UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY LAW OF Copyright, Trademarks, and Patent Winter 2015 Patent Professor Abraham Drassinower Storage KE 2799 .D73 2015 v.[3< C.1 BORA LASKIN L/*W LIBRARY JAN I 3 2015 FACULTY OF L/.W UNfVHRSrn' Or T ORO^'ITO l««L —«P—- Copyright, Trademarks and Patent Winter 2015 Patent Professor Abraham Drassinower Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/copyrighttradema03dras_1 Volume 3 Patents Table of Contents Presumption of Validity Diversified Products Corp. v. Tye-Sil Corp. (1991), 35 C.P.R. (3d) 350 (F.C.A.).1 Novelty Reeves Brothers Inc. v. Toronto Quilting & Embroidery Ltd. (1978), 43 C.P.R. (2d) 145 (F.C.T.D.).4 Diversified Products Corp. v. Tye-Sil Corp. (1991), 35 C.P.R. (3d) 350 (F.C.A.).8 Apotex Inc. v. Sanofii-Synthelabo Canada Inc., 2008 SCC 61 .15 Obviousness/Inventive Step Beecham Canada Ltd. et al. v'. Procter & Gamble Co. (1982), 61 C.P.R. (2d) 1 (F.C.A.).26 Beloit Canada Ltd. et al. v. Valmet Oy (1986), 8 C.P.R. (3d) 289 (F.C.A.).27 Diversified Products Corp. v. Tye-Sil Corp. (1991), 35 C.P.R. (3d) 350 (F.C.A.).30 Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., 2008 SCC 61 .38 Utility Xv. Commissioner of Patents (1981), 59 C.P.R. (2d) 7 (F.C.A.).52 Minerals Separation North American Corp. v. Noranda Mines Ltd. (1952), 15 C.P.R. 133 (J.C.P.C.).55 Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd., [1976] 1 S.C.R. 555 (S.C.C.).60 Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153.67 Subject Matter Harx’ard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 45.89 Sufficiency of the Patent Specification ConsolboardInc. v. MacMillan Bloedel (Saskatchewan) Ltd., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 504 (S.C.C.).146 Beecham Canada Ltd. et al. v. Procter & Gamble Co. (1982), 61 C.P.R. (2d) 1 (F.C.A.).157 Leva Canada Ltd. v. Pfizer Canada Inc. 2012 SCC 60.162 Infringement Catnic Components Ltd. v. Hill and Smith Ltd., [1982] R.P.C. 183 (H.L.).189 Beecham Canada Ltd. et al. v. Procter & Gamble Co. (1982), 61 C.P.R. (2d) 1 (F.C.A.).194 O’Hara Manufacturing Ltd. v. Eli Lilly & Co. (1989), 26 C.P.R. (3d) 1 (F.C.A.).198 Cameo Inc. and General Electric Company v. Whirlpool Corporation and Inglis Ltd., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1067, (S.C.C.).’..204 I