ebook img

Case 3317. Scarabaeus Arenarius Olivier, 1789 (Currently Aphodius Arenarius) And Scarabaeus Fasciatus Olivier, 1789 (Currently Aphodius Fasciatus) (Insecta, Coleoptera): Proposed Conservation Of The Specific Names PDF

2004·3.1 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Case 3317. Scarabaeus Arenarius Olivier, 1789 (Currently Aphodius Arenarius) And Scarabaeus Fasciatus Olivier, 1789 (Currently Aphodius Fasciatus) (Insecta, Coleoptera): Proposed Conservation Of The Specific Names

232 Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 Case 3317 Scavabaeus avenarius Olivier, 1789 (currently Aphodius arenarius) and Scarabaeusfasciatus Olivier, 1789 (currently Aphodiusfasciatus) (Insecta, Coleoptera): proposed conservation of the specific names Frank-Thorsten Krell Department ofEntomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code, is to conserve the specific names of the scarab beetles Scarabaeusfasciatus Olivier, 1789 (currently Aphodius fasciatus) and S. arenarius Olivier, 1789 (currently Aphodius arenarius). These names arejuniorprimary homonyms ofS.fasciatus Linnaeus, 1758 (currently Trichius fasciatus) and S. arenarius Fabricius, 1787 (currently Aegialia arenaria) respectively. Despite their homonymy the two specific names have been used since publication and are currently in use. S.fasciatus Linnaeus and S.fasciatus Olivier have never been considered congeneric, and S. arenarius Fabricius and S. arenarius Olivier have not been considered congeneric since 1807. Trichiusfasciatus (Linnaeus) is a common and well-known pollinophagous Palaearctic species of the subfamily trichiinae. Aegialia arenaria (Fabricius) (subfamily aegialiinae or subfamily aphodiinae, tribe aegialiini) is a localized European sand-dwelling scarab beetle. Aphodius (Pianolinus)fasciatus (Olivier) and Aphodius (Plagiogonus) arenarius (Olivier) are well-known European dung beetle species (subfamily aphodiinae, tribe aphodiini). It is also proposed that the name Scarabaeus putridus Geoffrey in Fourcroy, 1785 should be suppressed. Keywords. Nomenclature; taxonomy; Coleoptera; scarabaeidae; aphodiinae; aegialiinae; trichiinae; Aphodius arenarius; Aphodiusfasciatus; Aegialia; Trichius; dung beetles. 1. Linnaeus (1758, p. 352) described Scarabaeusfasciatus, a common European pollen feeding chafer, known as the bumblebee beetle. The species was transferred to Trichius Fabricius, 1775 (scarabaeidae. trichiinae) by Fabricius (1775, p. 40) where it has remained. Latreille (1810, p. 428) designated it as the type species ofthe genus A Trichius Fabricius. lectotype has not been designated, but four syntypes are preserved in the collection of the Linnean Society of London (Landin, 1956b, p. 12). Scarabaeusfasciatus Linnaeus, 1758 has been placed on the Official List of Specific Names in Zoology (Opinion 2079, September 2004). 2. Olivier (1789, p. 90) described Scarabaeusfasciatus, a widespread Palaearctic dung beetle. The species was transferred to Aphodius Illiger, 1798 (scarabaeidae, aphodiinae) by Fabricius (1801, p. 79) where it has remained. The lectotype was designated by Landin (1956a, p. 2180 and is deposited in The Natural History Museum, London, in the Banks collection. It is identical to Aphodius putridus (Herbst, 1789, nee Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785) (Landin, 1956a, p. 218). Silfverberg Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 233 (1977, p. 91) recognized the preoccupation of A. fasciatus (Olivier) and proposed Aphodius tenellus Say, 1823 as the oldest available name for that species. This has been followed by a number ofauthors as shown in para. 10 below. However, already in 1967, Brown statedthatAphodiusuliginosusHardy, 1847 is theoldest available (i.e. non-preoccupied name) for Scarabaeusfasciatus Olivier, because Aphodius tenellus Say, 1823 is a different species. In spite of the formal preoccupation of Aphodius fasciatus, thisname is still inuse, simultaneouslywith thetwo othernames(seeparas. 