate section instead of including this under the theoretical framework or RoL because they form building blocks, upon which In an immediate repercussion to demonetisation The BSE SENSEX and NIFTY this research builds off.) 50 stock indices fell over 6 percent on the very next day. The days that followed demonetisation, people across India faced cash crunch with detrimental eco- As Yardi, S & boyd, d (2009), put it, these assumptions can be enumerated as: nomic effects across the country. It was reported that people had to stand in long queues for hours in the biting cold resulting in some deaths. 1. Social Equality can be achieved only when people have access to news and information. (Hargittai, 2008) Initially the move was welcomed by some international experts and analysts including bankers. But as the days unfolded, the move received severe criticism 2. Plurality of information and viewpoints necessitates and promotes diversity and flak from the members of the opposition parties leading to acrimonious only when an individual is exposed to diverse and multiple opinions. debates and triggering protests against the government across India. Demoneti- Monopoly of a single viewpoint or a lack of exposure can lead to homoge- sation resulted in slowing down industrial production and is considered to have neous or narrow-minded views. reduced the country's GDP. Prominent economists and the world media criticised Sunstein, 2001) this move in the days that followed due to cash shortage. 3. Engaging with isomorphic people can lead to polarisation, equality and As the news spread extremism (Sunstein, 2001) As the news spread, Twitter users began to voice strong and polarized views about demonetisation. In keeping with Twitter's slogan- “What's happening”, Issue position ≠ Political Commitment; users tweeted their mind. Drawing content categories: The debate was, clearly, a polarized one. In the era of Donald Trump and his 'vicious rhetoric' finding a place in popular cul- ture, the best way to explain the title of this chapter is this: A pro-Republican While some were all for the move, the others against it; what initially appeared as Trump supporter may be all out and about in support for his actions, but due to a simple a simple “note-ban” in people's tweets and their offline discourse too, his/her sexual orientation might not support Trump's homophobia. A pro- got quickly replaced by the accepted economic term, “#demonetization” or “#de- Democrat Hilary Clinton supporter can be in support of all of Clinton's moves, monetisation”. but may vehemently oppose her “Gay rights are human rights” stance. 15 International Education & Research Journal [IERJ] Research Paper E-ISSN No : 2454-9916 | Volume : 8 | Issue : 1 | Jan 2022 Hence, instead of categorizing people on the basis of their political commitment, ii) On the basis of frequency per quarter: i.e. whether or not they are a Narendra Modi supporter, the researcher manually codes Twitter users for their respective “issue-position” (Kelly, et al., 2005) on the #Demonetisation debate. He examines tweets about the #Demonetisation from each user and in some cases looks at the user's Twitter profile more gener- ally to code their position on the issue. (For the sake of simplicity, the word “Demonetis/zation” has been replaced with a capitalized D throughout the course of this work unless otherwise stated.) The content categories were drawn on a 5-point scale. A prototypical pro-D tweet was on the lines of: #Demonetisation Huge move to root out black money, despite all the short- comings. Positive development in the long run. More courage needed A prototypical anti-D tweet read something like: iii) On the basis of reply-pair tweets: #DeMonetisation is illconceived probably counter productive. #Fail @rbi @PMOIndia @arunjaitley Sobering reality check by @AmbaAzaad on the very marginalized in our societywho need to be prioritized in this #demonetization transition Tweets that could not be classified into either of the categories were classified as neither and read something like this: Every Tamil mom is gonna say "I told you so. Gold is always safe” #demonetization Master stroke with initial sweet pain..#demonetisation of 500 and 1000...#Modiji But as the researcher went further with the data analysis, two broad categories were beginning to emerge- strongly worded tweets. On seeing the same, the researcher further categorized the tweets as “strongly pro-D” and “strongly anti- The top two rows represent the number of like-minded reply pairs D” They were done on three basis: and; the bottom two are representative of opposite minded reply pairs Ÿ Associated the move with terrorism INFERENCES AND CONCLUSIONS: The impact of social media on social participation has been one of the most fre- Ÿ Used abusive language quently debated topics across the world. Research has been carried out in the recent years across the globe especially on group dynamics and web polarization. Ÿ Exhibited uncivilized and unethical human responses (predominantly seen However, in India, the demonetization notification, a controversial issue, was as rejoicing in the death of people and/or branding the voices of families of debated not only among intellectuals but among diverse groups of people, rich or the deceased as anti-national) poor; educated or uneducated; belonging to different religions and other catego- ries. The social media especially twitter found a very heavy traffic in the immedi- Hence, a Strongly Pro-D read something on the lines of ate response to demonetization. The present study is an endeavor to illustrate the impact of demonetization on opinion forming and group polarization on twitter. Why are #AAPTARDS opposing #DeMonetisation ? Does The assumption that the presence of homophily pre-supposes that people with Nodemonetization (sic) helps fight Corruption more than demonetization of similar opinion are bound to relate to groups which hold similar opinions as 500/1000? theirs. This tendency is expected to have a significant effect on group polariza- tion. In view of the research questions, hypotheses and specific objectives the Similarly, a prototypical Strongly Anti-D read something as thus: study revealed the following: #Demonetization is an act by Saffron Terrorists. 