Property of: Internationally Trained Lawyers Program University of Toronto Faculty of Law 655 Spadina Avenue, Toronto ON M5S 2H9 March 2013 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO (PLEASE) DO NOT REMOVE FACULTY of LAW Y Internationally Trained Lawyers Program R A R B LI W A L N KI S A L A R O B Canadian Criminal Law and Procedure (ITLP401) CASEBOOK-Volume 1 Instructor: Justice Rick Libman KE 8809 .L52 rv- 2011 Ontario v.1 2011-12 ■••ncd Lawyer* ProRtai r BORA LASKIN LAW LIBRARY DEC 1 3 2018 FACULTY LAW UNivERnrfv'o;-' • :mio UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY LAW of Internationally Trained Lawyers Program Canadian Criminal Law and Procedure (ITLP401) CASEBOOK - Volume 1 Instructor: Justice Rick Libman lC *> tklTLP Ontario ^ 2011-12 \ Internationally Trained Lawyer* Program Table of | Index for Canadian Criminal Law and Procedures Item Items Page No's No's 1 Canadian Criminal Law and Procedures ( Revised October Volume 5, 2010 1,1-19 2 Frey v. Fedoruk, [1950] S.C.R. 51 20-33 3 R. v. Jobidon, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 714, 34-72 4 R. v. Malmo-Levine, 2003 SCC 74 at paras. 73 - 79 73-170 5 R. v. Heywood, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 761 171-212 6 R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103 213-241 7 R. v. Labaye, [2005] S.C.J. No. 83 242-279 8 R. v. Gundy, [2008] O.J. No. 1410, 280-296 9 R. v. Pare, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 618 297-309 10 RvJ. (D.), [2002] O.J. No. 4916 (Ont. C.A.) 310-318 11 Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth & the Law v Canada (A.G.),[2004] 1 319-389 S.C.R. 76 12 Rv D’Angelo, [2002] O.J. No. 4312 (Ont. C.A.) 390-395 13 R. v. York (2005), 193 C.C.C. (3d) 331 (B.C.C.A.) 396-404 14 R. v. Marshall, [1969] 3 C.C.C. 149 (Alta. C.A.) and 405-410 15 R. v. Terrence, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 357 411-417 16 R. v. Pham, [2005] O.J. No. 5127 (Ont. C.A.) 418-430 17 R. v. Ewanchuk, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330 431-462 18 R. v. Cuerrier, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 371 463-502 Volume 2 19 R. v. Williams, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 134 1-17 20 R. v. Menezes, [2002] O.J. No. 551 (Ont. S.Ct. of J.) 18-54 21 R. v. Nette, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 488 55-84 22 R. y. Moore, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 195 85-98 23 R. v. Peterson, [2005] O.J. No. 4450 (Ont. C.A.), 99-119 24 R v. Browne (1997), 116 C.C.C. (3d) 183 (Ont. C.A.), 120-125 25 R. v. Vandergraff, [1994] M.J. No. 503 (Man. C.A.) 126-128 26 R. v Murray, [2000] O.J. No. 2182 (Ont. S.C.J.) 129-151 27 R. y. J.S.R., 2008 O.N.C.A. 544 152-166 28 R. v. Theroux, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 5 167-181 29 R. u. Chase, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 293 182-189 30 R. v^. Buzzanga and Durocher (1979), 25 O.R. (2d) 705 (Ont. C.A.) 190-199 31 R. v/. Currie (1975), 24 C.C.C. (2d) 292 (Ont.C.A.) 200-203 32 R. v. Duong (1998), 15 C.R. (5th) 209 (Ont.C.A.) 204-218 33 R. y. Vinikurov, [2001] A.J. No. 612 (Alta C.A.) 219-228 34 R. y. Briscoe 2010 SCC 13 229-240 35 R. v. Martineau, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 633 241-277 36 R. v. Creighton, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 3 278-318 37 R. \/. Beatty, [2008] S.C.J. No. 5. 319-347 38 R. y. DeSousa, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 944 348-363 39 R. v. Sault Ste. Marie, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299 R. v. Chapin, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 121 364-384 40 R. v/. Champin, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 121 385-394 41 Reference re Section 94(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act (B.C.), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 395-427 486 42 R. \/. Cancoil Thermal (1986), 52 C.R. (3d) 188 (Ont. C.A ). 428-436 Table of Index for Canadian Criminal Law and Procedures continued 43 R. v. Raham (2010), 253 C.C.C. (34.) 188 (Ont. C.A.); (2010) O.J. No. 1091 437-453 44 Levis (City) v. Tetreault, [2006] S.C.J. No. 12 454-468 45 R. v. Dunlop and Sylvester, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 881 469-488 46 R. v. Logan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 731 489-504 Volume 3 47 R. v. Hamilton, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 432 1-33 48 R. v. Ancio, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 225 34-53 49 R. v. Deustch, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 2 54-70 50 R. v. Dery, [2006] S.C.J. No. 53 71-83 51 R. v. Cooper, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 1149 84-106 52 R. v. Kjeldson, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 617 107-114 53 R. v. Oommen, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 507 115-125 R. v. Swaby, [2001] O.J. No. 2390 (Ont.C.A.) 126-133 54 55 R. \/. Parks, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 871 134-163 56 R. v. Stone, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290 164-236 57 R. v. Fontaine, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 702 237-253 58 R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833 254-292 59 R \/. Robinson, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683 293-325a 60 R. \/. Daviault, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 63 326-365 61 R. v. Pintar [1996] O.J. No. 3451(Ont.C.A.) 366-394 62 R. v. Cinous, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 3 395-465 63 R. \/. Laval lee, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 852 466-499 64 R. \/. Latimer, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 3 500-522 Volume 4 65 R. v. Hibbert, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 973 1-32 66 R. v/. Ruzic, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 687 33-63 67 R. v. G.R., [2005] S.C.J. No. 45 64-83 68 R. \/. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320 84-97 69 R. v. S.(J.H.), [2008] S.C.J. No. 30 98-106 70 R. y. Dinardo, [2008] S.C.J. No. 24 107-121 71 R. Arcuri, [2001] S.C.J. No. 52 122-133 72 R. v. Boucher, [2005] S.C.J. No. 73 134-152 73 R. v. Gunning, [2005] S.C.J. No. 25 153-166 74 R. y. Hamilton, [2004] O.J. No. 3252 (Ont. C.A.) 167-199 75 R. Cook, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1113 200-217 76 R \/. Proulx, [2001] S.C.J. No. 65 218-260 77 Kriegerv. Law Society of Alberta, [2002] S.C.J. No. 45 261-281 78 R. v. Grant 2009, SCC 32 282-342 79 343-363 R. \/. Suberu [2009] 2 S.C.R 80 R. v. Hall, [2002] S.C.J. No. 65 364-400 81 R. \/. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 401-414 82 R. \/. McNeil 2009 SCC 3 415-438 83 R. y. Mahalingan, [2008] S.C.J. No. 64 439-480 84 R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500 481-519 85 R. y. Priest, [1996] O.J. No. 3369 520-528 86 R. \/. Boucher, [2004] O.J. No. 2689 (Ont. C.A.) 529-537 Volume 5 87 R. v. Bremner, [2000] B.C.J. No. 1096 (B.C.C.A.) 1-19 88 R. v. Cromwell, [2005] N.S.J. No. 428 (N.S.C.A.) 20-41 Table of |lndex for Canadian Criminal Law and Procedures, continued 89 R. v. Ziatas, [1973] O.J. No. 726 (Ont. C.A.) 42-43 90 R v. Fallofield (1973), 13 C.C.C. (2d) 450 (B.C.C.A.) 44-50 91 R. v. Budreo, [2000] O.J. No. 72 (Ont. C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 51-66 92 R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688 67-99 93 R. v. Zinck [2003] S.C.J. No. 5 99-112 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/canadiancriminal01libm_3 Ofr. W U O tl Syllabus Canadian Criminal Law and Procedure (Revised October 5, 2010) Candidates are advised that the syllabus may be updated from time-to-time without prior notice. Candidates are responsible for obtaining the most current syllabus available. World Exchange Plaza 1810 - 45 O'Connor Street Ottawa Ontario KIP 1A4 Tel: (613) 236-1700 Fax: (613) 236 - 7233 www.flsc.ca 2 Canadian Criminal Law & Procedure Syllabus EXAMINATION: The function of the NCA exams is to determine whether applicants demonstrate a passable facility in the examined subject area to enable them to engage competently in the practice of law in Canada. To pass the examination candidates are expected to identify the relevant issues, select and identify the material rules of law as understood in Canada, and explain how the law applies on each of the relevant issues, given the facts presented. Those who fail to identify key issues, or who demonstrate confusion on core legal concepts, or who merely list the issues and describe legal rules without demonstrating how those legal rules apply given the facts of the case will not succeed, as those are the skills being examined. The knowledge, skills and abilities examined in NCA exams are basically those that a competent lawyer in practice in Canada would be expected to possess. MATERIALS: Required • Stephen Coughlan, Criminal Procedure (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2008) • The most up-to-date Criminal Code (an annotated Criminal Code is recommended). The Code wili contain the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in an Appendix. You must have a Criminal Code with you when you attend the exam. There are a number of published editions available. The most used are the Pocket Criminal Code (Thomson Carswell); Martin’s Criminal Code (Canada Law Book) Practitioner’s Edition (Lexis Nexis) and Tremeears Criminal Code (Thomson Carswell). Select the version of your choice.” Optional • Kent Roach, Criminal Law, 3rd ed, (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2004) [the 4th edition is forthcoming] • Don Stuart, Canadian Criminal Law, 5th ed.(Scarborough: Thomson Carswell, 2007) • Don Stuart, Learning Canadian Criminal Law, 11th ed. (Scarborough: Thomson Carswell, 2009) [this case book is often used by law schools for Criminal Law & Procedure courses] The optional materials are not necessary in order to write the NCA exam in Criminal Law & Procedure, but candidates should be aware that they are available. INTERNET ACCESS TO CASE LAW Select cases identified in the Syllabus may be available via the internet at the following web sites: • Supreme Court of Canada decisions (http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/index.html) • Canadian Legal Information Institute (http://www.canlii.org/) Case law may also be available electronically through commercial services such as LexisNexis / Quicklaw or eCarswell, or through a law school or County or District Court House law libraries. READING LIST References to the Coughlan text are shown as “Coughlan pp. xx - yy” and references to the Criminal Code are shown as “CC." All cases included in this syllabus should be read, even when identified as examples or illustrations. You are responsible for the law each decision describes. 2