10 and 11). 3. In 1801 (p. 68), Fabricius used the name Aphodiusfasciatus for another new species although he had adopted this binomen for Olivier's species already (see para. 2). This was an error since the type ofthis species is labelled 'Aphodius unifasciatus' in Fabricius's hand (Landin, 1957). A.fasciatus Fabricius is ajunior synonym ofA. coniugatus (Panzer, 1795) (Illiger, 1803, p. 292; Landin, 1957). It has not been treated as a valid name since, and is a junior secondary homonym of Aphodiusfasciatus (Olivier, 1789). 4. Fourcroy (1785, p. 12) described in six words Scarabaeus putridus (the name given by Geoffroy, see d'Aguilar & Raimbault, 1990), which was synonymized with Scarabaeus arenarius Fabricius, 1787 by Olivier (1789, p. 97). The name had been forgotten until Bedel (1911, p. 48) rediscovered and used it as the valid name for the species Aphodius arenarius sensu Olivier. The type is not known (Dellacasa, 1988, p. 186). Hence, its specific identity was considered by Landin (1956a, p. 224) 'impossible to interpret' and by Dellacasa (1983, p. 389) to be indecipherable ('indecifrabile'). Baraud (1992, p. 249) denies the synonymy of Fourcroy's Scarabaeusputridus with Aphodius arenarius (Olivier): 'putridus auct., nee Fourcroy'. 5. Herbst (1789, p. 160f) described Scarabaeus putridus, a junior homonym of Fourcroy's (1785) S. putridus. The species was transferred to Aphodius Illiger, 1798 (scarabaeidae, aphodiinae) by Illiger (1798, p. 30, as a synonym ofA.foetidus (F.)). It has remained in this genus. No type specimen is known (Dellacasa, 1988, p. 186). 6. Sturm (1805, p. 125) described Aphodius putridus (scarabaeidae, aphodiinae). It has been considered a synonym of A. borealis Gyllenhal, 1827 (Dellacasa, 1988, pp. 186, 393; Baraud, 1992, p. 251). However, no type specimen is known (Dellacasa, 1988, p. 186). Apart fromAdam (1994, 1996), A. putridus Sturmhas not been treated as a valid name since and is a junior secondary homonym of Scarabaeus putridus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785. 7. Fabricius (1787, p. 11) described Scarabaeus arenarius. The species was transferred to Aphodius Illiger, 1798 (scarabaeidae, aphodiinae) by Illiger (1798, p. 22), to Psammodius Fallen, 1807 by Fallen (1807, p. 37), and finally to Aegialia Latreille, 1807 by Dejean (1821, p. 55) (scarabaeidae. aegialiinae) where it has remained and is the type species. It has been used constantly and frequently since its description (e.g. Stebnicka, 1977, p. 460 (older references therein); Paulian & Baraud, 1982, p. 89; Jessop, 1986, p. 17; Lundberg & Gustafsson, 1986, p. 65; Dellacasa, 1988, p. 359; Krai, 1989, p. 19, 1993, p. 68; Lumaret, 1990, p. 338; McNamara, 1991, p. 147; Tiberghien, 1991, p. 225; Baraud, 1992, p. 105; Krell & Fery, 1992, p. 210; Silfverberg, 1992, p. 37; Duff, 1993, p. 127; Rossner, 1993, p. 6; Giirlich, Suikat & Ziegler, 1995, p. 71; Hansen, 1995, p. 125; Anderson et al., & 1997, p. 27; Bordat, 1997, p. 37; Cantonnet, Casset Toda, 1997, p. 107; Telnov et al., 1997, p. 55; Kohler & Klausnitzer, 1998, p. 129; Bunalski, 1999, p. 13). The 234 Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 lectotype has been designated by Landin (1956a, p. 223) and is deposited in Fabricius's collection in Kiel. 8. Olivier (1789, p. 96 [Scarabe]) used Scarabaeus arenarius for a different species. He adopted this name for Scarabaeusputridus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785, and cited Scarabaeus arenarius Fabricius with a question mark. The latter synonymy was definitely rejected by Illiger (1800, p. 201) in his annotated translation of Olivier's monograph. However, the name 5. arenarius became established with Olivier's authorship. The species was transferred to Aphodius Illiger, 1798 (scarabaeidae, aphodiinae) by Fabricius (1801, p. 82) (as a synonym of Aphodius arenarius (F.)) where it has remained. The type is deposited in the Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris (Dellacasa, 1988, p. 90). 