Zootaxa 3421: 1–31 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN1175-5334(online edition) Cave shrimps Troglocaris s. str. (Dormitzer, 1853), taxonomic revision and description of new taxa after phylogenetic and morphometric studies Ć Č JURE JUGOVIC1,2*, BRANKO JALŽI 3, SIMONA PREVOR NIK4 & BORIS SKET5 č 1,4,5 Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za biologijo, Ve na pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. č 2 Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno raziskovalno središ e, Garibaldijeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia & Univerza na Primorskem, Fakulteta za matematiko, naravoslovje in informacijske tehnologije, Glagoljaška 8, 6000 Koper 3 Hrvatski prirodoslovni muzej, Demetrova 1, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail addresses: [email protected]; [email protected]; 3 [email protected]; 4 [email protected]; 5 [email protected] * Corresponding author Abstract Within the Dinaric genus Troglocaris cave shrimps from the subgenus Troglocaris s. str. (Dormitzer, 1853) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Atyidae), have the widest distribution area. The recent molecular analyses have revealed significant, cryptic diversity in the subgenus. The aim of the subsequent detailed morphometric analyses was the provision of the appropriate diagnosable characters for the discovered lineages, i.e. taking care of their taxonomical visibility. We herein designate a neotype and provide a detailed description for the polytipic type species of the genus T. (T.) anophthalmus (Kollar, 1848), to enable its morphological distinction from the erroneously described T. (T.) planinensis Birštejn, 1948. Considering a combination of morphological, geographical and molecular data, we describe four new subspecies: T. (T.) a. ocellata ssp. nov., T. (T.) a. periadriatica ssp. nov., T. (T.) a. legovici ssp. nov. and T. (T.) a. sontica ssp. nov., apart from the extant T. (T.) a. ć intermedia Babi , 1922. Due to a considerable morphological variability and no easily observable diagnostic morphological characters, the GenBank accession numbers for the COI gene are added in all mentioned taxa. Key words: Atyidae, phylogeny, subterranean, morphology, taxonomy Introduction Although only an integration of all biological disciplines can promote biological research at the tempo set by biodiversity crisis (Whitfield 2007), the morphology-based alpha taxonomy (MOBAT) remains the most important discipline, providing the accessible data-set for assigning taxonomically valid names on the basis of name-bearing specimens. Many “cryptic” species or species with an “overlooked diversity” remain taxonomically invisible, as badly under-resourced MOBAT cannot keep pace with their discovery. The MOBAT is essential and should be promoted if the promise of the profound implications for the evolutionary theory, biogeography and conservation planning is to be realised (Schlick-Steiner et al. 2007). The freshwater cave dwelling shrimp Troglocaris anophthalmus (Kollar 1848) is among Dinaric largest and most distinctive cave invertebrates. Despite of intensive research of its taxonomy (e.g. Kollar 1848; Dormitzer ć č 1853; Babi 1922; Holthuis 1956), reproduction, ontogeny (Matjaši 1958, Juberthie Jupeau 1974, 1975), as well č as ecology (Gottstein-Mato ec 2003), the taxonomy of the genus has remained unresolved for a century or longer. An initial molecular analysis of numerous European cave shrimp populations to solve a biogeographical enigma of Troglocaris, was conducted by Zakšek et al. (2007). In 54 specimens from three known disjunct centres of the genus distribution, three genetic markers were used for a reconstruction of its phylogeny: mitochondrial cytochrome oxydase subunit I mtDNA (COI, 610 base pairs), 16S rDNA (472 bp) and nuclear ITS2 rDNA (836 bp). The genus was found to be polyphyletic. The results promoted an a posteriori redefinition of taxa at different levels (Sket & Zakšek 2009). The novel genus Gallocaris Sket et Zakšek, 2009, was erected for the French taxon Troglocaris schmidti inermis Fage, 1937, related to the genus Dugastella Bouvier. Additionally, four new Dinaric Accepted by J.W. Goy: 11 May 2012; published: 14 Aug. 2012 1 č species were recognized, three of them belonging to the subgenus Spelaeocaris Matjaši , 1956: T. (S.) prasence,T. (S.) kapelana and T. (S.) neglecta all Sket et Zakšek, 2009. Within the subgenus Troglocaris (=Troglocaris s. str.) only T. (T.) bosnica Sket et Zakšek, 2009, was morphologically and molecularly distinct enough to be