ebook img

Cotton varieties planted PDF

16 Pages·1998·3.1 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Cotton varieties planted

Historic, Archive Document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. **-■8.1 VS'-l* Cotton Varieties Planted, United States 1998 Crop Deltapine brand upland cottonseed was the most popular planted in the United States for the 1998-99 season, according to the USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service's Cotton Programs. Paymaster brand was the second most popular followed by Stoneville, Sure-Grow, CPCSD, All-Tex and Tamcot. Transgenic varieties accounted for about 45 percent of plantings. Deltapine brand varieties were the most popular planted in 1998, accounting for 39.4 percent of the United States acreage. This brand accounted for 60.7 percent of the acreage planted in the southeastern states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia). It accounted for 39.1 percent of the acreage planted in the south central states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee), 25.9 percent of the acreage planted in the southwestern states (Oklahoma and Texas) and 29.8 percent in the western states (Arizona, California and New Mexico). Deltapine's most popular variety was Deltapine NuCotn 33B. This variety accounted for 8.8 percent of the United States acreage planted. Paymaster brand varieties were the second most popular planted in 1998, accounting for 26.8 percent of the United States acreage. These varieties accounted for 53.1 percent of the acreage planted in the southwestern states, 17.3 percent in the southeastern states and 8.7 percent in the south central states. The most popular Paymaster variety was Paymaster HS 26, accounting for 5.7 percent of the U.S. acreage followed by Paymaster PM 2 32 6 RR with 4.7, and Paymaster PM 2200 RR with 3.4 percent of the acreage. Stoneville varieties were the third most popular planted in 1998. These varieties accounted for 16.2 percent of the acreage planted. They accounted for 10.0 percent of the acreage planted in the southeastern states, 44.1 percent of the acreage in the south central states, 4.5 percent in the southwestern states and 1.5 percent in the western states. The most popular Stoneville variety was Stoneville ST 474 which accounted for 6.2 percent of the United States acreage planted. The second most popular variety was Stoneville BXN 47 which accounted for 5.7 percent of the U.S. acreage. Sure-Grow varieties were the fourth most popular planted in 1998. These varieties accounted for 5.2 percent of the U.S. acreage and accounted for 8.6 percent of the southeastern states planted acreage, 7.6 percent in the south central states, 0.9 percent in the southwestern states, and 5.7 percent in the western states. CPCSD (California Planting Cotton Seed Distributors) varieties were the next most popular and accounted