9. Scarabaeusfasciatus Olivier, 1789 is ajunior primary homonym ofScarabaeus fasciatus Linnaeus, 1758. However, as shown in paras. 1 and 2 above, the two binomina Scarabaeusfasciatus had never been used simultaneously since S.fasciatus Linnaeus had been transferred to Trichius 14 years before S. fasciatus Olivier was described. Therefore they have never been considered congeneric and will never be because the species belong to two different subfamilies which are, according to some authors, even families. Despite their homonymy both names have been used constantly and frequently since their description (for thejunior homonym Aphodius fasciatus, see para. 10, for the senior homonym Trichius fasciatus, see Paulian & Baraud, 1982, p. 397; Stebnicka, 1983, p. 132 (older references therein); Jessop, 1986 p. 30; Lundberg & Gustafsson, 1986, p. 68; Nikolaev, 1987, p. 207; Krai, 1989, p. 25 1993, p. 70; Dzhambazishvili, 1990, p. 57; Gangloff, 1991, p. 54; Baraud, 1992, p. 774 Silfverberg, 1992, p. 39; Duff, 1993, p. 132; Rossner, 1993, p. 13, 1996, p. 52; Adam 1994, p. 10; Carpaneto &Piattella, 1995, p. 15; Giirlich, Suikat &Ziegler, 1995, p. 73 Alexandrovitch, 1996, p. 30; Kahlen & Hellrigl, 1996, p. 476; Nikritskii et al., 1996 & p. 59; Cantonnet, Casset Toda, 1997, p. 109; Inglebert, 1997, p. 54; Telnov et al. 1997, p. 58; Brandstetter & Kapp, 1998, p. 68; Kohler & Klausnitzer, 1998, p. 131 & Bunalski, 1999, p. 28; Rossner Schulze, 1999, p. 59; Mitter, 2000, p. 107 Negrobov, 2000, p. 94; Rossner & Kaltz, 2000, p. 10; Bragina, 2002, p. 90). 10. Presently four different names are used for one species: Aphodius fasciatus (Olivier, 1789) (Dellacasa, 1983, p. 386; Jessop, 1986, p. 8 Nikolaev, 1987, p. 123; Berlov, 1989, p. 400; Gangloff, 1991, p. 40; Krell & Fery & 1992, p. 218; Duff, 1993, p. 128; Rossner, 1993, p. 7, 1996, p. 50; Giirlich, Suikat Ziegler, 1995, p. 72; Kahlen & Hellrigl, 1996, p. 475; Brandstetter & Kaupp, 1998 p. 67; Kohler & Klausnitzer, 1998, p. 130; Bunalski, 1999, p. 21; Mitter, 2000, p. 85 Rheinheimer, 2000, p. 104); Aphodius putridus (Herbst, 1789) (Stebnicka, 1976, pp. 22, 119; Bast, 1985 Dellacasa, 1988, p. 393; Dzhambazishvili, 1990, p. 31; Franzen, 1992, p. 244; Koch 1993, p. 230; Kim, 1995, p. 70, 2000, p. 100; Negrobov, 2000, p. 93); & Aphodius tenellus auct. nee Say, 1823 (Paulian Baraud, 1982, p. 183; Stebnicka 1983, p. 96; Lundberg& Gustafsson, 1986, p. 66; Krai, 1989, p. 22; Silfverberg, 1992 p. 37; Milander et al., 1993, p. 21; Nikritskii et al., 1996, p. 55; Roslin, 2000, pp. 323 355); Aphodius uliginosus Hardy, 1847 (Lumaret, 1990, p. 250; Baraud, 1992, p. 251 Krai, 1993, p. 69; Adam, 1994, p. 13, 1996, p. 304; Hansen, 1995, p. 126; Carpaneto &Piattella, 1995, p. 8; Alexandrovitchet al., 1996, p. 29; Anderson et al., 1997, p. 28 . Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 235 Bordat, 1997, p. 33; Cantonnet, Casset & Toda, 1997, p. 105; Palestrini, Barbero & Rolando, 1998, p. 104; Nadai & Merkl, 1999, p. 217; Tagliaferri, 1999, p. 4). 11 Presently the binomen Aphodiusputridus is used for two oreven three different species: Bast (1985), Dellacasa (1988, p. 393), Dzhambazishvili (1990, p. 31; 2000, p. 183), Franzen (1992, p. 244), Koch (1993, p. 230), Kim (1995, p. 70; 2000, p. 100), Koteles & Bakonyi (1996, p. 100), and Negrobov (2000, p. 93), e.g. use the name Aphodiusputridus (Herbst, 1789) for Aphodiusfasciatus (Olivier, 1789). Paulian & Baraud (1982, p. 114), Jessop (1986, pp. 8, 21), Nikolaev (1987, p. 112), Lumaret (1990, p. 134), Nikcevic (1991, p. 98), Silfverberg (1992, p. 37), Krai (1993, p. 68), Milanderet al. (1993, p. 16), Carpeneto & Piattella(1995, p. 8), Hansen (1995, p. 126), Alexandrovitch (1996, p. 29), Bordat (1997, p. 33), Cantonnet et al. (1997, p. 103), Telnov et al. (1997, p. 57), Martynov (1998, p. 44), and Bragina(2002, p. 90), e.g. use the name Aphodius putridus (Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785) for Aphodius