described. All other populations of Troglocaris s. str. were assigned to Troglocaris aggr. anophthalmus. Further phylogenetic analyses (Zakšek et al. 2009) tested T. aggr. anophthalmus for a possible cryptic diversity and/or unrecognized evolutionary processes. The phylogeographical procedures showed that this aggregate is composed of four major č monophyletic, geographically defined phylogroups: W-Slovenian, E-Slovenian, Adriatic, and So a phylogroups. Authors argued that phylogroups could be treated as species as they are in agreement with all four aspects of genealogical concordance species concepts (sensu Avise 2000). Syntopy of the W-Slovenian and the putative fifth, i. e. Istra, phylogroups confirmed the status of biological species (sensu Mayr 1970) of the former phylogroup. It also indicated the same possibility for the putative phylogroup in spite of its much lower COI genetic distance (Zakšek et al. 2009). However, it has remained unresolved whether the Istra putative phylogroup represents a biological species per se or as a part of the rest of T. aggr. anophthalmus, excluding W-Slovenian phylogroup. In the same study, a detailed sampling also recovered a further split of the E-Slo phylogroup into E-Slo1 and E-Slo2 subgroups, which were geographically associated. The phylogenetic framework published by Zakšek et al. (2007, 2009) provided a solid basis for the detailed morphometric studies (Jugovic et al., 2010a, 2011). Only the adult animals were included in the analyses to exclude main sources of ontogenetic variation. Beside 71 metric also 17 meristic characters were recorded (all listed in Jugovic et al., 2011), describing body proportions and elaboration of cuticular structures. Additionally, eye pigmentation, presence of supraorbital, antennal and pterygostomial spine, as well as presence of exopodites on pereopod V were considered. The descriptions, as well as the taxonomic decisions presented herein follow the results of discriminant function analysis (Jugovic et al. 2011) conducted in accordance with Zakšek et al. (2009: p. 933–934, Table 1; see also Appendix C) molecular analysis. In this paper we are trying to imply the biological species concept (Mayr 1970) to delimit some taxa within T. aggr. anophthalmus. Presently, the inappropriate morphological characters used for the recognition of three taxa č within the aggregate: T. (T.) a. anophthalmus (Kollar, 1848), T. (T.) a. intermedia Babi , 1922, and T. (T.) planinensis Birštejn, 1948 prevent their proper identification (Sket & Zakšek 2009). Apart from T. (T.) planinensis (= W-Slo phylogroup), the aggregate consists of (Sket & Zakšek 2009; Zakšek et al. 2009, Figure 1): (1) T. (T.) anophthalmus anophthalmus (= E-Slo1 subgroup and geographical group), (2) T. (T.) anophthalmus intermedia (= a subspecies that is molecularly nested within E-Slo phylogroup), (3) T. (T.) anophthalmus – Bela Krajina (= E- Slo2 subgroup and geographical group), (4) T. (T.) anophthalmus – Adriatic (= Adriatic phylogroup and č č geographical group), and (5) T. (T.) anophthalmus – So a (= So a phylogroup and geographical group), and (6) T. (T.) anophthalmus – Istra (= Istra putative phylogroup, according to ITS2 marker). Since (except for T. (T.) planinensis = W-Slo phylogroup) the recognition of the above listed groups of populations as separate biological species would require information on their mating potential (reproductive isolation), we are designating them as subspecies of T. (T.) anophthalmus. We are considering multiple samples for each subspecies designation, thus trying to avoid the negligence of morphological variability present in Birštejn (1948) and Kollar (1848). Although the consistency of T. (T.) anophthalmus group from Istra (= Istra putative phylogroup) was not clearly supported by the mtDNA genetic marker, we believe a description of a subspecies is legitimate: the group is morphologically and genetically variable, its consistency is supported by a nuclear marker (we use it as a diagnostic character). Materials and methods Based on (1) the molecular analyses which indicated genetic isolation of several populations within T. aggr. anophthalmus (see the list of references in the Introduction section), (2) the subsequent detailed morphometric analyses were conducted, confirming the morphological distinctiveness of the identified phylogroups (see chapter »Morphometric analysis«); and (3) the description of several taxa (species and subspecies) were enabled. Although the morphological differences are minute, identification of taxa is possible when all descriptives (i.e. morphological, genetic and ecological evidence) are considered simultaneously (see chapters »Abbreviations and organisation of the text« and »Taxonomic descriptions«). 