1. Homophily, not that bad either: The results from this work we see both homophily and heterogeneity in con- DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION: versations about #Demonetization. i) On the basis of captured tweets: Twitter was abuzz with activity on the day Demonetization was notified. It was expected that twitter users would engage with various conundrums on this eventful day. It was also expected that people would engage in conversa- tions with others who share similar views as they do. However, it was noted that active twitter users are likely to be engaged with those who hold differ- ent and varied opinions. The narrative of diversity becomes more pro- nounced during calamitous events. As argued by Hulbert, Haines & Beggs, 2000, this research too, furthers their finding that, although debate and diversity are critical components of a democratic society, the 'element of social support' can be provided through the presence of homophily. A range of homogeneous exchanges with people can help them to emotionally with- stand the trauma while discussing or mourning dramatic events. 2. More 'media' than 'social': The results suggest that newer media outlets have continued the legacy of breaking the preceding medium's swiftness in 'breaking' news. Twitter too has followed suit and has become the go-to medium for any breaking news, offering its users a wide array of filters to get relevant results. Setting a filter to limit one's geography can help confirm the slightest of seismic move- ments, too banal for mainstream media. Thus, Twitter today, has become International Education & Research Journal [IERJ] 16 Research Paper E-ISSN No : 2454-9916 | Volume : 8 | Issue : 1 | Jan 2022 more media-media than social media. Going further, the study reveals that twitter is more a news breaking media rather than social. The results suggest that newer media outlets have continued the leg- Once upon a time, (not so long ago), humans lived in the age of the broadcast acy of breaking the preceding medium's swiftness in 'breaking' news. world. The editors of publications were the traditional gatekeepers. Then, with the advent of the internet, traditional gatekeeping roles saw a flip never Also, the study engages to indicate that mapping the trajectory of the cultural con- imagined, with social media adding abundant democratization. Then came text is significant. The deliberations that take place tend to shift towards a generic the algorithm, replacing on a massive scale, 'the editor'. We are now being “public sphere” without any prominent hurdle and therefore, there is a fair likeli- provided the most personally relevant as well as appealing results. The Code hood of low extremism and instability, but the results point towards a “stifling uni- is the Master of this filtration. However, these codes are but, written by formity”. This implies that polarization stems from learning rather than just humans. Although unlike the good old 'editor-gatekeeper', the code- another manifestation of group dynamics. Hence the study prevents us from visu- gatekeeper's human coder is not a keeper of public trust. Guided by little or alizing any one-to-one relationship between attitude formation and group polar- no journalistic ethics. ization. Hence, what's needed is not a reversal to the past, i.e., the days of the editor. As argued in this study, issue positions have, more often than not, shown to be Certainly not. A democracy encourages engagement with different view- independent of political alignment or in-group associations. Learning-led polar- points, but when the internet is limiting that engagement (by offering infor- ization helps promote the ability of voicing opinions and views of such individu- mation that is reflective of our established view), it is also limiting our abil- als; thus, aiding even the 'within-group' discussion to go in the direction of debate ity to engage. and discussions thus, strengthening democracy. What's needed is this: since our browsing and behavioral patterns is what The present study therefore, helps in laying bare some of the mechanisms which trains' these filters/codes/algorithms, it is imperative to develop, what the homophily has been working as an intervening variable in the process of group researcher proposes to call 'filter literacy'. Users of the internet need to polarization. The presence of homophily explains the isomorphic nature of develop, understand and decipher the working of these tools while at the groups which basically tend to engage within themselves. To conclude, that same time demand content that aids the widening of their horizons – even homophily not only makes a differential impact upon different groups of people when it's seemingly uncomfortable. on twitter, it also impacts various forms of social engagement and participation very differently. This, however cannot be realized to its full potential, unless and until the tech giants widen their horizons, giving users a more transparent, under- The theoretical relevance of the present study lies in going beyond the relation- standable (and to an extent, controllable) view of the working of these filters. ship between uniformity of opinions, attitude formation and group polarization. It provides insights into specific conditions of filtering, algorithm-gate keeping~ As, Eli Parser, author of 'The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding by the socio-technical giants under which group polarization may or may not