arenarius (Olivier, 1789). Adam (1994, p. 13; 1996, p. 304) used Planolinus putridus (Sturm, 1805) for AphodiusborealisGyllenhal, 1827 (hepromoted the subgenera ofAphodiusto generic level). However, Aphodiusfasciatus (Olivier) is still in use (see para. 10), as is Aphodius arenarius (Olivier) (Rey, 1986, p. 119; Bouyon, 1991, p. 172; Gangloff, 1991, p. 35; & Baraud, 1992, p. 249; Krell Fery, 1992, p. 302; Rossner, 1993, p. 7, 1996, p. 49; & & Ziegler, Suikat Gurlich, 1994, p. 5; Gurlich, Suikat Ziegler, 1995, p. 71; Koteles & Bakonyi, 1996, p. 100; Kohler & Klausnitzer, 1998, p. 129; Nadai & Merkl, 1999, p. 218, 2000, p. 75; Dzhambazishvili, 2000, p. 181, Negrobov, 2000, p. 91; Rheinheimer, 2000, p. 103; Rossner & Kalz, 2000, p. 8; Verdii & Galante, 2000, p. 397; Bunalski, 2001, p. 30; Schmidt, 2002p. 76; Weichselbaumer, 2003, p. 84)despite their preoccupation. The only way to name these two species unequivocally is to avoid the equivocal binomen Aphodiusputridus and to use the welLknown and unequivocal synonyms Aphodiusfasciatus (Olivier) and Aphodius arenarius (Olivier) instead. As in another similar case (Case 2878, BZN 51: 121-127; Opinion 1890, BZN 55: 54-57) the formally correct acts of replacing long forgotten homonyms have resulted in nomenclatural inconsistency and confusion rather than in any kind ofstability. 12. The InternationalCommission onZoological Nomenclatureis accordinglyasked: (1) to use its plenary power: (a) to suppress the nameputridus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785, as published in the binomen Scarabaeus putridus, for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those ofthe Principle of Homonymy; (b) to rule that the following specific names are not invalid: (i) fasciatus Olivier, 1789, as published in the binomen Scarabaeus fasciatus, by reason of being a junior primary homonym of Scarabaeusfasciatus Linnaeus, 1758; (ii) arenarius Olivier, 1789, as published in the binomen Scarabaeus arenarius, by reason of being a junior primary homonym of Scarabaeus arenarius Fabricius, 1778; (2) to place on the Official List ofSpecific Names in Zoology the followingnames: {a)fasciatus Olivier, 1789, as published in the binomen Scarabaeusfasciatus (not invalid by reason ofbeing a junior primary homonym of Scarabaeus fasciatus Linnaeus, 1758 as ruled in (l)(b)(i) above); 236 Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 (b) arenarius Fabricius, 1787, as published in the binomen Scarabaeus arenarius; (c) arenarius Olivier, 1789, as published in the binomen Scarabaeus arenarius (not invalid by reason ofbeing ajunior primary homonym of Scarabaeus arenarius Fabricius, 1787 as ruled in (l)(b)(ii) above); (3) to place on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Specific Names in Zoology the following names: (a) putridus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785, as published in the binomen Scarabaeusputridus and as suppressed in (l)(a) above; (b)putridus Herbst, 1789, as published in the binomen Scarabaeus putridus (ajunior primary homonym of S. putridus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785); (c) putridus Sturm, 1805, as published in the binomen Aphodius putridus (a junior primary homonym of S. putridus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785); (d)fasciatus Fabricius, 1801, as published in the binomen Aphodiusfasciatus (ajunior primary homonym ofAphodiusfasciatus Olivier, 1789). References Adam, L. 1994. A check-list ofthe Hungarian Scarabaeoidea with the description often new taxa (Coleoptera). Folia Entomologica Hungarica, 55: 5-17. Adam, L. 1996. Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of the Biikk National Park. Pp. 299-308 in Mahunka, S. (Ed.), Thefauna ofthe Biikk NationalPark II. Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. Aguilar, J. d' & Raimbault, F. 1990. Notes de bibliographic entomologique 3. Geoffroy, Fourcroy et l'article 51 du Code de Nomenclature. Entomologiste, 46: 37-40. Alexandrovitch, O.R., Lopatin, I.K., Pisanenko, A.D., Tsinkevitch, V.A. & Snitko, S.M. 1996. A catalogue of Coleoptera (Insecta) of Belarus. 