for 4.6 percent of the U.S. acreage planted in 1998. CPCSD varieties were the most popular planted in the western states, accounting for 52.0 percent of that acreage. Acala Maxxa was the most popular variety of CPCSD planted and accounted for about 3.6 percent of the U.S. acreage. Transgenic varieties, genetically engineered varieties resistant to worms, herbicides or both, accounted for about 45.2 percent of the upland cotton planted in the United States in 1998. Pima S-7 was the most popular American Pima variety planted in 1998. This variety accounted for 61.9 percent of the United States acreage and was the most popular variety planted in Arizona and California. Deltapine DP HTO was the second most popular American Pima variety and accounted for 10.8 percent of the U.S. crop. Pima S-6 was the next most popular variety planted in New Mexico and Texas and accounted for 10.8 percent of the U.S. crop. Germain's CH 252 accounted for 10.7 percent of the U.S. acreage. Estimates of the percentage of the various varieties of cotton planted in the United States for 1998 are based on informal surveys made by the Cotton Program Classing Offices. The variety data are based on estimates furnished by cotton ginners for the territories served by their gins, seed dealers, extension agents, and others. Estimated percentage of upland cotton planted to leading specified varieties, by growth areas, 1998 crop SOUTH- DELTAPINE DELTAPINE DELTAPINE PAYMASTER DELTAPINE PAYMASTER SURE-GROW EASTERN NUCOTN33B NUCOTN 35B DP 5690RR PM 1220 RR DP 5415RR PM 1220 BG/R 125 11.35 7.96 6.04 5.07 4.94 4.94 4.68 SOUTH STONEVILLE STONEVILLE DELTAPINE SURE-GROW DELTAPINE STONEVILLE PAYMASTER CENTRAL BXN 47 ST 474 NUCOTN 33B 125 51 BG 4740 PM 1220 RR 18.88 16.87 13.10 5.03 3.60 3.54 3.22 SOUTH- PAYMASTER PAYMASTER PAYMASTER PAYMASTER DELTAPINE ALL-TEX TAMCOT WEST HS 26 PM 2326 RR PM 2200 RR HS 200 50 ATLAS SPINX 15.28 12.76 9.26 7.50 6.27 3.25 2.79 WEST CPCSD DELTAPINE CPCSD SURE-GROW PHYTHOGEN'S DELTAPINE DELTAPINE ACALA MAXXA NUCOTN 33B ACALA GTOM 125 PHY 33 ACALA DP 5415 DP 6211 ACALA 40.74 15.41 8.51 2.86 2.66 2.09 1.97 UNITED DELTAPINE STONEVILLE STONEVILLE PAYMASTER PAYMASTER CPCSD PAYMASTER STATES NUCOTN 33B ST 474 BXN 47 HS 26 PM 2326 RR ACALA MAXXA PM 2200 RR 8.83 6.22 5.67 5.65 4.71 3.64 3.42 Estimated percentage of upland cotton planted to leading specified brands, by growth areas, 1998 crop -1 J *3.: ~ j SOUTH¬ DELTAPINE PAYMASTER STONEVILLE SURE-GROW AGRIPRO AGREVO TERRA EASTERN 60.66 17.28 9.95 8.58 1.94 1.16 0.03 SOUTH STONEVILLE DELTAPINE PAYMASTER SURE-GROW AGREVO AGRIPRO MISC. CENTRAL 44.12 39.09 8.69 7.59 0.23 0.04 0.22 SOUTH- PAYMASTER DELTAPINE ALL-TEX STONEVILLE TAMCOT AFD SURE-GROW WEST 53.12 25.88 5.05 4.54 3.55 1.61 0.93 WEST CPCSD DELTAPINE SURE-GROW PHYTHOGEN'S GERMAIN'S ACALA STONEVILLE 52.00 29.76 5.70 3.09 2.63 1.88 1.54 UNITED DELTAPINE PAYMASTER STONEVILLE SURE-GROW CPCSD ALL-TEX TAMCOT STATES 39.36 26.77 16.22 5.24 4.64 1.87 1.31 August 12, 1998 8 9 9 1 f o p o r c , s e t a t S d e t i n U d n a s e t a t s y b , s e i t e i r a v d e i f i c e p s o t d e t n a l p n o t t o c d n a l p u f o e g a t n e c r e p d e t a m i t s E . 