2 · Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press JUGOVIC ET AL. Morphometric analysis The majority of specimens are deposited in the Zoological collection of the Oddelek za biologijo, Biotehniška fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana (OBBFUL), Slovenia. Specimens deposited elsewhere are specified in the Results section (see also Appendix C). Altogether, 80 samples comprising over 580 specimens of T. aggr. anophthalmus from all known molecular phylogroups recognized by Zakšek et al. (2009; phylogroups/subgroups listed in the Introduction section) were surveyed, each specimen acquiring a unique voucher number (Appendix C). Besides morphometric data from Jugovic et al. (2011), the newly studied samples mainly collected in Istra and from the type localities were used for the herein descriptions (see Appendix C), following the same methodology as indicated in Jugovic et al. (2011). As some sexually dimorphic characters were disclosed lately, separate discriminant function analyses for adult males and females were conducted (Appendix A). Such analyses enabled the inclusion of both, sexually non-dimorphic (as in Jugovic et al. 2011), as well as of sexually dimorphic characters. Abbreviations and organisation of the text The abbreviation “CL” is consistently used for a carapace length in the descriptions while all other abbreviations are only provided to warrant consistency with the Figure 5 and Appendix B (this paper) and Appendices from Jugovic et al. (2011). They are defined by their first appearance in the text. The rostral dentition formula '(X+Y)/Z' denotes number of teeth dorsally on rostrum and carapace by the number of teeth ventrally on rostrum. The anterior spine-like projections on the carapace are called spines (supra–, suborbital spines; see Figure 2B), following a traditional nomenclature. The spiniform setae on the telson are denominated in accordance with Sket & Zakšek (2009); three pairs of dorsal spiniform setae are present throughout this group of taxa, but the distal pair has been considered as a part of the spiniform setae row and has been placed on the distolateral corners of the telson (see Figure 2Tel). Pereopod III–VII length is given as the sum of articles 3–7 lengths (articles 3–6 in pereopods I–II), due to the prevalent loss (damaging) of basal articles during section. Roman numerals are used to denote successive body metameres and appendages, whilst the Arabic numerals denote articles within the appendages. The term 'comb-like' in connection with the pereopod dactyl (article 7) refers to a dense row of spiniform setae along its inner margin (as in Figure 4PpV – see the enlarged part). Since the morphological differences among taxa are minute, the full description of all investigated characters is provided only for T. (T.) anophthalmus anophthalmus (= E-Slo1 subgroup). A single reported value is given for the male neotype while a range of values [in parentheses] refers to all other males from the subspecies’ collection. The descriptions for other taxa (denoted as »differential descriptions« in the text), however, comprise exclusively specifications for the most discriminative characters. The comparison of these characters for six phylogroups of Troglocaris s. str is shown in Figure 5. A differential description of T. (T.) anophthalmus anophthalmus is added for practical reasons (see Appendix D). In the differential descriptions of males and females the arithmetic mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum [in parentheses] are given for each character, considering all specimens of the taxon/phylogroup. In the description of T. (T.) anophthalmus anophthalmus females, the same values as for differential descriptions are used. In the Istra phylogroup females, only some morphometric characters are presented (see Appendix B) owing to small sample size and rather damaged animals. For the comparison of the most discriminative characters, see Appendix B. One should be aware that T. (T.) anophthalmus anophthalmus,T. (T.) anophthalmus intermedia and T. (T.) anophthalmus ocellata ssp. nov., were all comprised within the E-Slo phylogroup (see Sket & Zakšek 2009), since the lack of the molecular data prevented their further recognition. Results Taxonomic descriptions Family Atyidae De Haan Subfamily Paratyinae Holthuis GenusTroglocaris Dormitzer, 1853 NEW TAXA OF TROGLOCARIS S. STR. Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press · 3 Subgenus Troglocaris (Troglocaris) Dormitzer, 1853 Troglocaris (Troglocaris) anophthalmus anophthalmus (Kollar, 1848) Synonymy: Palaemon anophthalmus Kollar, 1848; Troglocaris schmidtii Dormitzer, 1853; see also Holthuis (1956); Troglocaris (Troglocaris) – the E-Slo1 subgroup Zakšek et al., 2009 Type locality: Slovenia, Dobrepolje, cave Kompoljska jama. Material examined: Neotype: adult male (TA965), CL 7.6 mm, Kompoljska jama, Kompolje, Videm-Dobrepolje, Slovenia, 45°47'58.23" N, 14°43'51.39" E, 3rd September 2009, collected by J. Jugovic, specimen partly dissected, preserved in 70 % ethanol. Other specimens from the neotype locality: Males: adult male (TA966; preserved in 96 % ethanol at -20°C), 7.5 mm; adult male (TA977; preserved in 96 % ethanol at -20°C), 6.5 mm; same data as neotype. Females: 8 adult females, TA975 (CL 8.4 mm); TA976 (CL 7.4 mm); TA978 (CL 8.5 mm); TA979 (CL 7.1 mm); TA980 (CL 7.8 mm); TA981 (CL 7.3 mm); TA982 (6.9 mm) (all preserved in 70 % ethanol); TA989 (CL 7.3 mm) (preserved in 96 % ethanol at -20°C); same data as neotype. Other specimens examined: over 60 specimens from 11 samples (Figure 1, Appendix C1). Males, CL 4.7–8.3 mm. Females, CL 5.8–9.0 mm. Voucher numbers and GenBank identification numbers for COI gene are in Appendix C1. Diagnosis: Subspecies of T. (T.) anophthalmus with completely reduced eye and body pigmentation. Rostrum length variable, when rostrum longer than 45 % of CL, dorsal margin usually curved upwards, ventral margin with 7 teeth or less. Antenna I article 3 length usually more than ½ of article 2 length. Pereopod III article 4 usually with three or less spiniform setae along inferior margin and at inferodistal angle, article 6 weakly or strongly curved in adult males. Pereopod V only exceptionally with exopodite. Fully mature males with no or with a single retinacular hook on appendix interna of pleopod I endopodite. Medial margin of pleopod I endopodite with short spiniform setae. Description of male neotype and other [values in parentheses, if different] male material (partly after Fabjan 2001): Body and eye pigmentation completely reduced. CL 7.6 mm [5.3–7.6 mm]. Carapace (Figure 2B) surface smooth, with supraorbital and suborbital spines only. Anterolateral carapace angle rounded, without pterygostomial angle. Transversal crest posteriorly on the carapace. Rostrum length 59 % [32–78 %] of CL, shape sigmoidal [various], with 25+7/2 teeth [12–31+4–11/0–7]. Teeth on carapace along 17 % [14–25 %] of CL. Abdominal somites smooth. Pleonite V length 56 % [45–60 %] of pleonite VI length. Telson (Figure 1Tel) length 47 % [40–64 %] of CL and 87 % [85–109 %] of pleonite VI length. Telson elongated rectangular, distal margin width 66 % [48–80 %] of proximal margin width, the former 13 % [10–16 %] of CL. Dorsal surface with 3 pairs of dorsolateral spiniform setae [exceptionally 4 setae on one margin], at 0.60, 0.74 and 0.94 of telson length. Rather rounded distal border with 11 [9–14] strong spiniform setae; both distolateral setae approximately 3 times longer, all other 2 times longer than dorsolateral spiniform setae. Antenna I (Figure 2AI) peduncle length 52 % [46–61 %] of CL. Peduncular article 1 about 1.5 [1.3–1.7] times as long as article 2, the latter 1.6 [1.5–2.0] times as long as article 3. Article 1 with nearly straight mesial margin with setose distal part; lateral stylocerite with broad base and slender, acute tip, its length 42 % [37–45 %] of peduncle length and approximately 80 % of article 1 length; distolateral lobe sharply pointed, its length 13 % [13–18 %] of peduncle length. Article 2 length approximately 83 % of article 1 length, mesial and lateral margins setose. Article 3 length approximately 41 % of article 1 length. Upper flagellum uniramous, lower flagellum slender, lengths of both flagella rather exceeding 200 % of CL. Antenna II (Figure 2AII) with robust basicerite. Peduncle length 34 % [32–43 %] of CL. Scaphocerite 2.7 [2.6–3.2] times as long as wide, approximately 1.7 times [1.4–1.7] as long as peduncle, its length 55 % [51–63 %] of CL, distally broad, ovally produced, lateral margin nearly straight with stout distolateral tooth. Tooth length 10 % [9–13 %] of scaphocerite length. Scaphocerite mesial, distal and distolateral margins fringed with dense row of plumose setae. Flagella length rather exceeding 200 % of CL. Mandibula with rather robust corpus, with small group of plumose setae on lateral margin. Without palp. Mandibular pars incisiva (incisor process; Figure 3Md) stout, tapering distally, distal