104 pp. Fund of Fundamental Investigations ofthe Republic ofBelarus, Minsk. Anderson,R.,Nash, R. & O'Connor, J.P. 1997. Irish Coleoptera. A revisedandannotatedlist. Irish Naturalists' Journal, Special Entomological Supplement, 1997: iv, 81 pp. Baraud, J. 1992. Coleopteres Scarabaeoidea d'Europe. Faune de France, France et Regions Limitrophes, 78: 9, 858 pp., 11 pis. Bast, A. De. 1985. Cartes 1818-1866: Coleoptera Scarabaeoidea Aphodidae. In Leclercq, J. & & Gaspar, C. Verstraeten, C. (Eds.), Atlas provisoire des insectes de Belgique (et des regions limitrophs). Cartes 1801-2030. Faculte des Sciences Agronomiques de l'Etat, Zoologie Generale et Faunistique, Gembloux. [unpag.]. Bedel, L. 1911. Faunedes ColeopteresduBassindelaSeine,4(1), Scarabaeidae. 164pp. Societe Entomologique de France, Paris. Berlov, E. Ya. 1989. 6. Podsem. Aphodiinae. In Lera, P.A. (Ed.), Opredelitel' nasekomykh dalbnego vostoka SSSR v zhesti tomakh, 3(1): 387-408. Bordat, P. 1997. Premiere partie: Lucanoidea, Scarabaeoidea Laparosticti. Catalogue des Coleopteres de ITle de France, 6: 8-37. Bouyon, C. 1991. Sur quelques Aphodius du Sud-Est du MassifCentral (Col. Scarabaeidae). Entomologiste, 47: 171-172. Bragina, T.M. 2002. Fauna i pochvennoe naselenie plastinchatousykh zhukov (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Naurzumskogo zapovednika (Kazakhstan). Russian Entomological Journal, 11: 87-92. Brandstetter, CM. & Kapp, A. 1998. Kdferinventar von Vorarlberg undLiechtenstein. Insecta: Coleoptera. 92 pp. Burs, Erster Vorarlberger Coleopterologischer Verein. Brown, W.J. 1967. Notes on the extralimited distribution of some species of Coleoptera. Canadian Entomologist, 99: 85-93. Bunalski, M. —1999. Die —Blatthornkafer Mitteleuropas. Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea. Bestimmung Verbreitung Okologie. 80 pp. Slamka, Bratislava. Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December2004 237 Bunalski,M.2001. ContributionstotheknowledgeofScarabaeoidea(Coleoptera)ofBulgaria. Part II. Species not recorded from Bulgaria before. Wiadomosczi Entomologiczne, 20: 29-32. Cantonnet, F., Casset, L. & Toda, G. 1997. Coleopteres du Massifde Fontainebleau et de ses environs. V, 251, 6, 36, II. 2 pp.. 8 pis. Association des Naturalistes de la Vallee de Loing et du Massifde Fontainebleau. Carpaneto, G.M. & Piattella, E. 1995. Coleoptera Polyphaga V (Lucanoidea, Scarabaeoidea). Checklist delle Specie della Fauna Italiana. 50: 1-18. Dejean, P.F.M.A. 1821. Catalogue de la collection de coleopteres de M. le Baron Dejean. viii, 137 pp. Crevot, Paris. Dellacasa, G. 1983. Sistematica e nomenclatura degli Aphodiini italiani (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae). Museo Regionale di Science Naturali, Torino, Monografie, 1: 1-467. Dellacasa, M. 1988. Contribution to a world-wide catalogue of Aegialiidae, Aphodiidae. Aulonocnemidae, Fermitotrogidae (Coleoptera Scarabaeoidea). Memorie della Societa Entomologica Italiana, 66: 1—455. Duff, A. 1993. Beetles of Somerset, their status and distribution. 269 pp. Somerset Archaeological & Natural History Society, Taunton. Dzhambazishvili, Ya.S. 1990. OprelediteYplastinchatousych zhukov (Coleoptera: Lamellicornia Lucanidae i Scarabaeidae) Gruzii. 72 pp. Metsniereba, Tbilisi. Dzhambazishvili, Ya.S. 2000. Katalog plastinchatousych zhukov (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Troginae, Geotrupinae, Hybosorinae, Ochodaeinae. Aphodinae) Gruzii. Proceedings of the Institute ofZoology Tbilisi, 20: 180-185. Fabricius, J.C. 1775. Systema Entomologiae, sistens Insectorum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, adiectisSynonymis, Locis, Descriptionibus, Observationibus. Flensburgiet Lipsiae. Fabricius, J.C. 1787. Mantissa insectorum sistens eorum species nuper detectas adiectis characteribus genericis, differentilis specificis, emendationibus, observationibus. 