1 e l b a T n cn gg (OM MO rt-- * OM" * O^ ^O *rT- (O Ifi T00-((DDlT/l-tOlDTn-(^DOOlfO)C(DMnOSi)n'fO(MO('M-N'-(NDM(OONO^ngO)CCOOONJ oT— oT— oCM OM' « fT'-- C-rM- 28* § g H doo o dddddddddooNf-'-N t- CM r- CO CM d do o do d o' d 3 CO I I I I I I I • CCdOO • • iCCCnOOD CcMo iConM rT—- hCCMD- 1 1 • C(oMO COD XCCM*- ax00rj ■ ■ i i ■ i ■ i CO CO O- CO CO oo CO 00 CD N- CO in CD CO T- h- CO co Xf- i i i i o ' 'O' ' ■** 0 0(0* o r- co co o) in 00 h- 1"- CD o CM i if r— • o o -r- * M- I?) iiii odd o o T- T~ O T~ CO o CM o o CM d CM (CND do o o o o' COM) • • 1 CD • • i i CinD • (cDo i▼n— oXj* CTM“ xCOr oT— 1 To— ■ • h■«-r ■ i i i o o d d o o o C- T" Uco ■ ■ ■ * • ■ • i • • • • i dtcjo- octm ' dcoro> *cccobo rCoeM ' CodM oCcOo icno hxcor- ioCnD idCnM oCD 0icno0 oiCnM dhC0M0- iiii l l l:l CM T}- CO o in CO o h- CO NO- • ion cm ■ i i i i ■ ■ << ■ i i •M" i CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CM 00 h- 1 1 M- in ''•I iiii O CO do o t- o o o CO d u o xr CD CD CM CM CD CO f'- 01 00 z ■ i i i i i i i i i • i i i i i CO • o ■ CM O I CD 1 h- xr CO • h- CO o ■ i ii iiii ■ i iii oX- o o o 00 d CM d T~ 00 i i i i i i ... i oCO 1 1 1 • ChD- ' CTO- r0-0 Ce'D¬ ■ fe'n- ■ • i i iiii ■ i i i CM CM CCMO o co CD N- in 2 I I I I I I I I T— I I . ■ <q . O' h- ■ i • i i ■ i i i ib co XT iCnM r- co t- cocoM-v-cncocoin h- CO 2in i i i i CO ■ i ■ M N ' • O»- ' COO COO • hCO- o1- • OSi-Mt-MOCM UCO) , CCMO I I II IIII o d T~ o od o o' COOCDinCMOOO cm in _<) I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i O ' ' ' CD. CM 1 CCMO COO 'in ' • ion ihn-: oco I I III IIII o I N r- h- CM CM tCtl • rO-' GA l l 1 o 1 • No- 1 Xr—T i 1 1 CCDD X00T CoD TC—M 0CD0 CoO o o COO' or— 0CO0 l cCMo 0’M0’ 00 in xT:—T Cx—M CCMD i i i i • i i i 1 1 1 l l 1 1 j 1 o o o cb OO CM d d T“ o d cb o cb in Cl CO LCOD CM Ti¬ CM CO CM CM N- eJ • l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T— 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ro CD 1 1 00 i • i i i • i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I d X— CM o cb 00 CM in Is- u CCMD C0O0 NCO- 1 1 1 1 1 CCOO ' 1 Oxr 1 1 1 1 1 CCDO 1 1 CCDO v- CoO 1 o■cf 1 1 xC—O 1 cinn 1 icno i i i i i i i § CCMO OCM iCnO CO 1 1 111 o o ▼— o o o o o o d o cb CM o o CO CM co 00 CM o CO CM co in CD CO <! 