pro- From You', puts it, “While it's sometimes convenient to see only what you duce the given impact within the framework of online social participation and want to see, it's critical at other times that you see things that you don't.” engagement. A more concerted solution to the problem the academia argues is that, map- Richness of a study also lies in its ability to raise some new issues which may be ping the trajectory of the cultural context is imperative. Sunstein, for taken up for future research, instance, argues that shifting towards a generic sort of a “public sphere” with- out any significant hurdle in deliberation, there is a fair likelihood of low LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY: extremism and instability, but the result may be a “stifling uniformity”. This study limited to the first 24-hour responses by individual account holders on Hence, he throws much light on the need for directing deliberation in such a Twitter to the demonetization announcement. manner that the resulting polarization stems from learning rather than just another manifestation of group dynamics. As argued in this study, issue posi- Twitter introduced support for hash tagging in a few local Indian languages in tions have, more often than not, shown to be independent of political com- 2015. However, with this study focused on English language hashtags i.e., #De- mitments or in-group associations. Learning-led polarization will help pro- monetization & #Demonetisation, it was not inclusive of those who sent out mote the ability of voicing of the perspectives & views of such individuals; tweets in Hindi or Marathi, albeit tweeting in the first 24 hours. thus, aiding even the 'within-group' discussion to go in the direction of debate and discussions. It's important to note that the Twitter stream turns back more search results when making queries in real time. The tweets returned in the case of this research work In the backdrop of the interplay between uniformity of opinions, polariza- are hence a subset of the total tweets sent out during the time. tion and group dynamics, Yardi and Boyd suggest a two-pronged approach. (However, both being primarily from the social computing background, sug- BIBLIOGRAPHY: gest a tech-driven, nonetheless potentially effective approach.) Firstly, to I. "The riots that could not be televised" Indianexpress.com. 3 November 2009. maintain stability and balance, they suggest, putting to use voting and rank- Accessed on March 2015, accessed at http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/the- ing algorithms. Secondly, to promote rigorous debates and diversity of view- riots-that-could-not-be-televised/536471/ points it is imperative to encourage and motivate people from marginalized, II. Kelly, J., (2005). Debate, Division, and Diversity: Political Discourse Networks in diverse racial, social and educational backgrounds towards participation. USENET Newsgroups. Paper presented at the Stanford Online Deliberation Confer- The internet has expanded the spectrum of the demographics of its users. ence DIAC'05. The ever-broadening spectrum of diverse people using the internet---from III. Malik, S. (2014). You are what you tweet: Analyzing Celebrity culture on Twitter, elderly users to those in rural belts, has also widened the range of opportuni- Unpublished ties to engage in diverse discussions. IV. McQuire, Scott (2016). Geo Media Networked Cities and the Future of Public Space, Polity Press Parks and newspapers have, for long, served as a kind of 'information com- V. Sunstein, Cass (2001). Republic.com: Princeton University Press. mons', where people meet and discuss. If the growing evolution of informa- tion online into an anti-common platform is not checked, then the future of VI. Sunstein, Cass (2008). The Law of Group Polarization in Debating Deliberative social media, or rather say, the future of these massively giant socio- Democracy Blackwell Publishing Ltd. technical systems will remain, anti-common. VII. Veblen, Thorstein (1904).The Theory of Business Enterprise, Lauer Robert H.(ed), Perspectives on Social Change. Allyn and Bacon Polarization, homophily, filtering, algorithm-gate keeping~ may be argued VIII. Virginia Nightingale, (2014). The Handbook of Media Audiences, John Wiley & along the lines of empirical evidence or at a normative level. However, in the Sons Ltd. ultimate analysis, the arguments about diversity and/or the lack of it, solidar- IX. Webster, J. (1986), Audience Behaviour in the New Environment, Journal of Com- ity and division, justice and injustice, are too important to be left to science. munication, Vol.36, 77-91 X. When the Internet Thinks It Knows You, The New York Times, accessed on April Theoretical Relevance of the study: 13th, 2017 Accessed at URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/opinion/ The theoretical contribution of the study lies in its ability to fill in the gaps in 23pariser.html existing literature regarding the culture of polarization, uniformity of opinions XI. Wimmer, Roger D. and Dominick, Joseph R., 2014, Mass Media Research: An Intro- and attitude formation on Twitter. Rather than homogenizing the effect of duction, 10e, Wadsworth demonetization the study is able to specify how group polarization takes place and the nature of tweets explains how engagement and group dynamics on con- XII. Yardi, S., boyd, d. Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time troversial issues promotes diversity. The internet has expanded the spectrum of on Twitter, 2015 the demographics of its users. The ever-broadening spectrum of diverse people using the internet---from elderly users to those in rural belts, has also widened the range of opportunities to engage in diverse discussions pointing towards diver- sity thereby endorsing one of the major hypotheses. 17 International Education & Research Journal [IERJ]