1. 20, 382 pp. Hafniae, Proft. Fabricius, J.C. 1801. Systema Eleutheratorum secundum Ordines, Genera, Species adiectis Synonymis, Locis, Observationibus, Descriptionibus. 1. Kiliae. Fallen, C.F. 1807. Observationes Entomologicae. 3 (pp. 31-42). Berlingianis, Lundae. Fourcroy, A.F. de. 1785. Entomologia Parisiensis; sive Catalogus Insectorum quae in Agro Parisiensi reperiuntur; Secundum methodum Geoffraeanam in sectiones, genera & species distributus: Cus addita sunt nomina trivialia &fere trecentae novae Species. Pars Prima. Parisiis. Franzen, B. 1992. Vorlaufige Liste der Kafer von Koln (Insecta: Coleoptera). Decheniana Beihefte, 31: 217-249. Gangloff,L. 1991. Lamellicornia. Scarabaeidae. Lucanidae. CatalogueetAtlasdes Coleopteres dAlsace, 4: 1-107. Giirlich, S., Suikat, R. & Ziegler, W. 1995. Katalog der Kafer Schleswig-Holsteins und des Niederelbegebietes. Verhandlungen des Vereins fur Naturwissenschaftliche Heimatfor- schungzu Hamburg. 41: 1-111. Gyllenhal, L. 1827. Insecta Svecica. Classis I. Coleoptera sive Eleuterata. 1(4). X, 762 pp. Fleischer, Lipsiae. Hansen, M. 1995. Katalog over Danmarks biller. Entomologiske Meddelelser, 64: 1-231. Hardy, J. 1847. Descriptions of new British Coleoptera, with additional notes. Annals and Magazine ofNatural History, 19: 379-383. Herbst, J.F.W. 1789. Natursystem aller bekannten in- und ausldndischen Insekten, als eine Fortsetzungder von Biiffonschen Naturgeschichte. Nach dem System des Ritters von Linne und Fabricius zu bearbeiten angefangen von Carl Gustav Jablonsky. Der Kafer zueyter Theil. Pauli, Berlin. Illiger,J.K.W. 1798. VerzeichnissderKaferPreussens. Entworfen vonJohann GottliebKugelann Apotheker in Osterode. 42, 510 pp. Gebauer, Halle. Illiger, J.K.W. 1800. Oliviers Entomologie oder Naturgeschichte der Insekten mit ihren Gattungs- undArtMerkmalen, Hirer Beschreibung undSynonymie. Kafer. Erster Theil. 16, 309 pp. Reichard, Braunschweig. 238 Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 Illiger, K. 1803. Abandrung der in Fabricii Systema Eleutheratorum doppelt vorkommenden Namen. Magazinfur Insektenkunde, 2: 292-293. Inglebert, H. 1997. Seconde partie: Scarabaeoidea Pleurosticti. Catalogue des Coleopteres de Vile deFrance, 6: 38-61. Jessop, L. 1986. Dung Beetles and Chafers, Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea, New Edition. Handbookfor the Identification ofBritish Insects, 5(11): 1-53. Kahlen, M. & Hellrigl, K. 1996. Coleoptera—Kafer (Deck- oder Hartfliigler). Pp. 393-511 in Hellrigl, K., Die Fierwelt Sudtirols. Kommenti—ertes systematisch-faunistisches Verzeichnis der auf dem Gebiet der Provinz Bozen Siidtirol (Italien) bekannten Tierarten. Naturmuseum Siidtirol, Bozen. Kim, J.I. 1995. Check list of the Laparosticti from Chejudo (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Insecta Koreana Supplement, 5: 63-72. Kim, J.I. 2000. Coleoptera (Scarabaeoidea). Economic Insects of Korea 4. Insecta Koreana Supplement, 11: 1-151. Koch, K. 1993. Dritter Nachtrag zur Kaferfauna der Rheinprovinz Teil III: Ostomidae - Scolytidae. Decheniana, 146: 203-271. Kohler, F. & Klausnitzer, B. (Eds.) 1998. Verzeichnis der Kafer Deutschlands. Entomologische Nachrichten undBerichte, Beiheft, 4: 1-185. Koteles, L. & Bakonyi, G. 1996. First record on the Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) fauna of Godollo (Hungary). Folia Entomologica Hungarica, 57: 97-104. Krai, D. 1989. Seznam ceskoslovenskych Listorohych Brouku (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). Check list of Czechoslovak Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera). Studie a Zprdvy Okresniho Muzea Fraha-vychod, (9)1987: 15-30. Krai, D. 1993. Scarabaeidae. Pp. 68-71 in Jelinek, J. (Ed.), Check-listofCzechoslovakInsects, 4 (Coleoptera). Seznam ceskoslovenskych brouku (Folia Heyrovskyana, Supplementum 1). Praha. Krell, F.-T. & Fery, H. 1992. Familienreihe Lamellicornia. Pp. 250-252 in Lohse, G.A. & Lucht, W., Die Kafer Mitteleuropas, 13. Goecke & Evers, Krefeld. Landin, B.