margin of 3 [3–6] teeth of different size. Teeth number on left and right mandible often different. Pars molaris stout, U-shaped with triturative surface and numerous short simple marginal setae. Spine row of scarce serrate setae traversing to dense pappose setae. Left maxilla I (Figure 3MxI(l)) palp truncated, with one long plumose seta at interodistal angle and one [1–2] stout spiniform subdistal seta. Right maxilla I palp (Figure 3MxI(r)) without plumose seta. Rectilinear outer margin 4 · Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press JUGOVIC ET AL. of upper lacinia (basipodial endite) with numerous short strong cuspidate setae, curvilinear inner margin and ventral surface with plumose setation. Lower lacinia (coxal endite) well developed, semicircular; outer margin with dense plumose and serrate setation, submedial line with five rows of shorter pappose and some simple setae. Outer part with sparse group of pappose setae. Maxilla II (Figure 3MxII) with slender, simple, tapering palp with one simple seta distally. Basipodial endite bilobed; upper lobe subrhomboidal, margins with dense plumose and serrate setation, ventral surface with group of sparse plumose setae. Lower lobe with almost rectilinear outer margin, fringed with densely packed plumose and serrate setae; sparse simple setae are present all over its surface. Coxal endite fan-like, with dense plumose setae along distal margin and scarce plumose setae subdistally. Scaphognatite well developed, broad, margin fringed with plumose setae, anterior lobe large, posterior lobe narrower, subtriangular, with group of plumose setae on lower distal part. Maxilliped I (Figure 3MxpI) palp clubby, flat distal margin with several plumose setae. Epipodite poorly developed, bilobed. Basipodial endite approximately 2.5 times longer than coxal endite, distal margin and mesial surface with dense rows of long plumose setae, almost rectilinear outer margin with row of shorter papulose setae with scale-like setules. Coxal endite poorly developed, with short serrate and longer plumose setae along outer margin. Exopodite with large caridean lobe approximately 2 times longer than flagellum. Lobe and flagellar margins and lobe ventral surface with plumose setation. Maxilliped II (Figure 3MxpII) with well developed endopodite. Dactylopropodus broad, with long plumose setae on upper superior margin, densely packed longer pappose and shorter serrate setae along almost rectilinear lower superior margin and some long submarginal plumose setae. Exopodite with well developed flagellum, with plumose distal setae and serrate proximal setae. Well developed comb-like podobranchium with approximately 8 branches. Maxilliped III (Figure 3MxpIII) with slender endopod, its length 89 % [84–105 %] of CL. Ischiomerus well separated from basis, rather curved, about 5.5 times as long as wide, with sparse pappose setae proximally on superior margin. Penultimate article slender, about 8.2 times as long as wide and 1.1 times ischiomeral length, with spiniform submarginal setae on mesial surface and few long pappose setae at distosuperior angle. Terminal article (dactylopropodus) about 11.5 times as long as wide and 1.3 times ischiomeral length, tapering distally, with strong ⅓ apical dactylopropodal spine (claw). Distal of inferior margin with approximately 9 subequal spiniform setae, ⅔ proximal of mesial surface and superior submarginal surface with transverse series of serrate setae. Exopodite tip reaching beyond ischiomeral distal tip, robust flagellum with serrate proximal setae and long plumose distal setae. Coxa with larger, well developed arthrobranchium upper and smaller, weakly developed (frequently damaged by section) lower arthrobranchium. Pereopod I (Figure 4PpI) length from base of article 3 (ischium) to apex of article 6 (propodus, unmovable finger of chela) 57 % [53–67 %] of CL. Length relations of above articles (in percentages of pereopod I length): 15 % [11–16 %]: 22 % [22–27 %]: 33 % [27–33 %]: 30 % [29–36 %]. Chela with palm subcylindrical, slightly compressed, fingers with dense tuft of longer pappose and shorter serrate setae apically. Within tufts also shorter setae rounded distally (Figure 4PpIfin). Article 6 maximal length 22 % [21–26 %] of CL, its length 2.2 [1.9–3.1] times its width. Chela palm well developed, its basal bulge length approximately 23 % [13–26 %] of article 6 maximal length. Article 7 (dactylus, movable finger) length 49 % [49–66 %] of article 6 maximal length. Exopodite with serrate basal setae and plumose distal setae, little overreaching distal