1 I 1 1 o 1 1 • in • 1 T— 1 1 1 00 1 • o n r- t— CD 1 co 1 1 i 1 co 1 CO i i • i i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1:1 d X~ o xr CM T“ d CM CM o TT cC\Ni Nl 1 1 1 1 CCDO s 1 CoD 1 1 1 l oCOo 1 CCMO CxOr r00- C0M0 oCMn CO CM 1 CCMD hCM- CCDO iCnD CO TT rn- CTOf i i i i i i i • 1 1 • l 1 1 Ij| l d d d o o d cb O CM o o o cb o CM CO TxTr xT kxr in CO CM CO CM ai c- T— co in CO N- CO CO CM in < 1 1 • 1 1 1 • 1 CM ' i CM CM xT 1 T— • T— 1 O x— 1 CD 00 00 CM i co i i i i i i i 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 Ijl o o o o CM cb o h- T— o o o 00 o C4 CCDD in co 3 3 5 ai Cl ro o (oo<foCc<OMl <Ia«o<oi<D-o Ioo<oCQ<tD-L i8COonL Mqc§no O<5CmL Or8C*L- DDCatooLCC 0DTix—n“. DiCQDC■XnMLCC- oCCCoMO>L DD8CC CQOD iCCQtnoML t¥Co0(DtD0o: aii<CnnDn: DD8CC s §5<o< U1 iConO °in C^M XO °cm iCOoon>L iCOqDixV—nnLC: »aiooznzn- OCCiQQnTD>. CCoOQDL) oaCoOCL:)l hoCr4nC4>.--)l. i0QCaoCCnDDL:. § § S+ 2o &g Ho<—i io<605<n <06oi5<n <o0<63c- o<i<3O0n co ^ <n TJ t 0) UJ 3 DC C 5 ■*C* UzJ UzJ UzJ UzJ UzJ UZJ UzJ UZJ UZJ UzJ UZJ UzJ UZJ UzJ UzJ UzJ UZJ UzJ UzJ UzJ UzJ UZJ UzJ UzJ IzD IzD LzD IzD IzD UZJ UzJ UzJ ZUJ ZUJ czn CzO wz CzO CzO O O O Q 1 o0 <a\LO——LIj C<HUD_LjJ a<HUD—JJ C<hU-QJ*LJ Ch<UD_LJ-J C<HUD_LJJ »C<—UDL-JJ C<hUQL-J C<K_UQLJJ C»<—UQL-JJ C<»U—oL-JI C<(_UQ-LiJ C<lUQ_-LJJ CJU<_QL-JJ C<hU_aLJ-J C<1U_DL-Jl JC<UQ_—LJJ CtUo<_-LJl C<H_UQLJJ C<1_UaL-lJ HC<_UQLJJ C<JUQ-—LJJ C(UQ<_-LJl C<hUQ_LJ-J C<h_IQDLJ- C<H_IDDLJ C<hIQDL- C<H_LQDLl C<»IQDL- C<HLO_DLj C<_UDLjJ C<hUaL-J <h—UaCL-JJ aH—<UCLJJ Qzz0 Qzz0 Qzz3 C0ofLl 00«a. «C0La «0CoL U0iJ U0J U§0J aU0J Uc0tJ i_oX il_oXi l_oXi !_oIi e l b a T g. n i d n u o r o t e u d d d a ot n y a m s l a t o T E: T O N t. n e c r e p 5 0 0. n a h d t s e s u e L n ti * n o s. C a s n a . K 1 e es l d b u a cl T n I 1/ AL T. 00 00 00 1<— 8 8 8 8 T C 0.0.0. o 8 8 8 8 O P 000 T 111 OTHER PCT. 10.24 5.00 9.93 OUIJ' COM CiCCnMDD CCOMMM- CCCOMMM UJ 2 T j iC<—L mO RCEN 2.13 0.00 2.01 (-•mNr- cC■'oOr oCoO omot > UJ E » Q P to ■ o O) E VILL740 ENT 1 0 7 CO UJ cm o NEG 4 RC 2.30.02.1 o-l s UCOJ COO COM C0O0 OB E T P o S CD O T M CCDD GRIPRHS 46 ERCEN 2.47 0.00 2.32 •©©3 111 Oo CCOO UCCOOJ* COO CCTOOT* A P T Q 5 fl > APINE 5415 CENT 12 00 94 ^T•3 F1z1T1 *<iQno CCOO UoJ oo ELTDP ER 3.0.2. o© aa. CM CO O CO D P a M E UJ L T ■ TONEVILST 474 PERCEN 4.04 6.31 4.17 ■©c© uJQ—<i CQinL o'f IO OOO C'MfMf S « . JM APINE 5690 CENT 87 00 58 ©uaa> (UIC<x—OJ: CoCMM CCMO OCM' CCOO DELTDP PER 4.0.4. ©l. < N. CO O CO O a: « W UJ GRO25 CENT 99 00 70 S 2) r■^*»r Ct-O ChO- RE1 ER 4.0.4. So Ic—n r-L cm U P S o NE T © s ^ ELTAPI32B ERCEN 7.47 0.00 7.03 5w £< sO cUdo) SOcd; cUMo'J «(oMo- D P 8 *“■ u ELTAPINE DP 90B ERCENT 8.83 0.00 8.31 ■40e©«->4 cVo 1<N0 CCCOOO -CHdM- cCosi c0Mn0 D P « E YMASTER 1220 RR ERCENT 10.87 0.00 10.23 U5•M J• uj ao8CmOn. cooooi UJ cCOM~' CUCOOJ AM P V OD. PP o DELTAPINE NUCOTN35B PERCENT 10.93 23.15 11.65 vHinn EoMc«cn ( ui aoinn: aCCMj- JUCOJ. iCsM: ° ■DcCD NE 33B irC « U2I ZcoJ PIN | 2X8 s a. 8 CO CM AT CO U) DELTNUCO OUnJ NCM l(C/JJ CCMT) J^- 8£ S uCOj -d- rri < < STATE ALABAMA FLORIDA OFFICE TOTAL Mf'lTP' Tntalc m»v b<£n©0 >Uhc<—o-J £zCoO—o<H £Zcoo<O2nnD IO<I Lot<U L

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.