-O. 1956a. The Fabrician species ofAphodiini and Aegialiini (Col. Lamellicornia). Opuscula Entomologica, 21: 203-228. Landin, B.-O. 1956b. The Linnaean Species ofLamellicornia described in 'Systema Naturae', X Ed. (1758). (Col.). Entomologisk Tidskrift, 11: 1-18. Landin, B.-O. 1957. The lectotype ofAphodiusfasciatus Fabricius, 1801 (Col. Scarabaeidae). A Supplement. Opuscula Entomologica, 22: 191-192. Latreille, P.A. 1807. Generacrustaceorumetinsectorumsecundum ordinemnaturalem infamilias disposita, iconibusexemplisqueplurimisexplicata. 2.280pp. Koenig,ParisiisetArgentorati. Latreille, P.A. 1810. Considerations generales sur I'ordre naturel des animaux composant les classes des crustaces, des arachnides, et des insectes; avec un tableau methodique de leurs genres, disposes enfamilies. AAA pp. Schoell, Paris. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1. 824 pp. Salvii, Holmiae. Lumaret, J.P. 1990. Atlas des Coleopteres Scarabeides laparosticti de France. Inventaires de Faune et de Flore, 1: 1^420. Lundberg, S. & Gustafsson, B. 1986. Catalogus Coleopterorum Sueciae. Entomologiska Foreningen i Stockholm & Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm. Martynov, V.V. 1998. Opisanei licinok trech vidov zhukov roda Aphodius (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Soobshenie 1. Vestnik Zoologii, 32(5-6): 39-46. McNamara, J. 1991. Family Scarabaeidae, scarab beetles. Pp. 145-158 in Bousquet, Y. (Ed.), Checklist ofbeetles ofCanada andAlaska. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada. Milander, G., Roosileht, U. & Siida, I. 1993. Plastinchatousyezhuki podsemeistvaAphodiinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) Estonii. Eesti Feaduste Akadeemia Foimetised, Biologia, 42: 13-38. Mitter, H. 2000. Die Kaferfauna Oberosterreichs (Coleoptera: Heteromera und Lamellicornia). Beitrdge zur Naturkunde Oberosterreichs, 8: 3-192. Nadai, L. & Merkl, O. 1999. Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from the Aggtelek National Park. Pp. 215-220 in Mahunka, S. (Ed.), FheFaunaoftheAggtelekNationalParkI. Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 239 Negrobov, S.O. 2000. K faune i ekologii rogachez i plastinchatousykh zhukov (Coleoptera: Lucanidae, Scarabaeidae)Voronezhskoioblasti. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie,79: 89-95. Nikcevic, J. 1991. Prilog poznavanju sastava faune Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae i Cicindelidae) okolineTitograda. GlasnikRepublickogZavodazaZastituPrirodeiPrirodnjackogMuzeja u Titogradu, 23: 96-99. Nikolaev, G.V. 1987. Plastinchatousye Zhuki (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) Kazakhstana i Srednei Azii. 232 pp. Nauka, Alma-Ata. Nikritskii, N.B., Osipov, I.N., Chemeris, M.V., Semenov, V.B. & Gusakov, A.A. 1996. Zhestkokrylye-ksilobionty, mitsetobionty i plastinchatousye Prikosgo-Terrasnogo biosfernogo zapovednika (s obzorom fauny etich grupp Moskovskoi oblasti). 111 pp. Moskovskogo Universiteta, Moskva. Olivier, M. 1789. Entomologie, on Histoire Naturelle des Insectes, avec lews caracteres generiques et specifiques, leur description, lew synonymie, et lew figure enluminee. Coleopteres. 1, Scarabe. 189 pp. Paris. Palestrini, C, Barbero, E. & Rolando, A. 1998. Intra- and interspecific aggregation among dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) in an Alpine pasture. JournalofZoology, 245: 101-109. Panzer, G.W.F. 1795. Entomologia Germanica exhibens Insecta per Germaniam idigena secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Sp—ecies adjectis Synonymis, Locis, Descriptionibus. I. Eleutherata. (Deutschlands Insecten Fauna oder entomologisches Taschenbuch fuer das Jahr 1795). Norimbergae. Paulian, R. & Baraud, J. 1982. Faune des Coleopteres de France. II. Lucanoidea et Scarabaeoidea. Encyclopedic Entomologique, 43: 1-478. Rey, A. 1986. Aphodius {Plagiogonus) arenarius (Olivier) (Coleoptera Sacarabaeidae). Bollet- tino della Societa Entomologica Italiana, 118: 119. Rheinheimer, J. 2000. Die Kaferfauna des Landkreises Karlsruhe und einiger angrenzender Gebiete. Mitteilungen, Entomologischer Verein Stuttgart, 35: 2-141, 143. Rossner, E. 1993. Rote Liste der gefahrdeten Blatthomkdfer und Hirschkdfer Mecklenbwg- Vorpommerns. 