end of article 4 (merus). Pereopod II (Figure 4PpII) longer and thinner than pereopod I, its length (given as in pereopod I) 75 % [69–88 %] of CL. Length relations of above articles (given as in pereopod I): 17 % [14–19 %]: 24 % [23–28 %]: 34 % [31–35 %]: 25 % [24–29 %]. Chela with palm subcylindrical, slightly compressed, fingers with dense tuft of longer pappose and shorter serrate setae apically. Within tufts also shorter, distally rounded setae (as shown for pereopod I on Figure 2PpIfin). Article 6 maximal length 23 % [21–27 %] of CL, its length 2.4 [2.0–3.6] times its width. Chela palm well developed, its basal bulge length approximately 21 % [11–22 %] of article 6 maximal length. Article 7 (dactylus, movable finger) length 60 % [48–66 %] article 6 maximal length. Exopodite with serrate basal setae and plumose distal setae, reaching distal end of article 4 (merus). Pereopod III (Figure 4PpIII) length from base of article 3 (ischium) to apex of article 7 (dactylus) 153 % [148–205 %] of CL. Length relations of above articles (in percentages of pereopod III length): 9 % [7–10 %]: 34 % [31–36 %]: 18 % [17–20 %]: 31 % [28–33 %]: 8 % [5–12 %]. In fully mature males article 7 inferior margin with NEW TAXA OF TROGLOCARIS S. STR. Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press · 5 FIGURE 1. Distribution map of eight taxa of the subgenus Troglocaris s. str., with phylogroup/subgroup designation (in brackets, as in Zakšek et al. 2009). Different symbols denote taxa, their coloration denotes method of the analysis: black – molecular and morphometric analysis; grey – morphometric analysis; white – molecular analysis. 17 [8–40] spiniform setae in two, proximally densely and distally rarely set groups. Article 6 of mature males slightly curved, 13 % [12–20 %] of article 6 length differentiated (i.e. article distally widened, with a group of numerous spiniform setae). Articles 5 and 4 bear 1 and 3 [1–4] large spiniform setae on mesial surfaces, respectively. Article 3 bears 1 smaller [0–1] spiniform seta on mesial surface. Exopodite well developed, with basal serrate setae and plumose distal setae, reaching approximately second half of article 4 (merus). Pereopod IV similar to pereopod III. 6 · Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press JUGOVIC ET AL. Pereopod V (Figure 4PpV) length 157 % [142–171 %] of CL. Length relations of its articles (in percentages of pereopod V length): 8.5 % [8–9 %]: 30 % [28–30 %]: 18 % [16–19 %]: 36 % [35–38 %]: 7.5 % [7–9 %], the latter with 43 [37–54] equally long spiniform setae, formatting a comb-like article 7. Articles 5 and 4 bear 1 and 2 [1–3] large spiniform setae on mesial surfaces, respectively. Article 3 bears no [0 (exceptionally)–1] spiniform setae on mesial surface. FIGURE 2. Troglocaris (Troglocaris) anophthalmus, Kompoljska jama, Kompolje, Videm–Dobrepolje, male (TA966), CL 7.5 mm: B, body, appendages (except antennae I–II and uropods) omitted, lateral view; Tel, telson, dorsal view; PlpI, left pleopod I; PlpII, left pleopod II; AI, left antenna I; AII, left antenna II. Female (TA975), CL 8.4 mm: PlpI(f), left pleopod I, PlpII(f), left pleopod II. Ai,appendix interna;Am,appendix masculina. Enlarged parts of the structures are indicated by arrows and their magnifications. Pereopods I–IV with pleurobranchia, epipodites and exopodites. Pereopod V with pleurobranchium, without epipodite, exceptionally with exopodite – if developed, exopodite short, not/barely exceeding pereopod article 2 (basis) in length. All pereopods with setobranchia. Pleopod I (Figure 2PlpI) endopodite well developed, with wide basis, tapering apex and slightly bent shallow groove on outer subdistal part. Endopodite length 19 % [17–25 %] of CL and 38 % [34–46 %] of exopodite length. Outer margin with 17 [17–33] spiniform setae. Appendix interna with no [0–1] retinacular hooks distally, not exceeding lamina in length. Exopodite with plumose setae along margins. Pleopod II (Figure 2PlpII) with well developed shield-like appendix masculina, with numerous spiniform setae on medial and subdistal surface; its length 24 % [24–35 %] of CL and 63 % [62–73 %] of endopodite length. Appendix masculina 2.1 [2.1–3.3] times longer than appendix interna, the latter with 15 [3–23] retinacular hooks apically. Exopodite 1.2 [1.1–1.3] times longer than endopodite. Endopodite and exopodite lengths 39 % [37–51 %] and 44 % [43–60 %] of CL, respectively; their inner and outer margins fringed with plumose setae. Uropod (Figure 4U) exopodite overreaching tip of endopodite, its width 33 % [29–34 %] of length, its length 60 % [50–71 %] of CL. Exopodite lateral margin almost rectilinear and without setae proximal to distolateral tooth, NEW TAXA OF TROGLOCARIS S. STR. Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press · 7 other margins fringed with plumose setae, sparse setae also subterminally on surface. Diaeresis with 1 [exceptionally 2] movable stout spiniform seta. Endopodite length about 0.9 exopodite length, with plumose setae along margins. FIGURE 3. Troglocaris (Troglocaris) anophthalmus, Kompoljska jama, Kompolje, Videm–Dobrepolje, neoparatype male (TA966), CL 7.5 mm: MxpII, left maxilliped II; MxpIII, left maxilliped III. Neoallotype female (TA975), CL 8.4 mm: Md, left mandible: fro – frontal view, lat – lateral view; MxI(l), left maxilla I, MxI(r), palp of right maxilla I, MxII, left maxilla II, MxpI, left maxilliped I. Enlarged parts of the structures are indicated by arrows and their magnifications. Description of females (partly after Fabjan 2001; average values presented): CL 7.4 ± 0.8 mm [5.8–9.0 mm], significantly longer than in males (t-test, p < 0.05). Pereopods III–IV subsimilar, not differentiated. Pereopod III (Figure 4PpIII(f)) length from base of article 3 (ischium) to apex of article 7 (dactylus): 143 ± 10 % [119–172 %] of CL. Length relations of above articles (in percentages of pereopod III length): 10 ± 1 % [7–12 %], 34 ± 1 % [31–36 %], 18 ± 1 % [16–20 %], 31 ± 1 % [28–34 %] and 7 ± 1 % [5–8 %]. Article 7 with 6.5 ± 1.4 [4–10] spiniform setae. Article 6 with 5.9 ± 1.5 [4–10] groups of spiniform setae. Pleopod I (Figure 2PlpI(f)) endopodite length 17 ± 3 % [10–23 %] of CL and 38 ± 7 % [24–51 %] of exopodite length. Endopodite basis wide, remarkably tapering distally. Distal endopodite extension possibly representing appendix interna (according to its location), but without retinacular hooks. Pleopod II (Figure 2PlpII(f)) without appendix masculina. Distribution. The subspecies is distributed in SE Slovenia, in NW parts of its Dolenjska region, mainly č covering the Suha Krajina: from Sti na 27 km SE of Ljubljana, along the upper course of the Krka River to Novo mesto and further in the SE direction to the Kolpa/Kupa River near Kostel at the border with Croatia (Figure 1). 8 · Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press JUGOVIC ET AL. Remarks. According to Kollar (1848), the type sample (not explicitely designated as such) was brought to the ‘k. k. Hof-Naturalien-Cabinet’. The collection is now in possession of the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (Vienna, Austria), but the sample couldn’t be found (P. Dworschak, pers. comm.). Both, Kollar and Dormitzer (1853; for its T. schmidtii) mention Kompoljska jama (Kollar also mentioned the nearby cave Potiskavc [‘Portiskavcz’]) as the locality of their samples. Since Kompoljska jama is easily accessible, with regularly available shrimps, it was selected as the (neo)type locality (Sket & Zakšek 2009). FIGURE 4. Troglocaris (Troglocaris) anophthalmus, Kompoljska jama, Kompolje, Videm–Dobrepolje, neoparatype male (TA966), CL 7.5 mm: PpI, left pereopod I; PpII, left pereopod II; PpIII, left pereopod III; PpV, left pereopod V; U, left pleopod VI (uropod). Neoallotype female (TA975), CL 8.4 mm: Pp III (f), distal part (articles 6 and 7) of the left pereopod III; PpIfin, placing of the setae on the movable (m) and immovable (i) fingers (equal on left and right side of the pereopods I–II). 3 – pereopod article 3. Enlarged parts of the structures are indicated by arrows and their magnifications. Troglocaris (Troglocaris) anophthalmus ocellata ssp. nov. Synonymy: Troglocaris (Troglocaris) – the E-Slo2 subgroup Zakšek et al., 2009; Troglocaris anopthalmus intermedia č ć ć Gottstein Mato ec, 2003 and Franjevi , 2006, p.p. (from Kukuruzovi a špilja, Croatia). Type locality: Slovenia, Vinica, cave Jama v kamnolomu. Type sample:Males: adult male (TB046, holotype), CL 7.8 mm, Vinica, cave Jama v kamnolomu, Slovenia, 45°27'15.14" N, 15°14'39.17" E, June 1977, collected by M. Štangelj, specimen partly dissected, preserved in 70 % ethanol. Other males: adult male (TB045; preserved in 70 % ethanol), 7.5 mm; adult male (TB047; preserved in 70 % ethanol), 8.2 mm; same data as holotype. Females: 2 adult females, TB049 (CL 8.8 mm); TB050 (CL 8.4 mm, collected 27th May 1974) (all preserved in 70 % ethanol); same data as holotype. NEW TAXA OF TROGLOCARIS S. STR. Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press · 9 Other specimens examined: over 50 specimens from 8 samples (Figure 1, Appendix C2). Males, CL 4.7–8.3 mm. Females, CL 5.0–9.0 mm. Voucher numbers and GenBank identification numbers for COI gene are in Appendix C2. Diagnosis: Subspecies of T. (T.) anophthalmus comprising populations with mostly pigmented eye rudiments (in more than 90 % of analysed specimens; see Appendix C2 for exact localities). In mature males, appendix interna with no retinacular hooks distally, not exceeding lamina in length. Etimology:Ocellata - adjective from Latin ocellus – with a small eye (rudiment in thČis case). Remarks: In samples from Dolenjske Toplice (cave Sušica, 1 specimen) and rnomelj (cave Stobe, 4 specimens) no specimen had pigmented eye rudiments, despite their placement in the E-Slo2 subgroup in the ITS2 and COI based phylogenetic trees (Zakšek et al., 2009). It should be noted, however, that the discriminant function analysis was run on T. (T.) a. ocellata together with T. (T.) a. anophthalmus and T. (T.) a. intermedia, as a monophylum. Therefore the appropriate differential description for T. (T.) anophthalmus ocellata is missing and only the eye specifics and data on retinacular hooks on male pleopod I are given (see also Material and methods). Distribution: Bela Krajina (extreme SE Slovenia), contiguous to the area of T. (T.) a. anophthalmus (located north westerly). Considering only the exsistence of pigmented eye rudiment also the population of the ć geographicaly remote Kukuruzovi a špilja near Rakovica (Croatia, at the NW Bosnian border) should be assigned to T. (T.) a. ocellata (Figure 1). ć Troglocaris (Troglocaris) anophthalmus intermedia Babi , 1922 ć Synonymy:Troglocaris schmidti var. intermedia Babi , 1922; Troglocaris intermedia d'Udekem d'Acoz, 1999; nec Troglocaris č ć ć anopthalmus intermedia Gottstein Mato ec, 2003 and Franjevi , 2006, from Kukuruzovi a špilja (Croatia). ć ć ć ć Type locality: Croatia, Ogulin, Slunj-Tounj, Mikašinovići, Mićkašinovi a pe ina (= pe ina Zala). Specimens examined: 29 specimens from Mikašinovi a pe ina (Figure 1, Appendix C3). Only specimens collected from ć ć Mikašinovi a pe ina have been attributed to this subspecies. Voucher numbers and GenBank identification numbers for COI gene are in Appendix C3. Preliminary (see remarks) diagnosis: Specimens from the type locality without pigmented eye rudiments and with rostrum length less than 35 % of CL. In mature males, appendix interna with no retinacular hooks distally, not exceeding lamina in length. ć ć Remarks and distribution: Presently certified only from Mikašinovi a pe ina, but morphologically similar populations are known from the vicinity (they were too old to be analysed molecularly): wider Ogulin area, e. g. cave Privis and cave Rudnica (see Figure 1, Appendix C3). The appropriate morphological characterisation of the subspecies will be possible when fresh samples for the molecular analysis will be obtained from the mentioned area. Since the rostral length in Troglocaris s. str. seems to be dependent on the presence of the predatory Proteus anguinus Laurenti (see Jugovic et al., 2010b), we can not admit the identification of the subspecies only on the basis of this character (rostral length was used as a key character in original description). The lack of pigment in the eye rudiments distinguishes this population from the geographically closest T. (T.) a. ocellata. In the COI based ć ć phylogenetic tree, the population from Mikašinovi a pe ina is separated from T. (T.) a. anophthalmus andT. (T.) a. ocellata, but splits are weakly supported. Troglocaris (Troglocaris) anophthalmus periadriatica ssp. nov. Synonymy: Troglocaris (Troglocaris) – the Adriatic phylogroup Zakšek et al., 2009 incl. Troglocaris schmidti auct. from Vjetrenica, p.p.; incl. Troglocaris schmidti schmidti forma typica Fage, 1937 p.p.; incl. Troglocaris anophthalmus č Matjaši , 1960. Type locality: Bosnia and Hercegovina, Popovo polje, Zavala, cave Vjetrenica. Type sample:Male: adult male (TA063, holotype), CL 6.0 mm, lake at the end of Blatni rov, Gornji Absolonov kanal, cave Vjetrenica, Popovo polje, Bosnia and Hercegovina, 42°50'43.21" N, 17°59'09.26" E, 18th August 2005, collected by M. Zagmajster, specimen partly dissected, preserved in 70 % ethanol. Females: 7 adult females, TA794 (CL 6.9 mm); TA795 č (CL 6.0 mm); TA796 (CL 6.2 mm), Donja Vjetrenica, 26th September 1962, collected by J. Matjaši , other data as in holotype; TA798 (CL 6.0 mm); TA799 (CL 5.2 mm), TA800 (CL 7.0 mm), data as in holotype; TA801 (CL 6.6 mm), lake Duguljasto jezero, Gornji Absolonov kanal, other data as for TA798–TA800; one juvenile female, TA797 (CL 6.0 mm), 10 · Zootaxa 3421 © 2012 Magnolia Press JUGOVIC ET AL.