[ation in Action The Jesuit Refugee Service and the Ministry ofAccompaniment Kevin O'Brien, S.J. ONEll I t.'feRARY BOSTON COLLEGE BX3701 .S88x v.37:no.4(2005:winter) 02/07/2006 Current Periodicals WINTER 74 2005 • THE SEMINAR ON JESUIT SPIRITUALITY The Seminar is composed of a number of Jesuits appointed from their provinces in the United States. It concerns itself with topics pertaining to the spiritual doctrine and practice of Jesuits, especially United States Jesuits, and communicates the results to the members of the provinces through its publication, STUDIES IN THE SPIRITUALITY OF JESUITS. This is done in the spirit of Vatican H's recommendation that religious institutes recapture the original inspiration of their founders and adapt it to the circumstances of modern times. The Seminar welcomes reactions or comments in regard to the material that it publishes. The Seminar focuses its direct attention on the life and work of the Jesuits of the United States. The issues treated may be common also to Jesuits of other regions, to other priests, religious, and laity, to both men and women. Hence, the journal, while meant especially for American Jesuits, is not exclusively for them. Others who may find it helpful are cordially welcome to make use of it. CURRENT MEMBERS OF THE SEMINAR James W. Bernauer, S.J., teaches philosophy at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Mass. (2004). Richard A. Blake, S.J., is chairman of the Seminar and editor of STUDIES; he teaches film studies at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Mass. (2002). Kevin Burke, S.J., teaches systematic theology at Weston Jesuit School of Theology, Cambridge, Mass. (2003). T. Frank Kennedy, S.J., teaches music and is director of the Jesuit Institute at Bos- ton College, Chestnut Hill, Mass. (2004). Gerald L. McKevitt, S.J., teaches history at Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, Cal. (2005). Dennis L. McNamara, S.J., teaches sociology at Georgetown University, Washing- D.C ton, (2005) William E. Reiser, S.J., teaches theology at the College of the Holy Cross, Worces- ter, Mass. (2004). Philip J. Rosato, S.J., teaches theology at St. Joseph's University, Philadelphia, Pa. (2005) Thomas L Schubeck, S.J., teaches social ethics at John Carroll University, Univer- sity Heights, Ohio (2004). Dennis C. Smolarski, S.J., teaches mathematics and computer science at Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, Cal. (2003). The opinions expressed in STUDIES are those of the individual authors thereof. Parentheses designate year of entry as a Seminar member. © Copyright 2005 and published by the Seminar on Jesuit Spirituality Publication Office Editorial Office Studies in the Spirituality of Jesuits Faber House MO 3601 Lindell Blvd., St. Louis, 63108 102 College Road MA Tel. 314-977-7257; soon 314-633-4622 Chestnut Hill, 02467-3841 Fax 314-977-7263; soon 314-633-4623 Tel. 617-552-0860; Fax 617-552-0925 E-mail [email protected] E-mail [email protected] Consolation Action in The Jesuit Refugee Service and the Ministry Accompaniment of Kevin O'Brien, S.J. studies in the spirituality of iesuits WINTER 37/4 2005 • The first word . . . Over the years most of us have developed creative strategies for dealing with unreasonable superiors, like the ones who object to our keeping our horse behind the students' tennis court or question our needing a personal SUV to get to our weekend call in an inner-city parish. In these instances the guilt trip tactic usually works quite well. Do you hate animals? Do you my question preferential option for the poor? Personally, I find it quite effective to keep the genetic/nuclear option in reserve. Here's how it works. One side of my family claims a connection to Richard Croker, the nineteenth-century head of the Tammany Hall machine in New York. Great Uncle Richie came up through the ranks of the Tunnel Gang in Hell's Kitchen on the West Side of Manhattan and was alleged to have dispatched a rival somewhat forcibly. He was acquitted of the charge of murder, but no one ever challenged his leadership again. The historical events are true, it seems, even though the relationship to my grandmother Ellen Croker remains a bit problematic. The other side of the family was always thought to be good, hard- working Midwestern stock. (Isn't that the way the cliche is usually ex- A pressed?) distant cousin started to nose around family history on the Internet and discovered that one of our mutual ancestors had become a key figure in a labor dispute in an Illinois factory town. As a good union man, he performed his duty rather vigorously and definitively. Well, what else does one do with strike breakers? My cousin never let me know if he was convicted. Even though the courts might have taken a dim view of his arbitration techniques, in some circles in those days he may have been regarded as a hero. So in dealing with obtuse superiors, I merely let it be known that homicidal genes lurk in both strands of my double helix and suggest that it wouldn't take much provocation to loose the rogue DNA in the genome. Subtext: Be careful. Very careful. A silly conclusion, isn't it? Still, there's a point to the silliness. Here I am in the twenty-first century, a mild-mannered, soft-spoken, bookish little guy who would hesitate to step on an ant, but I wade in the same gene pool as men of extraordinary violence—presuming the stories are true. Biologically, I'm made of the same stuff as my more colorful nineteenth- century forebears. Yet unlike them, I've never turned to violence. The fact is, I've never been in a position where I felt I had to. They were immi- grants or second-generation working people trying to fight for a foothold on the lower rungs of the ladder of success. They had to face challenges to 222 survival in a very harsh world, and perhaps did not choose wisely, but they did what they felt they had to do. Because they survived and prospered in their new country, I don't face those choices. As we think about it, many and probably most American Jesuits today could tell similar stories from their family history. Famine, war, persecution, discrimination, and hopelessness drove our ancestors from their home countries. Even those who were relatively secure came to the New World in search of a better life for their children. Often enough, they were less than welcome. They came into a world of urban ghettos and criminal gangs, of frontier lawlessness and range wars, sweatshops, mines, and mills, of Molly Maguires and the dreaded Pinkertons. Welcomed at first as cheap labor to jump-start the economic engines of the new repub- lic, they were told to keep in their place, and in many instances they with their strange Catholic rituals were considered a threat to the American way of life. If they spoke English at all, they had a funny thick accent (con- temptuously called a "brogue") that provoked laughter or contempt or outrage. Can it be any surprise that some, many, reacted to the hostility A with deeds of violence? few generations later, we, the respectable main- stream American clergy, can scarcely imagine what it must have been like for our immigrant ancestors in the wild days of the nineteenth century. Or we've forgotten. Or we deny. But it is important to remember. If placed in their position, who of us could be sure we would not make the same mistakes? Do we have any right to assume a posture of moral superiority? Desperation leads to des- perate actions, and I have never, ever been desperate enough to do what they purportedly did. It's the rare American Jesuit who has ever wondered if he would have a place to sleep at night or would have anything to eat the next day. This degree of material security probably places us in a minority of the world's citizens over the last millennium. What if it were otherwise? Let's let the imagination play with that notion of desperation. At the outset, I admit a certain bit of inspiration from Philip Roth's recent novel The Plot againstAmerica but work in several outlandish variations on his theme. His story is based in the past when Charles Lindbergh defeats Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1940. Keeping to his isolationist promises to keep us out of the war, Lindbergh seeks an accom- modation with the Nazis, and this detente bears serious implications for the Jewish communities in the United States. My story takes place in the future. Midway through the fourth term of President Malthus P. Hobbes, the Minuteman Party, with solid majori- ties in both houses, enthusiastically supports the President's America First strategy to suppress the last vestiges of insurgency by authorizing a pro- gram of compassionate depopulation of San Francisco; Madison, Wiscon- sin; New York City, and the entire state of Massachusetts. Congress rushes passage of the legislation on rumors that a renegade legislature, the Hillary, IV