20 pp. Umweltministerin des Landes Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schwerin. Rossner, E. 1996. Checklist der Blatthornkafer (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) Thuringens. Check-Listen Thuringer Insekten, 4: 47-53. Rossner,E.&Kalz,H.2000. DieBlatthorn-undHirschkaferartenderUmgebungvon Eisleben (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Entomologische Mitteilungen Sachsen-Anhalt, 8: 7-16. Rossner, E. & Schulze, J. 1999. Verbreitung der Gattung Trichius Fabricius, 1775 in Ostdeutschland (Col., Scarabaeidae, Trichiinae). Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte, 43: 59-66. Roslin, T. 2000. Dung beetle movements at two spatial scales. Oikos, 91: 323-335. Say,T. 1823. DescriptionsofcoleopterousinsectescollectedinthelateexpeditiontotheRocky Mountains. Journalofthe Academy ofNatural Sciences ofPhiladelphia, 3: 139-216. Schmidt, A. 2002. Zur Kaferfauna des ehemaligen Standortiibungsplatzes Wetzlar- Magdalenenhausen. Hessische Faunistische Briefe, 21: 53-78. Silfverberg, H. 1977. Nomenclatoric notes on Coleoptera Polyphaga. Notulae Entomologicae, 57: 91-94. Silfverberg, H. 1992. Enumeratio Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Baltiae. Helsingin Hyonteisvaihtoyhdistys, Helsinki. — Stebnicka, Z. 1976. Zukowate Scarabaeidae, Grupa podrodzin: Scarabaeidae laparosticti. Klucze do Oznaczania Owadow Polski, xix (28a) = 89. Patistwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa. Stebnicka, Z. 1977. A revision of the world species of the tribe Aegialiini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae). Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 22: 397-506, pi. 23. Stebnicka, Z. 1983. Superfamilia: Scarabaeoidea Latreille, 1802. Pp. 7-160 in Burakowski, B., Mroczkowski, M. & Stefanska, J. (Eds.), Chrzaszcze. Coleoptera. Scarabaeoidea, Das- cilloidea, Byrrhoidea i Parnoidea. Katalog Fauny Polski, 38. Sturm, J. 1805. Deutschlands Fauna in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. V. Abtheilung. Die Insecten. Erstes Bandchen. Kafer. 44. 271 pp. Author, Niirnberg. . 240 Bulletin ofZoological Nomenclature 61(4) December 2004 Tagliaferri, E. 1999. Ricerche coleotterologiche nella Tenuta di San Rossore (Pisa): Scarabaeoidea laparosticta. Attidella Societa Toscana diScience Naturali, Memorie (B), 106: 1-10. Telnov, D., Barsevskis, A., Savich, F., Kovalevsky, F., Berdnikov, S., Voronin, M., Cibulskis,R. & Ratniece,D. 1997. Check-ListofLatvian Beetles(Insecta: Coleoptera). Mitteilungendes Intemationalen Entomologischen Vereins, Supplement, 5: 1-140. Tiberghien, G. 1991. Observations sur les coleopteres de la chaine pyreneenne de regions limitrophes. lle Note: Scarabaeoidea Laparosticti. Bulletin du Centre des Etudes et de Recherche Scientifique Biarritz, 15: 219-228. Verdu, J.R. & Galante, E. 2000. Larval morphology and biology oftwo species ofAphodius (Plagiogonus) from the Iberian Peninsula (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae). European JournalofEntomology, 97: 395^401 Weichselbaumer, E. 2003. Kaferfunde aus dem Landkreis Neuburg/Schrobenhausen und UmgebungTeil2 (Coleoptera). NachrichtenblattderBayerischenEntomologen, 52: 79-89. Ziegler, W., Suikat, R. & Giirlich, S. 1994. Rote Liste der in Schleswig-Holstein gefdhrdeten Kaferarten. 96pp. LandesamtfurNaturschutzund LandschaftspflegeSchleswig-Holstein, Kiel. Acknowledgement ofreceipt ofthis application was published in BZN 61: 133. Comments on this case are invited for publication (subject to editing) in the Bulletin; they should be sent to the Executive Secretary, I.C.Z.N., The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]).

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.